Abortion: The Ethics of Liberty | INFJ Forum

Abortion: The Ethics of Liberty

Discussion in 'Philosophy and Religion' started by TheLastMohican, Mar 19, 2009.

Share This Page

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 3 users.
More threads by TheLastMohican
  1. TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/fourteen.asp

    A few excerpts:

    The Premise




    If accepted for legal purposes, this argument would have some interesting implications for the procedures of abortion. It would be legal to remove a fetus from the womb, but not to kill it directly (especially not when it is capable of breathing on its own). That could necessitate some strange practices, but it would, at least in my opinion, make the legalization of abortion philosophically consistent. The basic rule is that we are not allowed to kill children, but we are not required to nurture them, either. It gives us the simple freedom to keep to ourselves.

    Thoughts?


     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. IndigoSensor

    IndigoSensor Product Obtained
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Threads:
    762
    Messages:
    14,154
    Likes Received:
    1,320
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    1w2 sx/so/sp
    Oh man, did you open a can of worms! I don't think that argument would ever be put into practice, it is so odd (for lack of a better word) that very very few people would latch onto it. However, it sorta does make sense.

    My personal take on abortion is that it is the womens choice up until the last minute. I have never seen a problem with abortion, nor will I ever. It is a potential life, not a life.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Satya

    Satya C'est la vie
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Threads:
    540
    Messages:
    7,278
    Likes Received:
    550
    Trophy Points:
    656
    MBTI:
    INXP
    I think in my lesser moments I have made that argument purely with the malice intention of inflaming the sensibilities of extreme pro-life advocates. However, I value human life in and of itself too much to take it seriously. In a rational world it may make sense, but in a rational world there would probably be no need for abortions in the first place.
     
  4. Flavus Aquila

    Flavus Aquila Finding My Place in the Sun
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Threads:
    323
    Messages:
    10,046
    Featured Threads:
    49
    Likes Received:
    5,655
    Trophy Points:
    1,102
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Australia
    MBTI:
    INTJ - A
    Enneagram:
    10000
    At what point does 'potential life' become 'actual life'?
     
  5. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    That's what you get with a purely rational argument. :wink:

    My position up until now was that abortion, while morally ambiguous, should not be legal. My reasoning was that conception is the only point at which we can properly define the beginning of life, because human development (be it growth or degenerative aging) is continuous and the fetus is basically the same just after birth as it was an hour before, the only difference being that the umbilical cord has been severed. It's still dependent on other humans for any lengthy survival period.

    This new argument neatly bypasses that problem of definition, because we are no longer talking about when the fetus gains the right to life; instead, we can just remove it and then give it a sporting chance to live if it can. Since we're not deliberately killing it, the "right to life" is no longer an issue. All that matters is our right to do what we please with our time and energy.
    Strange, perhaps, but it makes more sense than any arguments I have previously heard from either side of the abortion debate.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. texasgirl

    texasgirl Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Threads:
    4
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    ENFJ

    And that is what makes abortion such a touchy issue. We have no way of determining when the change form potential life to actual life is made. Thats the controversy in a lot of the arguments. Some people believe that its not actually alive until it comes out a pink crying baby, while others consider it actual life as soon as it is conceived.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    Do you mean this argument specifically, carrying the logic through to the lack of obligation by the parents, or do you just meaning using the parasite argument from the woman's perspective?
    I've seen the latter used a number of times by someone on another forum, but she didn't express it as one consistent rule as this article does, but more as a subjective sympathy stance.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. KingOfSpades

    KingOfSpades Community Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Threads:
    10
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    It's logically consistent, but I woudl worry about the social consequences of this writ large. It seems it would cultivate a very self-interested attitude about what to do with your life. The parental bond is strong, and suggesting that a parent has no obligation to provide for the kid might lead to a lot of poor parenting and just a pretty intolerable social environment where everyone is out for themselves.

