I don't know what to make of this post.
I would postulate what you, as an individual, see as "normal" would be far different from what I see as normal. If we cannot agree on normalcy, how can we further agree on what is "natural"? "Naturally", therefore, becomes a barrier rather than a bridge between our understanding things.
Take Christianity, for example; I would be amazed if we see eye to eye on moral laws in the Bible. Some take the moral laws and use them as crutches to get about, while others lay snares for the same laws trying to discredit them.
I see the law in the Bible so misunderstood because of the inability to try and understand the Bible as a complete book. People have a tendency to quote scriptures without the realization of their intent. The law is said to be a tutor to bring us unto Christ. When we have reached that understanding, we are told to love the Lord God with all your heart, soul, and mind. We are taught to love our neighbor as ourselves. We are told all the law and all the prophets are here in these two things. Against these things there can be no law, for they are the fulfilling of the law.
I question whether I personally could possibly be better off without this understanding. I know I could not be better off. Normal or natural to me is, then, most likely much different than that of most. This new set of two laws or new covenant is written in my mind and in my heart. I cannot see otherwise to be normal or natural.
Is it natural for me to drop by your house and urinate in your front yard?