I always hear from atheists, as an argument to religion/faith and spirituality, that there is no "evidence" that a God does or does not exist. Typically, atheists will focus on the 'does exist' part, where I notice agnostics will try to be more levelheaded as in 'we don't know, it's unproven both ways'.
But hypothetically, saying it was possible to develop some sort of prove or evidence, what sort of evidence do atheists want? This has never been clear to me.
I know that one person cannot represent an entire grouping of people, so if those whom identify themselves as atheists could come forth with a hypothesis upon why people of their name tagging think this, as well as their own personal point of view, I believe it would be much helpful to my understanding of atheism and their interactions with religion/faith and spirituality.
But hypothetically, saying it was possible to develop some sort of prove or evidence, what sort of evidence do atheists want? This has never been clear to me.
I know that one person cannot represent an entire grouping of people, so if those whom identify themselves as atheists could come forth with a hypothesis upon why people of their name tagging think this, as well as their own personal point of view, I believe it would be much helpful to my understanding of atheism and their interactions with religion/faith and spirituality.