Is everyone racist? *thread split* | Page 9 | INFJ Forum

Is everyone racist? *thread split*

Ashkenazis are Semitic. Some of them have partial Khazar ancestry too, but only a small minority. Most Khazars never adopted Judaism anyway, only the elites did, and the Khazars converted en masse to Islam only about a century later. No more than 12% of Ashkenazis carry any of the Turkic genetic markers that a Khazar descendant would, and even those carry far more Levantine genes.
 
Ashkenazis are Semitic. Some of them have partial Khazar ancestry too, but only a small minority. Most Khazars never adopted Judaism anyway, only the elites did, and the Khazars converted en masse to Islam only about a century later. No more than 12% of Ashkenazis carry any of the Turkic genetic markers that a Khazar descendant would, and even those carry far more Levantine genes.

wrong!


http://matzav.com/report-new-genetic-study-says-ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-khazars

Report: New Genetic Study Says Ashkenazi Jews Descend from Khazars


Agence France-Presse reports: Jews of European origin are a mix of ancestries, with many hailing from tribes in the Caucasus who converted to Judaism and created an empire that lasted half a millennium, according to a gene study. The investigation, its author says, should settle a debate that has been roiling for more than two centuries.
Jews of European descent, often called Ashkenazis, account for some 90 percent of the more than 13 million Jews in the world today.
According to the so-called Rhineland Hypothesis, Ashkenazis descended from Jews who progressively fled Palestine after the Moslem conquest of 638 AD.
They settled in southern Europe and then, in the late Middle Ages, about 50,000 of them moved from the Rhineland in Germany into eastern Europe, according to the hypothesis.
But detractors say this idea is implausible.
Barring a miracle -which some supporters of the Rhineland Hypothesis have in fact suggested - the scenario would have been demographically impossible.
It would mean that the population of Eastern European Jews leapt from 50,000 in the 15th century to around eight million at the start of the 20th century.
That birth rate would have been 10 times greater than that of the local non-Jewish population. And it would have occurred despite economic hardship, disease, wars and pogroms that ravaged Jewish communities.
Seeking new light in the argument, a study published in the British journal Genome Biology and Evolution, compares the genomes of 1,287 unrelated individuals who hail from eight Jewish and 74 non-Jewish populations.
Geneticist Eran Elhaik of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland, trawled through this small mountain of data in search of single changes in the DNA code that are linked to a group’s geographical origins.
Such telltales have been used in past research to delve into the origins of the Basque people and the pygmy people of central Africa.
Among European Jews, Elhaik found ancestral signatures that pointed clearly to the Caucasus and also, but to a smaller degree, the Middle East.
The results, said Elhaik, give sound backing for the rival theory - the “Khazarian Hypothesis.”
Under this concept, eastern European Jews descended from the Khazars, a hotchpotch of Turkic clans that settled the Caucasus in the early centuries AD and, influenced by Jews from Palestine, converted to Judaism in the 8th century.
The Judeo-Khazars built a flourishing empire, drawing in Jews from Mesopotamia and imperial Byzantium.
They became so successful that they sent offshoots into Hungary and Romania, planting the seeds of a great diaspora.
But Khazaria collapsed in the 13th century when it was attacked by the Mongols and became weakened by outbreaks of the Black Death.
The Judeo-Khazars fled westwards, settling in the rising Polish Kingdom and in Hungary, where their skills in finance, economics and politics were in demand, and eventually spread to central and western Europe, according to the “Khazarian Hypothesis.”
“We conclude that the genome of European Jews is a tapestry of ancient populations including Judaised Khazars, Greco-Roman Jews, Mesopotamian Jews and Judeans,” says Elhaik.
“Their population structure was formed in the Caucasus and the banks of the Volga, with roots stretching to Canaan and the banks of the Jordan.”
Many things are unknown about the Khazars, whose tribal confederation gathered Slavs, Scythians, Hunnic-Bulgars, Iranians, Alans and Turks.
But, argues Elhaik, the tale sketched in the genes is backed by archaeological findings, by Jewish literature that describes the Khazars’ conversion to Judaism, and by language, too.
“Yiddish, the language of Central and Eastern European Jews, began as a Slavic language” before being reclassified as High German, he notes.
Another pointer is that European Jews and their ancestral groups in the Caucasus and Middle East share a relatively high risk of diseases such as cystic fibrosis.
The investigation should help fine-tune a fast-expanding branch of genomics, which looks at single-change DNA mutations that are linked with inherited disease, adds Elhaik.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gd65h8as7
[MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION].

Btw, via your research, do you know who the Biblical Jews actually are?

I happened across footage of the programme to return them home to Israel a couple of years ago on a religious channel. Their language, customs and gravesites have been authenticated. Can't find the footage anywhere but I am glad to have witnessed it.

Biblical prophecy is nearly at it's completion.

Can't wait for this nonsense to be over.
 
@muir .

Btw, via your research, do you know who the Biblical Jews actually are?

I happened across footage of the programme to return them home to Israel a couple of years ago on a religious channel. Their language, customs and gravesites have been authenticated. Can't find the footage anywhere but I am glad to have witnessed it.

