D
Answer With A Question! (Part 7)
- Thread starter hush
- Start date
I dont know which of the following questions make sense for me:
(Free style question)
1) if everything is possible, is it possible for something to be impossible?
BUT
(From linguistic perspective)
2) If “anything is possible”, then the idea that “something-is-impossible” is impossible. Because if anything is possible, then nothing is impossible.
If one thing becomes impossible, and that's the idea that “something is impossible.
Literal argument in the question will only lead to inherently contradictory, meaning one answer will always contradict one part of the question.
OR
(From science point of view, we should rewrite the question)
3) What Is Scientifically Impossible?
I Googled found one of these
"'Impossible' is an abstraction that only has meaning subjectively. Science is about what is, not what might or might not be. 'Impossible' represents the desire to do something outside of reality. As a result, it is impossible for science to prove or disprove anything such as the existence of gods."
Which one makes more sense for you?
(Free style question)
1) if everything is possible, is it possible for something to be impossible?
BUT
(From linguistic perspective)
2) If “anything is possible”, then the idea that “something-is-impossible” is impossible. Because if anything is possible, then nothing is impossible.
If one thing becomes impossible, and that's the idea that “something is impossible.
Literal argument in the question will only lead to inherently contradictory, meaning one answer will always contradict one part of the question.
OR
(From science point of view, we should rewrite the question)
3) What Is Scientifically Impossible?
I Googled found one of these
"'Impossible' is an abstraction that only has meaning subjectively. Science is about what is, not what might or might not be. 'Impossible' represents the desire to do something outside of reality. As a result, it is impossible for science to prove or disprove anything such as the existence of gods."
Which one makes more sense for you?
Last edited:
Dont worry bro, after a deep thought those are likely nonquestions
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/non-question
One interesting person yesterday came out with question No. 1. I thought I could help answer it, but what I did was just expanding the question and offer some nonquestions.
And to make it worst, she looked more puzzled to hear those
@OP, good headline topic btw
Are facts simple, straight, lazy or late?
Would simple straightness or lazy lateness be indicative?
Hindrance or not, could the possibility be sought?
