The thought of that scares the beejebus out of me. Why would we have the right, or even the desire, to destroy the natural world like that? To me, this looks like an idea that treats human-kind as the end of existence; like billions of years have led up to us.
There's a set of laws living things must abide by to continue on surviving, the most important being not to destroy your competitors to ensure global diversity. Global diversity gives life on Earth a chance to survive and maintain even in the face of a global catastrophe. Out of hundreds of millions it's much more likely for some to survive than out of thousands, which if we try and play god we will likely wipe out countless species. It's my belief that should we destroy nature and try and control the entire world in such a way, we may destroy all life on the planet. Should we face
a catastrophe that destroys human life, life on the entire planet may be doomed.
We're making nature our enemy, and forget that we came from nature, we are just another living thing. We're wagging war against nature, and it's completely unnecessary...unless we want to continue living in such a way as we currently are.
Hey, I agree, just our governmental structures will have to change to save the environment. Democracies run on money now-days. Originally, ours did not. Capitalism corrupts, definitely, but communism wasn't the answer to that as history proved. Also, socialism is unsustainable without a robust capitalist system to maintain tax revenue into governments. I think socialism will prove to make things worse in the long run. We fund our current socialism on debt, once that system breaks down say within the next 100 years, we will be totally screwed as a nation.
Governments no longer act in the interest of their constituencies, and furthermore, no longer act for the benefit of the world. Genocide occurs and the world turns a blind eye; but threaten our capitalist establishments and lookout, it's war!
Without revolution, whether peaceful or violent, I believe we're headed for a future where corporations run governments. Maybe we're already there and I'm just too naive to see it. The thing is, I do believe revolutions will occur at some juncture. Perhaps merely a political revolution that cleanses congress for a few years to get some beneficial laws enacted. The problem with that is, "how long will it last?" With capitalism around, a democracy will always revert to the ways of money. This will happen faster than nature's ability to reassert itself.
The problem with a democratic system is that it is reactionary, instead of proactive. It will change how things are done, but it will change far too late and too little. Even after it changes, politicians will back-peddle while no one is looking. It wont seek to protect nature until nature is so far gone, there isn't much to protect. This way the cost of protecting what is left is very low too, since it will be a few sanctuaries.
It's all about money and cost, and how many political points a politician has to ramrod something through. Never is any thought given to an overall plan, where priorities are outlined and carried out over the long term.
I like to believe in galactic diversity rather than global diversity of species. I do have a faith that humans will survive for quite some time, though.