Biblical prophecy is nearly at it's completion.

Can't wait for this nonsense to be over.

In my country the Uk we have always been taught that when people invaded they displaced or wiped out the existing people; now through genetics and archeology we are finding that this teaching has been false

The people who were first there intermingled with the incomers

It is very likely that the same has happened in palestine

So the palestinean people are more likely to have a genetic link to the biblical hebrews than the ashkenazi khazar 'jews'. The people living in palestine likely just converted to islam when they were invaded by islamic forces. Islam tended to be fairly lenient with the people under it's occupation but they sometimes taxed other faiths so it would have been easier to convert to islam

Religion is not a good indicator of where people are from as we can see with the khazari jews and the modern palestinean muslims because religions are just ideas and the ideas of people change and also ideas spread geographically

This means that all those christian zionists who are supporting the genocide of the palestineans because they believe they are supporting the biblical hebrews are living in fantasy land and it is happening because the ashkenazis control their media and brainwash them; many of the zionist 'christian' evangelists are actually on the payroll of the zionist ashkenazi financiers

Hitler used to speak about this concept of the 'big lie' where if you tell enough people a lie and you do it with enough chutzpah they will believe you because by the virtue of repitition and frequency it begins to take on the aspect of reality (see the mainstream corporate media to see this in effect!)

Well the ashkenazi financiers are up there amongst the best (including the vatican) at telling 'big lies'

They are world beaters at lying, but their lies are unravelling fast
 
Last edited:
Ashkenazis are Semitic. Some of them have partial Khazar ancestry too, but only a small minority. Most Khazars never adopted Judaism anyway, only the elites did, and the Khazars converted en masse to Islam only about a century later. No more than 12% of Ashkenazis carry any of the Turkic genetic markers that a Khazar descendant would, and even those carry far more Levantine genes.
Obviously all your sources have been corrupted by the Aske-naxis! Don't you see they are manipulating the information outlets and perverting to their end?

What is Janet Yellin"s ancestry? (and don't quote the NYT!)
 
[MENTION=1871]muir[/MENTION]

I disagree with the intermingling theory. That sounds like a usual argument against multi culturalism. Especially as you began by stating you live in the UK, which I do too.

Anyhow, I don't have the perseverance to debate this topic. People feel what they feel and know what they know. I go with the idea of simple sense; if you go back far enough and look at ancestry, the majority of those who were armed then are still armed and poised in the same ways now via the dominant beliefs of their clan.

People are fucked up. Never will I behave as such.
 
@muir

I disagree with the intermingling theory. That sounds like a usual argument against multi culturalism. Especially as you began by stating you live in the UK, which I do too.

Anyhow, I don't have the perseverance to debate this topic. People feel what they feel and know what they know. I go with the idea of simple sense; if you go back far enough and look at ancestry, the majority of those who were armed then are still armed and poised in the same ways now via the dominant beliefs of their clan.

People are fucked up. Never will I behave as such.

It's not a 'theory' genetics has proven that the original britons did not disappear off the face of the planet or off to avalon...they are still there in you and me

But there has been massive intermingling and we are now a mix...there is no such thing as 'racial purity'

'Race' is only skin deep in a sense...what really matters is what is going on in peoples heads and hearts!

So 'multi-culturalism' isn't strictly speaking a racial thing...it is a cultural thing

And if you think about it culture is only ideas

For example extremism of any kind is a culture. So do we think that mixing neo-nazis in with takfiri muslims or orthodox jews would be a good 'multi-cultural' mix?

Ok that's an extreme example but do you know what i mean?

Putting the racial issue aside.....if you throw lots of people from different cultures together rapidly there is going to be some tensions because people are literally speaking different languages

I'm all for intermingling...it's part of the natural fluid human process but i wonder if forcing it on people at an artificially accelerated rate is not just a recipe for disaster
 
Last edited:
Obviously all your sources have been corrupted by the Aske-naxis! Don't you see they are manipulating the information outlets and perverting to their end?

What is Janet Yellin"s ancestry? (and don't quote the NYT!)

It's either fact or it isn't

The question is: 'is the current set up working or do we need to evolve it?' ie where do we all go from here?

I'd like to evolve it and PEACEFULLY

I want an inclusive way of life which also includes the ashkenazis so that all can feel safe and secure including the ashkenazis

But it needs certain groups to stop playing games
 
It's not a 'theory' genetics has proven that the original britons did not disappear off the face of the planet or off to avalon...they are still there in you and me

But there has been massive intermingling and we are now a mix...there is no such thing as 'racial purity'

'Race' is only skin deep in a sense...what really matters is what is going on in peoples heads and hearts!

So 'multi-culturalism' isn't strictly speaking a racial thing...it is a cultural thing

And if you think about it culture is only ideas

For example extremism of any kind is a culture. So do we think that mixing neo-nazis in with takfiri muslims or orthodox jews would be a good 'multi-cultural' mix?

Ok that's an extreme example but do you know what i mean?

