Varient Forms (A New Way To Think About Type)

I sort of came up with this idea when I brought my type into question again a few months back. Another factor that can be used to explain someone's type is something I like to call variant forms. Let me explain.

Back in September, I focused more again on my type, specifically the cognitive functions. I came to realize that my Te was just as strong as my Fe, and that Si somehow is directly behind my Ni. All four of these functions should not be able to mix with each other, but somehow they manage to do so. This brought me into questioning if I was possibly an INTJ, or an ISFJ. After looking into more detail, I found that these types do actually fit me pretty well. Much more so then I had thought. I found that I had to resign myself to IxxJ for the time being. I even discovered that I had some ISTJ tendencies too. I retook regular mbti tests and still tested as INFJ, but found that my N/S and F/T scores were rather low. This isn't to say that either of these are weak in me, it is that I use certain aspects of each letter, making them appear weak.

After a while, some talking, and thinking I realized that I am still an INFJ, but with some differences. I am of an IJ variant form. Because I have a strong Te and Si for an INFJ, I have several modes I can go into. When the situation calls for it, I can very easily go into an INTJ mode, and take advantage of Te (again because it is right up against my Fe). I typically do this in the lab or doing any kind of technical work. I am still an INFJ in these cases, and go back to it the second I want to, but I allow my Te to run things more. Another mode I will go into is ISFJ mode; I do this when I am socializing with a large group of people. I let Si take reigns and govern how I interact with people. This lets me appear more normal and regular and I can get along easier. Again, I am still an INFJ in this mode and I will switch back to it when I want. I just find it easier to go into an ISFJ mode, I will function better. I can also go into ISTJ mode when I need to be firm with people, and get them to do things that need to be done, kind of like a leadership mode.

This is what a variant form is. It is an order preference between several different types, governed by two strong letters (for me, I am IJ because my I is pretty solid, and I have an extremely strong J score). It also comes down to a top three or four functional preference, for me it is Ni>Si>Fe>Te, and this correlates to INFJ>INTJ>ISFJ>ISTJ.

For INFJ's this is actually a pretty common phenomenon. From what I have witnessed, NF seems to be a very common variant form. This makes sense, as this is a temperament. Out of all the NF's, INFJ's tend to have the weakest I and J letters, so they will have a high level of confusion between the four idealist types. It is sort of tricky to sort out the exact order preference, but this can be drawn out by a function order. For example, someone with this kind of functional preference: Ni>Fi>Ne>Fe would likely boil down to this: INFJ, INFP, ENFP, ENFJ. Another common variant form would be IN. Not as common as NF, but still prevalent. At first glance this doesn't seem to mix well at all, because Ni and Ti are involved together. Yet, people of this variant form do exist. Here is an example set that is decently common: Ni>Ti>Fi>Ne. From this a type order emerges like this INFJ>INTP>INFP. Te does not appear in the set so INTJ technically does not appear in the order. However, the Ni>Ti>Fi>Ne preference can have gaps in between filled with other function. This could make deducing a preference a little more tricky, but can also make it easier. All variant forms in could potentially exist, even something as confusing as an IF variant. Some are just easier to put together, and some are just more common. It is also important to note that single letter variants do not exist (at least for the theory I have here). That opens the door to too many types, and it begins to break down the whole purpose of mbti. It then goes without saying that a no letter variant does not exist either.

This is an important point. Just because someone can be a variant form doesn't mean that they can be more then one type. The first type that appears out of this is the person's type. After that, they have the ability to transfer over and act as another type by activating another cognitive function that the person has a good handle over. Variant forms become useful in describing a persons overall personality. It can be done using cognitive functions, or type order. Type order is easier for most people to explain. By saying that you are a certain type, but have the ability to transfer over to another, fills in holes and gaps that otherwise can not be reasoned by one type alone. Someone could be an INFJ, but not fit all the details of it. Other parts of their personality are left unexplained and reasoned. However, if someone that is an INFJ happens to have a very strong Te, they could in theory go into an INTJ mode at will when it is needed. This could easily fill holes to their personality that are situational dependent. Things could go deeper and a third or fourth type that are even less commonly turned on, would explain other details to ones personality.

In essence, variant forms fill in the blanks that don't fit classic molds. Further explaining complex personalities that MBTI (and nearly all personality assessments) can't explain. We are human after all; we are all very different from one another. This is exactly what makes everyone an individual, and unique person.

 

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by ranking, I think I understand. The bottom appears to be a NF varient, that's actually quite classic NF.

I believe it is possibly, simply because I have seen too many people not fit classic molds. I am not following the classic rules of cognitive function paring. I take into concideration, but it isn't iron-clad for this.

This theory explains details of MBTI to me, and it makes sense in my head. Not everyone is going to agree with it.

 

Yes the function recombination would explain things a lot, and I do like the y-chromosome analogy (even though I don't fully understand it, I don't have a strong molec-bio background).

I think we could further define this by also saying that not only do have a function prefrence, they also is a preference to which functions one will prefer to put together and fuse their main functions to form the shadow functions. Then an order for these emerge.