How can we take it back?
- Thread starter Skarekrow
- Start date
The game that became “Monopoly” was created to teach children how unfair our system is.
"In 1903, the Georgist Lizzie Magie applied for a patent on a game called The Landlord's Game with the object of showing that rents enriched property owners and impoverished tenants. She knew that some people would find it hard to understand the logic behind the idea, and she thought that if the rent problem and the Georgist solution to it were put into the concrete form of a game, it might be easier to demonstrate. She was granted the patent for the game in January 1904."
"In 1903, the Georgist Lizzie Magie applied for a patent on a game called The Landlord's Game with the object of showing that rents enriched property owners and impoverished tenants. She knew that some people would find it hard to understand the logic behind the idea, and she thought that if the rent problem and the Georgist solution to it were put into the concrete form of a game, it might be easier to demonstrate. She was granted the patent for the game in January 1904."
Yes, this is a real story sadly.
So the same group that wants to force women to carry their babies to term and put them up for adoption, want to cut the ability for those children to find a loving home to an even slimmer margin - as if there are not kids sitting in foster care as I type this?
Where are the evangelicals?
They should all be adopting children and STFU.
They certainly shouldn’t be taking actions that hurt children (yes, this hurts children by denying them the opportunity for a possible loving family).
Instead we are trying to legislate religious morals not shared by the majority of people in this country.
Instead they are trying to legislate bigotry and discrimination.
Handmaid’s Tale...here we come!
The amendment appears on a funding bill for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. If it remains in the final bill, the amendment would cut 15% of federal adoption funding to states and localities that penalize adoption agencies that refuse to place children in families that conflict with the agency’s “sincerely held religious beliefs or convictions.”
The amendment also bars the federal government from refusing to work with adoption agencies that discriminate.
The vote in the committee was 29-23, along party lines, with Rep. Scott Taylor (R-VA) the lone Republican to vote against the amendment.
“House Republicans are pandering to their far-right base at the expense of LGBTQ people and children in need of a home,” said Democratic National Committee (DNC) LGBTQ Media Director Lucas Acosta.
“Rather than focusing on empowering families or uniting children with their parents, Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee voted to give child welfare agencies a license to discriminate against qualified potential parents.”
Acosta added, “Across the country, LGBTQ candidates are running for office and taking a stand against the Trump-GOP agenda, which seeks to roll back the progress we have made. In November, voters will stand together in the face of this bigotry and hate and elect Democrats up and down the ticket.”
In addition to LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, the amendment would also impact interfaith couples, single parents, married couples in which one prospective parent has previously been divorced, or other qualified parents to whom an agency could have an objection.
A big barrier to placing children with families is a lack of qualified prospective parents; having the government give contractors and subcontractors a license to discriminate, thereby limiting the pool of prospective parents for no legitimate reason, is unconscionable and an unacceptable use of taxpayer dollars.
“Any Member of Congress who supports this amendment is clearly stating that it is more important to them to discriminate than it is to find loving homes for children in need,” said David Stacy, director of government affairs at the Human Rights Campaign.
“Congress should be focusing on ways to help children in the child welfare system find homes rather than creating needless obstacles for prospective parents, effectively shrinking the pool of qualified folks who want to provide children with a loving home. HRC urges Congress to reject this discriminatory amendment in the final appropriations bill.”
HRC recently released a report, Disregarding the Best Interest of the Child: License to Discriminate In Child Welfare Services, detailing the harm of efforts to write anti-LGBTQ discrimination by child welfare agencies into law. Statistics suggest that an estimated two million LGBTQ adults in the U.S. are interested in adoption, but the LGBTQ community often remains an untapped resource when it comes to finding families for children and youth in foster care.
“Taxpayer dollars should never be used to promote discrimination against any American, LGBTQ or otherwise,” said Kasey Suffredini, president of strategy at Freedom for All Americans.
“It’s shocking to see some lawmakers willing to hurt not only LGBTQ Americans, but vulnerable children waiting for forever homes. This is just the latest example that discrimination against LGBTQ Americans is real, urgent and a detriment to all Americans – and should be cured by federal, comprehensive protections as soon as possible.”
