Some I'm taking PHIL 106 or intro to logic.
I feel like I'm not getting it to be blunt. I'm so frustrated I know this will help me make better argument and provide a good base for further courses. But I can't seem to get a lot of the concepts. Even thought I know the benefit of applying logic its difficult to get this stage.
I've never been good at math. it seems this is a related issue.
We just finished Categorical Syllogisms and we are working on propositional logic.
We are using intro to logic by Hurely.
Any imput would helpful.
I feel like I'm not getting it to be blunt. I'm so frustrated I know this will help me make better argument and provide a good base for further courses. But I can't seem to get a lot of the concepts. Even thought I know the benefit of applying logic its difficult to get this stage.
I've never been good at math. it seems this is a related issue.
We just finished Categorical Syllogisms and we are working on propositional logic.
We are using intro to logic by Hurely.
Any imput would helpful.