Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues? | Page 70 | INFJ Forum

Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues?

http://www.zengardner.com/manifesting-and-the-mystic-morphic-field/

Manifesting the Morphic Field

by Zen Gardner
There was an interesting article recently about researchers who found within the computer informational field what appears to be proof of foreknowledge of 9/11. The huge spike in chatter regarding the events immediately prior to the strikes is completely anomalous. In other words, it goes on to say, for it to be just a coincidence is next to impossible.
No big surprise. But what about this informational field?
They call this computer information world a type of “morphic field” or “information field” and it seems to be a virtual manifestation of the global mind. Not all of it of course, but the informational global mind, which at this point in history is a massive amount of generated information that’s accelerating by the hour.
Research in this field is also being investigated by other visionaries. By tracing trends in language using webbots that crawl the internet reading data with assigned values to various words, they’ve been able to often predict not only major events, trends and changes, but the specific nature and sometimes locations of future phenomena.
It’s not an exact science by any means, but this whole field starts to show the power of the literal electromagnetic informational mind as evidence of or a reflection of human consciousness, and we should pay close attention.

Language as a Manifestation of Consciousness

Language shared is clearly consciousness at work. This is our current fundamental method of communication. Perhaps general telepathy is on the horizon, but for now words backed by intention and no doubt other influences is how we understand communication.
Whichever, it only stands to reason that the greater the body of consciousness manifested, the greater the effect on the present, and hence the future.
In the words of Roger Nelson, founder of the Global Consciousness Project (GCP) from his book Quantum Mind p. 57;;
My own ‘model’ is that consciousness or mind is the source or seat of a non-local, active information field (this is not a standard, well defined physical construct). Such fields interact, usually with random phase relationship and no detectable product. When some or many consciousness (information) fields are driven in common, or for whatever reason become coherent and resonant, they interact in phase, and create a new, highly structured information field… that becomes the source of the effects we measure. Source
Pretty profound. When the accumulated consciousness fields are driven in common or show coherency or resonance, they create a new information field.
Sound interactive? That’s the whole point…we need to get busy manifesting Truth and Love within this field.

Click on link above for the rest of the article
 
10402997_10152823451246275_1684010428184846308_n.jpg
 

Those sorts of people are my heroes.

Could've been a conservative, could've been a patriot, could've been a christian traditionalist, could've been the opposite of all those things but first and foremost he was a human still capable of being revolted by war crimes in a war zone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skarekrow
Insanity...

Today House Republicans unveiled their budget.
It
(1) decimates programs for the poor (huge cuts in Medicaid, food stamps, and Pell grants for college students from poor families);

(2) cuts federal aid to education;

(3) turns Medicare into a voucher system (that doesn’t keep up with expected increases in healthcare costs);

(4) repeals Obamacare (which is now providing health insurance to 16.4 million people who otherwise wouldn’t have it);

(5) boosts military spending by nearly $40 billion next year (through an off-budget war funding account);

(6) increases military spending in subsequent years while further cutting domestic discretionary spending; and

(7) doesn’t raise a dime of taxes on the wealthy and doesn’t close any tax loopholes used by the rich.

Budget plans don’t have the force of law but they set goals and reveal priorities – and now that Republicans run both houses of Congress those goals are doubly important.

As revealed in this budget, Republicans aim to reward the rich, expand the military, harm the middle class, and screw the poor.

Nothing new, only slightly more extreme and brazen.



 
[video=youtube;-K_733z4GBQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-K_733z4GBQ[/video]
 
11062551_995440103818681_8726975451571740166_n.jpg


In just the latest outrageous scam from the heretical Word of Faith movement,
Prosperity Gospel preacher Creflo Dollar issued a plea to his followers to donate
$60 million dollars to his ministry in order to finance a
Gulfstream G650 luxury private jet – the most expensive jet in the world.
 
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-20/us-begs-russia-remain-‘swift’-one-bank-fails-again

U.S. Begs Russia to Remain in ‘SWIFT’ - The One Bank Fails Again


Submitted by Sprott Money on 03/20/2015 11:51 -0400



........Submitted by Bullion Bulls Canada - Written by Jeff Nielson


Does it get any funnier than this? Well, arguably, we’ve already seen an even funnier episode from these financial “Wile E. Coyotes”. But let’s begin with a look at the most recent “botched operation” by the psychopaths of the One Bank.


