- Nov 12, 2008
- 14,153
- 1,334
- 0
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 1w2 sx/so/sp
Ok, I have to say this is really hard for me to explain. I will do my best.
I have come to realize recently, with the help of @VH: that functions can have a much wider range of ways to be used then previously thought, so much so that they can work in ways that seem totally wrong. Thus causing confusion on a persons type, and further their cognitive function order. Descriptions of each function work well for the basic idea, however they do not cover the sheer bredth that a function can work under. I also have to state here, this could make a person much more confused about their type then beforehand, so not everyone should really read this, lol. It's possible that people who realised grave errors with their self essement (which I have done before), actually came to realise exactly this, without knowing it.
For a very long time, I have professed that I use Si to a very high level, same with Te. I do feel that I use those functions, but not as high as I previously thought. A while back I had a series of people tell me "you're mistaking Si for Fe" which on the surface seems impossible, but this is actually true. I claimed to use Si in a social sense. At the core I use Fe to judge a shitton of things constantly. It just doesn't show up in capacity tests. I also say I use Te to make a lot of judgements because I prefer to be impartial and not use emotion to make assessment. There is this bad assumtion made by nearly everyone that Fe uses emotion and feelings to make judgements. While this is often the case, it does not have to be. I do make a lot of judgements in the absence of emotion (or I beat it away with a shovel). However the way I make these judgements does still function under the same pretenses that Fe uses. I balence out very much with what is the benifit of the group, what is socially acceptable, what creates the most harmony. I use logic and reason to form the inital starting points before anything. However, it passes through the exact same filters that Fe always uses. Just doesn't have emotion and feelings tied to it. Hence, lots of confusion.
I am willing to bet I am not the only INFJ here who does this. The same could go for our primary function; Ni. Not all of us use Ni the same, and that is pretty clear if you look around at everyone. A huge hallmark of this is, Ni tends to be written in such a way where people believe that it has spiritual and supernatural implications. Some people do indeed use Ni in a way where spirit and "energy" and all the new age-y relgious stuff explains. However, many people do not. In fact a lot of people who disregard relgious pratices of any kind will often (but not always) use Ni in a different way. Thus thinking they might not use it, and do so in place of another function.
This is dreadfully hard to explain all this VH said it well, you can't crystalize something fluid, but damnit I am gonna do it anyway. I will admit though, this really can't be written in such a way to explain it all and put everyone under an unbrella and say "you're this". You have to do your own internal digging and thinking to figure out this. Of course you can do it through talking out with others. That's how I came to realise how I used Fe in the way that I do. I also feel like this will help sort out our most common type confusion here "INFP vs. INFJ; which are you?". Some people might use Fi in total absence of emotion and feeling, some people might use Ni in total absence of mysticism and looseness.
Discuss.
I have come to realize recently, with the help of @VH: that functions can have a much wider range of ways to be used then previously thought, so much so that they can work in ways that seem totally wrong. Thus causing confusion on a persons type, and further their cognitive function order. Descriptions of each function work well for the basic idea, however they do not cover the sheer bredth that a function can work under. I also have to state here, this could make a person much more confused about their type then beforehand, so not everyone should really read this, lol. It's possible that people who realised grave errors with their self essement (which I have done before), actually came to realise exactly this, without knowing it.
For a very long time, I have professed that I use Si to a very high level, same with Te. I do feel that I use those functions, but not as high as I previously thought. A while back I had a series of people tell me "you're mistaking Si for Fe" which on the surface seems impossible, but this is actually true. I claimed to use Si in a social sense. At the core I use Fe to judge a shitton of things constantly. It just doesn't show up in capacity tests. I also say I use Te to make a lot of judgements because I prefer to be impartial and not use emotion to make assessment. There is this bad assumtion made by nearly everyone that Fe uses emotion and feelings to make judgements. While this is often the case, it does not have to be. I do make a lot of judgements in the absence of emotion (or I beat it away with a shovel). However the way I make these judgements does still function under the same pretenses that Fe uses. I balence out very much with what is the benifit of the group, what is socially acceptable, what creates the most harmony. I use logic and reason to form the inital starting points before anything. However, it passes through the exact same filters that Fe always uses. Just doesn't have emotion and feelings tied to it. Hence, lots of confusion.
I am willing to bet I am not the only INFJ here who does this. The same could go for our primary function; Ni. Not all of us use Ni the same, and that is pretty clear if you look around at everyone. A huge hallmark of this is, Ni tends to be written in such a way where people believe that it has spiritual and supernatural implications. Some people do indeed use Ni in a way where spirit and "energy" and all the new age-y relgious stuff explains. However, many people do not. In fact a lot of people who disregard relgious pratices of any kind will often (but not always) use Ni in a different way. Thus thinking they might not use it, and do so in place of another function.
This is dreadfully hard to explain all this VH said it well, you can't crystalize something fluid, but damnit I am gonna do it anyway. I will admit though, this really can't be written in such a way to explain it all and put everyone under an unbrella and say "you're this". You have to do your own internal digging and thinking to figure out this. Of course you can do it through talking out with others. That's how I came to realise how I used Fe in the way that I do. I also feel like this will help sort out our most common type confusion here "INFP vs. INFJ; which are you?". Some people might use Fi in total absence of emotion and feeling, some people might use Ni in total absence of mysticism and looseness.
Discuss.