[h=1]10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed[/h] 		 	  	 		 	   [TABLE="class: contentpaneopen"]
 [TR]
 	[TD] 		 			By TFP Student Action 		 		   	[/TD]
 [/TR]
   [/TABLE]
    
1. It Is Not Marriage
Calling something  marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant  between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the  procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the  spouses.
The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something  entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women.  This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and  psychological differences between men and women which find their  complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose  of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of  children.
Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.
 Click "like" for TRUE marriage! 
 
 
[Get the TFP newsletter for free]
 
2. It Violates Natural Law
Marriage is  not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship  rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.
Natural  law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued,  and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what  is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of  each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means  that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.
Any  situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of  the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.
Being  rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It  applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids  consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to  the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man.  (Rom. 2:14-15)
3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
It  is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence  of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident  difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by  a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.
The unfortunate  situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a  same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be  deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be  raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will  always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.
Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.
4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
In  the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not  only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual  and transgender variants.
Civil laws are structuring principles  of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and  sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior.  They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify  everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.
Legal  recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain  basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public  morality.
5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Homosexual  activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue  similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.
This is false.
First  of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A  man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their  characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other  poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are  insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man  and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.
Same-sex  “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless  of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to  marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.
Secondly,  inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with  non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between  the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between  two individuals of the same sex.
6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union
Traditional  marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end  must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using  contraception. It naturally tends to create families.
On the  contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses”  want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial  means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not  to create families.
Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.
7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage
One  of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage  is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal  conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is  beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual  affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and  strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.
Homosexual  “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose,  objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals  whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the  protection the State extends to true marriage.
8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society
By  legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and  active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the  new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to  children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.
In  the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed  more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding  services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental  property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as  tenants.
In every situation where marriage affects society, the  State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their  consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the  natural order and Christian morality.
9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution
In  the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual  relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual  revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex  “marriage.”
If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as  the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used  to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other  forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant  garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.
The  railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes  increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the  Chicago Free Press:
"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it  or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation  movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of  homosexuality."
10. It Offends God
This  is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral  order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage”  does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be  opposed to it.
Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather,  it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and  Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image;  in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God  blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and  subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)
The same was taught by Our Savior  Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male  and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and  shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).
Genesis also teaches  how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The  Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew  those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the  cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)