To any readers with even a moderate comprehension of global events, it has been completely obvious that the Western financial crime syndicate which rules over us (the One Bank) has targeted Russia for (at least) economic destruction — and perhaps political destruction, as well. It has commenced this campaign by unleashing its most-ferocious attack dog on Russia: the United States (aka “the Fourth Reich”).


The political/economic terrorism against Russia began with the coup in Ukraine, which was fully and completely orchestrated by U.S. Neo-Cons (most unelected), who actually “run” the U.S. government. This was immediately followed by a two-pronged strategy, directed squarely against Russia itself.


One-half of the campaign was an enormous, steaming mound of anti-Russia propaganda, continuously defecated by the West’s corporate media monopoly. This absurd, nonsensical propaganda relentlessly attempts to “blame Russia” for anything-and-everything even remotely connected to the West’s cannibalization of the Ukraine, and often simply fabricates “acts of Russian aggression”. This has continued even as these fascists have ordered their Ukraine Thugs to perpetrate ever more-aggressive and barbaric acts, primarily against the large, ethnic Russian population within their own nation.


The other half of this campaign was massive, overt economic terrorism against Russia, in virtually any-and-every form which could be dreamed-up by the One Bank’s army of (financial) psychopaths. They first launched an all-out attack on the Russian ruble. They then deliberately/ruthlessly manipulated oil prices to ½ their previous level, because Russia is the world’s largest energy exporter.


They also had the U.S. pressure the West’s other Lackey Governments to adopt round after round of ever more-punitive “economic sanctions” against Russia, “punishing it” for supposed misdeeds which were nothing more than the fabrications of its own propaganda. Then, as the supposed coup de grace, they had ordered that Russia be expelled from “SWIFT”.


For those readers not familiar with yet another one of the One Bank’s “tools” for financial oppression/control, SWIFT is the Western created/controlled electronic system for managing most large, commercial transactions between nations. Living in the 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century’s electronic/computerized era, this financial crime syndicate assumed that Russia could not survive (economically) without access to this system.


The psychopaths miscalculated, badly, in almost every respect of this operation. But before summarizing this chain-of-blunders by this pack of Wile E. Coyotes, let’s review what was at least an equally botched “operation”: the economic terrorism and economic blackmail which they perpetrated against the government (and people) of India.


Regular readers are already familiar with this episode, so this summary will be as brief as possible.

a) The One Bank caused a stampede out of the (ultra-fraudulent) paper-called-gold market it operates, after it perpetrated the Cyprus Steal [an unintended consequence].

b) Because this fraudulent, paper market was (is) literally a hundred times larger than the real gold market, this stampede out of the paper-called-gold market caused a sharp drop in the price of gold.

c) This sharp drop in the price of gold then precipitated a stampede into real, physical gold — with import levels in China and India skyrocketing to an all-time high [another unintended consequence].

d) Having already squandered most of their gold inventories via their reckless/incompetent/perennialprice-suppression, this explosion in demand for real gold terrified the banksters so much that they immediately sought some way to squash this demand. With China insulated from the One Bank’s economic terrorism, the banksters chose India as their target/victim.

e) (As with Russia) they launched a ruthless attack on India’s currency, blackmailing India’s government into imposing a near-total embargo on gold imports before they would cease their economic attack.

f) This gold embargo immediately caused a massive explosion in Indian demand for silver [an unintended consequence], a massive explosion in gold-smuggling into India [another unintended consequence], and the beginning of a separate, blackmarket, real-world price for gold [another unintended consequence].



g) Having decided that the “cure” for its previous malady was more painful than the “disease”, the One Bank completely reversed itself, and has allowed India’s government to remove all of the previous import restrictions.


This cartoon of failure-and-incompetence provides us with more than an opportunity for a good laugh, at the expense of these Wile E. Coyotes. It illustrates an important psychological concept which has previously been raised in an earlier commentary: the difference (in mentality and behavior) between psychopaths and“chess players”.


