For instance laws that are in place to protect people from being harmed by others make a lot of sense to me. I follow those laws. I would likely do that even if they were not laws though. I don't need threat of consequence to keep me from being an inhumane asshole. But apparently some people do, so it is likely over all a good thing that laws like that exist.
I follow rules and/or laws when they make sense to me. I don't follow them when they don't. I am not likely to follow a rule simply because it is a "rule". There are plenty of rules/laws that don't make any sense at all to me. I don't really care if social norms like that or not.
For instance laws that are in place to protect people from being harmed by others make a lot of sense to me. I follow those laws. I would likely do that even if they were not laws though. I don't need threat of consequence to keep me from being an inhumane asshole. But apparently some people do, so it is likely over all a good thing that laws like that exist.
And for an example on the other end of the spectrum, laws that tell me I am not free to smoke a joint in my own house or basically to do whatever I want to my own body as long as it isn't hurting anyone else, can suck my metaphorical dick. :]
Generally more supportive, more complementary than breaking. I work under the assumption that the original laws are made to protect the people and it's people mostly that are abusing it to their own ends. In that case, any law could be twisted.What is your attitude towards rules/laws?
When I can.Do you take them seriously?
BY not breaking it as much as possible, especially if those will cause me / other people inconvenience / problems.In what way do you follow the rules?
2 dimensions; One is, how much of me breaking it will cost me?When do you break them?
What is your attitude towards rules/laws?
Do you take them seriously?
In what way do you follow the rules?
When do you break them?