- Aug 9, 2009
- 1,339
- 180
- 0
- MBTI
- IEI
- Enneagram
- 6w5 sp/sx
So, I think we can more or less all agree that MBTI captures some individual differences among people, but do you actually hold the position that MBTI is, well, truth?
That there are 16 discrete types, as described by a basic function order preference, with people being exactly one of these types throughout life?
Would you entertain the idea that these dichotomies are actually more dynamic? That perhaps there are perhaps several groups of people lumped into one category (say, S-type), that are being defined more by a lack of a trait than the existence of one?
In other words, what I am suggesting is that the MBTI is an internally consistent system, which maps onto a certain type of variation among humans, but does not really capture the essence of how this variation really works.
That there are 16 discrete types, as described by a basic function order preference, with people being exactly one of these types throughout life?
Would you entertain the idea that these dichotomies are actually more dynamic? That perhaps there are perhaps several groups of people lumped into one category (say, S-type), that are being defined more by a lack of a trait than the existence of one?
In other words, what I am suggesting is that the MBTI is an internally consistent system, which maps onto a certain type of variation among humans, but does not really capture the essence of how this variation really works.