What makes the One Bank’s colossal failure with its Indian gold embargo so humorous is not merely the long chain of “unintended consequences” which were provoked by its own extreme-and-malicious behavior (in typical, Wile E. Coyote style). What makes this folly so humorous is that all of these “unintended consequences” were totally obvious.


Deprive the world’s most-ardent “precious metals lovers” of their (legal/official) gold market, and it was obvious they would do several things: buy lots more silver, start smuggling lots of gold, and selling it in a blackmarket. Making this even more obvious, gold-smuggling has been an Indian ‘tradition’ which its government had only recently brought under control.


But it gets still funnier. From where did much (most?) of this “smuggled” gold come? From Switzerland, thehomeland of the banksters themselves. Again, this unintended consequence was also an obvious development, since (as we all know) “there is no honour among Thieves”. And showing the corrupt level to which the West has devolved, while all this Swiss gold entered India illegally and unofficially as “smuggling”, it left Switzerland officially (and legally?) as its “gold exports”.


The point here is that any moderately intelligent child would (using elementary logic) have been able to project this entire chain of events in his/her mind, anticipate the reactions to this crime and thus predict(easily) all of these unintended consequences — assuming that child was a chess-player. This is how chess players program themselves to think.


The chess player doesn’t simply plot some scheme (i.e. “move”) and then devote all his time/energy to admiring his own ‘genius’. Rather, he first tentatively imagines making that move, and then he seeks to envision any-and-all rational responses to that move (i.e. the potential “moves” of his opponent). It is only after the chess player has thoroughly analyzed all potential counter-moves, and still sees the move as bettering his own “position” that he actually follows through on that strategy.


Such thinking is almost entirely beyond the capacity of the psychopath. By their very nature, these predators have a short-term, instant-gratification mentality. Compounding this tunnel-vision, their own extreme arrogance and narcissism means they are prone to simply ignoring their enemies/opponents (i.e. victims). It is thus inevitable that these defective predators will be continually vulnerable to being “surprised” by unintended consequences.



Hopefully readers are not already laughed-out from this first Wile E. Coyote cartoon, as we are about to be treated to a second, courtesy of Simon Black: US plan to drop Russia from global banking system hilariously backfires. Black himself sets the context for the latest escapades of these Wile E. Coyotes:

Russia is once again Arch-Enemy of the United States. It’s like living through a really bad James Bond movie, complete with cartoonish villains. And for the last several months, the US government has been doing everything it can to torpedo the Russian economy, as well as Vladimir Putin’s standing within his own country.
The economic nuclear option is to kick Russia out of the international banking system. And the US government has been vociferously pushing for this. Specifically, the US government wants to kick Russia out of SWIFT, short for the Society of Worldwide Interbank Financial Communications.

Well, the Psychopaths did want to get Russia expelled from SWIFT. But that was yesterday, and this is today, and today these Wile E. Coyotes are contemplating an old cliché, which is now staring them in the face: ‘Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.’


Being ultra-arrogant, psychopaths tend to ignore the ‘common wisdom’ of the Little People, which is what most clichés represent. But if they were to commit themselves to learning (and understanding) only one of our numerous clichés, it would be this one — given their own, glaring propensity to be “surprised” by unintended consequences.


Black then explains for our benefit how this cliché, and yet more “unintended consequences” fit into this latest cartoon:

Here’s what’s utterly hilarious[.]
On Monday afternoon, not only did SWIFT NOT kick Russia out…but they announced they were actually giving a BOARD SEAT to Russia. That is basically the opposite of what the US government was pushing for.
Awkward…But the story is even bigger than that. Because at the same time that the US government isn’t getting its way with SWIFT, the Chinese are busy putting together their own version of it called CIPS. CIPS stands for the China International Payment System, it’s intended to be a direct competitor to SWIFT, and a brand new way for global banks to communicate and transact with one another in a way that does NOT depend on the United States. [emphasis mine]


Shortening Mr. Black’s characterization somewhat, CIPS is the One Bank’s worst nightmare. Why have these banksters spent (literally) a hundred years trying to get people (primarily Western populations) to stop holding their wealth in precious metals? Because it’s only when we use the banksters’ fraudulent paper instruments (i.e. their worthless/fraudulent fiat currencies) that they can ‘efficiently’ steal from us en masse.


