2 bombs explode at Boston Marathon-terrorist attack? | Page 2 | INFJ Forum

2 bombs explode at Boston Marathon-terrorist attack?


You should save that for the perpetrators

But you won't catch them because they're already among you and you are too busy looking without
 
No

I'm saying this is an inside job to scare the public so that the government can make some more changes to the law

stay tuned for the arrival of more government 'anti terror' laws!



Well I agree that the gov. is going to make new laws such as TSA-style check points and such. However I dont think they need to give the public a reason. The public is pretty insignificant in terms of action. We'll just roll over and take it. I just wish they would skip the middle man, which in this case was the bombing.


I dont get the library connection though. Why is that important? Running a controlled explosion isn't a big deal to me, maybe because I am a demolitions expert I just dont get where you are coming from here.


Explain it to me like I'm an idiot sensor.
 
[video=youtube;hH6UynI5m7Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH6UynI5m7Y&feature=player_embedded#![/video]
 
Well I agree that the gov. is going to make new laws such as TSA-style check points and such. However I dont think they need to give the public a reason. The public is pretty insignificant in terms of action. We'll just roll over and take it. I just wish they would skip the middle man, which in this case was the bombing.


I dont get the library connection though. Why is that important? Running a controlled explosion isn't a big deal to me, maybe because I am a demolitions expert I just dont get where you are coming from here.


Explain it to me like I'm an idiot sensor.

With all these bombings there have been military exercises carried out on the same day dealing with the same sort of problem

For example in London the police were carrying out an exercise to deal with a bombing when the bombing happened. The same happened on 911

It looks like some exercises are going live

Who stands to gain from this? Who stands to gain from any of these attacks?

Who is it that keeps getting richer and more powerful all the time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stu
[MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION]

That the gov reacts to the fears of the people is a given.

That the gov terrorizes and murders the people at the behest of the international banking conspiracy in order to create that fear is bulshit

that comfy individuals will sit at home and post ludicrous, unsubstantiated charges against whole nations of people is assholish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muir
The left blames the right... point being? I bet the right is going to blame the left! I bet Evangelicals are going to blame the Muslims and Westboro will blame the gays! This is like shooting fish in a barrel.

No the people doing the blaming are NOT the left!

They are pretending to be the left, but they are wolves in sheeps clothing!

Do you remember the whole MacCarthy witchhunts thing when senator MacCarthy was trying to root out a 'communist plot' within the US? Hollywood was heavily involved; in fact the Marlon Brando film 'along the waterfront' was made as a result of this because the director elia kazan was made to testify to the house committee of unamerican activities

Well anyway that 'communist plot' was not really a communist plot. The people he was trying to root out were working with the communists at times but they were not true communists ie they did not believe in the means if production being in common ownership

The people he was trying to root out are however globalists. They have a vision for a world government NOT a communist government, but people in the US seem to use the word 'communism' to mean a centrally controlled planned economy

That is what these guys want and it is what they are trying to turn the US into

They want to create a state socialist state like Hitler did. He also worked closely with the corporations.

These guys are not 'left' and they are not 'right' they just play the left and right off against each other to synthesise what THEY want from the situation

In this situation they will synthesis more government powers against the people: problem, reaction solution

They will create a problem (a bombing), to create a reaction from the public (fear and outrage) in order that they can then offer their pre-prepared solution (to create new laws that will take more of the publics freedoms away)

People shouldn't get caught up in the whole 'left v's right' drama....its a distraction....they need to keep their eyes on the globalists.... they are the real movers and shakers
 
@muir

That the gov reacts to the fears of the people is a given.

That the gov terrorizes and murders the people at the behest of the international banking conspiracy in order to create that fear is bulshit

that comfy individuals will sit at home and post ludicrous, unsubstantiated charges against whole nations of people is assholish.

Hey i'm sorry that the truth is upsetting but the sooner everyone faces it the sooner the situation can be sorted out and the sooner these crazy people can be stopped from killing more people

But i promise you that if you and everyone else keeps believing what your government tells you there will be more and more attacks and your freedoms will be whittled away more and more until you are a microchipped, corporate slave
 
People shouldn't get caught up in the whole 'left v's right' drama....its a distraction....they need to keep their eyes on the globalists.... they are the real movers and shakers

You are the one who brought it up!!!!
 
Historian Professor Carroll Quigley spoke about the conspiracy in his book 'Tragedy and Hope':

In 1966, Quigley published a one-volume history of the twentieth century entitled Tragedy And Hope. At several points in this book, the history of the Milner group is discussed. Moreover, Quigley states that he has recently been in direct contact with this organization, whose nature he contrasts to right-wing claims of a communist conspiracy:
This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements.... This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other group, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.[SUP][6][/SUP][SUP]:949-950[/SUP]
According to Quigley, the leaders of this group were Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner from 1891 until Rhodes' death in 1902, Milner alone until his own death in 1925, Lionel Curtis from 1925 to 1955, Robert H. (Baron) Brand from 1955 to 1963, and Adam D. Marris from 1963 until the time Quigley wrote his book. This organization also functioned through certain loosely affiliated "front groups", including the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Institute of Pacific Relations, and the Council on Foreign Relations.[SUP][6][/SUP][SUP]:132, 950-952[/SUP]
In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank for International Settlements.
 
