What do you call an INFJ liberal?No no no. ......
No.
I have nothing against infjs. I have found the infj presence on this world to be agreeable.
I just don't like liberals. Liberals are attempting to destroy society at every turn.
What do you call an INFJ liberal?No no no. ......
No.
I have nothing against infjs. I have found the infj presence on this world to be agreeable.
I just don't like liberals. Liberals are attempting to destroy society at every turn.
An INFJ.
That's not very funny as jokes go.An INFJ.
That's why it's funny! Because it's not funny!That's not very funny as jokes go.
Pardon me, I'm still trying grasp jnfj humor.That's why it's funny! Because it's not funny!
I don't think they do differ based on feeling and thinking preferences so much.Pardon me, I'm still trying grasp jnfj humor.
Seriously though....
Are you not the least bit interested in why the t and f designations seem to differ fairly dramatically in regard to politics?
No no no. ......
No.
I have nothing against infjs. I have found the infj presence on this world to be agreeable.
I just don't like liberals. Liberals are attempting to destroy society at every turn.
You could be righf but I am begining to suspect a corolation . I don't remember having met one intj that favors socialism.I don't think they do differ based on feeling and thinking preferences so much.
I used to date one years ago lol.You could be righf but I am begining to suspect a corolation . I don't remember having met one intj that favors socialism.
You have met one then, I have not.I used to date one years ago lol.
See, this confuses me.
The far right (Trumps sponsors) have historically been anti-Israel.
So this supposed 180 doesn't make sense to me.. Especially when taking into account US, UK and Russian relations.
Unless he's playing a major WIFOM.
The Neo Liberal "protesters" are highly organised , most likely backed by Soros and Clinton.
*cries harder just to annoy you*
What are you doing on this site? This is an INFJ forum. What do you think this place is, and what are you doing here? You are going to encounter people here who are sympathetic to the emotional lives of people who are suffering. We are INFJ type people, this is the way we are wired. We aren't delusional; this is the way we are, and you can't make us change. You seem continually unable to contain your disgust about the way we are. Here in this post you are personally attacking our minds and our ability to think and reason, in a way that has nothing to do with responding to any political issue at hand. If you can't understand, respect, and appreciate that people here have different thoughts to you, I think you should go away from this site, and join a different forum where people will be more similar to you.
We've had the same issues here a couple of years ago. I'm a little ambivalent about it, because financial planners might find themselves in situations where it simply isn't a good time to invest. I can't believe that large institutions should have to "close shop" in those situations.How exactly was this supposed to benefit the consumer? The worker? Etc?
"Yesterday a Texas court struck down the US Chamber of Commerce’s attempt to overturn a new Labor Department rule requiring retirement advisers to put their customers’ interests first. The decision affirms what we already knew: this conflict of interest rule was lawfully enacted and the rulemaking process took the views, costs, and benefits of all the stakeholders into account. Now President Trump needs to follow suit. He should stand up to the Chamber of Commerce — and the armies of lawyers and lobbyists that brought this frivolous lawsuit — and allow the rule to be implemented in April as planned.
Hardworking Americans saving for their retirement deserve to have a retirement adviser who is recommending the investments that are the best for their retirement security, not the ones that let advisers pocket kickbacks and prizes."
We've had the same issues here a couple of years ago. I'm a little ambivalent about it, because financial planners might find themselves in situations where it simply isn't a good time to invest. I can't believe that large institutions should have to "close shop" in those situations.
A lot of investing is essentially a gamble, so I think better information is the key, not some ill defined concept of "in the best interest of..."