If we don’t “play in their sandbox”, the One Bank can’t steal from us — or least it makes it much more difficult for this crime syndicate to steal. What would it mean, what will it mean, what does it mean, when we not only have (China’s) renminbi as our new ‘reserve currency’, but it also offers the world its own electronic system for handling all their (our) commerce? It means that we won’t be playing in the One Bank’s “sandbox”, any longer.


Once again, the Law of Unintended Consequences has risen up to bite the One Bank in its enormously bloated ass. Once again its servants, a collection of psychopathic, Wile E. Coyotes have treated us to a cartoon which illustrates their own genetic deficiency. They even wrote the punchline for this cartoon themselves. After malevolently scheming to have Russia kicked-out of SWIFT, the One Bank’s henchmen now dangle a ‘carrot’ in front of Russia — as they beg it to stay.
 
[h=1]The real reasons behind Israeli leader's claim to speak for Jews[/h][video=youtube;E4_1dfp3tAM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4_1dfp3tAM[/video]
 
http://www.bullionbullscanada.com/intl-commentary/26287-the-one-bank

[h=2]The One Bank[/h]Written by Jeff Nielson Sunday, 21 July 2013 13:07


In 1980, in an infamous episode of “American Justice”; the Hunt Brothers were charged (and convicted) with attempting to “corner the silver market” – i.e. an attempt to monopolize it. At the time prosecution commenced, the Hunt Brothers had only managed to acquire less than 20% of total global inventories.
Nonetheless, given the strict provisions of our anti-trust laws this was a violation. In this one (relatively tiny) market; even a 20% concentration by a single entity is considered unacceptable. But that was when our governments were less-corrupt, and still enforced these laws on at least a semi-regular basis.
Flash ahead to 2013, and readers of my previous commentary were presented with the earth-shattering findings of a trio of Swiss researchers:
In detail, nearly 4/10 of the control over the economic value of [all transnational corporations] in the world is held, via a complicated web of ownership relations, by a group of 147 [transnational corporations] in the core, which has almost full control over itself. The top holders within the core can thus be thought of as an economic “super-entity” in the global network of corporations. A relevant additional fact at this point is that ¾ of the core are financial intermediaries. [emphasis mine]
In 1980, it was intolerable for one entity to have even a 20% share of one, small market. In 2013, the same cabal of (Western) governments has allowed a “super-entity” to acquire double that share – not of a single (small) market, or a whole sector, or even an entire economy. Rather, this is a single “super-entity” with 40% control of everything.
Of course when these researchers coined their term “super-entity”, they had no need of inventing new terminology. The word they were searching for was “monopoly”: a single monopoly with 40% control over the entire global economy.
Obviously what is being implied here is not minority control in every single market/sector/economy. Clearly this One Monopoly has a stranglehold over 40% of all markets/sectors/economies – with this obscene level of control spreading rapidly, like a particularly virulent economic cancer.
When the researchers speak of the ¾ of the “core” which are “financial intermediaries”; what this euphemistic language means is that ¾ of this giant monopoly are banks and bank holding-companies. The One Monopoly is one, big bank.
Despite its fraud-bloated size; the entire Western financial sector (all of these rapacious, utterly criminal Big Banks) would form only a small component of this One Bank. Thus while it is not necessarily true that the One Bank has effective control of all these fraud-factories; it is undoubtedly true that it controls the vast majority of them.
A “banking monopoly” with 40% control of all sectors of the global economy will obviously have a much, much higher concentration of control in the Heart of the Beast. The Big Banks of the West are literally “partners in crime” in the truest sense of that expression.
What is the crime being perpetrated by the One Bank? Anyone who reads even the diluted accounts of the Corporate Media will already know that the One Bank is involved in a cornucopia of crime, with the Attorney General of the United States, himself, publicly pledging to cover up all this (literal) organized crime. The One Bank is a crime syndicate.
However, among this litany of financial/economic atrocities, one grandiose scheme stands out above all others: nothing less than the economic enslavement of all humanity. While the “web” of corporate fronts which hides this obscene/illegal monolith may be intentionally convoluted; its strategy couldn’t be simpler.
Persuade/coerce all the Puppet Governments under its influence to intentionally become over-indebted, literally to the brink of bankruptcy…and then blood-suck. Steal a (large) portion of all the labours of all productive members of our society as so-called “interest payments” – forever.
The One Bank is above all else a gigantic parasite, claiming a large piece of all human production while earning none of it.
Understand that in one way or another, all of the massive/unrepayable bond debts of these Deadbeat Debtors are thoroughly tainted with fraud. How did (nearly) all of the West’s governments bury themselves in debt, far past the point of insolvency? They had a lot of help.