Nine states already have laws on the books that allow child welfare agencies receiving taxpayer funding to discriminate against LGBTQ youth and families – Alabama, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Virginia. Five of those bills have passed in the last two years. According to data from the Family Equality Council’s Every Child Deserves a Family campaign, more than 21,000 youth were awaiting adoption in these states.
A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, July 12, in Dumont v. Lyon, a challenge to Michigan’s law that allows state-funded adoption agencies to cite religion as a reason for turning away foster parents or adoptive parents based on their sexual orientation.
Research consistently shows that LGBTQ youth are overrepresented in the foster care system, as many have been rejected by their families of origin because of their LGBTQ status, and are especially vulnerable to discrimination and mistreatment while in foster care. This type of amendment will only exacerbate these challenges faced by LGBTQ young people.
So the same group that wants to force women to carry their babies to term and put them up for adoption, want to cut the ability for those children to find a loving home to an even slimmer margin - as if there are not kids sitting in foster care as I type this?
Where are the evangelicals?
They should all be adopting children and STFU.
They certainly shouldn’t be taking actions that hurt children (yes, this hurts children by denying them the opportunity for a possible loving family).
Instead we are trying to legislate religious morals not shared by the majority of people in this country.
Instead they are trying to legislate bigotry and discrimination.
Handmaid’s Tale...here we come!
Republicans vote to make it legal nationwide
to ban gays & lesbians from adopting
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/07...ays-lesbians-adopting-passes-house-committee/
The House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday passed an amendmentallowing taxpayer-funded adoption agencies to deny LGBTQ families the ability to adopt a child based on religious objection.to ban gays & lesbians from adopting
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/07...ays-lesbians-adopting-passes-house-committee/
The amendment appears on a funding bill for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. If it remains in the final bill, the amendment would cut 15% of federal adoption funding to states and localities that penalize adoption agencies that refuse to place children in families that conflict with the agency’s “sincerely held religious beliefs or convictions.”
The amendment also bars the federal government from refusing to work with adoption agencies that discriminate.
The vote in the committee was 29-23, along party lines, with Rep. Scott Taylor (R-VA) the lone Republican to vote against the amendment.
“House Republicans are pandering to their far-right base at the expense of LGBTQ people and children in need of a home,” said Democratic National Committee (DNC) LGBTQ Media Director Lucas Acosta.
“Rather than focusing on empowering families or uniting children with their parents, Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee voted to give child welfare agencies a license to discriminate against qualified potential parents.”
Acosta added, “Across the country, LGBTQ candidates are running for office and taking a stand against the Trump-GOP agenda, which seeks to roll back the progress we have made. In November, voters will stand together in the face of this bigotry and hate and elect Democrats up and down the ticket.”
In addition to LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, the amendment would also impact interfaith couples, single parents, married couples in which one prospective parent has previously been divorced, or other qualified parents to whom an agency could have an objection.
A big barrier to placing children with families is a lack of qualified prospective parents; having the government give contractors and subcontractors a license to discriminate, thereby limiting the pool of prospective parents for no legitimate reason, is unconscionable and an unacceptable use of taxpayer dollars.
“Any Member of Congress who supports this amendment is clearly stating that it is more important to them to discriminate than it is to find loving homes for children in need,” said David Stacy, director of government affairs at the Human Rights Campaign.
“Congress should be focusing on ways to help children in the child welfare system find homes rather than creating needless obstacles for prospective parents, effectively shrinking the pool of qualified folks who want to provide children with a loving home. HRC urges Congress to reject this discriminatory amendment in the final appropriations bill.”
HRC recently released a report, Disregarding the Best Interest of the Child: License to Discriminate In Child Welfare Services, detailing the harm of efforts to write anti-LGBTQ discrimination by child welfare agencies into law. Statistics suggest that an estimated two million LGBTQ adults in the U.S. are interested in adoption, but the LGBTQ community often remains an untapped resource when it comes to finding families for children and youth in foster care.
