I am sexually attracted to the typical standards. However, my initial attraction to a woman is greatly changed after I learn who they are. I can easily find a smoking hot woman VERY unattractive after I hear her speak...
Haha. That is too true.
I am sexually attracted to the typical standards. However, my initial attraction to a woman is greatly changed after I learn who they are. I can easily find a smoking hot woman VERY unattractive after I hear her speak...
Haha. That is too true.
I should mention that it works in the opposite too. A great mind is a beautiful thing, and beauty in my eyes/mind is not just superficial. I cannot separate physical/mental beauty overall.
well honestly physical features dont even play into attraction for me...Just as NAI said...they could be smokin...but open their mouth and their the most unattractive person..
I think If I had to pic a physical feature it would be the eyes.
I should mention that it works in the opposite too. A great mind is a beautiful thing, and beauty in my eyes/mind is not just superficial. I cannot separate physical/mental beauty overall.
I am sexually attracted to the typical standards. However, my initial attraction to a woman is greatly changed after I learn who they are. I can easily find a smoking hot woman VERY unattractive after I hear her speak...
I relate to this a great deal. There are physical features that look attractive to me, but I don't connect those typically to a sense of intimacy. I'm generally not "picky" about the details of someone to whom I am attracted. Bad hygiene is a problem for me, but that is separate from physical features. I think I could adapt to an unusually wide range of outward appearances if the internal person I admire. The person I'm in love with internally then becomes my outward ideal.well honestly physical features dont even play into attraction for me...Just as NAI said...they could be smokin...but open their mouth and their the most unattractive person..
I think If I had to pic a physical feature it would be the eyes.
Someone paler than me, and I'm freaky pale.
Hm.Hairiness, especially hairy arms.
There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -Sir Francis Bacon
can you find a horribly ugly woman hot after she opens her mouth?I am sexually attracted to the typical standards. However, my initial attraction to a woman is greatly changed after I learn who they are. I can easily find a smoking hot woman VERY unattractive after I hear her speak...
I wouldn't put myself in any position to judge someone based on their appearance. I don't have any right. I'm kind of offended by those who do. It hurts my feelings a little bit. Everyone looks different for a reason. I actually wrote a long, emotional rant about this last night in my journal. You guys remember "The Swan," the show a few years ago? They would take these women and give them all kinds of plastic surgery and make them work out for a bit until they were "beautiful." Made me sick, but I always kinda wished they would make me over anyway. I hate impossible beauty standards. They make people hate themselves. It's sick. And yet I only hate it because I can't live up to it.
Ahh, no, so not what I meant.I think we're just discussing things that we're attracted to or not physically attracted to, which, unfortunately, is a fact of life. Preferences are not necessarily judgments. We all have likes and dislikes, however arbitrary sometimes. Much the same way you may dislike certain personality traits and favor others, it's what you personally find appealing that counts. No one is sitting down and saying that someone is going to be a better person if they'd only lose more weight or get plastic surgery or dye their hair this or that colour. No one is equating ____ physical trait with _______ negative trait. These are just personal preferences. And there's nothing wrong with having them.
I am actually kind of offended that you would compare this thread to "The Swan." The show was hazing people, picking out traits and pitting people against one another as to who would turn out to be the more attractive in the end. The message there was that you have to beautiful to make it in life.
This is not the case here. We're merely acknowledging that there are things that we individually find unappealing in a partner physically, but you'll find that people also underscore the fact that personality also tends to enhance attractiveness. These opinions not the same across the board and by no means are we asking to have anyone fit our preferences.
The word "fat" has a negative connotation, so a different word could have been chosen. It suggests that anyone who is big by any standard is somehow less, unacceptable, or less worthy. Someone may find someone who is under or over their recommended weight appealing or unappealing, but it does suggest that someone is less than the best if their looks don't fit a particular idealized standard in terms of weight.
I think that's the real concern. We do have a right to our individual preferences but i think it's tricky when a standard suggests that someone is not good enough if they don't meet a particular ideal weight, signifying discrimination. I think this is why some are bothered by the use of the term "fat", apart from the health implications.
Ahh, no, so not what I meant.
I was talking about my rant in my journal last night.
All the same, I wouldn't not give a person a shot because they had a certain trait that was conventionally "unattractive." Everyone has traits like this, I myself am made up almost entirely of unattractive traits. Hence the rant. Sometimes when we focus on the details, we miss the big picture. I've known a lot of people whom I have found to be extremely attractive in their oddness. For example, I once dated a guy with a really big nose. I made it a point to not discount this person as a potential mate because I found this quality odd. And as it turns out, I started to kind of like his nose, because I liked the person, and having it had given him more character because of the obvious ridicule he had faced growing up. He had a sense of humour about it, and I found that extraordinarily attractive.
I guess I'm sort of bothered by the fact that the OP says nothing about a mate, or a partner, just "a person." It may have been intended that way, but that's not how it was worded. And I've met a lot of people in my time who will only have friends and acquaintances who fit a certain standard of attractiveness (not that most of them would admit to it, but a few have).
I don't think there's anything wrong with having preferences. I just wouldn't discount an entire person based on one or two features, because people are so much more than that, and really, given a chance, anybody can surprise you. There are qualities that I find attractive, but I'm not going to limit the dating pool like "singled out" because it isn't fair, to me or to them.
Hopefully that made more sense?
It's not about taking offense really. It's that the word "fat" as a negative connotation, especially here in the US, and being "big" is often used to support subtle and more overt forms of discrimination, so that is why i think it would be the least desirable word to use. That's pretty much it.
Same. It may be shallow, but it is by far my number one turnoff.