A World Without Pets? | INFJ Forum

A World Without Pets?

Discussion in 'News and Politics' started by enigma, Dec 26, 2009.

Share This Page

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 1 user.
More threads by enigma
  1. enigma

    enigma Armed and Fabulous!

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Threads:
    68
    Messages:
    1,275
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    infj
    Enneagram:
    1w9
    Taking the dog for a walk to the store would seem like a more environmentally-friendly option than piling into the SUV.
    [​IMG]Robert and Brenda Vale blast pets in their new book for having more of a carbon footprint than a gas-guzzling SUV.
    (Getty Images)

    Not so, say two New Zealand scientists whose new book claims pets have a carbon footprint that is about twice the size of the gas guzzling vehicles that have long been a bane of environmentalism.
    In "Time to Eat the Dog, the Real Guide to Sustainable Living," Robert and Brenda Vale charge that a medium-size dog has a footprint of 2.1 acres compared with slightly more than one acre for a standard sport utility vehicle.
    The New Scientist Web site relayed other carbon footprint comparisons from the Vales' book. Cats are roughly equal to small Volkswagens while two hamsters have the same footprint as a plasma television. Goldfish are comparable to a pair of cell phones.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. Wyst

    Wyst Are you there?

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Threads:
    57
    Messages:
    1,915
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    622
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    4w5
    If they try and take away the INFJ's cats, heads will roll.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Raccoon Love

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Threads:
    310
    Messages:
    5,413
    Likes Received:
    703
    Trophy Points:
    657
    Gender:
    Female
    MBTI:
    INFP
    Enneagram:
    4w5
    I could not imagine a world wihout pets, and we have no right to take them away, we are all living things and art of a cycle and we all deserve an equal chance.
     
  4. OP
    enigma

    enigma Armed and Fabulous!

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Threads:
    68
    Messages:
    1,275
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    infj
    Enneagram:
    1w9
    I am still stuped by this article. What a croc of BS:m031:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Soulful

    Soulful life is good

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Threads:
    249
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    245
    MBTI:
    Hmm.. this sounds familiar. I think there might already be a thread about this, probably buried somewhere.
     
  6. Wyst

    Wyst Are you there?

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Threads:
    57
    Messages:
    1,915
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    622
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    4w5
    Proposal for pet
    population reduction.


    [​IMG]
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Wyst

    Wyst Are you there?

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Threads:
    57
    Messages:
    1,915
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    622
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    4w5
    I read an article similar to this that had to do with reducing the demand for beef by everyone becoming vegetarian. Ridiculous.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. Skoffin

    Skoffin <font color=#00EE99>She Whose Name We Do Not Speak

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Threads:
    26
    Messages:
    787
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INTP
    I will dismember anyone who attempts to take my pets away.

    What the hell is the point of this book? Should we eliminate all animal life just to reduce carbon?
    Might be a tad tricksy though, without carbon wouldn't the plants then be fucked too?
    :m190:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. testing

    On Holiday

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Threads:
    37
    Messages:
    902
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    qwer
    You've got that right!
     
  10. randomsomeone

    randomsomeone Well-known member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Threads:
    8
    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Dogs? Cats? What about the carbon footprint of children?!?!?! And grandma??? Why not get rid of them, too??

    btw, I have no pets.
     
  11. fairypotter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Threads:
    1
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    I agree, Wyst taking away the CATS would HURT.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    Moxie likes this.
  12. Faye

    Faye ^_^
    Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Threads:
    311
    Messages:
    7,278
    Featured Threads:
    4
    Likes Received:
    4,615
    Trophy Points:
    892
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Gridania
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    4w5
    The real problem isn't pets. The real problem is the like 40 billion + animals that are killed and eaten each year. If you really want to reduce the carbon footprint of animals, place restrictions on meat production and consumption. After that is done, work on encouraging people to have less children, less pets, and use mass transit more.

    Of course, what is the chance that any of this is actually going to happen? Other than mass transit, I don't see it as very likely. Child laws might take effect if overpopulation becomes a tangible issues in western countries, but that will probably take decades.
     
Loading...

Share This Page