“Taxpayer dollars should never be used to promote discrimination against any American, LGBTQ or otherwise,” said Kasey Suffredini, president of strategy at Freedom for All Americans.
“It’s shocking to see some lawmakers willing to hurt not only LGBTQ Americans, but vulnerable children waiting for forever homes. This is just the latest example that discrimination against LGBTQ Americans is real, urgent and a detriment to all Americans – and should be cured by federal, comprehensive protections as soon as possible.”
Nine states already have laws on the books that allow child welfare agencies receiving taxpayer funding to discriminate against LGBTQ youth and families – Alabama, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Virginia. Five of those bills have passed in the last two years. According to data from the Family Equality Council’s Every Child Deserves a Family campaign, more than 21,000 youth were awaiting adoption in these states.
A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, July 12, in Dumont v. Lyon, a challenge to Michigan’s law that allows state-funded adoption agencies to cite religion as a reason for turning away foster parents or adoptive parents based on their sexual orientation.
Research consistently shows that LGBTQ youth are overrepresented in the foster care system, as many have been rejected by their families of origin because of their LGBTQ status, and are especially vulnerable to discrimination and mistreatment while in foster care. This type of amendment will only exacerbate these challenges faced by LGBTQ young people.
UPDATE: Here is a link to the specific amendment’s text (See Page 29)
The obscene level of seemingly acceptable insanity...*sigh*
Listen to These Christians Discuss How Bigfoot is Real and Part of Satan’s Plan
Full Story - http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friend...-how-bigfoot-is-real-and-part-of-satans-plan/
Listen to These Christians Discuss How Bigfoot is Real and Part of Satan’s Plan
Full Story - http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friend...-how-bigfoot-is-real-and-part-of-satans-plan/
"For the greatest menace to the conservative evangelical machine that seeks to overrun our planet is the emergence of true freedom and equality for all. That Jesus loves all, redeems all, embraces all, affirms all, and blesses all with heaven’s unlimited supply of equality and freedom is their greatest fear, trigger, and vulnerability — rendering their monstrous system of faith to be impotent, fraudulent, and devoid of true life.
That’s why nearly every conservative evangelical interpretation of scripture, personification of God, and assertion in society is desperately bent on diluting and covering up this revelation of grace and its manifestation upon the earth, and quickly replacing it with a conditional, religious, self-righteous brand of believing — not because they are lovers of truth, but because they are worshippers of power.”
That’s why nearly every conservative evangelical interpretation of scripture, personification of God, and assertion in society is desperately bent on diluting and covering up this revelation of grace and its manifestation upon the earth, and quickly replacing it with a conditional, religious, self-righteous brand of believing — not because they are lovers of truth, but because they are worshippers of power.”
Full story -
Conservative Evangelical Christianity, The Death of America
https://www.redletterchristians.org/conservative-evangelical-christianity-the-death-of-america/
Conservative Evangelical Christianity, The Death of America
https://www.redletterchristians.org/conservative-evangelical-christianity-the-death-of-america/
ah so the plan is to 'take back' america from conservative christians and then hand it to......to who?
communists
i don't actually agree that conservative christians are in charge of america. If they were then they'd run the fed, IRS, the alphabet agencies like the CIA and all the big corporations but they don't
communists
i don't actually agree that conservative christians are in charge of america. If they were then they'd run the fed, IRS, the alphabet agencies like the CIA and all the big corporations but they don't
Last edited:
Pin
"Magnificent Bastard" / Ren's Counterpart
- Jun 26, 2017
- 12,750
- 50,524
- 3,276
- MBTI
- ENTJ
- Enneagram
- 3w4, 3-8-7
I'm of the belief that monied-interests 'run' America, after all, that's what founded her in the first place.
Let's not run to identity politics.
well if all of those 'monied interests' were say muslims you would then be able to perceive an identarian aspect to their influence
however the monied interests that control america are not muslim....nor are they conservative christians
conservative christians are more your common farming folk and mom and pop business owners
when you consider that it becomes interesting to observe how much hatred some people express towards them as if those farming and small business owners are somehow the cause of those peoples pain
they're not but those people have been hoodwinked into believing that they are