I need to preface this by saying I personally have a rather odd view on abortion in that I believe it is taking a life but still believe it is what I would consider to be "necessary murder" and I vote in a "pro-choice" fashion. You couldn't exactly call me pro-choice, nor could you call me pro-life. It's left me to look at both sides from what I believe to be a more objective point of view.
So here is the question, and it is a question for pro-lifers or pro-choicers that believe pro-lifers should make an exception for rape cases. The question is this: if you believe a fetus to be a life, and you believe that life to have value, and you are heavily against this "murder" in general and would go as far as to say as it should be illegal. Why then, is a baby that comes from rape's life less valuable than a baby that comes from consensual sex?
So here is the question, and it is a question for pro-lifers or pro-choicers that believe pro-lifers should make an exception for rape cases. The question is this: if you believe a fetus to be a life, and you believe that life to have value, and you are heavily against this "murder" in general and would go as far as to say as it should be illegal. Why then, is a baby that comes from rape's life less valuable than a baby that comes from consensual sex?