Thanks for your input
@Gaze 
(I hope you are well, by the way. Glad to see you're back.)
I'm wondering whether this ESTJ perception would only apply to people who've interacted with you superficially at the work place, or perhaps in the initial stages. Do you think there are some among your more long-term colleagues that may still perceive you as ESTJ?
I know that, from my own experience, I was able to detect my former boss's INFPness after a little while.
Well, this is based on my management experience in education, so I can't say whether these perceptions are widespread. I am very reserved when I'm not in front of others doing my thing, and it's been pointed out that I don't give much of myself away. I likely don't appear to others the way I feel. When I open up, I can seem quite different than I appear when I'm not engaging with others. But that can be said for many people, so don't think that's unusual. But people have thought I was definitely extroverted or ENTJ at least. Thing is, I don't really talk about personality typing with colleagues very often except on a few occasions although I think it's really useful if it was discussed more. I think it definitely shapes our management and interaction styles. Being tough all the time or never being tough doesn't really work. Always a balance, although it's not easy to find it.
For example, I do or did have a very TJ approach to managing when I first started out, but that didn't fly well, so I reluctantly softened my approach over a period of time. Now, I'm more comfortable using an NxP approach. However, I'm better at balance F and T when I'm giving feedback or advice, but very TJ (although I try to tone it down with a little Fe) when I'm evaluating. I think that's part of being in this profession (education).
I've always thought that there is a huge difference between the type of personality you may have to demonstrate for the sake of what you do, and your own natural personality. I can be very dominant but usually with someone who is less dominant than I am (such as my best friend -ISFJ, because she is very similar to me but far more passive and subdued than I am). I often match my personality to those I'm around, so a little chameleonish. Just like many here, you learn to maneuver social situations. We can appear very passive in one but dominant in another. I'd rather be relaxed and easy going than have to be aggressive to get people to what they should, because it's sometimes more of a drain on the system and waste of energy to keep being dominant. Just stressful especially if the other person keeps pressuring and can't compromise, and doesn't understand balance.
I'm sure there are some who see me as ESTJ. Also depends on the person or situation. If you show compassion, you can be seen as a pushover, if you're very authoritative, then you're seen as a dictator who is not nice.

It's pretty subjective. Rarely, do people process that what you do depends on the job and what you are trying to accomplish. I'm very results oriented, and had to learn to be more people oriented over time. I'm pretty good though at hiding some of my thoughts and feelings and good at reflecting what others expect. So, someone may see us as a particular type because we reflect what they expect or what is necessary in that situation, though that may not be who we are or how we perceive ourselves to be. I'm sure others feel the same. I really don't see myself as really that unique anymore, the way I used to process being a particular type.
Hope I didn't confuse you too much with all this. Please feel free to take it apart. Typing is not something I define myself by anymore but I think it's a useful tool to understand different traits or qualities especially motivations. I've been typed on this forum as INFP, but typed in real life by an MBTI expert as INTP. I do express a ton of Fi online, so it makes sense. Who knows.
