No it isn't very difficult to research. Find a search engine and type in Gates de-population
Actually I did fact-check all the claims you made in your post, and it certainly took a lot longer than the 15-minutes you are suggesting. The majority I found to be outright lies, and the remainder (the supposed wealth of the Rothschilds) could only be engaged with on the grounds of reasoned conjecture, since there is of course absolutely no evidence I could actually attempt to source.
Now, you demand that I research a lot of claims. Let's count:
1
2
3
4
5, though I did in fact research this - see my post above.
Radioactive materials? That is the least of it. 30 years of injecting Syphillis into African American men? We went to war with Iraq via a perfectly run PR campaign? The Government "allowed" zero money down loans and then selling those loans to the public? The FBI had Hunters laptop and did nothing, they knew Hillary destroyed evidence, and then had information on Orange man bad that they knew There is not enough bandwidth to continue that list.was fabricated and ACTED on it? I contend the CIA was created to be corrupt. list. DUPONT did poison the water AND so did PG&E. I won't take the time now but I will certainly do it later and search American atrocities against its own people. Are you old enough to remember the days when nicotine was good for you?
'Radioactive materials' was but one example, and as you show here, there are enough verified atrocities perpetrated by the US government and its corporations that I really do not see the need to fabricate the existence of imagined ones, or allege some kind of sinister global cabal pulling all the strings. There are
real enemies of freedom enough that I personally believe would be a better target of your ire and campaigning energy. Rather, all of this energy is expended on fictions, deflected away from the actual perpetrators and beneficiaries of corruption - no doubt they themselves would see this as a major coup; to deflect the attention of those who might be their most ardent critics away from themselves and towards a fantasy receptacle of public scrutiny. It frustrates me to see so many being put in these hamster wheels; being so easily controlled, manipulated and lied to.
So I have no clue what I am talking about and then need a reference to some curve? Great! Now genius, prove that Club Rome did not exist
6
Prove that the New York Times didn't support Hitler
7
And so did the Daily Mail, which is why it's known as the 'Daily Heil' in the UK. I'm not sure what this proves beyond the fact that fascism did, indeed, happen.
that the Rothchilds don't own the world's banking system
8
Fauci wasn't funding sickening experiments
9 (or #2 repeated. Do you want me to look at this twice?)
The Rockefellers at one time didn't own the ENTIRE gasoline chain of production
10
there were indeed WMD's in Iraq
11
[that Biden doesn't have dementia
12
India didn't improve its situation with horse dewormer
13
that vaccinating children with NO risk of dying with a vaccine that they admit the don't know the adverse reaction will be is a good idea
14
That anyone with political pull does not have to be vaccinated
15
Explain please, since I am too stupid for words, why the employees of big Pharma are exempt from being vaccinated?
16
Alinsky didn't want to collapse American society
17
Gates hasn't said the world is over populated
18
You also just said it there, if merely saying it is your standard of evidence. See my post above debunking this.
if I am THAT stupid you ought to be able to do ALL of that in what 15 minutes?
There are 18 claims and I have 15 minutes, which amounts to 50 seconds per claim. I'm afraid my research rate is a little slower than that.
If I had the time, maybe I could give you a quote on how much that might cost you, but as it stands, I simply don't have the free time to expend on checking all of these claims.
If I wanted to do it properly, it would take weeks, or if I did it to the depth of my cursory replies this morning, then it might take this long:
05:20am to 06:43am to check 5 claims, or 16.6 minutes per claim. For the 18 claims you have presented here, this would amount to 298.8 minutes, or nearly five hours going at a decent clip. I wouldn't be able to find a Reuters debunking for each of these as I did this morning, so I'd wager it would take considerably longer than that. In other words, what you've demanded here is essentially at least full day's work to produce only cursory fact-checking.
In any case, the thread had been moderated - you'll have to wait for or create your own on-topic thread to continue this discussion.