After these governments were already all on the threshold of insolvency; the One Bank sent its minions to begin whispering in the ears of all these Puppet Governments. The One Bank had “discovered” a magical way for all these governments to all borrow much, much more – and still remain solvent (claimed the minions).
The “magic” was via all the extremely complex (and entirely illegal) “financial derivatives” which the Puppet Governments had allowed these bankers to bring into existence. Indeed, the most-destructive/most-illegal form of these derivatives (credit-default swaps) had been explicitly banned in the U.S. for nearly a century based on anti-gambling statutes.
The promises of the minions of the One Bank were all lies. There was no “magic” way to permanently reduce interest rates, and thus permanently be able to (viably) finance much more debt.
When these financial fiduciaries (i.e. the minions of the One Bank) made their financial warranties which were unequivocally false, that was fraud. Moreover, the primary tool to perpetrate this fraud was credit-default swaps – i.e. illegal instruments.
All Western bond debts are the product of fraudulent misrepresentation, perpetrated through the use of illegal instruments (credit-default swaps, et al). According to the most basic tenets of the Rule of Law; all of these bond debts are now thoroughly tainted with fraud – and thus null-and-void as a matter of law.
The fact that our corrupt governments have (at best) passively facilitated the rape of their own economies, and “legitimized” all this bond fraud/crime by refusing to enforce their own laws cannot redeem the inherent fraud of these transactions.
When Debt Jubilee arrives and all these bond-debts are wiped clean (as they have been in previous historical episodes of similar, systemic fraud); the basis for eradicating all this debt will not be purely in morality, but also clearly in legality. The crime must end. Humanity must be allowed to remove the Yoke of the One Bank.
While undoubtedly many reader questions still remain about this malevolent “super-entity”, certainly one question rises above all others. Can we put a specific name to this “one bank”? Apparently so: Rothschild.
Many historical sources document the Rothschild clan as being unquestionably the wealthiest “house” on the planet in the 19[SUP]th[/SUP] century, my own favorite source being the superlative documentary, The Money Masters. This clan has never suffered any significant, publicly-recorded financial set-back. Yet flash ahead to the early 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century, and on any (so-called) “world’s wealthiest list” you will never see the Rothschild name appear.
Simply having “more money” makes it easier to accumulate (i.e. steal) even more money. Thus our presumption (if anything) is that House Rothschild would have extended the financial gap which separates these Misers from humanity.
The implication here is clear. The “world’s richest” lists compiled in the propaganda of the Corporate Media are simply the “B-list” billionaires. What does it mean to really be one of the “world’s wealthiest”? Being able to have your name removed from that propaganda list.
The Rothschilds, world’s wealthiest bankers of the 19[SUP]th[/SUP] and 20[SUP]th[/SUP] centuries, have (apparently) succeeded in creating One Bank, in order to greatly expand/accelerate their looting of all the wealth of humanity in the 21[SUP]st[/SUP] century. How important is such a corporate front to the malevolent aspirations of House Rothschild?
Here the Swiss researchers are unequivocal:
In particular, the top ranked actors hold a control ten times bigger than what could be expected based on their wealth. [emphasis mine]
The One Bank is nothing less than a gigantic “amplifier” of financial crime – apparently the new crimes of House Rothschild. Such a paradigm leads one to paraphrase a piece of immortal verse from the legendary J.R.R. Tolkein:
One Bank to rule them all,
One Bank to find them,
One Bank to bring them all,
And in the darkness bind them.
We are all “bound” by the fraud-bonds of the One Bank. And until we finally/completely/irrevocably destroy this One Bank; we will remain the financial thralls of these real-life Dark Lords.
 
