then simply remove those words from the argument if there are no ways of substantiating them, obviously it is almost aways a bad idea to say most and alot in a argument.
most and alot don't really change the argument in it'self anyways and doesn't give you ground to refute it on. Unless you call his statistics into question, which if false dosen't answer the question it simply take away his credibility.
it would be the same as asking for your source in christian to athiest conversions. the only ground you hold above him in your statement is that christianity represents a larger group and therefore more likley to be more conversions to the atheist theology. This doesn't answer why they changed the worldveiw.
of course if show satistics to prove your point that a "countless" of atheist converted from christianity by way of lack of evidence then you still have credibility.
most and alot don't really change the argument in it'self anyways and doesn't give you ground to refute it on. Unless you call his statistics into question, which if false dosen't answer the question it simply take away his credibility.
it would be the same as asking for your source in christian to athiest conversions. the only ground you hold above him in your statement is that christianity represents a larger group and therefore more likley to be more conversions to the atheist theology. This doesn't answer why they changed the worldveiw.
of course if show satistics to prove your point that a "countless" of atheist converted from christianity by way of lack of evidence then you still have credibility.