Putting the racial issue aside.....if you throw lots of people from different cultures together rapidly there is going to be some tensions because people are literally speaking different languages

I'm all for intermingling...it's part of the natural fluid human process but i wonder if forcing it on people at an artificially accelerated rate is not just a recipe for disaster

Forcing things doesn't turn out well.

Just look at anonymous. Not the so called activist group, just the whole concept. I mean the whole idea is you can strip away differences and the only thing that matters is your words right? Wrong. They managed to fuck that up by introducing a unifying etiquette. So now anons aren't separated by race, religion, or sexual orientation... now they're separated by their memes and how adept at anonspeak they are. They still rip you a new one if you don't fit in.
 
Anonymous is funded by the cia
[video=youtube;F-Zi1mwMa-E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-Zi1mwMa-E[/video]
 
Forcing things doesn't turn out well.

Just look at anonymous. Not the so called activist group, just the whole concept. I mean the whole idea is you can strip away differences and the only thing that matters is your words right? Wrong. They managed to fuck that up by introducing a unifying etiquette. So now anons aren't separated by race, religion, or sexual orientation... now they're separated by their memes and how adept at anonspeak they are. They still rip you a new one if you don't fit in.

Are you sdpeaking about anonymous the hacktivist group?
 
Are you sdpeaking about anonymous the hacktivist group?
No. Just plain anonymous. The culture of people who post things without giving any kind of identity - not even avatars or user names. Mostly on image boards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muir
Anonymous is funded by the cia
[video=youtube;F-Zi1mwMa-E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-Zi1mwMa-E[/video]

I wouldn't be suprised

They have just declared a global drive to awaken the masses!

Meanwhile in the UK we have a celebrity called Russel Brand telling the public (especially the younger generation who are feeling pretty cheated right now) that they shouldn't vote and that we need 'revolution'; but he doesn't go into any specifics!

he has even been on major TV shows on the BBC and spoken about the need for revolution

NO ONE of a truely radical pursuasion even gets airtime on the BBC let alone is allowed to mention the 'r' word

he is controlled opposition. He is going out with a jemima khan who is a goldsmith who are intermarried as a family with the Rothschilds. Her brother Zac (a tory MP) is married to Alice rothschild. Jemimas father was jimmy goldsmith who the british character in Oliver stones 'wallstreet' film is based on (played by terence stamp)

Jimmy goldsmith funded a group called 'great britain 75' which was set up by SAS founder David Stirling; the aim of the group was to infiltrate and disrupt the trade unions in the 70's

So brand is in with the 'globalist' clique

They are all fabian socialists which is to say that they believe in the creation of a planned economy run by a strong centralised government which would be run by them (backed up by a police state). As all socialists will tell you the socialist revolution must be a 'global' one so their vision is for a global state-socialist government through which they will rule humanity with totalitarian power

So that's the 'revolution' that brand (friend of illuminati puppets in hollywood and pop music industry like Jay Z & Katy Perry) and his banker clique buddies want

Their 'revolution' is not going to be a good development for the workers as it will see us have even less say in the decision making process then we do now!

In the meantime their plan is to destroy capitalism so that people run into their open arms. They are sabotaging the economy by endless quantitative easing and they are subverting society through cultural marxism

They are getting ready to make their move and the build up of orchestrated 'threats' like ebola, ISIS, dodgy stockmarkets, housing bubble etc etc are all going to add up to the feeling among the population that somethign drastic needs to be done

Once the public are so desperate that they are clamouring for change the globalists will make their move

I'm expecting a BIG false flag...maybe a nuclear explosion blamed on 'extremists' or ebola (being declared airborn and spread) etc etc
 
Last edited:
No. Just plain anonymous. The culture of people who post things without giving any kind of identity - not even avatars or user names. Mostly on image boards.

Oh ok, i wasn't aware of the phenomenon

Avatar photos and names and so on are not 100% fullproof because people can fake those things so really all you can go on is peoples views

For me the litmus test is whether or not someone believes we should centralsie or decentralise power. This is a sure fire way to spot the shills. if they argue for centralising power and for us to 'respect authority' then you know they are subserviant to what they perceive to be a higher power
 
Oh ok, i wasn't aware of the phenomenon

Avatar photos and names and so on are not 100% fullproof because people can fake those things so really all you can go on is peoples views

For me the litmus test is whether or not someone believes we should centralsie or decentralise power. This is a sure fire way to spot the shills. if they argue for centralising power and for us to 'respect authority' then you know they are subserviant to what they perceive to be a higher power

Avatars and names most certainly can be faked and almost don't mean anything sure. But the point is, people still have them while anons don't even give that much of a shit. Naming yourself anything is almost attention seeking in some of the circles - some would say it is actually attention seeking.

If you name yourself anything at all it means you want to be remembered as you, and they are anti-identity.
 
Avatars and names most certainly can be faked and almost don't mean anything sure. But the point is, people still have them while anons don't even give that much of a shit. Naming yourself anything is almost attention seeking in some of the circles - some would say it is actually attention seeking.

If you name yourself anything at all it means you want to be remembered as you, and they are anti-identity.

Except as you say they will each have their own vibe, their own views and their own habits etc