- Sep 28, 2008
- 41,532
- 247,425
- 4,281
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
Full-blown pathetic.Ah yes, losing the argument so fall back on insulting the oppositions intelligence! It has taken longer than it probably should have but it finally has happened. The right has finally figured out the lefts tactics.....they are now just tiresome but hey, it was worth a try....
Trump's style is sometimes just plain bad. No doubt about it.Drumpf will either die soon or come down with some sort of ailment that will take him out of the political game largely.
I don't celebrate other people's suffering, but I am going to celebrate the fuck out of that shit.
Fucking trash.
Trump's style is sometimes just plain bad. No doubt about it.
However, Biden turned out to be the alternative.
Ya got any goods on him? It's real easy. His inappropriate touching of young girls during photo ops (when my daughters were young, I would not have let them near him). His plagiarism. His racist comments. Son Hunter's laptop. Hey, since when is sex with an underage woman OK? Or his meth addiction. Just totally depraved.
Or is Biden's "style" off the table? Seems so. Why is that?
AgreedFor the life of me I do not understand the obsession with donny. He is a con man, nothing more.
Larry, that did not return a page. But, I searched The Mueller Report in that site and it returned a ton of stuff.
I am not sure what you are talking about but you asked me for ONE THING in the Steele Dossier that I ALLEGE to be true. I posted ONE THING that is true, namely that Steele reported that the GRU was running a cyber operation against the Clinton campaign. Turns out there is tons of stuff in the steele dossier that is true, stuff that is plausible and not proven and stuff that is false as it is riddled with Russian disinformation.57,
Thanks. I think this is the first time you actually responded to something asked.
In a former life, I used to "argue apologetics" in a Christian forum. Conditional immortality versus unconditional. Sabbath versus Sunday. Trinity versus some other view of the godhead. And so on.
I did not feel like the exchanges were just. Persons of the contrasting view of my own would offer a couple Bible passages as support for their interpretation. I would respond point by point. And then offer passages of my own. They would completely ignore my offerings and add more passages. I got to the point that I actually referenced every single one of these events.
1. How many times I offered passages with explanation.
2. How many times they were responded to.
3. How many times they offered passages with explanation.
4. How many times I responded to them,
The result was a STENCH.
This thread is exactly the same, save your last post for which I am thankful.
How may times did I ask you to reference anything from The Steele Dossier that you think is truthful? Three times, perhaps? How many times did you reply on point? ZERO.
Is this dialoguing for masochists? Is that what this is about?
larry has offered support for his claims. Where are the responses? ZERO.
Especially coming from an INFJ where I would hope the person would have some level of respect for another person, but no.
Meanwhile, you mentioned The Mueller Report a few times. Now, you may not have appreciated the veracity of my posts, but I did post! A number of times.
From that article:I certainly realize that not only do "facts" (which include falsehoods) need to be documented and that documentation has to be from an approved source, including whether it has a proven track record of providing b.s. or not. In most cases the dubious sources are more creditable than factual ones.
My latest source is Rolling Stone, anyone, as in ANYONE, who tries to make the case that publication is a right wing conspiracy pusher need not be taken seriously or responded to for any reason.
They did publish a SUPERB article that explains all of this VERY well.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...t-steele-dossier-collusion-news-media-924944/
It is not a real long read and it is again very well done.
Larry