Hi ya, @
Jack! I'm glad you're receptive to new ideas! That will make discussing science with me a lot easier. =) In the interest of full disclosure you should know a little about me: I'm an independent researcher/astrophysicist. I'm not employed as a scientist and I have little direct association with academia. Also, my understanding of the universe is unique. I'll be inclined to deny perspectives modern science holds in favor of plasma cosmology perspectives. In other cases I will supersede teachings of plasma cosmology and tell you things about the universe only I hold to be true. To make matters worse, I don't always agree with Relativity and Quantum Mechanics -the two of the most successful theories humanity has ever produced. In many ways, I'll outline an entirely unique perspective you want to hear my take on things. You should carefully consider if it's worth your time! I mean, in essence I'm telling you I'm either seriously, irrevocably bat-shit crazy or I understand the nature of the universe better than any human. (<--I didn't ask for any of this so please don't judge me too harshly on that statement, I just call it like I see it. In truth, the isolation isn't worth it. I just want a simple life with a good woman, but no, I had to be a freak... Lovely! That's just fucking wonderful.) Anyway, you can find a taste of my scientific aptitude in the links if you want to get a feel for how my perspectives stand to scrutiny within a more science savvy community. Some there had nice things to say about me! =) For instance:
"Cool. You're up for a Nobel Prize."
The resident math genius, "Chief Scientist; Adjunct Full Professor of Computer Science; six times Who's Who in the World; national, state Advisory Panels; author of two books, many papers; Jedi Math Dog", had this to say about me:
"I have noticed your intellect... it stands out, even here. You hang in there, and before you know it, you will be a theory builder!"
http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?t=119394&page=5
http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?t=121446&page=2
And here's a brief outline of my scientific blasphemy... Exhaustive research has given me these impressions. Also, it would seem I'm the only one who would tell you such things:
The antimatter debate: you don't need to create pairs to have antimatter. Energy will readily take form in either. Only, this universe is left handed. =) That's right! It just happened that way. Reverse polarity changes relative orientation of forces. Because of the way matter orients it's fields, any energy stabilizing into a particle here will have a preference to matter, not anti particles. Removed from outside forces, a bunch of energy stabilizing into a particle would have a 50/50 chance of going antimatter... Unless it has characteristics other than its own existence. If we can apply angular momentum or anything like that to it, then the state of the energy will define anti or plus. I have confidence in that assessment but further testing is needed to confirm it. Still, the preponderance of matter coming out of active galactic nuclei and heavy atomic collisions give the impression we already have tested and confirmed that perspective.
I'm also fairly certain matter doesn't actually gain mass as it approaches the speed of light. As if you would start pulling stars off position if you went by them really fast. That consequence is a matter of the mathematics needing to balance out. It balances but in a different fashion. Redefining time and particles is necessary to making that perspective relevant. It's related to time dilation. The matter will essentially behave as if it were in a heavier gravitional field.
I've redefined time. I can disprove time travel in a paragraph:
[It's not a technical feat, its impossible. When you look into the night sky you see stars. That essentially means you have absorbed and incorporated energy into your being that originated all across the cosmos. Likewise, your body temperature exists far above absolute zero. That means you have been a radiation source that has been lighting up this section of the galaxy since you were born. The energy that makes us is essentially transient and it is so deeply and intricately interwoven into the rest of the universe we could never be isolated from it. Time travel is asking the universe to completely reconstruct itself without your energy -Not gonna happen. No rebuilding the universe unless you're here to join us. Besides, time does not exist as a dimension, there's nowhere to go. Thinking of time as a dimension is a very effective and beautiful way to track how the universe is interacting, but that model does NOT directly apply to the nature of the universe. The only thing we can infer from the existence of time is that the universe's constitutes are dynamic. The universe exists independent of time.] This is contrary to parts of Einstein's Relativity.
I can explain why time dilation occurs, not just what it does.
There is no fabric to space. "Space-time" does not exist. It is an analogy, not a precise description. [E=mc^2 was genius! Much of what Einstein described exactly relates to physical reality. He's still the man.]
Particles exist in a fashion that agrees with QM while proving Einstein right about his reservations against QM. Ultimately, I'm going to prove Bohr lost that argument. This is contrary to current perception of quantum mechanics.
Quasars are essentially full-spectrum lasers. The difference is they keep particle disassociated energy in resonance, not merely atomic structures.
Neutrons are the universe's most powerful energy source. Quasars (active galactic nuclei), supernovae, and magnetars all burn neutrons for power. The only thing that collapses to oblivion when you exceed neutron stability is human mathematics.
"The Mystery Spot" and similar places are terrestrial analogues of sunspots.
Earth's continents are what remains of protoEarth's original crust. Continents, as we have them on Earth are unique to all known worlds and could not have developed as a natural consequence of planet formation. [Archaic Crust Theory can be found in this section of the forum.]
A consequence of Archaic Crust Theory of Continents likely takes us much closer to discovering/understanding how life formed on this planet.
Sprites -the lightning phenomenon, are essentially the same type of spark that occurs when you touch "hot" electrical wires together. The intense upward lightning hyper-agitates the matter in the day glow band and explodes it much like an electrical fire does to wires.
I mentioned this in the Death of God thread. If I understand your response correctly, could I describe it as suggesting that the self-organizing properties of matter might serve to counter those aspects of the second law which would lead to this particular fate?
Absolutely! Properties of plasma dictate self-organization. Plasma is a known fact of the universe! Lighting, solar wind, stars, galactic arms and the filaments that link the clusters and superclusters are all plasma. This universe is plasma. In fact, every time you read "filament" in an astrophysical/cosmological context, it explicitly says plasma! Those are plasma filaments, every time, please make no mistake about it. The entire observable universe is linked by energy conduits! That "web" of galactic clusters and superclusters is a web of plasma. Recent observations show stars go "up and down" in the galactic disk as they rotate about the center of the galaxy. That phenomena is inexplicable in gravitationally based theories of the universe. Plasma behavior tells me they're not simply going up and down, they are spiraling around prevailing plasma conduits. But ya, plasma doesn't pay much attention to the second law of thermodynamics. Thermodynamics 2 is a balance, not a directive of the universe. Until our theories say that, they are wrong. Pure and simple, wrong. I'd be happy to tell you all about it, provided you're still interested in my input.