With all these bombings there have been military exercises carried out on the same day dealing with the same sort of problem

For example in London the police were carrying out an exercise to deal with a bombing when the bombing happened. The same happened on 911

It looks like some exercises are going live

Who stands to gain from this? Who stands to gain from any of these attacks?

Who is it that keeps getting richer and more powerful all the time?

I suspect that bombers probably try to blow up things while the bomb squad is off on a training event because they believe that they will be less ready to deal with the aftermath. People who keep getting richer and more powerful all the time would continue to grow in wealth and power whether or not they blew something up. Their money makes money for them regardless if they sleep all week or not.

"Excercises going live" What do you even mean by this?

While I agree with you from time to time, you would do us all a favor by being precise with your accusations. Name the names. Give addresses of evil perpetrators. Also answering your own questions, because it seems liek sometimes only you know the answer to them. Give a proactive plan to rid the earth of the people doing wrong because as it sits, you are hyping up a movement that doesnt exist.
 
You are the one who brought it up!!!!

I said the corporate controlled media is blaming the 'right wing extremists'....the point i'm making is that the corporate controlled media wants to divert the attention of the public away from themselves

They want to portray anyone who wants to keep the constitution as a terrorist so that they can continue to dismantle the constitution in order to build their state socialist country they want to see

I'm making the point that the whole 'right v's left' narrative they spin in their media is a distraction and people shouldn't get caught up in it

Sorry i could have explained it better
 
  • Like
Reactions: the
I said the corporate controlled media is blaming the 'right wing extremists'....the point i'm making is that the corporate controlled media wants to divert the attention of the public away from themselves

They want to portray anyone who wants to keep the constitution as a terrorist so that they can continue to dismantle the constitution in order to build their state socialist country they want to see

I'm making the point that the whole 'right v's left' narrative they spin in their media is a distraction and people shouldn't get caught up in it

Sorry i could have explained it better

Who is they? Most media is owned by a corporation these days. Which ones specifically do you mean?


Also do you have any intel on what Congress has been doing while we werent watching? I'm thinking back to the whole gay marriage vote/ Monsanto protection act maneuveur.
 
I suspect that bombers probably try to blow up things while the bomb squad is off on a training event because they believe that they will be less ready to deal with the aftermath. People who keep getting richer and more powerful all the time would continue to grow in wealth and power whether or not they blew something up. Their money makes money for them regardless if they sleep all week or not.

"Excercises going live" What do you even mean by this?

While I agree with you from time to time, you would do us all a favor by being precise with your accusations. Name the names. Give addresses of evil perpetrators. Also answering your own questions, because it seems liek sometimes only you know the answer to them. Give a proactive plan to rid the earth of the people doing wrong because as it sits, you are hyping up a movement that doesnt exist.

If i am too precise i get attacked. The best i can do is chuck in pieces of the puzzle and hope people make the links and/or research more about them

I have listed many of the people behind the conspiracy, particularly the families behind the federal reserve bank who continue to get richer despite the havoc they and their banking buddies unleash on the rest of us

They get richer and they want a strong government that will protect them from the public so they have to bolster the powers of the government and take away the freedoms of the public

Professor Noam Chomsky calls this process of using the media to subtly persuade the public 'manufacturing consent'
 
Last edited:
Who is they? Most media is owned by a corporation these days. Which ones specifically do you mean?


Also do you have any intel on what Congress has been doing while we werent watching? I'm thinking back to the whole gay marriage vote/ Monsanto protection act maneuveur.

I'll see what i can find, but prob not tonight as its gettin late here!

yes the media is owned by the corporations, but who owns the corporations? I've posted a lot of youtube videos giving this sort of info recently!

Gay marriage is a fairly liberal issue so i would expect that to get through at some point; it's not an issue i have any emotions about...if gay people feel the need to bring the state into their relationship by signing a contract created by the state then that's their business

The state has nothing to do with my relationship...but that's just my view on that.

Monsanto is getting scary....the increasing power they are having over the food supply, the patents etc. They are part of the corporate web and of course they want the government to protect them and their rights against the people

One of the main forums for the corporate web is the council on foreign relations; here's a list of their members corporate or otherwise:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_Council_on_Foreign_Relations
 
I was going to post about this, but anything posted after a [MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION] post is rather superfluous :deadhorse:.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muir