- MBTI
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 947 sx/sp
There is no try. There is only Dookie.
Cheers,
Ian
Because it doesn't register to me as fair. Not to get me wrong, we are all entitled to our own dislike but not to the point of disrespecting the other for what they are. The discrimination at play here affects individuals for who they are. They are being judged as rather so harshly holistically when the appropriate dimension of the judgement ought to only be on one facet. Say a person fails to earn a job for their height because they can't reach the overhead carriers in a flight cabin, that makes sense but if a person loses a job as a bank teller because they aren't aesthetically pleasing enough---- how does that appropriately correlate? Similarly, do we simply decide that a person isn't worthy of a second look just because we weren't pleased the first time? Don't everyone deserve an iota of the benefit of doubt?Because you don’t understand it, or because you judge it as wrong?
I understand. I have been a sucker for Keanu Reeves' aesthetic.But the subconscious pull can be strong for the plethora of weak minded in the world.
This is true but it’s only slight in my opinion. Personality is much more important. Some very physically attractive people are like lightbulbs that have never been switched on and never will. When I look at other people who I find compellingly beautiful, I find that their up front physical appearance is not outstanding, but my goodness how they glow brightly.It has always seemed patently obvious to me that physical attractiveness has a huge influence on how you move through the world and what kinds of opportunities you get.
Because it doesn't register to me as fair. Not to get me wrong, we are all entitled to our own dislike but not to the point of disrespecting the other for what they are. The discrimination at play here affects individuals for who they are.
Say a person fails to earn a job for their height because they can't reach the overhead carriers in a flight cabin, that makes sense but if a person loses a job as a bank teller because they aren't aesthetically pleasing enough---- how does that appropriately correlate?
Similarly, do we simply decide that a person isn't worthy of a second look just because we weren't pleased the first time?
Don't everyone deserve an iota of the benefit of doubt?
I understand the role of experiences such as yours in the formation of preference, but even if only at the matter of forming some basic respect of the other, I think they deserve that.
especially when it comes to the dating market these given how things are so skewed these days.
This is true but it’s only slight in my opinion. Personality is much more important.
Personality is much more important.
...
Of course having great physical attractiveness might win you a billionaire partner - you might well win that race. To actually become a success in power and wealth - I don’t think it’s a great advantage.
S T R A W M A N F A L L A C YIt is indeed a bit of a misconception that good looks on their own are like a free ticket to easy town.
I feel compelled to emphasize this because this is a very common reaction when I argue that physical attractiveness is a common category of discrimination. People rush to reassure me that "Sure, but looks aren't everything" or "Sure, but not everyone thinks that way" or "Sure, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder"—but all of these are counterarguments to arguments that I didn't make. You can't dismiss my claim just because you can identify a flaw in a more extreme version of it!physical attractiveness has a huge influence on how you move through the world and what kinds of opportunities you get.
Sorry mate, we don't do biology in 2022. You will have sex with fat people and you're going to like it, insensitive bastard.I don't like loud or obnoxious people, nor do I like obese people.
physical attractiveness has a huge influence on how you move through the world and what kinds of opportunities you get.
You mention that these problems stopped when you moved to a rural area. Was the move motivated by a desire to get away from these kinds of interactions, or was that just a side benefit? Do you think that the boundary crossing and dismissive behavior has become less frequent purely because you interact with fewer people where you now live, or is there also a cultural dimension to i.e. when you do interact in your rural area with people there, the base rate of this prejudice is lower?
On the contrary, I think this negates the point of discussion. Beautiful people experience similar rejections as uggos so what's the topic now?physically attractive also face certain difficulties in society such as catcalling, envy, and undermining behavior—and all of this lends further weight to the point that physical attractiveness is an important dimension of social existence.
Let me try and clarify - I'm saying that our actual perception of physical attractiveness in someone is as much to do with their personality as it is with their bone structure, etc. And I'd agree that this is certainly a basis for discrimination.Warning: Pedantry incoming. I think you guys are arguing in good faith, but I want to clarify my position (again).
S T R A W M A N F A L L A C Y
My claim isn't as specific as "physical appearance is more important than personality" or "good looks are a free ticket to easy town"! It's simply that
I feel compelled to emphasize this because this is a very common reaction when I argue that physical attractiveness is a common category of discrimination. People rush to reassure me that "Sure, but looks aren't everything" or "Sure, but not everyone thinks that way" or "Sure, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder"—but all of these are counterarguments to arguments that I didn't make. You can't dismiss my claim just because you can identify a flaw in a more extreme version of it!
Amber heard has the world's most beautiful face according to the golden ratio.
This topic and other themes related to people regarded as “extremely beautiful”, by many, are super interesting to me. I might even have a lot to say on the topic, but I’m reluctant to comment because the whole “beautiful people” thing is so emotionally charged.
As it stands, I already feel emotionally ambivalent about two or three comments I’ve made since having been on the forum. I have so much respect and admiration for so many people in this community and I really value being a part of it. I’ll admit that I want to be well regarded. As I contemplated responding to the thread I realized that I’ve reached a personal comfort-threshold for sharing potentially unpopular, harmony-threatening, perspectives on the forum for a while