I try to stay away from metaphysical/ontological theory because I cannot pretend to know what exists beyond this realm. I think someone with Ni would be much more inclined to develop or follow a belief. I simply accept not to believe any particular, but also not to dismiss any particular.
What we do with tech and how we use it should ultimately be governed by our metaphysical/ontological meaning but no one can seem to agree, so it seems we have to find some sort of common ground on this front. Science became secular in order to proceed forward. I am thankful for the advances we have seen, but I also worry about the devastation of our tools.
The simplest thing is this, we need to survive, and we need to survive in a way that doesn't ruin the world, or ruin the environment for future generations. We need to use our tech with respect, something that seems highly lacking these days.
I think eras tend to overemphasize their positions because they need to break free from the restraints that previously held them back and moderation would not fulfill that need. Science is fairly recent in its secularist nature in terms of overall history, especially concerning the Western history of Christianity. Right now, we can definitely see the over-emphasis of secularist nature. Yet, to say god (or anything) doesn't exist beyond our comprehension is absurd. It is ultimately leading to a bad state because people find they are not attaining fulfillment in their lives because we look in all the wrong places. The media seems to exacerbate humanity searching in all the wrong ways. Typically I see media's faults due to being owned by VERY large corporations, and we all know their primary motivation.
Will a nation primarily influenced by sociopaths ultimately result in a nation of sociopaths?
What we do with tech and how we use it should ultimately be governed by our metaphysical/ontological meaning but no one can seem to agree, so it seems we have to find some sort of common ground on this front. Science became secular in order to proceed forward. I am thankful for the advances we have seen, but I also worry about the devastation of our tools.
The simplest thing is this, we need to survive, and we need to survive in a way that doesn't ruin the world, or ruin the environment for future generations. We need to use our tech with respect, something that seems highly lacking these days.
I think eras tend to overemphasize their positions because they need to break free from the restraints that previously held them back and moderation would not fulfill that need. Science is fairly recent in its secularist nature in terms of overall history, especially concerning the Western history of Christianity. Right now, we can definitely see the over-emphasis of secularist nature. Yet, to say god (or anything) doesn't exist beyond our comprehension is absurd. It is ultimately leading to a bad state because people find they are not attaining fulfillment in their lives because we look in all the wrong places. The media seems to exacerbate humanity searching in all the wrong ways. Typically I see media's faults due to being owned by VERY large corporations, and we all know their primary motivation.
Will a nation primarily influenced by sociopaths ultimately result in a nation of sociopaths?