China isn't in cahoots with the One Bank? That name is a big aggrandising too, no? I get the emphasis, just sounds like something they'd like.
 
China isn't in cahoots with the One Bank? That name is a big aggrandising too, no? I get the emphasis, just sounds like something they'd like.

It's catchy though...and it emphasises the centralised nature of the western banking system. As the article says they are a 'criminal syndicate'

I still hear people say things like: ''i don't think there is a group of people pulling the strings'' and it's those people who would gain a deeper understanding from hearing a term like 'one bank' in order to help them realise just how centralised power is in the west

In a faced paced modern world people need a hook. So for example the occupy movement used their simple chant of the 99% against the 1%...that really captured peoples imagination because it highlighted in one sentence the widening gap between the rich and the rest of us

China have created their own bank to challenge the western banking system and even the UK and australia have moved to join it

In terms of how enlightened the powers that be are in china....well that's a subject all of its own isn't it? But China is also a centralised power, so yes warning bells should sound there too (it's not exactly people power there)
 
The ring of power

[video=youtube;CObE4Cnuw5k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CObE4Cnuw5k#t=5941[/video]
 
George Bush and the Murder of John Kennedy. A Dark Legacy (sound missing from first vid see second!)


[video=youtube;YYmombA4WwE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYmombA4WwE[/video]

[video=youtube;-NlJQJUUqR4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NlJQJUUqR4[/video]
 
Last edited:
Ok...so a pretty dark subject...but if society is to straighten itself out and purge the corruption then it is nevertheless a subject that needs to be dealt with by society

In the UK we are seeing massive scandals relating to child abuse and murder by politicans and other powerful people and now the investigations are moving to the Royal Family itself

We are learning about police cover ups and about high profile celebrities being members of satanic rings that have infiltrated gvoernment. This stuff is now in the MIANSTREAM NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is no longer dismissed as the 'crazy' claims of 'conspiracy nuts'

The following is a story from todays papers (click on link to see more):

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-ring-before-coverup-excop-says-10126864.html


Royal family member was investigated as part of paedophile ring before cover-up, ex-cop says


A recent newspaper story on the police cover up:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...aims-involving-mps-and-officers-10110800.html



Child sex abuse: Watchdog to investigate Metropolitan police over 'cover-up' claims involving MPs and officers


A video on youtube has recently shown a naked man trying to escape from the upper floors of the royal Buckingham palace before falling (presumably to his death)

[video=youtube;gQkHcLaFtik]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQkHcLaFtik[/video]

The BBC being the zionist controlled propaganda peddling scumbags that they are are now trying to force out the journalists who reported on how the BBC harboured Britains most prolific rapist, necrophiliac and satanist Jimmy saville within the BBC for years:

[FONT=&quot]http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/08/bbc-whistleblowers-jimmy-savile

[/FONT][h=1]The sinister treatment of dissent at the BBC[/h]
NickCohen.png

Nick Cohen

obody from John Humphrys in the morning to Evan Davis at night dares mention a scandal at the BBC. It undermines their reporting of every abuse whistleblowers reveal. It reinforces the dirty common sense of British life that you must keep your head down if you want to keep your job. The scandal is simply this: the BBC is forcing out or demoting the journalists who exposed Jimmy Savile as a voracious abuser of girls. As Meirion Jones put it to me: “There is a small group of powerful people at the BBC who think it would have been better if the truth about Savile had never come out. And they aim to punish the reporters who revealed it.”
Jones was one of the BBC’s best investigative producers. He had suspected that Savile was not the “national treasure” the BBC, NHS, monarchy and public adored, ever since he had seen Savile take girls away in his car from an approved school his aunt ran in the 1970s. He broke the story which showed that Savile was one of the most prolific sex abusers in British history, and handed the BBC what would have been one of its biggest scoops. If it had run it. Which, of course, it did not. The editor of Newsnight banned the report. Thus began a cover-up which tore the BBC apart.
A week ago, Jones’s managers told him that a temporary assignment on Panorama was over. He should have been able to go back to his old job. But there was no old job to go back to. He had been fired.
Jones’s reporter on the Savile film was Liz MacKean, who documents the sufferings of the powerless – whether it be raped children in Britain or persecuted gay men in Putin’s Russia.
But she spoke out, so the BBC forced her out too. “When the Savile scandal broke,” she told me, “the BBC tried to smear my reputation. They said they had banned the film because Meirion and I had produced shoddy journalism. I stayed to fight them, but I knew they would make me leave in the end. Managers would look through me as if I wasn’t there. I went because I knew I was never going to appear on screen again.”
Advertisement

