Ah, thanks for clarifying; I think I knew that, actually. A word can mean so many things that it's extremely common for a single word to undermine an entire logical discussion.
I'll think about the Te vs. Ti. It presently rings true...wait, not anymore. I see what you're getting at, but...well, at least INTPs, they also use a lot of evidence. Ti is supposed to act as a compendium of knowledge which the user then draws from -- a "personal logic system." I think Te is more likely to use evidence "in front of the eyes" to make its arguments, as it sees the world logically. But, both INTJs and INTPs collect vast sums of knowledge, so much as to be walking encyclopedias.
So, um...the more I think, the less I conclude. Happy future postulations to you!
Evidently, I am too young.