Huh?oooh yes. The female code for "cute if I like the person involved, but disgusting if I don't" that causes all sorts of middel/high school problems for men
sigh...
Today is just not my day
sigh...
Today is just not my day
Dawkins broadcasts his ideas effectively and he's not afraid to do so in person, so he's probably an "E." He's certainly not an "S." He's definitely a "T"--indeed he may not possess an ounce of "F." So, it comes down to whether he's a "P" or a "J", i.e., an ENTP or an ENTJ. Which of the two, I can't tell. The man is brilliant but hardly a diplomat.
I like him too, some of his ideas are really interesting. Norton's right though, the man's no diplomat - he sometimes comes across as quite arrogant.
He definitely has Fe, but it is tertiary/relief role. Typically an individual is quite comfortable using the third function but does so in a rather childish manner that can make others uncomfortable. A user of childish Fe focuses on social structure but thinks that the self should be at the apex of this structure. Such an individual typically wants to be liked by everyone, but can also revel in being reviled as being the center of attention is what is seen as really important. Tertiary Fe is largely responsible for Narcissism.
So what does it mean when a person is happy to be liked but indifferent enough to being disliked for her to make little to no effort not to be?
Being reviled sounds like an enormous hassle.
Especially since it can go the wrong way and earn you admiration from other nasty people.
Huh?
sigh...
Today is just not my day
*internet hugs* aww, i'm sorry 'bout that
... I was messing around a little bit. i-Fail.
Last edited:
S
Shai Gar
- Mar 17, 2010
- 4,872
- 1,225
- 766
- MBTI
- ????
- Enneagram
- 9w1
Introvert and extravert in MBTI tend to correlate with introvert and extrovert in the typical sense of the word. If his first function is introverted, It's completely possible that I might not see it and see the auxiliary extroverted function instead. So, what exactly makes you think he is surely an ENTP, I don't have a lot of knowledge on him.
Interesting point. You may be right. But, what happens when there is no real conclusion to an argument, such as in the great questions of life (theology, politics, etc.)? These are the questions that are most difficult to answer (if they are answerable at all) yet the ones about which most people seem the most convinced one way or another. Certainty where there is no certainty.
- Mar 17, 2010
- 4,872
- 1,225
- 766
- MBTI
- ????
- Enneagram
- 9w1
TJ's will tend to avoid those questions. If there cannot be a logical conclusion then it's best to focus your efforts elsewhere.
This is where Dawkins differs as he enjoys the constant bickering back and forth. This is a very TP like attitude. Hell even I get caught up in it sometimes.
TJ's enjoy the getting there, TP's enjoy the ride.
TP's start the questions, TJ's finish the answers.
I don't know, when he's in front of a crowd or a camera he appears to be an extrovert. However it's not all that hard to be extroverted when needed or wanted.
