Your face is a façade
Ffs stop writing funny shit because Ren will not like it if I laugh!
I laughed my ass off when I read it! lol I never take things badly where there is no intention to hurt behind them.
Your face is a façade
Ffs stop writing funny shit because Ren will not like it if I laugh!
Well there is an intention behind you, and it's gonna hurt.I laughed my ass off when I read it! lol I never take things badly where there is no intention to hurt behind them.
Well there is an intention behind you, and it's gonna hurt.
He won’t forget this. INTPs are complex people and only let very few people in. And sure the same can be said for INFJs, however we’re friendlier. If an INTP likes you and lets you in, you’ve made a very loyal friend for life. The two I know I would do just about anything for them because they are the best people I know. And damn they can be funny af!I laughed my ass off when I read it! lol I never take things badly where there is no intention to hurt behind them.
mmm... the closest the comes to mind is chaos. But even chaos has its own logic right?
It's a good question. If chaos had its own logic, would it not be predictable to an extent?
I guess you could answer that chaos is predictably chaotic. But this sounds circular. Hmmm..
It's a good question. If chaos had its own logic, would it not be predictable to an extent?
I guess you could answer that chaos is predictably chaotic. But this sounds circular. Hmmm..
Chaos is still bound by logic... Hence "chaos theory"
Chaos theory is different from chaos itself though, don’t you think? You might argue that a theory is by definition bound by logic (and I would agree) but whether that is the case of its subject matter must be examined separately.
Maybe chaos is not the opposite of logic but what lies outside logic. What lies beyond the boundaries of the logical realm. Trying to conceptualise the opposite of logic is perhaps vain because opposite-ness is itself a logical term.
Wouldn't what lies outside logic just be what we have yet to understand?. How can we apply logic to something that seems purely chaotic to us?Chaos theory is different from chaos itself though, don’t you think? You might argue that a theory is by definition bound by logic (and I would agree) but whether that is the case of its subject matter must be examined separately.
Maybe chaos is not the opposite of logic but what lies outside logic. What lies beyond the boundaries of the logical realm. Trying to conceptualise the opposite of logic is perhaps vain because opposite-ness is itself a logical term.
@Deleted member 16771 what you think about Gödels imcompletenes theorem?Actually that's not true. Logic would always work if there are valid axioms upon which to perform syllogistic reasoning, which could be the case within a static system for an outside observer not bound by the stasis (e.g. the static state could exhibit symmetry - a valid axiom).
Therefore maybe what we're actually trying to define is a state of existence without any conceivable valid axioms. I can barely imagine it. This would be a state of existence without rules. A kind of pure potential state; some weird, pre-big-bang kind of reality. No rules, no time - a kind of existence essentially indistinguishable from non-existence.
In any case, I think the fundamentality of logic is probably beyond doubt: there is no 'opposite form of reasoning' that is not actually defined by it.
@Deleted member 16771 what you think about Gödels imcompletenes theorem?
Gödel showed that with in the axioms there are true statements that can not be proven by the axioms. "This statement can not be proved from the axioms."Hmm, I've never encountered that, I'll have to have a look and get back to you.