oh shut up.
do you leap on everything called "black" and shout "that's racist"? animals respond to signals, rather than consider the context. i say sit, a dog sits, even if a car's about to hit him. don't be stupid.
again: in every culture, women were historically inferior.
think about it.
----
edit: actually forget it.
i meant that even in cultures that developed independently, women were HISTORICALLY considered inferior to men in almost all of them. it happens naturally, and as i said, that doesn't make it right.
this thread is a joke.
your ego survives on the idea that you're "open minded", but every time someone says the word "women" or "race" you can't get past the possibility of racism or sexism. consequently, you never get to see what the other person was trying to say, because you have this blind messiah complex, finding problems where there aren't any. THAT is real ignorance. if you weren't like that, you would have seen my point.
you started this thread because you found it interesting in that it reconsiders social values, but you're not even aware of your own closed-mindedness. i'll bet if there was an "-ism" for monogamy, this thread wouldn't even exist. and to be honest, the issue is a quick study, not very intellectually stimulating.
oh, and by the way, i'm female.
do you leap on everything called "black" and shout "that's racist"? animals respond to signals, rather than consider the context. i say sit, a dog sits, even if a car's about to hit him. don't be stupid.
again: in every culture, women were historically inferior.
think about it.
----
edit: actually forget it.
i meant that even in cultures that developed independently, women were HISTORICALLY considered inferior to men in almost all of them. it happens naturally, and as i said, that doesn't make it right.
this thread is a joke.
your ego survives on the idea that you're "open minded", but every time someone says the word "women" or "race" you can't get past the possibility of racism or sexism. consequently, you never get to see what the other person was trying to say, because you have this blind messiah complex, finding problems where there aren't any. THAT is real ignorance. if you weren't like that, you would have seen my point.
you started this thread because you found it interesting in that it reconsiders social values, but you're not even aware of your own closed-mindedness. i'll bet if there was an "-ism" for monogamy, this thread wouldn't even exist. and to be honest, the issue is a quick study, not very intellectually stimulating.
oh, and by the way, i'm female.
Last edited: