Merkabah | Page 345 | INFJ Forum
Seems fitting today.
Enjoy!





by Travis Bradberry
March 17, 2015


Toxic people defy logic.
Some are blissfully unaware of the negative impact that they have on those around them, and others seem to derive satisfaction from creating chaos and pushing other people's buttons.

Either way, they create unnecessary complexity, strife, and, worst of all, stress.

Studies have long shown that stress can have a lasting, negative impact on the brain.
Exposure to even a few days of stress compromises the effectiveness of neurons in the hippocampus - an important brain area responsible for reasoning and memory.

Weeks of stress cause reversible damage to neuronal dendrites (the small “arms” that brain cells use to communicate with each other), and months of stress can permanently destroy neurons.

Stress is a formidable threat to your success - when stress gets out of control, your brain and your performance suffer.

Most sources of stress at work are easy to identify.
If your nonprofit is working to land a grant that your organization needs to function, you're bound to feel stress and likely know how to manage it.

It's the unexpected sources of stress, those that take you by surprise, that harm you the most.

Recent research from the Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology at Friedrich Schiller University in Germany found that exposure to stimuli that cause strong negative emotions - the same kind of exposure you get when dealing with toxic people - caused subjects' brains to have a massive stress response.

Whether it's their negativity, cruelty, the victim syndrome, or just plain craziness, toxic people drive your brain into a stressed-out state that should be avoided at all costs.

The ability to manage your emotions and remain calm under pressure has a direct link to your performance.

TalentSmart has conducted research with more than a million people, and we've found that 90% of top performers are skilled at managing their emotions in times of stress in order to remain calm and in control.

One of their greatest gifts is the ability to neutralize toxic people.

Top performers have well-honed coping strategies that they employ to keep toxic people at bay.

To deal with toxic people effectively, you need an approach that enables you, across the board, to control what you can and eliminate what you can't.
The important thing to remember is that you are in control of far more than you realize.

While I've run across numerous effective strategies that successful people employ when dealing with toxic people, what follows are 12 of the best:



1. They Set Limits (Especially With Complainers)

Complainers and negative people are bad news because they wallow in their problems and fail to focus on solutions.

They want people to join their pity party so that they can feel better about themselves.

People often feel pressure to listen to complainers because they don't want to be seen as callous or rude, but there's a fine line between lending a sympathetic ear and getting sucked into a negative emotional spiral.

You can avoid this only by setting limits and distancing yourself when necessary.

Think of it this way:

If the complainer were smoking, would you sit there all afternoon inhaling the second-hand smoke?

You'd distance yourself, and you should do the same with complainers.

A great way to set limits is to ask complainers how they intend to fix the problem.

They will either quiet down or redirect the conversation in a productive direction.

2. They Don't Die in the Fight

Successful people know how important it is to live to fight another day, especially when your foe is a toxic individual.

In conflict, unchecked emotion makes you dig your heels in and fight the kind of battle that can leave you severely damaged.

When you read and respond to your emotions, you're able to choose your battles wisely and stand your ground only when the time is right.

3. They Rise Above

Toxic people drive you crazy because their behavior is so irrational.

Make no mistake about it - their behavior truly goes against reason.
So why do you allow yourself to respond to them emotionally and get sucked into the mix?

The more irrational and off-base someone is, the easier it should be for you to remove yourself from his or her traps.
Quit trying to beat toxic people at their own game.

Distance yourself from them emotionally and interact with them as if they were a science project (or you were their shrink, if you prefer the analogy).

You don't need to respond to the emotional chaos, but only to the facts.

4. They Stay Aware of Their Emotions

Maintaining an emotional distance requires awareness.

You can't stop someone from pushing your buttons if you don't recognize when it's happening.
Sometimes you'll find yourself in situations where you'll need to regroup and choose the best way forward.

This is fine and you shouldn't be afraid to buy yourself some time to do so.

Think of it this way:

If a mentally unstable person approaches you on the street and tells you he's John F. Kennedy, you're unlikely to set him straight.

When you find yourself with a co-worker who is engaged in similarly derailed thinking, sometimes it's best to just smile and nod.

If you're going to have to straighten him out, it's better to give yourself some time to plan the best way to go about it.

5. They Establish Boundaries

This is the area where most people tend to sell themselves short.

They feel like because they work or live with someone, they have no way to control the chaos.
This couldn't be further from the truth.

Once you've found your way to rise above a person, you'll begin to find his or her behavior more predictable and easier to understand.

This will equip you to think rationally about when and where you have to put up with toxic people and when you don't.

For example, even if you work with someone closely on a project team, that doesn't mean that you need to have the same level of one-on-one interaction with this person that you have with other team members.

You can establish a boundary, but you'll have to do so consciously and proactively.

If you let things happen naturally, you are bound to find yourself constantly embroiled in difficult conversations.
If you set boundaries and decide when and where you'll engage a difficult person, you can control much of the chaos.

The only trick is to stick to your guns and keep boundaries in place when the person tries to encroach upon them, which will inevitably happen.

6. They Won't Let Anyone Limit Their Joy

When your sense of pleasure and satisfaction are derived from the opinions of other people, you are no longer the master of your own happiness.

When emotionally intelligent people feel good about something that they've done, they won't let anyone's opinions or snide remarks take that away from them.

While it's impossible to turn off your reactions to what others think of you, you don't have to compare yourself to others, and you can always take people's opinions with a grain of salt.

That way, no matter what toxic people are thinking or doing, your self-worth comes from within.

Regardless of what people think of you at any particular moment, one thing is certain - you're never as good or as bad as they say you are.

7. They Don't Focus on Problems - Only Solutions

Where you focus your attention determines your emotional state.

When you fixate on the problems you're facing, you create and prolong negative emotions and stress.

When you focus on actions to better yourself and your circumstances, you create a sense of personal efficacy that produces positive emotions and reduces stress.

When it comes to toxic people, fixating on how crazy and difficult they are gives them power over you.
Quit thinking about how troubling your difficult person is, and focus instead on how you're going to go about handling him.

This makes you more effective by putting you in control, and it will reduce the amount of stress you experience when interacting with them.

8. They Don't Forget

Emotionally intelligent people are quick to forgive, but that doesn't mean they forget.

Forgiveness requires letting go of what's happened so that you can move on.
It doesn't mean you'll give a wrongdoer another chance.

Successful people are unwilling to be bogged down unnecessarily by others' mistakes, so they let them go quickly and are assertive in protecting themselves from future harm.

9. They Squash Negative Self-talk

Sometimes you absorb the negativity of other people.

There's nothing wrong with feeling bad about how someone is treating you, but your self-talk (the thoughts you have about your feelings) can either intensify the negativity or help you move past it.

Negative self-talk is unrealistic, unnecessary, and self-defeating.
It sends you into a downward emotional spiral that is difficult to pull out of.

You should avoid negative self-talk at all costs.

10. They Limit Their Caffeine Intake

Drinking caffeine triggers the release of adrenaline.

Adrenaline is the source of the fight-or-flight response, a survival mechanism that forces you to stand up and fight or run for the hills when faced with a threat.

The fight-or-flight mechanism sidesteps rational thinking in favor of a faster response.
This is great when a bear is chasing you, but not so great when you're surprised in the hallway by an angry co-worker.

11. They Get Some Sleep

I've beaten this one to death over the years and can't say enough about the importance of sleep to increasing your emotional intelligence and managing your stress levels.

When you sleep, your brain literally recharges, shuffling through the day's memories and storing or discarding them (which causes dreams), so that you wake up alert and clear-headed.

Your self-control, attention, and memory are all reduced when you don't get enough - or the right kind - of sleep.
Sleep deprivation raises stress hormone levels on its own, even without a stressor present.

A good night's sleep makes you more positive, creative, and proactive in your approach to toxic people, giving you the perspective you need to deal effectively with them.

12. They Use Their Support System

It's tempting, yet entirely ineffective, to attempt tackling everything by yourself.

To deal with toxic people, you need to recognize the weaknesses in your approach to them.
This means tapping into your support system to gain perspective on a challenging person.

We all have someone at work and/or outside work who is on our team, rooting for us, and ready to help us make the best of a difficult situation.

Identify these individuals in your life and make an effort to seek their insight and assistance when you need it.
Something as simple as explaining the situation can lead to a new perspective.

Most of the time, other people can see a solution that you can't, because they are not as emotionally invested in the situation.

Bringing it All Together

Before you get this system to work brilliantly, you're going to have to pass some tests.

Most of the time, you will find yourself tested by touchy interactions with problem people.
Thankfully, the plasticity of the brain allows it to mold and change as you practice new behaviors, even when you fail.

Implementing these healthy, stress-relieving techniques for dealing with difficult people will train your brain to handle stress more effectively and decrease the likelihood of ill effects.
 
The Lesson Offered By...
The Dark Ones


There are those on our world that have lived in, and ruled through darkness.
These "dark ones" have a sunken so low (frequency) that their hearts cannot perceive the love and light that is washing over the planet right now.

It would be so easy to fear and condemn them, but I am here to suggest a higher perspective and a higher way.

The Negative Path

Until recently the frequency of the collective consciousness of humanity has been dropping lower and lower and manifesting a darker and darker reality.

There are many people on our world (incarnate souls) right now that are on a negative path.
They are manifesting hatred and fear and feel very justified in doing so.

These people fall into two broad categories:
  • those that have become mesmerized by their ability to control others and the false sense of power and self-importance that it gives them

  • those that feel wronged by those that are controlling and dominating them and who feel justified in lashing out and hurting others
In this atmosphere, it would take a lot of wisdom for the rest of us not to react with fear and judgment.

Unfortunately, wisdom is still in relatively short supply and the state of our world sadly reflects this.


The earth and humanity are currently in the mid-stages of a massive shift of consciousness, this shift is being orchestrated by the Universe, and we are nearing the tipping point where the light will illuminate all the dark corners of Humanity.

The "dark ones" know that a momentous change is imminent, and they are scared.

Even thou their hearts cannot feel it, their minds can see the changes occurring in humanity, and they are afraid it may end their way of life.

Their fear is understandable because if they don't change they won't transition to 5th-dimensional earth with the rest of us, and the probable timelines for 3D earth are very bleak indeed.

Labels, Definitions, and Illusions

Labeling the people on a negative path as the "dark ones" is a bit overdramatic, even judgmental sounding.

Please forgive me, I did this to get your attention.
Perhaps the term the "lost ones" would be better, but that isn't exactly right either.

Those on a negative path are souls just as we all are.
They incarnated in a physical body and dove into the earth game for the same reasons as we did - to know and grow through concrete physical experience.

Our souls are much wiser and loving than what gets expressed by us here on in the physical plane on Earth - our minds and egos get in the way.
And your soul is an aspect of an even higher-self (christ-self/god-self) who is very wise, knowledgeable, and loving.

As part of the balanced evolution of our souls, we have all played both "dark" and "light" roles in our many lives...

There aren't any souls who haven't explored the dark side to some extent.
It's only here in the physical planes where we play and get dirty.

Remember that the YOU here playing in the dirt (on Earth) isn't the real you, the REAL YOU is your soul and higher-self.

The point here is there really aren't any "bad" people.
That's just a label we use, and a definition the we hold, because of our limited perspective.

Some souls CHOSE to hold power over and control others in the design of their life plan, others have just LOST THEIR WAY in this life.
Those that chose to control others did so as a learning experience for themselves and for others.

For themselves it's an opportunity to learn about the misuse of power, for the others, it's an opportunity to learn about the not giving away one's power.
It is also an opportunity to explore how we will respond to negative people and events and learn about the effectiveness of the various modes of response.

Will we respond with fear, judgment, and retribution or will we respond with understanding, forgiveness, and compassion?
And which works better in the long run?

Remember, we all find our way back to the light eventually, we are all redeemable.
It is the journey from the dark to the light that makes us appreciate what we are - we are the light.

Embracing this higher perspective can free us from the response pattern of fear, condemnation, and retribution and enable us to create a better reality.

Cut Off From The Light

Those on the negative path have had experiences and made choices that have closed their heart to the divine light of their soul and source and cause their ego rule their mind.

They cannot feel the love and light and can't hear the inner voice of their soul and higher self.

They simply do not realize that they are love and light, and hence they live in a world of separation, fear, and hate.

If We Were In Their Shoes

It is very tempting to judge these people but tread very carefully here.

Whether we know it or not, we have all been in similar circumstances, made similar choices, and lost our way down the negative path for a while at some point in our many lives.

It is very easy to judge others choices without understanding the experiences they had that conditioned those choices.

Most believe that if they were in the others shoes they would not have made the same choices.

But this is because we are judging their choices and actions from the context of our own experiences, not theirs.
The reality is that if we had had their experiences, then we would have made the same choices.

Below Seth/Story Waters, as a part of One Self teachings illustrates this point using a Terrorist as the example.

The terrorist exists within the one self.

You would not make different choices than the terrorist.
If we stand in their shoes we would choose the same as they did.

There is only one will that chooses.
The same thing that is making choices within you is making choices in them.

When that which we are goes inside of the conditions that is the terrorist it becomes the perspective of the terrorist.
When we stand in their shoes we choose as they choose.

We are them choosing.

This the realizations of the one self.
This is the realization that you cannot blame another.

That you cannot say they did something that you would have not done.

That you are better than them, you are not, you are them.

Seth via Story Waters

Embracing this truth enables us to extend forgiveness and compassion to all those who have lost their way and offers them the chance to feel and embrace the light, and join us in ascension to the new earth.

No one needs to be left behind, let's try to uplift everyone.

The Challenge for Those Lost in Negativity
  • The first challenge for all those lost in negativity, to all those that have contributed to the fear and hate in our reality, is to be on the receiving end of fear and hate and see the futility of this mindset.

    As the Earth's base frequency approaches the fifth-dimension everyone's manifestations are quickened and anyone sending out fearful, hateful, or harmful thoughts will immediately experience similar and very challenging manifestations in their personal reality.

    This is how our reality works - reality is a reflection of our thoughts and inner state of mind and it is the most marvelous training program.
    This process will nudge most of negative mindset out of the darkness and into the light.
  • The second challenge for those lost in negativity, as they get nudged out of the darkness and begin to realize how their ways have hurt so many others, will be to forgive and love themselves.

    When they realize what they've done the may hate themselves and this will keep them stuck if the lower frequencies.

    But if they can forgive and love themselves, they will be able to join the great planetary transmutation and ascension.
    No one is too dark to be forgiven or too fearful to live in love.
We can help these people into the light; we can help them rediscover their true selves.

By shining our love and light towards them, by extending our forgiveness and compassion to them as they begin to see the light, we can help them get over the hump of forgiving and loving their selves and joining us in the creation of a new reality, a new earth.

The Challenge of Forgiving the "Bad" Guys
  • Can you conceive of unconditional forgiveness and love towards perpetrators and as well as victims?
    This is a very big hurdle for many.

  • Can you imagine a reality in which all those who have ever suffered darkness (negative experiences) which tainted them to become negative themselves, were spontaneously healed of that which created the negativity within them?
  • What if those who have defined themselves as bad were able to release that programming and accept the light of unconditional love so that they could unconditionally forgive and accept themselves?

  • Then, would they remember that they are ONE with ALL life?

  • What if all of humanity was healed in the light, and all the darkness was released?
  • What if we could release our perception of separateness from others and our judgments that some people are inherently better than others - the idea of "good" people versus "bad" people?

  • What if the "good people" realized that they are just the people who have remembered their higher-self and that the source of their beingness is light and love?

  • What if they shared their light and love with ALL the people that have formerly identified as bad?
By shining our light and love everywhere and to everyone those who have not seen the light or felt the love of their higher-self will have the opportunity to absorb our light and awareness and raise their frequency and join us in the light and the ascension to the new earth.

No one has to be left behind, we are all brothers, we are all one.

Those lost in negativity may not be ready to accept the light and release their darkness but why not offer our help to them?
Why condemn and fear them?

Their souls are right beside us in the higher planes of reality, and we are all brothers - there is no animosity between us there.

We have the ability to create a wonderful new reality with our unconditional love, unconditional forgiveness, and the power of our light.

Our choices will define our destiny, are we ready to choose compassion and forgiveness instead of fear and judgment?
 
Great list!

Methods of Deception
A List of Common Pitfalls Encountered by Truthseekers

energy-vortex.png


Some paths are more circuitous and painful than others.
Knowing what to watch for can save you lots of unnecessary trouble.

This comes down to matching enthusiasm with discernment and seeking out the wisdom needed to navigate a clear path.

Here is a list of pitfalls I have encountered on my path to higher understanding:

1.) Accurate prophecies are no guarantee of positive intent.

Deceptive sources may make successful predictions solely to win blind devotion, induce feelings of doom, or create self-fulfilling prophecies.

When positive sources give prophecies, they respect freewill and present probabilities without macabre coloring or undue fatalism.

2.) That a body of material contains identifiable truths does not necessarily make it valid.

Deceptive sources may pile a heap of lies upon an otherwise factual basis, while the sloppier cases simply slap together fragments of existing material.

In contrast, positive material is always more than the sum of its parts and presents extra information that is novel, practical, and verifiable.

3.) Preoccupation with lower truths can distract from the pursuit of higher truths.

For instance, obsession with exposing political corruption can distract from gaining necessary spiritual empowerment, which is a popular tactic employed by hyperdimensional entities and their human agents.

Positive sources prioritize by framing lower truths in their higher context.

4.) Just because something contains convoluted trivia, complex jargon, and voluminous pages, it does not necessarily contain profound truths.

The illusion of profundity sends people on a wild goose chase for grand truths better found elsewhere.

Positive sources are complex only for the sake of accuracy and conciseness.

5.) The alternative to a fallacious belief system may not always be a better alternative.
Rejecting something and seeking its diametric opposite could simply be going from self-deception to self-destruction.

Positive sources do not subscribe to this mechanical binary thinking and instead present balanced solutions that transcend such false dichotomies.

6.) Deceptive sources win allegiance by stroking the ego and playing upon insecurities.

We are all special and here for a reason, but these dark forces diminish humility and cater to self-importance by assigning one grandiose titles, messianic roles, and outlandish past life histories.

Positive sources help you achieve a humble understanding of your place in the universe without exalting or repressing who you truly are.

7.) Sometimes an action toward balance can overshoot equilibrium and become a new type of imbalance.

For instance, removing harmful contaminants from your diet can bring a healthier balance, but removing too many foods without proper substitutes can lead to nutritional deficiency.

To avoid this trap, corrective actions must always be gauged relative to equilibrium.

8.) The right method for the wrong person can give detrimental results.
For example, the Fourth Way methodology aims to grow souls within those who have none; if people who need soul awakening rather than soul growth limit themselves to such a system, they will assume they are less than they truly are and spiritually suffocate.

By knowing yourself, you will know what is right for you [by Fourth Way, I mean the system of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky, which is incomplete and skewed.

For a more balanced and complete treatment, see the system outlined by Boris Mouravieff in Gnosis]

9.) Gifts are not always given with sincerity.

Alien abductees are frequently given psychic powers and even healing abilities, but to the aliens these are worthless trinkets they don’t mind trading for spiritual and biological ownershipover the abductee.

Gifts are only sincere when given unconditionally and selflessly.

10.) Being under attack is not always a sign of being on the right path.

Attacks can sometimes serve as false confirmation in order to cattle-prod the paranoid into clutching more tightly onto their deceptive belief system, such as devout Catholics receiving demonic attacks because they are easily herded this way and fed upon.

For those on the right track, attacks are far more sophisticated; they seek to undermine faith and pressure one into committing self-sabotage.

11.) Astral deceivers often impersonate impressive characters such as historical figures, ascended masters, archangels, Jesus, or aliens.

They do this in order to form a parasitical bond with those who believe this deception, and they go to great lengths to build up their characters.

Material should always be evaluated on its content, not its source, and deceptive sources will give cunningly flawed or empty material regardless of their self-proclaimed credentials.

12.) Noble intentions can be diverted onto quixotic endeavors.

Those with good hearts can, due to a lack of knowledge or ungrounded idealism, be led onto a primrose path demanding much time, energy, and resources in order to keep them spinning their wheels thinking they are making a difference when in the big picture their talents could be better applied elsewhere.

Discernment requires not letting subjectivity and wishful thinking mask the warning signs that one is pursuing an inefficient path.

13.) Group consensus is a double edged sword.

While conferment and agreement between multiple individuals lowers the risk of personal bias, if the entire group can be entrained into agreeing upon a false idea, then any individual dissenting on the side of truth will be rebuffed on the rationalization that an individual is far more likely to be wrong than an entire group.

Personal communion with one’s heart and mind should always take precedence over group consensus because the truth is within.


14.) Anything good can be shown in a bad light; anything bad can be shown in a good light.

By taking the best promises of a deceptive path and comparing it to the worst risks of a productive path, the deceptive path may falsely seem like the optimal choice.

Only by examining the totality of each option can one make an informed choice.

15.) That a method or system “just works” and produces visible results is no guarantee that the system is ultimately beneficial.

What results you see may be matched by greater amounts of detriment you cannot see, which is especially true of systems that emphasize substituting technology, ritual, or formula for spiritual practice, self-determination, and discovery.

The best one can do is consider the benefits but hunt for the potential shortcomings of a system and guard against them.

16.) Deception seeks to emulate truth as closely as possible while propagating just the opposite.

It shares the superficial characteristics of a positive source and hopes the target audience does not look past the shallow mimicry.

Ultimately, something always tends to feel “off” about these sources despite surface appearances indicating nothing out of the ordinary; once intuition alerts you, it is the job of reason to help you zero in on the problem.
 
Last edited:
Fascinating!
(This lady lives about 20 mins from me)



Talking To Bees • Piping The Queen


Join us for a spiritual journey into mother nature's process of genesis, the adventures of beekeeper & New York Times Bestselling Author Susan Chernak McElroy and professional Animal communicator and Intuitive Jane de Forest continue.

Sans bee suit protection, and armed only with a "zen" mindset & musical instruments ....
Susan & Jane use the ancient Egyptian technique of "piping the queen" or calling a newly birthed swarm with sound resonance into a new home.

In their fascinating experiment, watch as Susan & Jane enchant a wild 20,000 bee swarm down from a
30 foot tree and scoop them bare handed into their waiting hive.
Enjoy.

www.susanchernakmcelroy.net
www.janesinspiration.com

Thank you to Gene Kritsky, PhD in Entomology, a Fulbright Scholar & Chair of Biology at Mount St. Joseph University. who's research in Egyptological history, and archaeology inspired Jane.
 
28280048_1782616058455703_687780462035685056_n.jpg


28167231_1782552585128717_2829608364299261827_n.jpg


 
28276447_1754674491251591_1214156483627615424_n.jpg
 


Even This Shall Pass Away

4126975757_aefe69de98.jpg

by Theodore Tilton

Once in Persia reigned a king,
Who upon his signet ring
Graved a maxim true and wise,
Which, if held before his eyes,
Gave him counsel at a glance
Fit for every change and chance.
Solemn words, and these are they;
“Even this shall pass away.”

Trains of camels through the sand
Brought him gems from Samarcand;
Fleets of galleys through the seas
Brought him pearls to match with these;
But he counted not his gain
Treasures of the mine or main;
“What is wealth?” the king would say;
“Even this shall pass away.”

‘Mid the revels of his court,
At the zenith of his sport,
When the palms of all his guests
Burned with clapping at his jests,
He, amid his figs and wine,
Cried, “O loving friends of mine;
Pleasures come, but do not stay;
‘Even this shall pass away.’”

Lady, fairest ever seen,
Was the bride he crowned the queen.
Pillowed on his marriage bed,
Softly to his soul he said:
“Though no bridegroom ever pressed
Fairer bossom to his breast,
Mortal flesh must come to clay –
Even this shall pass away.”

Fighting on a furious field,
Once a javelin pierced his shield;
Soldiers, with a loud lament,
Bore him bleeding to his tent.
Groaning from his tortured side,
“Pain is hard to bear,” he cried;
“But with patience, day by day,
Even this shall pass away.”

Towering in the public square,
Twenty cubits in the air,
Rose his statue, carved in stone.
Then the king, disguised, unknown,
Stood before his sculptured name,
Musing meekly: “What is fame?
Fame is but a slow decay;
Even this shall pass away.”

Struck with palsy, sore and old,
Waiting at the Gates of Gold,
Said he with his dying breath,
“Life is done, but what is Death?”
Then, in answer to the king,
Fell a sunbeam on his ring,
Showing by a heavenly ray,
“Even this shall pass away.”​
 
This is an interpretation I find interesting.
Enjoy!


28279733_10155978461641093_7437057274624600591_n.jpg


The meaning behind this ancient symbolism.
It’s symbolic of the duality of life.
Good and bad.

Our free will and intentions.
Our higher loving thoughts versus our lower evil thoughts.
Balance.

This is what these people knew and understood before the church personified evil and gave it the name Lucifer.
This was borrowed from a pagan concept.
It’s been used to keep people living in fear of going to a bad place if they don’t behave; to keep them subservient, in submission.

Man is symbolic of the beast and our lower physical and spiritual expression of all that is bad.
The Bible says man’s number is 666.
This is because ancients knew then that man was made of carbon.

Carbon is 6 on the periodic table.
6 protons 6 neutrons 6 electrons.
Lucifer is symbolic of man, the beast, and 666 is a literal interpretation regarding our physical makeup.

Lucifer is known as the bright morning star; Jesus too is referred to as the bright morning star in Revelations.
[ Rev. 22-16 “I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches.
I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star,”]

They key is balance.
Both were Gods creations and it’s the polarity that provides the balance, the free will to act upon good or evil.
The entire story is symbolic.

Man has simply convoluted things over the years with his tweaks and remakes
which is why all of the most famous saviors share so many things in common.
Horus, Mithras, Osiris, Atticus, Krishna, etc.​
 
28276391_175928816379791_6620501031060914247_n.jpg
 



by Amos M. Ginsberg

Amos M. Gunsberg
is a psychotherapist and trainer of psychotherapists in New York City since 1950.
He is a founder of the School for Quality Being.
His address is 61 West 74th St., New York, N.Y. 10023-2433 USA.
E-mail: clubking@ix.netcom.com
This article first appeared in PsychNews International, Volume 2, Issue 5. Reprinted with permission.
To subscribe to PsychNews, send the following command to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU in the BODY of e-mail:
SUBSCRIBE Psychnews yourfirstname yourlastname
The PsychNews International is currently available on the World Wide Web:
http://www.cmhc.com/pni/



  • We used to call them psychopaths - these creatures that appear on our planet physically in human form, but are not human beings.

  • We noted they are amoral. That should have given us a clue.

  • We noted they do not FEEL feelings. That should have instructed us.

  • We noted they are heartless. That should have set off the alarm.

  • These creatures lack elements which distinguish the human being.

  • They exhibit no connection with, no understanding of what we call "morality," "honesty," "decency," "fair play," etc.

  • They lack the faculty we call empathy.

  • They lack the faculty we call introspection.
Mankind has spent centuries trying to make sense of these creatures as some form of human being.
All in vain.

Not only in vain, but at enormous on-going cost to our civilization.
These creatures are not human beings gone wrong.

They are a different species... dedicated to the murder of human values... as a prelude to the murder of human beings... e.g., the tactics used by Nazis, past and present.

They laugh at us.

They say:

"No one understands us. People can't put themselves in the minds of men who act without a conscience. They try to understand, but they can't."

These creatures do not THINK human.
They do not SPEAK human.

They do not know what it is to BE human.

We classify them as "humanoid."

Yes, they have human form.
If we manage to resist their onslaught long enough, we will eventually develop technical scanning equipment which will measure how different they are from human beings, despite their similarity of form.

In the meantime, the quality of our lives... and often our very lives... depends on our recognizing these creatures for what they are, and taking steps to neutralize their attempts to destroy us.

EVIDENCE OF HUMANOID BEHAVIOR

They make pronouncements without substantiation.
To them, these pronouncements represent what reality is... pronouncement by pronouncement.

The present pronouncement may contradict what they said a moment ago.
This means nothing to them.

They make no attempt to deal with the contradiction.

They demonstrate a total lack of understanding what we mean by a "fact.”
In their writings and in their speech, they do not use that word.

We humans find this hard to believe.
The use of facts is such a basic part of our lives.

We base our conclusions and our actions on them.
We go on from there to test things and establish more facts.

When we debate, we present facts, and show how we derive our observations and our positions from them.

Without facts, all we have is what we call "fantasy."

Since these creatures have a human appearance, we assume they must think like us... be aware of what we are aware.
We think they MUST know what facts are.

When they don't address the facts, we say they are playing a game.
We think they do know what the facts are, but don't want to admit it.

Not so!
They DON'T know what a fact is.

When we speak of facts and ask them to address the facts, they look at us with vacant eyes.
They don't know what we're talking about.

They study us because their strategy is to pass as human.
They hear us use the words -- facts, evidence, substantiation.

They lack the human capacity to understand what we mean.
What they do is ignore our reference to facts, ignore our requests for them to supply facts, and hope we won't notice it's due to their lack of comprehension.

Let's look at examples of what THEY use for what WE mean by "facts."

- The Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (AAGT) held an open conference at which three "master" therapists worked with three volunteers. Dr. Jeffrey A. Schaler published a critique entitled "BAD THERAPY" in which he cited examples not only of bad therapy, but also of systematic abuse of a volunteer by the "master" therapist. (The Interpsych Newsletter, Vol 2, Issue 9, Nov 95.)

On their official Internet mail list (aagt@netride.com), members of the Association launched an attack on Dr. Schaler, culminating in their adoption of the slogan: "Saving Gestalt Therapy from Jeff Schaler," used as the subject line in a discussion thread.

Under this heading they "SAVED" Gestalt therapy by sending in e-mails labeling Jeff Schaler as "arrogant, snide, hair-splitting, nit-picking, disturbed, mean- spirited, ranting, self-serving," etc.

When asked how this labeling "SAVED" Gestalt therapy, they ignored the question.
When asked in what way Gestalt therapy was endangered by Jeff Schaler, they ignored the question.

It became clear they thoroughly believed their pronouncements erased not only the evidence presented but also erased Jeff Schaler himself.
They "pronounced" him to be no longer in existence.

For them, whatever they "declare" is what's real.
What WE call reality is not real to them.

THEY "pronounce" what is to be considered real.

- Here's another example. I asked a psychotherapy client to look at a chair which was situated about six feet away near a wall.
I then asked her to describe the chair.

She did, in rather complete detail, except for the legs.
THE CHAIR SHE DESCRIBED HAD NO LEGS!

I pointed this out, and asked how the chair could be suspended in air, with no legs to support it.

She said: "I put it there."

I asked: "If you look away, will it fall to the floor?"

She said: "No. If I look away, the chair is no longer there."

I asked: "If you look away... and it turns out the chair is still there?"

She ignored the question.

- Here's another example.
During a discussion on CD@maelstrom.stjohns.edu earlier this year, the statement was made:

"If enough people believe something to be true, then what they believe is what reality IS."

A question was then asked:

"There was a time when everyone, as far as we know, believed the sun revolved around the earth. Are you saying at that time the sun did, in fact, revolve around the earth... and it was only in obedience to a change in what people believed that the earth came to revolve around the sun?"

The question was ignored.

You might think their refusals to answer constitute an admission... an admission what they are saying is totally outlandish and indefensible.
Experience has shown you would be wrong.

Experience has shown they go right on making the same statements, even after evidence is produced to the contrary.

You see how different these creatures are?
You see how far off their thinking and behavior are from human thinking and behavior?

Nothing of what WE call reality is real to THEM.

I repeat...
Nothing of what we call reality is REAL to them.

When a human being mentions a chair, the reference is to a chair that sits there on its own legs.
It's there whether anyone sees it or not, whether anyone mentions it or not, whether anyone "declares" it to be there or not.

It's there ON ITS OWN.

A basic element in the profile of humanoids is their lack of comprehension that anything exists on its own, separate from their say-so.
They don't SEE it.

The only objects humanoids see are the ones they "declare"... the ones they imagine.

We use the phrase "my perception" to mean an appraisal, a measurement of something separate from ourselves.
We don't announce it as "fact.”

We are open to consider other views if given facts to consider.

Humanoids use the phrase "my perception" as a buzz word.
They imagine what they choose, and tell us it is their "perception"... which, in their minds, ESTABLISHES reality.

What we call "facts" do not exist for them.
That's why they whine and claim they are being attacked whenever substantiation is requested.

Humanoids claim their statements are valid simply because they make them!!!

They elaborate on this:

"I honor integrity in this regard. As an egoist, I make statements which are valid to me. Validity to my 'self' comes first. I grant other people this same respect assuming they say things valid to themselves."

Among human beings, for something to be deemed valid it has to be substantiated with facts.
Nothing is valid simply because someone says it.

When humanoids are asked how they determine what someone says is valid to that person, and not something made up or imagined, they ignore the question.

Note the strange use of the word "integrity.”
Humans define integrity as uprightness of character; probity; honesty.

We refer to sticking to the facts, sticking to the truth, not selling out.
Humanoids use "integrity" to mean insisting what they imagine is what's real.

No measurement.
No evaluation.

When the demand is made for their pronouncements to be evaluated, they claim the confronter is the one who has no integrity... meaning the confronter is not upholding THEIR position: what THEY imagine is what's real.

On what basis do they claim this?

Humanoids treat the world as if it were their own private VR simulation.
They "declare" things into being.

Everything is a hologram.
They program the holograms.

They interact with them in any way they choose.
They have them under total control.

When they decide to cancel a hologram, it vanishes.

A hologram is a hologram is a hologram.
A hologram is not supposed to have the ability to think for itself.

A hologram is not supposed to have the ability to measure, evaluate, appraise, etc.
Most importantly, a hologram is not supposed to be able to break out of its holographic state and critique its master.

When this does happen, they first chastise it to bring it back into line.
If that doesn't work, they "vanish" it.

When that fails, they run for cover by abandoning the program and calling up another one.

Experience has shown no matter what we say, no matter what we point out, no matter how much evidence is given, it has no meaning for these creatures.

They have one goal: to fool us into classifying them as human so they can concentrate on murdering our human values.
Without human values, the next step is murdering human beings.

In the film "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers," aliens are shown to be taking over by occupying the bodies of human beings.

The aliens take over not only the physical body but also the mind, memories, abilities, etc.
In every way the people seem to be the same as always, except for one thing.

They mention events, but with no feeling of them or about them.
THEY DO NOT FEEL FEELINGS.

We see a child struggling to get away from what appears to be its mother.
The next day they walk hand-in-hand.

The child has been taken over.


The lovers in the film try to stay awake so they won't be taken over.
She succumbs... and "she," now a creature, tries to fool him.

When she doesn't fool him, she tries to betray him.

These creatures do not FEEL alive.
They do not FEEL feelings.

In order to pass as humans, they know they have to give the appearance of knowing they are alive.
Their only recourse is to DECLARE they are alive.

The declaration does not produce the quality of FEELING alive.
They still don't FEEL feelings.

The only thing they have to go on, to refer to, is their own declaration.
If "declaring" is shown to be insufficient... if they are called upon to discuss feelings, give evidence of feelings, distinguish between feelings, etc., they are lost.

Their inner emptiness is apparent.
Their un-human status is exposed.

Here's a final example.

In the course of a discussion on psych-ci@maelstrom.stjohns.edu some time ago, a humanoid said:

"You hurt my feelings."

The humanoid was asked to identify the exact statements, and explain in what way these statements caused hurt to what particular feelings.

Answer: (Whining)

"I've said you hurt my feelings. I don't know what else to say... You are attacking."

Question:

"In what way do you a consider a request for substantiation and clarification to be an attack?"

No answer.

AN OVERVIEW

Humanoids:
  1. Make pronouncements without substantiation. These pronouncements are to be accepted as defining what reality is... moment by moment.

  2. Ignore requests to provide the basis for their pronouncements.

  3. Sneer at the human valuing of facts, honesty, decency, fair play.

  4. Applaud the use of lies, deceit, etc.

  5. Whine they are being "attacked" whenever they are questioned. Give no explanation of what the "attack" is or of what is being attacked.

  6. Do not FEEL feelings.

  7. View the world as their private holodeck.

  8. Apply themselves to keeping humans in their place - namely, insignificance.
FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Humanoids do not understand the distinction we humans make between good and evil.
When they harm us, they do not understand why we call them evil.

They do not understand why we have laws against murder.
Their approach is to boast, even moralize over their victims.

Since they do not understand the reason for such laws, they argue they cannot be held accountable for their actions.
Not so.

While they take the position the law does not apply to them, they do know the law was enacted to apply to everyone.

Furthermore, if they try to claim they didn't know there was such a law, we respond with a firmly established principle:

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse."

When they use those arguments, they make it clear they will continue to operate in accordance with their structure.

We may look for remorse (a human capacity).
We find none.

They do not think of themselves as promulgating evil.
They are simply doing what it is in their structure to do.

The rattlesnake does not think of itself as evil when it injects poison.
It is simply doing what it is in its structure to do.

Experience has shown humanoids continue to behave in the ways of their species... murdering human values as a prelude to murdering human beings. Nazis demonstrate this graphically.

The issue as to whether to hold them "accountable," in our human sense of the word, has to be divided into two parts.
We do not hold them accountable for BEING what they are.

We do hold them accountable for the damage they DO.

When a dog gets rabies, we don't hold the dog accountable for becoming rabid.
What we do, as a matter of self-protection, is put the dog down BEFORE it bites us, BEFORE it infects us.

We do not hold the rattlesnake accountable for HAVING poison fangs.
What we do, as a matter of self-protection, is kill the rattlesnake BEFORE it kills us.

So with the humanoid.

We need to be on our guard at the first sign of a murder of human values.
 
Last edited:
huntley8_top1.gif


multiple-dimensions-2.jpg


by Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

The subject of dimensions can be confusing for numerous reasons:

1) dimensions not only refer to anything to do with size, but also scope, and attributes

2) they are fundamental to existence and anything more basic than our material level of observation is difficult to know about

3) dimensions are used as a mathematical and geometrical way of expressing higher space

4) they are used (differently) with great freedom in the New-Age field, generally without having much idea what they mean

5) the different methodology used between the academic system (point 3 above) and the New Age (point 4 above) in setting up dimensions can be confusing

6) finally, dimensions not only frame spacetime but frame consciousness. This latter point is the aspect of dimensions we are interested in

Firstly, it is important to note that academically there is only acceptance of a 3D external world - what we refer to as the material world.
With this very limiting belief system, dimensions have reduced applications apart from expressing the structure of 3D, provide a 'vehicle' for time (4D) and of course all the mathematical contrivances in the micro-dimensions of string theories.

However, with a proper recognition of the nature of consciousness, which is grossly absent in current science, dimensions take on a whole new meaning - this is what we are interested in.

Most people might ask, why do we need dimensions?
What's wrong with just an environment of one type of space?

Science would give one answer to this and those that go beyond our materialistic science would give another.
Nevertheless one should be familiar with the academic geometric method of defining dimensions before going further.

This is covered briefly in the next paragraph.

An infinitesimally thin straight line gives us our first dimension.
We can take this line and move it at right angles to itself and trace out a surface to obtain 2D.

We then move this surface at right angles to each of its two dimensions, 1 and 2, to trace out 3D.
We now have a volume or solid, say, a cube.

This is as far as our perception will go, since we now have to imagine moving the cube (kind of expanding) at right angles to each of its three dimensions. (Note that when we say 2D or 3D we automatically include the lower ones within it - we might say third dimension but we are including two and one unless we specifically state the third-dimensional direction.)

Now each higher dimension is infinity over each adjacent lower one - an infinite number of infinitesimally thin lines will fit into the surface, and an infinite number of infinitesimally thin surfaces will fit into a 3D structure, etc.

Thus there are vast spatial increments in these geometric dimensions.

Now according to the scientific viewpoint, since we have a body and perception that are 3D oriented we can only operate in 3D space, and there is no awareness of different attributes of the dimensions relating to particular focuses of consciousness, which are expressed in frequencies.

This is the current state of education.

Let us bridge the gap between this immensely limiting viewpoint and the real meaning of dimensions by indicating that some quantum physicists and others are moving quantum theory in the direction of the presence of a unified field of energy that is being referred to as all consciousness - minute units or particles, billions of times smaller than subatomic particles.

In fact this unified field gives us a beginning for the more pertinent analysis of dimensions and their real meaning.

On the basis of the unified field of consciousness everything is the product of patterns of these consciousness units - the units cohere to form waves and the waves form structures.

This means dimensions are structures of consciousness.
Consciousness forms frameworks/dimensions for its own organization and qualification.

By creating different kinds of guide lines and formatting for itself it can explore its infinite potential.
The dimensions can even be designed so that large limitations are imposed on consciousness, enabling it to explore evolutionary probabilities and play out the details.

These arenas clearly contain space and time, but this system is quite different from the mathematical and inflexible academic method of dimensions.

Thus although consciousness (the unified field) is divided up in this manner and isolated linearly, it is nevertheless integrated with intrinsic configurations, nonlinearly.

For example, using our standard model as an analogy, the company organization, the groundfloor workers are apparently isolated (linearly) but through the managers, executives and president, they are integrated (nonlinearly).

In effect, higher dimensions always embrace the lower ones.

Since these dimensions set a template for consciousness and consciousness' personalities, then the nature of this dimensional environment is to reflect back or mirror the personality.

Thus the external mirrors the internal.
Let us take a look at some of the characteristics of our dimensions.

Our present manifestation of consciousness is such that we perceive 3D structures and think in 3D.
Although numerous dimensions are needed to explore consciousness they are nevertheless interdependent and interrelated, as stated above.

The structure of 3D gives us stable forms by means of the principles of counteraction, polarities and standing waves.
Moreover, the property (purpose) of 3D is to 'expand' out the inner-multidimensional and nonlinear aspects of consciousness into a spatial volume in which no two particles can occupy the same space.

And along with a time component from 4D, 3D enables us to learn cause and effect; to have time, and focus, to observe consequences of actions; to perceive isolated details vividly.

This extreme property of separation in 3D works with the merging and unifying traits of 4D which can penetrate and integrate the third dimension and go beyond it.

But the basic 3D gives separation of particles, out-of-phase energies and non-resonant frequencies.
In particular it encourages opposites and the 'ability' not to perceive another's viewpoint or suffering.

This rather severe characteristic is available for exploration if an individual's freewill selects it.
Also these dimensions encourage understanding by means of logic (though 3D logic only).

For this logical condition to dominate, the fifth dimension of mental and structural attributes is the main cause when 4D is essentially being bypassed (emotions, intuition and imagination).

Our present educational system is moving us in this direction.

Note that one can't blame the dimensions: one tunes to the dimensional level corresponding to one's consciousness, which becomes one's reality.
These dimensions are different frequency spectrums, ranging from low frequencies (rates of vibration of energies) to high, throughout each dimension and continuing into the next higher one.

Frequency spectrums
not only give us the whole field of radiant energy but also structures since everything is made up of patterns of frequencies (oscillating energy which when played against itself, forms standing waves and stable structures).

Thus we shall see that this new physics system of presenting dimensions is not just quantitative but also qualitative.

Now within the third dimension we have dimensions 1 and 2.
What part could they play?

It is easy for the reader to lose the purpose of these steps here since one's mind will automatically keep reverting to the context of our already heavily-formatted consciousness.

As an analogy, a consciousness that is molded into the shape of an X can't have knowledge of that X since this condition is the basis by which other patterns within this are judged.

For example, if the X was inside a sphere (representing consciousness) then the sphere can measure and know the cross relative to itself, the sphere.
If consciousness is being a state (dramatizing it, formatted by it) and this state is the basic one in its dimensions and existence, it can't observe it.

This would also apply at the highest level - Source.
To know itself it must project out its characteristics and separate them out to understand what it is.

As a consequence of this difficulty, let us risk a ludicrously simple and hugely limited analogy to bring the reader back to - if only in imagination - this fundamental format of consciousness (Source level) which hasn't yet got itself organized, so to speak.

This state must be multidimensional and beyond spacetime and we shall simulate this with the idea of superimposing many colors (like mixing paint) so that each color is spread throughout the whole.

With paints, this would be a muddy brown; with the rainbow colors of light it would be white light.

We now imagine this Source of all colors, each color uniformly distributed throughout the whole (Source), projects out individual colors, say, red is now focused (from being merged with the whole) to a spot.

In fact, one could imagine using a prism to split up the colors individually.
We can now have patterns of different colored spots, which have been separated out from Source, representing different phenomena.

The idea is that this enables the Source to understand its nature---what its potential is.

Consciousness thus constructs dimensions/frameworks which then feed back and draw out of that consciousness its many potential attributes to be experienced - structurally requalifying the Source which is then forever becoming in this manner. (Note that dimensions have been distorted to trap humans in the lowest ranges.)

To some degree, dimensions are personally rendered and form part of the individual's so-called hologram, giving their reality.

Returning to the evaluation of dimensions, we need dimensions 1 and 2 to provide smaller partitions within sequences for beginnings and endings; for cycles of activity structured from simple 'starts', 'changes', and 'stops’.

Without cycles there can be no existence of our kind.
Fundamental consciousness has no familiarity with sequence.

It must be programmed to provide the steps to explore itself - and to provide a form of evolution or ascension.

Now whereas the frequencies (energies) of the first three dimensions together encourage polarity, separation and ego, the fourth dimension provides a frequency spectrum for emotions, which are more holistic.

The fourth dimension emphasizes unity
, bringing together the separate parts, and creating a continuous flowing condition, enabling the energies to smoothly flow through the dimensions.

The cycles of action of dimensions 1 and 2 played out in 3D will complete more easily without stuck flows and without areas of energy hung up in time.

As we ascend into (focus on) the 4D frequency bands, physical movement becomes easier.
We learn how to use the energy field system around the joints rather than applying excessive muscular effort (see articles on mobility and fractal matrix, etc.).

There is a removal of mental blocks and an expansion of imagination - right-brain consciousness begins to assert itself.
One can project consciousness into all points of view simultaneously, preventing all conflict, and a greater balance is achieved in body, mind and spirit.

The fifth dimension relates to the mental attributes; is structural in nature but going beyond 3D structures.
It will work with 4D to clarify and give control to the emotions, aiding the projection of emotions into higher intuitive states and knowingness beyond simple logic and objectivity, which only gives representational knowledge.

One will find that the considered total number of dimensions varies greatly from one source to another.
The renowned philosopher Ouspenski theorized that the number of dimensions of our universe was six, but note that this is the mathematical/academic system of purely quantitative spatial dimensions.

In modern physics, string theories have 11 dimensions, however, these are minute dimensions of curled up micro-space and have no relationship with our above macro, qualitative dimensions.

Some channeling refer to more than 20 dimensions and other sources up to 60 or so - these are the qualitative type.
One system given, is that our full time/energy matrix has 15 dimensions - 5 universes of 3 dimensions each, first harmonic universe has D1, D2, D3, second harmonic universe has D4, D5, D6, etc. and each dimension divides into 12 sub-frequencies.
(Note the notation here: D1, D2, D3 indicate the separate dimensions but 3D embraces all three, etc.)

Now we perceive 3D as solid but when focused in higher dimensions these dimensions will also appear solid, though with greater flexibility, such as in teleportation capabilities.

In fact as we go up the dimensions, as the frequencies increase and there is increase in integration and harmonic energies, the probabilities available for selection and experience becomes greater with accompanying greater range of perceptions.

Space increases as with the academic system but because of the qualitative aspects it is more abstract, more part of the mind and consciousness and can be manipulated.

There is greater freedom of choice, more variety and possibilities; the dimensional frameworks are less restrictive as the responsibility grows.
 
I'm fine.jpg
 


by Amos M. Ginsberg

Amos M. Gunsberg
is a psychotherapist and trainer of psychotherapists in New York City since 1950.
He is a founder of the School for Quality Being.
His address is 61 West 74th St., New York, N.Y. 10023-2433 USA.
E-mail: clubking@ix.netcom.com
This article first appeared in PsychNews International, Volume 2, Issue 5. Reprinted with permission.
To subscribe to PsychNews, send the following command to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU in the BODY of e-mail:
SUBSCRIBE Psychnews yourfirstname yourlastname
The PsychNews International is currently available on the World Wide Web:
http://www.cmhc.com/pni/



  • We used to call them psychopaths - these creatures that appear on our planet physically in human form, but are not human beings.

  • We noted they are amoral. That should have given us a clue.

  • We noted they do not FEEL feelings. That should have instructed us.

  • We noted they are heartless. That should have set off the alarm.

  • These creatures lack elements which distinguish the human being.

  • They exhibit no connection with, no understanding of what we call "morality," "honesty," "decency," "fair play," etc.

  • They lack the faculty we call empathy.

  • They lack the faculty we call introspection.
Mankind has spent centuries trying to make sense of these creatures as some form of human being.
All in vain.

Not only in vain, but at enormous on-going cost to our civilization.
These creatures are not human beings gone wrong.

They are a different species... dedicated to the murder of human values... as a prelude to the murder of human beings... e.g., the tactics used by Nazis, past and present.

They laugh at us.

They say:

"No one understands us. People can't put themselves in the minds of men who act without a conscience. They try to understand, but they can't."

These creatures do not THINK human.
They do not SPEAK human.

They do not know what it is to BE human.

We classify them as "humanoid."

Yes, they have human form.
If we manage to resist their onslaught long enough, we will eventually develop technical scanning equipment which will measure how different they are from human beings, despite their similarity of form.

In the meantime, the quality of our lives... and often our very lives... depends on our recognizing these creatures for what they are, and taking steps to neutralize their attempts to destroy us.

EVIDENCE OF HUMANOID BEHAVIOR

They make pronouncements without substantiation.
To them, these pronouncements represent what reality is... pronouncement by pronouncement.

The present pronouncement may contradict what they said a moment ago.
This means nothing to them.

They make no attempt to deal with the contradiction.

They demonstrate a total lack of understanding what we mean by a "fact.”
In their writings and in their speech, they do not use that word.

We humans find this hard to believe.
The use of facts is such a basic part of our lives.

We base our conclusions and our actions on them.
We go on from there to test things and establish more facts.

When we debate, we present facts, and show how we derive our observations and our positions from them.

Without facts, all we have is what we call "fantasy."

Since these creatures have a human appearance, we assume they must think like us... be aware of what we are aware.
We think they MUST know what facts are.

When they don't address the facts, we say they are playing a game.
We think they do know what the facts are, but don't want to admit it.

Not so!
They DON'T know what a fact is.

When we speak of facts and ask them to address the facts, they look at us with vacant eyes.
They don't know what we're talking about.

They study us because their strategy is to pass as human.
They hear us use the words -- facts, evidence, substantiation.

They lack the human capacity to understand what we mean.
What they do is ignore our reference to facts, ignore our requests for them to supply facts, and hope we won't notice it's due to their lack of comprehension.

Let's look at examples of what THEY use for what WE mean by "facts."

- The Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (AAGT) held an open conference at which three "master" therapists worked with three volunteers. Dr. Jeffrey A. Schaler published a critique entitled "BAD THERAPY" in which he cited examples not only of bad therapy, but also of systematic abuse of a volunteer by the "master" therapist. (The Interpsych Newsletter, Vol 2, Issue 9, Nov 95.)

On their official Internet mail list (aagt@netride.com), members of the Association launched an attack on Dr. Schaler, culminating in their adoption of the slogan: "Saving Gestalt Therapy from Jeff Schaler," used as the subject line in a discussion thread.

Under this heading they "SAVED" Gestalt therapy by sending in e-mails labeling Jeff Schaler as "arrogant, snide, hair-splitting, nit-picking, disturbed, mean- spirited, ranting, self-serving," etc.

When asked how this labeling "SAVED" Gestalt therapy, they ignored the question.
When asked in what way Gestalt therapy was endangered by Jeff Schaler, they ignored the question.

It became clear they thoroughly believed their pronouncements erased not only the evidence presented but also erased Jeff Schaler himself.
They "pronounced" him to be no longer in existence.

For them, whatever they "declare" is what's real.
What WE call reality is not real to them.

THEY "pronounce" what is to be considered real.

- Here's another example. I asked a psychotherapy client to look at a chair which was situated about six feet away near a wall.
I then asked her to describe the chair.

She did, in rather complete detail, except for the legs.
THE CHAIR SHE DESCRIBED HAD NO LEGS!

I pointed this out, and asked how the chair could be suspended in air, with no legs to support it.

She said: "I put it there."

I asked: "If you look away, will it fall to the floor?"

She said: "No. If I look away, the chair is no longer there."

I asked: "If you look away... and it turns out the chair is still there?"

She ignored the question.

- Here's another example.
During a discussion on CD@maelstrom.stjohns.edu earlier this year, the statement was made:

"If enough people believe something to be true, then what they believe is what reality IS."

A question was then asked:

"There was a time when everyone, as far as we know, believed the sun revolved around the earth. Are you saying at that time the sun did, in fact, revolve around the earth... and it was only in obedience to a change in what people believed that the earth came to revolve around the sun?"

The question was ignored.

You might think their refusals to answer constitute an admission... an admission what they are saying is totally outlandish and indefensible.
Experience has shown you would be wrong.

Experience has shown they go right on making the same statements, even after evidence is produced to the contrary.

You see how different these creatures are?
You see how far off their thinking and behavior are from human thinking and behavior?

Nothing of what WE call reality is real to THEM.

I repeat...
Nothing of what we call reality is REAL to them.

When a human being mentions a chair, the reference is to a chair that sits there on its own legs.
It's there whether anyone sees it or not, whether anyone mentions it or not, whether anyone "declares" it to be there or not.

It's there ON ITS OWN.

A basic element in the profile of humanoids is their lack of comprehension that anything exists on its own, separate from their say-so.
They don't SEE it.

The only objects humanoids see are the ones they "declare"... the ones they imagine.

We use the phrase "my perception" to mean an appraisal, a measurement of something separate from ourselves.
We don't announce it as "fact.”

We are open to consider other views if given facts to consider.

Humanoids use the phrase "my perception" as a buzz word.
They imagine what they choose, and tell us it is their "perception"... which, in their minds, ESTABLISHES reality.

What we call "facts" do not exist for them.
That's why they whine and claim they are being attacked whenever substantiation is requested.

Humanoids claim their statements are valid simply because they make them!!!

They elaborate on this:

"I honor integrity in this regard. As an egoist, I make statements which are valid to me. Validity to my 'self' comes first. I grant other people this same respect assuming they say things valid to themselves."

Among human beings, for something to be deemed valid it has to be substantiated with facts.
Nothing is valid simply because someone says it.

When humanoids are asked how they determine what someone says is valid to that person, and not something made up or imagined, they ignore the question.

Note the strange use of the word "integrity.”
Humans define integrity as uprightness of character; probity; honesty.

We refer to sticking to the facts, sticking to the truth, not selling out.
Humanoids use "integrity" to mean insisting what they imagine is what's real.

No measurement.
No evaluation.

When the demand is made for their pronouncements to be evaluated, they claim the confronter is the one who has no integrity... meaning the confronter is not upholding THEIR position: what THEY imagine is what's real.

On what basis do they claim this?

Humanoids treat the world as if it were their own private VR simulation.
They "declare" things into being.

Everything is a hologram.
They program the holograms.

They interact with them in any way they choose.
They have them under total control.

When they decide to cancel a hologram, it vanishes.

A hologram is a hologram is a hologram.
A hologram is not supposed to have the ability to think for itself.

A hologram is not supposed to have the ability to measure, evaluate, appraise, etc.
Most importantly, a hologram is not supposed to be able to break out of its holographic state and critique its master.

When this does happen, they first chastise it to bring it back into line.
If that doesn't work, they "vanish" it.

When that fails, they run for cover by abandoning the program and calling up another one.

Experience has shown no matter what we say, no matter what we point out, no matter how much evidence is given, it has no meaning for these creatures.

They have one goal: to fool us into classifying them as human so they can concentrate on murdering our human values.
Without human values, the next step is murdering human beings.

In the film "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers," aliens are shown to be taking over by occupying the bodies of human beings.

The aliens take over not only the physical body but also the mind, memories, abilities, etc.
In every way the people seem to be the same as always, except for one thing.

They mention events, but with no feeling of them or about them.
THEY DO NOT FEEL FEELINGS.

We see a child struggling to get away from what appears to be its mother.
The next day they walk hand-in-hand.

The child has been taken over.


The lovers in the film try to stay awake so they won't be taken over.
She succumbs... and "she," now a creature, tries to fool him.

When she doesn't fool him, she tries to betray him.

These creatures do not FEEL alive.
They do not FEEL feelings.

In order to pass as humans, they know they have to give the appearance of knowing they are alive.
Their only recourse is to DECLARE they are alive.

The declaration does not produce the quality of FEELING alive.
They still don't FEEL feelings.

The only thing they have to go on, to refer to, is their own declaration.
If "declaring" is shown to be insufficient... if they are called upon to discuss feelings, give evidence of feelings, distinguish between feelings, etc., they are lost.

Their inner emptiness is apparent.
Their un-human status is exposed.

Here's a final example.

In the course of a discussion on psych-ci@maelstrom.stjohns.edu some time ago, a humanoid said:

"You hurt my feelings."

The humanoid was asked to identify the exact statements, and explain in what way these statements caused hurt to what particular feelings.

Answer: (Whining)

"I've said you hurt my feelings. I don't know what else to say... You are attacking."

Question:

"In what way do you a consider a request for substantiation and clarification to be an attack?"

No answer.

AN OVERVIEW

Humanoids:
  1. Make pronouncements without substantiation. These pronouncements are to be accepted as defining what reality is... moment by moment.

  2. Ignore requests to provide the basis for their pronouncements.

  3. Sneer at the human valuing of facts, honesty, decency, fair play.

  4. Applaud the use of lies, deceit, etc.

  5. Whine they are being "attacked" whenever they are questioned. Give no explanation of what the "attack" is or of what is being attacked.

