Yet Another Donald Trump Thread | Page 5 | INFJ Forum

Yet Another Donald Trump Thread

Eventhorizon said:
No no no. ......
No.
I have nothing against infjs. I have found the infj presence on this world to be agreeable.
I just don't like liberals. Liberals are attempting to destroy society at every turn.
Click to expand...
What do you call an INFJ liberal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
acd said:
That's why it's funny! Because it's not funny!
Click to expand...
Pardon me, I'm still trying grasp jnfj humor.

Seriously though....
Are you not the least bit interested in why the t and f designations seem to differ fairly dramatically in regard to politics?
 
acd said:
I don't think they do differ based on feeling and thinking preferences so much.
Click to expand...
You could be righf but I am begining to suspect a corolation . I don't remember having met one intj that favors socialism.
 
acd said:
I used to date one years ago lol.
Click to expand...
You have met one then, I have not.
But then again, I still don't think I can guess a person's type just by interacting with them. Of the intjs I think I know, I only know because they label themselves as such on discussion boards....
 
Friday, February 10, 2017
Common Dreams
Rumors of Sarah Palin as Canadian Ambassador Met With Hilarious Outrage
'If the Captain of Chaos wants to disrupt everything—including resetting relations with little ol' Canada—Palin would be the one to break the china'
Lauren McCauley, staff writer


palin_trump.jpg

Sarah Palin "represents the descent of politics," wrote the Ottawa Citizen's Andrew Cohen. "We see today a direct line from Palin to Trump. Politically, Trump is Palin's child." (Photo: AP)



Rumors that former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin could be the next ambassador to Canada have been met with a resounding "No Siree," as Canadians this week have erupted in a chorus of (hilarious) outrage.

The backlash erupted after White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Wednesday refused to rule out the appointment when questioned directly.

[...]

http://www.commondreams.org/news/20...lin-canadian-ambassador-met-hilarious-outrage


An ESFJ for American ambassador to Canada. You "betcha"! :tearsofjoy:

I see Sarah saying "I can see Russia Canada from my house!".

Go, Trump, go!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
Sarah would make an excellent representative of the American or Canadian people.
 
Sinny said:
See, this confuses me.

The far right (Trumps sponsors) have historically been anti-Israel.

So this supposed 180 doesn't make sense to me.. Especially when taking into account US, UK and Russian relations.

Unless he's playing a major WIFOM.

The Neo Liberal "protesters" are highly organised , most likely backed by Soros and Clinton.
Click to expand...


Okay, I'm no longer confused.. Trump is not apart of the anti-Jew conservatives, he's quite simply a pro Jew conservative, and this is probably most likely, simply because, he is indebted to them. (Going way back decades ago, up to today!)

I dunno why I complicate things.

And, er, by "Jew", I mean "Zionist".

It's really not fair to lump all "Jews" together :p
 
invisible said:
*cries harder just to annoy you*

What are you doing on this site? This is an INFJ forum. What do you think this place is, and what are you doing here? You are going to encounter people here who are sympathetic to the emotional lives of people who are suffering. We are INFJ type people, this is the way we are wired. We aren't delusional; this is the way we are, and you can't make us change. You seem continually unable to contain your disgust about the way we are. Here in this post you are personally attacking our minds and our ability to think and reason, in a way that has nothing to do with responding to any political issue at hand. If you can't understand, respect, and appreciate that people here have different thoughts to you, I think you should go away from this site, and join a different forum where people will be more similar to you.
Click to expand...


Oh, this is the second post of yours I've noticed in the space of an hour, belligerently ranting about some irrational shit... The only bigot I see here is you, calling for all none INFJs, and none Feeler sympathetic people to get lost.
That's not how the world works. If I see a third strike coming from you, I'll personally go out of my way irritate you. Because I find fun in such things :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flavus Aquila
 
How exactly was this supposed to benefit the consumer? The worker? Etc?

"Yesterday a Texas court struck down the US Chamber of Commerce’s attempt to overturn a new Labor Department rule requiring retirement advisers to put their customers’ interests first. The decision affirms what we already knew: this conflict of interest rule was lawfully enacted and the rulemaking process took the views, costs, and benefits of all the stakeholders into account. Now President Trump needs to follow suit. He should stand up to the Chamber of Commerce — and the armies of lawyers and lobbyists that brought this frivolous lawsuit — and allow the rule to be implemented in April as planned.

Hardworking Americans saving for their retirement deserve to have a retirement adviser who is recommending the investments that are the best for their retirement security, not the ones that let advisers pocket kickbacks and prizes."
 
Skarekrow said:
How exactly was this supposed to benefit the consumer? The worker? Etc?

"Yesterday a Texas court struck down the US Chamber of Commerce’s attempt to overturn a new Labor Department rule requiring retirement advisers to put their customers’ interests first. The decision affirms what we already knew: this conflict of interest rule was lawfully enacted and the rulemaking process took the views, costs, and benefits of all the stakeholders into account. Now President Trump needs to follow suit. He should stand up to the Chamber of Commerce — and the armies of lawyers and lobbyists that brought this frivolous lawsuit — and allow the rule to be implemented in April as planned.

Hardworking Americans saving for their retirement deserve to have a retirement adviser who is recommending the investments that are the best for their retirement security, not the ones that let advisers pocket kickbacks and prizes."
Click to expand...
We've had the same issues here a couple of years ago. I'm a little ambivalent about it, because financial planners might find themselves in situations where it simply isn't a good time to invest. I can't believe that large institutions should have to "close shop" in those situations.

A lot of investing is essentially a gamble, so I think better information is the key, not some ill defined concept of "in the best interest of..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
Flavus Aquila said:
We've had the same issues here a couple of years ago. I'm a little ambivalent about it, because financial planners might find themselves in situations where it simply isn't a good time to invest. I can't believe that large institutions should have to "close shop" in those situations.

A lot of investing is essentially a gamble, so I think better information is the key, not some ill defined concept of "in the best interest of..."
Click to expand...

It’s a matter of steering a retired or about to retire couple away from risky investments that make more money and make it faster for the investment house and instead steering them toward safer, albeit slower growth funds that don’t pay off as big or as fast as other investments might.
This is partially how our housing bubble began which almost collapsed the whole economy.
They don’t have to “close up shop”, but they do have to be honest with those who are investing money with them.

This in no way will benefit those investing their retirement savings or saving for retirement...it’s a gift to the companies, just like the gift Trump gave the oil industry when he did away with the necessary reporting of how much each company pays a foreign government to leech oil/minerals out of the ground....go ahead, bribe away!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back