The line between conspiracy theorists and rational skepticism as a logical analysis | Page 5 | INFJ Forum

The line between conspiracy theorists and rational skepticism as a logical analysis

[video=youtube;n0NYBTkE1yQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0NYBTkE1yQ[/video]

Grayson asks the fed which foreigners they gave half a trillion dollars to
 
Last edited:
[video=youtube;S3fPtMuBtMs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fPtMuBtMs[/video]
 
[video=youtube;1QK4bblyfsc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QK4bblyfsc[/video]

[h=1]$9,000,000,000,000 MISSING From The Federal Reserve SHOCKING FOOTAGE[/h]
 
[video=youtube;uN2rl2yK_kw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN2rl2yK_kw[/video]
 
[video=youtube;hepidgw-l1w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hepidgw-l1w[/video]
 
[h=1]The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind - Hidden Secrets of Money 4 | Mike Maloney[/h]
[video=youtube;iFDe5kUUyT0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0[/video]
 
Last edited:
Skull and bones member and ex CIA director and son of prescott bush (funder of hitler) President Bush tells us about their new world order:

[video=youtube;MADYzQstpsU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MADYzQstpsU[/video]
 
I think he is saying "new word order"
[video=youtube;QrfE7cKWDl4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrfE7cKWDl4[/video]
 
British ex prime minister Tony Blair on the NWO

[video=youtube;Jv17gVF9kMA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv17gVF9kMA[/video]
 
[video=youtube;Uv5cqh26CC0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0[/video]
 
Kissinger on the NWO

[video=youtube;4bKwH3kJew4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bKwH3kJew4[/video]
 
Bill Clinton on the NWO

[video=youtube;1etgsNU46s4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1etgsNU46s4[/video]
 
Hilary Clinton on NWO

[video=youtube;pSQFySxzznw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSQFySxzznw[/video]
 
Rahm Emmanuel saying crises are opportunites:

[video=youtube;_y0hVI8Oi8Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y0hVI8Oi8Q[/video]

he served as the Assistant to the President for Political Affairs and as the Senior Advisor to the President for Policy and Strategy before resigning in 1998. Beginning a career in finance, Emanuel worked at the investment bank Wasserstein Perella & Co. from 1998 to 2002 and served on the board of directors of Freddie Mac.

Emanuel's grandfather was a Romanian Jew from Moldova.[SUP][2][/SUP] The surname Emanuel (עמנואל), which means "God with us", was adopted by their family in honor of his father's brother Emanuel Auerbach, who was killed in 1933 in an altercation with Arabs in Jerusalem.[SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP]
Emanuel's father, Benjamin M. Emanuel, is a Jerusalem-born[SUP][5][/SUP] pediatrician at Michael Reese Hospital[SUP][6][/SUP] who was once a member of the Irgun, a Jewish paramilitary organization that operated in Mandate Palestine.[SUP][7][/SUP] His mother, Marsha (née Smulevitz), is the daughter of a West Side Chicago union organizer who worked in the civil rights movement, and briefly owned a local rock and roll club[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP] and later became an adherent of Benjamin Spock's writings. Emanuel's parents met during the 1950s in Chicago.[SUP][1][/SUP] Emanuel was born on November 29, 1959 in Chicago, Illinois. His first name, Rahm (רם) means high or lofty in Hebrew.[SUP][4][/SUP] He has been described by his older brother Ezekiel, an oncologist and bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, as "quiet and observant" as a child.[SUP][6][/SUP] Ari, the youngest, is the CEO of William Morris Endeavor, a talent agency with headquarters in Beverly Hills, California;[SUP][8][/SUP] he also has a younger adopted sister, Shoshana.[SUP][3][/SUP]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahm_Emanuel
 
At this point [MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION] your just spamming. This is barely related to the actual pointof this thread. This thread isn't about your silly theories, it's about the basic logical structuring of your arguments. However you have demonstrated rather well your willingness to accept anything that fits your theory as facts, so maybe you have indirectly stayed on topic...
 
At this point @muir your just spamming. This is barely related to the actual pointof this thread. This thread isn't about your silly theories, it's about the basic logical structuring of your arguments. However you have demonstrated rather well your willingness to accept anything that fits your theory as facts, so maybe you have indirectly stayed on topic...

I've posted a bunch of politicians saying themselves that they want to build a world government 'new world order'

It's right there....all you have to do is open your eyes and ears and allow reality in

Whats silly is ignoring whats right in front of your face, which with these clips the NWO now is

What it demonstrates as how 'conspiracy theorists' have the proof to back up what they're saying but that some people are unwilling to look at the proof

I'd say the conspiracy theorists are therefore the ones being rational because they are the ones going by the facts
 
Like in the other thread I keep coming back to the idea of what difference does it make?

Whether its a secret cabal of jew bankers or the troll on the hill which is having a causative effective what difference does it make?

I started to think this way when considering modern political ideologies which all have their own specific narratives about constituencies, actors, others, obsticles etc. all increasingly infantilised into an "us" and "them" but what I found most of the time were they were long on description and very short on prescription, especially short on what a mere singular individual could do and not really focusing much, if at all, on the reality that your sphere of influence falls much, much shorter of your sphere of concern. Even one particularly good model of theorising oppression which had something called a PCS model, personal, cultural and structural, of oppression didnt say much about how individuals could change or respond to this besides being aware of it.

Libertarianism in the US has been a little different, perhaps because they are operating with an ideology which, in theory at least, springs from rugged individualism.