  6. Do not FEEL feelings.

  7. View the world as their private holodeck.

  8. Apply themselves to keeping humans in their place - namely, insignificance.
FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Humanoids do not understand the distinction we humans make between good and evil.
When they harm us, they do not understand why we call them evil.

They do not understand why we have laws against murder.
Their approach is to boast, even moralize over their victims.

Since they do not understand the reason for such laws, they argue they cannot be held accountable for their actions.
Not so.

While they take the position the law does not apply to them, they do know the law was enacted to apply to everyone.

Furthermore, if they try to claim they didn't know there was such a law, we respond with a firmly established principle:

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse."

When they use those arguments, they make it clear they will continue to operate in accordance with their structure.

We may look for remorse (a human capacity).
We find none.

They do not think of themselves as promulgating evil.
They are simply doing what it is in their structure to do.

The rattlesnake does not think of itself as evil when it injects poison.
It is simply doing what it is in its structure to do.

Experience has shown humanoids continue to behave in the ways of their species... murdering human values as a prelude to murdering human beings. Nazis demonstrate this graphically.

The issue as to whether to hold them "accountable," in our human sense of the word, has to be divided into two parts.
We do not hold them accountable for BEING what they are.

We do hold them accountable for the damage they DO.

When a dog gets rabies, we don't hold the dog accountable for becoming rabid.
What we do, as a matter of self-protection, is put the dog down BEFORE it bites us, BEFORE it infects us.

We do not hold the rattlesnake accountable for HAVING poison fangs.
What we do, as a matter of self-protection, is kill the rattlesnake BEFORE it kills us.

So with the humanoid.

We need to be on our guard at the first sign of a murder of human values.

Hm, I think that's a bit harsh. Psychopaths/sociopaths/people with anti-social personality disorders definitely have feelings, and they can even demonstrate concern for a very limited group of people. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't exactly trust one, but at the same time they can be complex people with complex psychological makeup. There's also been research to show that psychopathy is more of a spectrum than a black/white duality. That some people can have traits of a psychopath, but still experience empathy.

I find this kind of thinking almost scary, because I've seen the exact same stuff written about schizophrenics, the intellectually disabled, the autistic. One group of people looks different to them, so they're immediately wrong and inhuman. It's seriously fallacious thinking, and can be very dangerous to those who are any bit different.
 
Hm, I think that's a bit harsh. Psychopaths/sociopaths/people with anti-social personality disorders definitely have feelings, and they can even demonstrate concern for a very limited group of people. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't exactly trust one, but at the same time they can be complex people with complex psychological makeup. There's also been research to show that psychopathy is more of a spectrum than a black/white duality. That some people can have traits of a psychopath, but still experience empathy.

I find this kind of thinking almost scary, because I've seen the exact same stuff written about schizophrenics, the intellectually disabled, the autistic. One group of people looks different to them, so they're immediately wrong and inhuman. It's seriously fallacious thinking, and can be very dangerous to those who are any bit different.

I agree with you, but I also would like to point out that the title is - “political poenology”, which is more or less the study of the origins of “evil” in the realm of politics, but the article certainly does put people the author groups into the title of “humanoid”, which I agree could be detrimental to those who are socially retarded and other such minor and typical sociopathic issues.
I tend to think he is speaking about those types who have a purposefully negative goal for those around them and society at large.
But yes...we should be careful with how we interpret such definitions and not give them out to people liberally.
There is a huge spectrum as you mentioned and it would have been nice if the author had specified more about which “psychopaths” he is referring to and show some differentiation.
Much love!
I always appreciate other POVs....and hope you know that I don’t adhere to every detail/claim of every article I post.
I take many, many things on here with a grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tin Man and Free
One group of people looks different to them, so they're immediately wrong and inhuman. It's seriously fallacious thinking, and can be very dangerous to those who are any bit different.
You're absolutely right, Tin Man.
However...
I tend to think he is speaking about those types who have a purposefully negative goal for those around them and society at large.
Agreed! I've had the unfortunate opportunity of knowing such types, and there is a significant difference in their difference, for lack of a better expression. They tipped the scales on the spectrum and seemed to get off on being the cause of another's pain.

Much love to you both. ❤
 
I agree with you, but I also would like to point out that the title is - “political poenology”, which is more or less the study of the origins of “evil” in the realm of politics, but the article certainly does put people the author groups into the title of “humanoid”, which I agree could be detrimental to those who are socially retarded and other such minor and typical sociopathic issues.
I tend to think he is speaking about those types who have a purposefully negative goal for those around them and society at large.
But yes...we should be careful with how we interpret such definitions and not give them out to people liberally.
There is a huge spectrum as you mentioned and it would have been nice if the author had specified more about which “psychopaths” he is referring to and show some differentiation.
Much love!
I always appreciate other POVs....and hope you know that I don’t adhere to every detail/claim of every article I post.
I take many, many things on here with a grain of salt.

I know you weren't championing those kind of notions. You've probably been on the end of them, being such a weirdo :p

I just felt it necessary to point out how dangerous such thinking can be. It's a short road from "psychopaths are just plain inhuman" to "anybody whose different from me is alien and wrong."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Free and Skarekrow
I know you weren't championing those kind of notions. You've probably been on the end of them, being such a weirdo :p

I just felt it necessary to point out how dangerous such thinking can be. It's a short road from "psychopaths are just plain inhuman" to "anybody whose different from me is alien and wrong."

Oh yes...you know I’m sure being an INTJ and me being an INFJ that we have been ostracized for some reason or another in our lives be it blatant and purposeful or people just being insensitive and assholes.
I’m certainly not trying to group the many fine people who don’t think like the rest of the sheep as being somehow “inhuman” and not worthy to live.
I do think that there are those who are mainly into the political sphere who only want to see more power and don’t care about the rest of humanity at all and seem to try their best to cause harm...i.e - Trump and his whole administration.
He couldn’t relate to the common man anymore than a brick.
His whole persona is fakery imho.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes...you know I’m sure being an INTJ and me being an INFJ that we have been ostracized for some reason or another in our lives be it blatant and purposeful or people just being insensitive and assholes.
I’m certainly not trying to group the many fine people who don’t think like the rest of the sheep as being somehow “inhuman” and not worthy to live.
I do think that there are those who are mainly into the political sphere who only want to see more power and don’t care about the rest of humanity at all and seem to try their best to cause harm...i.e - Trump and his whole administration.
He couldn’t relate to the common man anymore than a brick.
His whole persona is fakery imho.
That may be so, but he's been a crucial help to me and my people in what we are trying to do, so I'm not complaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Free
That may be so, but he's been a crucial help to me and my people in what we are trying to do, so I'm not complaining.

That is because the impact of what they have been doing hasn’t reached the general public yet.
Why were the tax cuts for people only for 2 years, while permanent for industry?
And then, you taxes are scheduled to rise - to pay for the $1.5 trillion deficit they created - to be also be paid for by throwing people off of heath insurance, food stamps, heating oil subsidies for the elderly to not freeze to death, the plan to make schools into a money-making industry where parent will have to take out student loans to pay for elementary school, the destruction of a huge amount of environmental regulations, the destruction of civil liberties that were granted to LGBQT people and also DACA recipients...meanwhile...some people get one time bonuses - which are far cheaper to pay out than to raise people’s wages....he clearly has many business conflicts of interest and has been sued an insane amount of times for trying to cheat people in one way or the other.
How exactly is he helping you?
Destroying medicare, medicaid, and Social Security?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Free
That is because the impact of what they have been doing hasn’t reached the general public yet.
Why were the tax cuts for people only for 2 years, while permanent for industry?
And then, you taxes are scheduled to rise - to pay for the $1.5 trillion deficit they created - to be also be paid for by throwing people off of heath insurance, food stamps, heating oil subsidies for the elderly to not freeze to death, the plan to make schools into a money-making industry where parent will have to take out student loans to pay for elementary school, the destruction of a huge amount of environmental regulations, the destruction of civil liberties that were granted to LGBQT people and also DACA recipients...meanwhile...some people get one time bonuses - which are far cheaper to pay out than to raise people’s wages....he clearly has many business conflicts of interest and has been sued an insane amount of times for trying to cheat people in one way or the other.
How exactly is he helping you?
Destroying medicare, medicaid, and Social Security?
Oh you misunderstand. It's what he's not doing publicly that's helping me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Free and Skarekrow