Fair enough.
What about someone else on the forum? Are you willing to discuss such matters with somebody else?
Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues?
- Thread starter muir
- Start date
-
- Tags
- right wing nut job
Fair enough.
What about someone else on the forum? Are you willing to discuss such matters with somebody else?
[MENTION=4822]Matt3737[/MENTION] give it the fuck up man. If you want to make a mountain out of a mole hill your going to find yourself banned. I am sure you don't care. No one ever does they just come back with a new screen name and start the shit all over. All your doing now is irritating people. ON PURPOSE! Go look at porn or something take a break. Seems like you need a release...
Yeah, except that makes it even worse. You theorized, in accordance to your own opinions, that muir was likely psychologically ill. You didn't have any concrete data, so you asked him to provide personal information. When he didn't, that threw a wrench in your plans and you were the one who ended up reacted abnormally. Then, just a few posts ago, you were trying to pass off your line of questioning as innocent and to the mutual benefit of everyone when really, it was just you fishing for information fit a pre-conceived diagnosis you based on pretty much nothing.
That is some seriously shady business.
I got no probs with you. And I don't want any. No one has neg repped you as far as I can tell. That's pretty patient on their part. This is supposed to be a place to hang out let your hair down. And have discussions. We can all get mad. I have before. I have found that It did no good and just disrupted the place. Cause everyone likes to see a car crash. They want the show. Is life not already full of people who will not sit down and reason with one another and come to agreeable solutions? Peace Bro!
this is a misreading of the facts.
I believe the oil companies expected the Iraqi fields to be flowing as the Saudis fields do by now. but they are not....but I am sure you predicted that
This doesn't even come close to being a response to what I said.... but it does give me a pretty good idea of how worthwhile it would be to continue trying to get you to respond to it.
Well I am sorry if I didn't live up to your expectations, but when I want to understand something I ask questions. I also acknowledge the fact that I may very well be in the wrong and mistaken.
I am still not persuaded though. I only see your disagreement as resultant from my transgression of a taboo subject. I do apologize, but I cannot do otherwise. My opinion will stand until further information is presented.
You can have your opinion all you want. I'm not trying to dissuade you. Frankly, I don't see how I could because I don't even know what facts you're basing any of this on.
My gripe with you is not that you transgressed a taboo subject. Not at all. My gripe with you is that you were being dishonest in your questioning by not only prying into something that is not at all your business, but by trying to pass it off in the interests of the community when the person refused to answer you the first time.
That wasn't a missreading of the facts...go check out what i said
Whilst you are checking out the whole slant drilling angle to the story maybe you could also look into the story about the supposed kuweiti nurse who testfified in front of congress telling a sob story about iraqi atricities which turned out to be completely false. She wasn;t a nurse at all and was in fact the daughter of the kuweiti ambasador but her performance helped sway congress
If you want to really know what i'm thinking.....
I am holding two possibilities in my head Stu
One is that they have gone in there for regime change and oil access and its all gone wrong....that's kind of the respectable mainstream view
The other possibility is that these guys are agents of chaos....they are just incredibly chaotic people for whatever reason
Until i know exactly which of those it is i will be continuing to observe and gather information
Fair enough. What would you expect me to say then? That I'm a narcissistic self-centered asshole? All in all most likely. I wanted to know what the fuck was going on and I damn well asked whatever I damn well pleased to find an answer that satisfied me.
I will live with that and I will have to live with your opinion of that behavior. I am sorry, but it is not something I can just 'let go'. I have an answer that satifies me until some other information demonstrates otherwise.
Well your post, if im not mistaken, was saying that you hadn't actually read much of my post but you thought i was by posting so much information trying to bamboozle you
I responded by saying that it was good information and that maybe you shoul read my post
If you read my post you will realise the relevance of the information and that it supports what i am saying
To be fair, he was pretty transparent from the beginning in what he was trying to accomplish through that line of questioning. There was nothing underhanded or "shady" about it, he just wanted to prove his point in a very up-front manner.
Ok you can think what you like about my mental state....thats fine man because i don't care what you think of me
But the problem with being dismissive of someone like that is that then you will close your mind to what they are saying and by doing so you might miss some info that could be useful to you
she was a plant, but that only proves that there where powerful forces pushing for an end of the potential oil revenue to the Ba'athists.
The difference between us is that I see many power centers, you see one
So when he was saying ''so muir what sort of music do you listen to'' you where thinking ''ah...i know what he's going to do next...he's going to say that he thinks muir is schizoidal!''
I don't think it was transparent. i think what was transparent was the deviousness. We all knew he was upto no good. As i say i find him untrustworthy
No, I'm not expecting you to say anything. I'm just clarifying why I'm disappointed. I was remembering how valiantly you once defended a fellow forum member from the presupposition that, just because he was introverted, lonely, and didn't have a girlfriend, he didn't go outside. You posited that other members didn't have the right to assume anything about another person based on a few lines of text. That was when you won my admiration, hence, my strong reaction to your posts here.
I guess we'll just have to leave this issue at rest.
I know muir. I know what you think of me too.
I've actually agreed with many things you've said, but not all of it. It's just that I feel you don't respect my opinion to disagree with the cabal and its range of influence.
I've actually spoken out about the government's manipulation regarding marijuana's legal status and how they lie to us in order to profit from the drug trade.
I just cannot agree with all of what you say.
No i see many power centres as well
I also see, as i have said, a polarity in the world...within which of course are many power centres....where on one side you have russia, china, brazil, india, south africa and many other countries and on the other side you have the neoliberal countries controlled by the central banks.
One side wants a 'unipolar' world as Putin called it and the other side wants a 'multi polar' world
Putin is telling the central bankers that their plan is not going to work. the BRICS nations and others are going to trade within themselves, the dollar will collapse and with it all the other fiat currencies will go as well
Then its back to gold again
Also can you please define 'powerful forces'