And yet, the facts show that those who pratice homosexuality and promiscuity are at a greater risk for STD's. Are you denying this?[
Yes. Lesbians are at the lowest risk, no matter how promiscuous they are.
Do you have any evidence that shows that they are at great risk because they dont' get checked out?
The same study your presented to me. That is why I said
you should read it. And the fact that it is reasonable to assume that people who do not get checked out for a cancer are more likely to contract it, but it makes absolutely no sense that having lesbian sex causes cancer. Can you present any evidence that having homosexual sex causes cancer in lesbians? A correlation is not evidence.
Actually, it is from homosexuality because the risk of AID's transfer is due to homosexuality. Men are normally less likely to contract AID's though sex with women than women are from men. That is a fact and yet... what do homosexual men often pratice?
So you agree that it is unprotected anal sex that leads to HIV transmission? Is it possible for two clean, monogamous homosexual men to give HIV to one another? Homosexuality has nothing to do with HIV, risky sexual behaviors are what lead to HIV transmission. Whether your are willing to admit it or not, a monogamous homosexual couple practicing unprotected anal sex will not get HIV over their entire lifetime. It is not their homosexuality that causes HIV, it is having promiscuous sex that causes it.
And yet... you didn't read that it says 'over 40' and still haven't responded to this part:
4. Gynecological Cancer
Lesbians have higher risks for many of the gynecologic cancers. What they may not know is that having a yearly exam by a gynecologist can significantly facilitate early diagnosis and a better chance of cure.
Why?
If you had actually read the study instead of simply googling for anything that would support your beliefs you would have read this...
"there is evidence that lesbians smoke more and drink more. It is also more likely they are overweight, which adds significant health risks."
The fact of the matter is that racial groups also have higher risks of cancers...
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/36679.php
http://www.fccc.edu/cancer/minorities/index.html
Are you going to argue that the color of their skin makes them more likely to develop cancers? Or could it be other factors? Higher levels of poverty? Higher alcoholism and smoking rates? Higher levels of obesity? Higher levels of depression? All factors common among minority groups in America.
I have done no such thing, I have said that promiscuity + homosexuality leads to an increased risk and what groups tends to be among the biggest praticers of promiscuity?
Let's cut to the chase. The primary means by which HIV spreads is through
anal sex. Do homosexual men practice anal sex more than any other group? Yes. Do lesbians practice it is less of any group? Yes.
It is not homosexuality, but
anal sex, that leads to the spread of HIV. For your formula to be correct it should be, Anal Sex + Promiscuity = increased risk. Both heterosexuals and homosexuals have anal sex. When you argue that HIV is a "gay" problem,
you are spreading ignorance that is very dangerous. You are suggesting that heterosexuals who practice anal sex are not at risk, when in reality they are the second highest risk group to gay men when it comes to sexual behavior. The rampant spread of HIV in Africa is the result of the cultural practice of anal sex as birth control among heterosexuals on that continent.
The only argument you have brought forward is that 'they don't get checked out as much'. Hummm... and yet... why are they at a greater risk? Many hetrosexual women don't get checked out as much and yet... they are not in a higher risk, why? I have also seen that you still haven't even addressed the second part of my argument, why?
Actually I have presented several arguments.
1. They are minority group that faces societal stigma which leads to greater depression rates. Depression leads to consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and excessive food, which in turn puts them at a greater risk for certain cancers.
2. Not getting checked out by a physician can lead to not catching health factors that increase their risk of certain cancers.
And I'll get to your lying argument as soon as you present a decent rational argument that homosexuality is immoral. So far you have made a good argument that promiscuity and unprotected sex is immoral. Of course, arguing that homoesxuality is immoral because homosexuals may be more likely to practice promiscuity and unprotected sex, is not very rational.