Knee Jerk reactions like the one you just made are more a function of Fe than Fi.
Your points seem to contradict themselves. How can an introverted function lead to a knee jerk response?
"In order from least to most subconscious, the introverted functions:
Si is conscious memory and association with left brained defining principles.
Ti is conscious logic and reasoning with right brained abstraction.
Fi is conscious emotion with subconscious emotional association.
Ni is subconscious perception with subconscious pattern recognition."
Fi is conscious emotion, why? I don't see it that way.
"Wrong. Feelings come from emotions, not the unconscious nor the subconscious. The ability to verbalize or not verbalize a cognition is only proof of right or left hemisphere dominance, not subconconscious operation. Fi is strongly rooted in the right side of the brain consciously, while associated with subconscious reference to memory."
And these emotions can come from the subconscious brain. Just because you don't do it that way, doesn't mean someone else doesn't.
Again this sounds good (as far as trying to discredit what I am saying) yet I have never said we shouldn't talk about things.
Oh I forgot this one:
"Simple. Each function is distinct and they're rarely all strong in any of us. If that seems to be the case, it is much more likely that self assessment has been inaccurate due to the influence of two of the four of those functions compensating for the others and working in tandem to create pseudo or 'shadow' functions. In fact, the distinctions between the dominance of each of these is the exact definition of the various NF types.
Ni = INFJ
Ne = ENFP
Fi = INFP
Fe = ENFJ"
Wow, you really are not giving me much benefit of the doubt here, I am well aware of the function order, what I was saying is that how can you be sure that what you are thinking at any given time is the function you think it is? How can you split up your brain and say "Ok, now I am definitely using Fi, or Fe, or Ni, or Ne with any sort of certainty. How do you know you aren't mixing it up when you try and define them here? If you haven't acknowledged this possibility perhaps you are not using your Ni effectively...or is it Ne?
Also if you look at other systems based on Jungs works you will find a different analysis. For example in Socionics INFJ is
Introverted Feeling
Extroverted Intuition
While INFP is
Introverted Intution
Extroverted Feeling
Are you saying Socionics is just wrong? It seems like you are unwilling to accept any analysis other than your own, which is a shame because it is going to be very hard for us to communicate like that.
"I think we should be very careful when making absolute statements about things being undefinable, which does mislead people, contributes to confusion, and does nothing to resolve the matters at hand."
Very original, straight up genius...wait I have heard that somewhere before
It was a nice way of saying you are being too arrogant and black and white in your statements, and that you need to be more open minded about things. I never said "This is the way it is: FACT" like you claimed. Demanding something is true does not make it such.
There is a clear contradiction in attempting to define the undefinable. You are calling gray things black and white, and this just isn't right.
It isn't what you are saying, it is how you are saying it.
"This is clearly this, and that is clearly that, so you are wrong". This is ridiculous. You have a certain view of the world and you seem unwilling to accept that it could be wrong, I am not claiming to be right, I am just stating that what you are saying is too black and white.
The idea isn't to not define something, it is to open up your mind to what the definition could be.
Nice try though, you almost had me.
BTW, any chance you are ENFJ?