President Donald Trump | Page 97 | INFJ Forum

President Donald Trump

My point in asking the question is that this fact alone makes him fairly unusual among his peers at Fox News.

Thanks for your reply.
Ok. Well truth be told I am not interested in news reporters thoughts. I just want the news and I want it to be factual, verifiable information.
My saying Smith has his own thoughts isnt necessarly a compliment.
 
My saying Smith has his own thoughts isnt necessarly a compliment.

Ha, I'm fully aware of that. He's one of the few on that network that will dare to defy the word of almighty Trump, and fairly frequently at that.

Whatever, I was more curious than anything. I know a lot of regular Fox News viewers call him out on the carpet for not toeing the party line.
 
The fact is you know nothing about the validity of any legal proceedings he is dealing with. Its a choice you make based on no factual information in deciding if he is guilty or innocent of the legal issues he faces. If you are bias youll likely say guilty. If you are a thinker youll wait to decide until you have all the facts.
All I did was pointing out he's not your average guy. The point you clearly advocated.
It's not my or your values we're debating, it's those stated in the editorial and Trump adhering to those great values (e.g. self-reliance, work ethics, honesty, justice).
Logically, there's no point accusing me of being biased, using fact free information or retarded, as I based my post on your statements, supplemented with information which is universally available for scrutiny.

Besides, if I have to wait for all the facts (a vague term indeed), in order to form a more nuanced and well-informed opinion, what consequences would that have on any threads you created on the alleged crimes of Hillary, the Dems, the special snowflakes, liberals, socialists, and more recently this fella McCabe?
It'd mean you of all would have to wait until hell freezes over.

But hey, I'll acknowledge there's a chance you might be right about everything and all of us here will become your groupies for showing us da wae.
However, up to this moment some of your arguments make as much sense to me as some socialist policies regarding civil liberties, taxation and the economy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eventhorizon
All I did was pointing out he's not your average guy. The point you clearly advocated.
It's not my or your values we're debating, it's those stated in the editorial and Trump adhering to those great values (e.g. self-reliance, work ethics, honesty, justice).
Logically, there's no point accusing me of being biased, using fact free information or retarded, as I based my post on your statements, supplemented with information which is universally available for scrutiny.

Besides, if I have to wait for all the facts (a vague term indeed), in order to form a more nuanced and well-informed opinion, what consequences would that have on any threads you created on the alleged crimes of Hillary, the Dems, the special snowflakes, liberals, socialists, and more recently this fella McCabe?
It'd mean you of all would have to wait until hell freezes over.

But hey, I'll acknowledge there's a chance you might be right about everything and all of us here will become your groupies for showing us da wae.
However, up to this moment some of your arguments make as much sense to me as some socialist policies regarding civil liberties, taxation and the economy.
No dont become my groupies. I just want people to know the truth. I dont want to be recognized for providing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Professor Snep
This whole, 'Only I know the truth and I am here to enlighten all you poor idiots!' Thing is getting really tiresome... Especially since EH only ever blasts his or some right wing nut's opinion... Such a tired schtick.
You are more than welcome to post counters to my posts and tell me how I am wrong. Naturally I assume when you dont that you agree with me.
 
That's delusional
Well....my first thought is its more likely you agree than disagree. Thanks for challenging that. Its does sound a little delusional the other way.
 
Jay-Z said in an interview with David Letterman that President Trump is "bringing out an ugly side of America."

The rapper sat down with Letterman on Netflix, urging Americans to "talk about the N-word and ... to talk about why white men are so privileged in this country."

"I think that what [Trump] is forcing people to do is have conversations and [forcing] people to band together and work together," Jay-Z said.



"You can’t really address something that’s not revealed. He’s bringing out an ugly side of America that we wanted to believe was gone, and it’s still here. We still gotta deal with it."

Letterman agreed, calling Trump a "racist."

End


Two incredibly ignorant men stiring up division and misinformation out into the world. I am all for free speech but theres no law that says someone cant be held accountable for blatantly promoting lies.
 
^^^ Cause we hold Trump so accountable for his blatant lies on Twitter and elsewhere??
It’s okay for him to say whatever he wants but others cannot express their opinions of the man?
Freedom of speech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stu and Wyote
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
^^^ Cause we hold Trump so accountable for his blatant lies on Twitter and elsewhere??
It’s okay for him to say whatever he wants but others cannot express their opinions of the man?
Freedom of speech.

The scary part is that most people don't seem as upset by Trump as they should. He's not just a "character."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow and Wyote
President says refusal to cross ‘red line’ has fueled Assad in Syria, amid reports of 40 dead in gas attack.
End


Yep. Refusal to do work and actually be an leader allowed this along with a long list of other things like North Korea developing nuclear weapons. That is part of Obamas legacy of failure of the American people. Leave it for the next guy Obama.
 
Last edited:
https://ilovemyfreedom.clickfunnels.com/optin

Heres a petition to boycott Jimmy Kimmel for his disturbing comments regarding the First lady. Any morally inclined person will agree this type of thing ahould never be tolerated. Only those full of hypocrisy will ignore it.

Here is the nice email I recieved after signing the petition.

"Thank You For Standing Up To Left-Wing Bigotry!

You have helped us get one step closer to hitting ABC & Disney where it hurts - the pocketbook! Once our petition hits 50,000 subscribers we will send these signatures to ABC at the address below:

Disney-ABC Home Entertainment and Television Distribution
500 S. Buena Vista St.
FGW #3052
Burbank, CA 91521-3515

We will send you an email once we mail these signatures.

God bless, and thank you for your support!

P.S. We are currently giving away FREE Pocket constitutions to the next 50 people who buy "USA #1" Jerseys."
 
https://ilovemyfreedom.clickfunnels.com/optin

Heres a petition to boycott Jimmy Kimmel for his disturbing comments regarding the First lady. Any morally inclined person will agree this type of thing ahould never be tolerated. Only those full of hypocrisy will ignore it.
Way ahead of you, I've been boycotting Jimmy Kimmel for years. Not for any political reason, just because he bores me.
 
P.S. We are currently giving away FREE Pocket constitutions to the next 50 people who buy "USA #1" Jerseys."
Isn't it strange to sell or give away a marketed copy of the US constitution? I'm sure there is no law against it, but it's somewhat awkward to sell people a cheapish imitation (prolly made in China) of something they hold dear.

It's like a greengrocer trying to sell mugs and keychains with your late grandmother's portrait to you, but her face is disgraced by some weird snapchat dog face filter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow