Ok, I've been working on creating my own philosophy. Any thoughts?
Mayflow philosophy, the beginning...
If you see something as sad, then you are the one who created "this is sad". It is not that something is sad. That something isn't even a something, it is just a way of seeing things that you are creating. It is only that you see it as sad. If you see something as unfair, well, yeah, same mental laws apply. Happy or whatever, too.
Now, how you see something is really entirely up to you. You see (or think you see) that others see it certain ways and you yourself determine that you will or will not accept this in some entirety or in partial, but you are still the one making this decision. Not everyone may be this individuated to be able to fully do this, and more accept to be part of a group and buy more into that "group think" but that is still a a decision made by the individual or monad. There is a balance in all of this and the balance is different for each individual, but not only that, but for each individual, each moment is a moment of newness and what was balance in the last moment is slightly shifted in the next. This prevents stagnation of the mind, Which could cause it to circle endlessly in a small defined circle, preventing it from widening into the eventual omniscience and open unlimitedness, which is in recognition of what it has always been.
Minds (whether of the individuated entities or the overall individuated species or the ones integrated within the whole of the whole) are holistic in aspect and beingness, and no one in this is separated from the others, although no two individuated beings are exact dupicates. Rain and a waterfall and individual droplets are individuated, and work together, as a whole as well.
This philosophy leans towards holography.
Mayflow philosophy, the beginning...
If you see something as sad, then you are the one who created "this is sad". It is not that something is sad. That something isn't even a something, it is just a way of seeing things that you are creating. It is only that you see it as sad. If you see something as unfair, well, yeah, same mental laws apply. Happy or whatever, too.
Now, how you see something is really entirely up to you. You see (or think you see) that others see it certain ways and you yourself determine that you will or will not accept this in some entirety or in partial, but you are still the one making this decision. Not everyone may be this individuated to be able to fully do this, and more accept to be part of a group and buy more into that "group think" but that is still a a decision made by the individual or monad. There is a balance in all of this and the balance is different for each individual, but not only that, but for each individual, each moment is a moment of newness and what was balance in the last moment is slightly shifted in the next. This prevents stagnation of the mind, Which could cause it to circle endlessly in a small defined circle, preventing it from widening into the eventual omniscience and open unlimitedness, which is in recognition of what it has always been.
Minds (whether of the individuated entities or the overall individuated species or the ones integrated within the whole of the whole) are holistic in aspect and beingness, and no one in this is separated from the others, although no two individuated beings are exact dupicates. Rain and a waterfall and individual droplets are individuated, and work together, as a whole as well.
This philosophy leans towards holography.