I think we should remain who we are, but I think experience narrows the possibilities of what could be right. It's the perfectionism that desires to be right in the first place. Let's suppose that the whole point of perception is to deepen or sharpen one's understanding of reality. If that's the case, one should probably consider even the variable that one could be wrong - but only insofar as to extract the truths elicited by such possibility.
I don't mean to say that we should never doubt ourselves . . . That would be dangerous and thoroughly unhealthy.
Disclaimer: I don't mean the following statements to be assertions of truth, but rather potential starting points for discussion.
What seems to constantly get me is the rarity/absence of people who will even consider the things that I believe will happen. . . even after I end up being right over and over. I find myself trying to discuss my concerns with possible outcomes and I'm usually given a blank stare and told to stop being pessimistic. I've constantly wondered HOW MANY TIMES do I need to be right before people will start listening to me. . . but the reality is that they'll never listen to me in a way that grants me validation of my ideas. . . the most I can hope for is that they'll stop outright dismissing me.
One of the major things I credit the whole MBTI/Jungian theories with is the insight it gives into HOW/WHY people see things so differently.
Imagine for a moment that you're an INFJ who doesn't know anything about the idea of different personality types. You see the world through your "Ni" which generates "truths" of perception that don't have a clear source. Next you filter them through the "Fe" idea of making sure that they mesh with the people around you. Then you need to bend your "Ti" to build a logical framework that unites everyone's criticisms of what you saw with "Ni". . . .
but the logical framework that unites everyone's input doesn't usually exist . . . . indicating that your "Ni" is wrong.
INTJs have the logic of the physical world to validate their perceptions. . . . it has less overall potential for truth . . . but is actually practical, applicable, and understandable by the majority of the world.
My personal experience is that I rarely get external validation of my beliefs until the physical proof of it has manifested in a way that I can show to everyone. INTJs can write equations/designs that prove their theories . . . I have to spend a month building the damn thing before anyone will believe me.
So back to the initial statement I made: It seems to me that the first step toward a healthy INFJ would be to STOP believing that your first perception is wrong even though people around you don't believe it . . . . . however, outright rejection of the possibility you're wrong would drive you into an unhealthy Ni-Ti loop.
INFJ truth seems to find validation through discussion . . . I think it's the reason we all gravitate to forums like this.
B