If you think that, then why bother citing it as a explanation as if it were reasonable?
you cannot suggest that men rape when there aren't enough women to go around without implying just what you deny.
The World’s Greatest Genocide
- Thread starter jimtaylor
- Start date
you cannot suggest that men rape when there aren't enough women to go around without implying just what you deny.
I cited it because I really dislike abortion. In some cases it is justified but people abuse it for a variety of reasons. I'm making the point that people should think about the implications of their beliefs. The propensity to rape or commit other crimes doesn't have to be in all men for this phenomenon to take place. We are talking about large numbers of people, not individuals.
What I wonder about is how to stop this from happening without forcing western ideals down people's throats, or claiming western development (i.e. capitalism) as a solution ('cause that's working so well for all of us here..). I don't know that it is really our responsibility to do anything about it other than work out our own issues of equality, and perhaps when/if they're ready, they'll see a different way of living to take note from. We ourselves have a lot of headway to make. Let's focus on resolving those issues. We can leave others to take responsibility for theirs.
I guess I'm not as bothered by the mere act of infanticide. It's another reflection of what we know to be the case (cultural gender inequality).
What perturbs me are the social problems that further impact negatively upon their societies and disadvantage women like trafficking, etc.
Also, how do the UAE have 205 males for 100 females? Are we talking births or population?
I guess I'm not as bothered by the mere act of infanticide. It's another reflection of what we know to be the case (cultural gender inequality).
What perturbs me are the social problems that further impact negatively upon their societies and disadvantage women like trafficking, etc.
Also, how do the UAE have 205 males for 100 females? Are we talking births or population?
Women should have babies because you dislike abortion + more female babies=men stop gang raping in India?
Yes that is a pretty drastic change from 102 to 307 and as a numbers person it stands out. This was a topic that I had to discuss in multiple statistics classes just because the professors wanted to show us how numbers are misleading. Especially in collecting data. There are too many variables involved to get personally attached to one theory or idea. All have to be considered until you are able to prove one correct and sometimes that never happens. That's why this is called the missing woman phenomenon. There is no real solid explination though we have solid indicators like the preference for male children over female children in some nations. At this point there is a chance it could be nothing more than limitations in recording information to the reality that 70 million women vanished for one reason or another.
Most definitely or manbearpig. They prefer females from certain demographical areas. I for one don't understand why more isn't being done to stop manbearpig. It's obvious that they are working with the aliens who travelled millions of miles just to stick stuff up our butts.
Where did you get this statistic?
According to my developmental psych textbook, there are about 106 boys born for every 100 girls, worldwide (United Nations, 2006b) and an even greater number of males are conceived.
Correct that is the current population ratio and I wish I could give you the textbook name that stated the 51% 49% but I can't. It was from two classes I had about a year and half ago. It isn't fact, it is just theory.
Well, gender population differences would be too difficult to track considering all the variables.
I mean, why assume the woman vanished rather than the men are living now? While there are armed conflicts still occuring, the great wars (WWI, WWII) would have skewed the ratio of men to woman for many years. We are close to seeing the WWII generation die off but not quite there yet. In terms of how that changes population ratios, I would think there is still normalizing going on.
I mean, why assume the woman vanished rather than the men are living now? While there are armed conflicts still occuring, the great wars (WWI, WWII) would have skewed the ratio of men to woman for many years. We are close to seeing the WWII generation die off but not quite there yet. In terms of how that changes population ratios, I would think there is still normalizing going on.