The BBC press office bridled when I described Jones and MacKean as “whistleblowers”. As the Pollard review of the Savile scandal had concluded that BBC management had acted in “good faith”, I must not call them that.
If you are tempted to agree, consider the sequel. Panorama responded magnificently to the news that the BBC had killed the Savile scoop. It broadcast a special documentary, which earned the highest audience in the programme’s history. Jones and MacKean described how their journalism had been suppressed, and Panorama went on to document Savile’s crimes. How open the BBC is, I thought. What other institution would subject itself to the same level of self-criticism?
What a fool I was. Since then, BBC managers have shifted Tom Giles, the editor of Panorama, out of news. Peter Horrocks, an executive who insisted throughout the scandal that the BBC must behave ethically, announced last September that he was resigning to “find new challenges”. Clive Edwards, who as commissioning editor for current affairs oversaw the Panorama documentary, was demoted. The television trade press reported recently that his future is “not yet clear” (which doesn’t sound as if he has much of a future at all).
Compare their treatment with those who did nothing to advance the public interest. As the Savile crisis deepened in the autumn of 2012, the BBC brought in Adrian Van Klaveren, the then head of Radio 5, to supervise news. He allowed Newsnight to falsely imply that Lord McAlpine was a child abuser – an allegation that every journalist who had investigated the child abuse allegations in North Wales could have told him was ridiculous. The disaster of Newsnight covering up the abuse by the BBC’s own celebrity rapist and then falsely accusing an innocent man led to the resignation of the director-general George Entwistle.
But Van Klaveren has been promoted, not squeezed out. He is head of something called “strategic change”. Helen Boaden, the BBC head of news at the time of the censorship, is now on the BBC’s executive board. Peter Rippon, the Newsnight editor who blocked Jones and MacKean, now has a comfortable job managing the BBC’s archive.
I could go on, but I am sure you are weary of bog-standard jobsworths. The wider point is that the interests of those at the top of an organisation and the interests of the organisation can be miles apart.
If the BBC had exposed Savile, viewers would have admired its honesty. If it had bent over backwards to ensure that Jones and MacKean did not suffer for speaking out, everyone would say that it was behaving as a free institution should, rather than looking like the official broadcaster of a paranoid dictatorship or the board of directors of HSBC.
In the banks, the NHS, the police or the BBC, the greatest threats to those in charge, however, are not threats to the institution but threats to their status. If subordinates can contradict them, how can they justify their salaries and the prestige that goes with them? The Pollard review into Savile showed that status anxiety was generating real hatred at the top of the BBC.
A senior BBC press officer vowed to “drip poison about Meirion’s suspected role”. He was later promoted. Peter Rippon said that if Jones spoke freely: “I will throw shit at him”.
The best aspect of modern culture is that it revolts against such hierarchical control. The computer revolution makes information sharing and cooperative ways of working easy to achieve. But hierarchies have men and women at their summits who will fight as ferociously as BBC executives to protect their position, and prevent democratic change.
The case of Jones and MacKean makes my point. I have reported on it in the Observer and Private Eye has covered it too. But the Tory press, which daily bashes the BBC, has avoided the story. You only have to look at the Telegraph to understand why it does not want to encourage insubordination. Its journalists must resign before they can protest against HSBC’s control of its news pages.
The power of hierarchies is hard to break. But if you want to fight fraud in the City or the rape of children, it has to be broken. A start can be made by insisting that everyone from John Humphrys in the morning to Evan Davis at night tells the truth about the purge of the BBC’s truth tellers.
 
Here's the BBC reporting the destruction of building 7 during the '911' attacks before the building even fell down!

That's because the zionists behind the BBC carried out the attacks

What a bunch of lying scumbags the BBC are....why anyone even listens to them or pays their licence fee i don't know...ignorance i guess

The BBC should be ignored out of existence

http://anonhq.com/small-911-truth-v...uk-man-won-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up/
 
[video=youtube;VVnkokDFSxg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVnkokDFSxg[/video]
 
[video=youtube;TUXEedX2R-0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUXEedX2R-0[/video]
 
Hehehe

11081200_569217183181116_2930135307667049942_n.jpg
 
One Bank Is Finally On Trial For The Financial Crisis

The trial of the centurya long-awaited determination of the damage perpetrated by Wall Street institutions in the financial crisisbegan Monday in New York. But it’s only happening because one bankunlike Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, and Bank of Americarefused to settle out of court. The Japanese firm Nomura stands accused of lying to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac about the quality of mortgages pooled into securities during the housing bubble. The case will finally reveal hard data on just how much money Nomura, and the rest of the industry, made through fraud.

Read more -
https://www.popularresistance.org/one-bank-is-finally-on-trial-for-the-financial-crisis-2/
 
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193175#.VRhdcI5ZS-X

[h=2]US Declassifies Document Revealing Israel's Nuclear Program[/h]Obama revenge for Netanyahu's Congress talk? 1987 report on Israel's top secret nuclear program released in unprecedented move.


By Ari Yashar, Matt Wanderman

First Publish: 3/25/2015, 8:00 PM

In a development that has largely been missed by mainstream media, the Pentagon early last month quietly declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document detailing Israel's nuclear program, a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race, and which the US until now has respected by remaining silent.
But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the US reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel's nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth.
The timing of the revelation is highly suspect, given that it came as tensions spiraled out of control between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama ahead of Netanyahu's March 3 address in Congress, in which he warned against the dangers of Iran's nuclear program and how the deal being formed on that program leaves the Islamic regime with nuclear breakout capabilities.
Another highly suspicious aspect of the document is that while the Pentagon saw fit to declassify sections on Israel's sensitive nuclear program, it kept sections on Italy, France, West Germany and other NATO countries classified, with those sections blocked out in the document.
The 386-page report entitled "Critical Technological Assessment in Israel and NATO Nations" gives a detailed description of how Israel advanced its military technology and developed its nuclear infrastructure and research in the 1970s and 1980s.
Israel is "developing the kind of codes which will enable them to make hydrogen bombs. That is, codes which detail fission and fusion processes on a microscopic and macroscopic level," reveals the report, stating that in the 1980s Israelis were reaching the ability to create bombs considered a thousand times more powerful than atom bombs.
The revelation marks a first in which the US published in a document a description of how Israel attained hydrogen bombs.
The report also notes research laboratories in Israel "are equivalent to our Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Oak Ridge National Laboratories," the key labs in developing America's nuclear arsenal.
Israel's nuclear infrastructure is "an almost exact parallel of the capability currently existing at our National Laboratories," it adds.
"As far as nuclear technology is concerned the Israelis are roughly where the U.S. was in the fission weapon field in about 1955 to 1960," the report reveals, noting a time frame just after America tested its first hydrogen bomb.
Institute for Defense Analysis, a federally funded agency operating under the Pentagon, penned the report back in 1987.
Aside from nuclear capabilities, the report revealed Israel at the time had "a totally integrated effort in systems development throughout the nation," with electronic combat all in one "integrated system, not separated systems for the Army, Navy and Air Force." It even acknowledged that in some cases, Israeli military technology "is more advanced than in the U.S."
Declassifying the report comes at a sensitive timing as noted above, and given that the process to have it published was started three years ago, that timing is seen as having been the choice of the American government.
US journalist Grant Smith petitioned to have the report published based on the Freedom of Information Act. Initially the Pentagon took its time answering, leading Smith to sue, and a District Court judge to order the Pentagon to respond to the request.
Smith, who heads the Institute for Research: Middle East Policy, reportedly said he thinks this is the first time the US government has officially confirmed that Israel is a nuclear power, a status that Israel has long been widely known to have despite being undeclared.