    When it comes to abortion I don't think there's any need to be logically consistent. As I get older I appreciate how gray life is -- how capable we all are of "good" and "evil". Those terms have much less meaning for me now than they would have 10 years ago. I would leave it up to every woman to decide what to do w/her body. Just like they say, "every athiest believes in God in a foxhole," I'm sure you could say that even a pro-life woman might consider abortion given some difficult life circumstance.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #8 KingOfSpades, Mar 19, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2009
    Creon likes this.
  9. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    It is life at least from conception onward. I don't see how you can argue against that; it has 46 chromosomes, and it's growing independently. But with this argument, none of that matters.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. IndigoSensor

    IndigoSensor Product Obtained
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Threads:
    762
    Messages:
    14,154
    Likes Received:
    1,320
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    1w2 sx/so/sp
    Strange it may be, but I don't particulary like the argument, because then it gives parents an excuse not to care for their children, which I have a serious problem with. On the flipside it does give reason for abortion.

    As far as the "where life begins" argument, it has never been an issue to me. I have always had a clear definition in my mind. Live begins when birth is decided on, and the birth is preformed. If abortion is decided, then it is not a life, even if live birth abortion is preformed. People have a hard time understanding my take on it. I only know 3 other people (my mom, my best friend, and a very close friend), who agree with me on this front.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    What I don't understand about your position is why you have a problem with parents killing or discarding the infant after birth. If it's okay prior to birth, and even during birth, then why not after birth?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. IndigoSensor

    IndigoSensor Product Obtained
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Threads:
    762
    Messages:
    14,154
    Likes Received:
    1,320
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    1w2 sx/so/sp

    And the problem occurs! I truly can't explain why I feel this way, it just makes sense to me. After birth was decided, the parents decided to give it life. Tough cookies if you change your mind, you already agreed on it. Imagine what would happen if parents started deciding "hmm, I'd rather not have this baby after all, time to get rid of it", it would cause alot of problems. Again I see a fetus up until the decision has been made that it is to be born, as a potential life, nothing more.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. Creon

    Creon Community Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Threads:
    15
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    Lawful Evil

    I agree.

    This argument may shed some light into the abortion issue, but it legalizes a rather problematic parent-child relationship. Someone could use this argument to defend himself of, for example, abandoning his newborn baby. In other words, it may open up new fronts.

    Note that abortion is legal in my country.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. arbygil

    arbygil Passing through

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Threads:
    382
    Messages:
    11,684
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Trophy Points:
    881
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    9w1
    Here's my take on the issue: I believe in education first. Once people know both the pros and the cons without bias, then the decision is up to them. Unfortunately we don't tell them all the pros and the cons. I think women should see pictures of infants/fetuses growing, and they should see movies of it moving in a human body. They should see it tasting its fingers and moving and wriggling about. They should see this *before* they get pregnant. It should be taught in sex ed classes, along with safe sex.

    And then, once they know what happens from conception to birth, I think it's up to them to decide what to do. Personally, I think it's a child, and I see it as a baby and not tissue. Growing, yes. Not complete, not totally cognizant, but growing nonetheless. But we all make decisions in our lives and we have to live with the decisions we make, for good or for ill. I'll explain how I feel but I won't come down on a woman who has decided to abort her child. She chose to do what she felt she needed to do.

    And I can't blame people who get pregnant via rape or abuse, because in such circumstances I don't know how I'd feel. I'm also not sure of cases when the mother is mentally incompetent or mentally disabled...or when the mother is dead but the baby is still clinging for life. I know how I feel about it and I can try and help counsel someone who is making a decision in their life, but ultimately that decision is the mother's. I'd rather she make an informed decision in a safe hospital than an informed decision in a back alley, risking her own life as well as her infant's (TMI: Happened to my mother and her first pregnancy).
     
  15. TenorKite

    TenorKite Community Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Threads:
    5
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    562
    MBTI:
    Undisclosed
    This is a message I sent off to a friend a number of years ago after a very vocal anti-abortion rally was held near my house. It seems very poorly written now, not that I'm any better of a writer, but I can now summarize it as: "We're defined by our relationships."

     
  16. Satya

    Satya C'est la vie
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Threads:
    540
    Messages:
    7,278
    Likes Received:
    550
    Trophy Points:
    656
    MBTI:
    INXP
    I'm sure you are aware of the forum I am speaking about and the argument I made was generally that a woman's womb was a "residence" and since it was her property she had the right to "evict" the fetus.
     
  17. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    Okay, I can guess where you presented that argument; I just didn't see it. (I haven't been very active at you-know-where recently.)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  18. the

    the Si master race.
    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Threads:
    479
    Messages:
    14,388
    Featured Threads:
    9
    Likes Received:
    8,829
    Trophy Points:
    1,112
    MBTI:
    ISTJ
    Enneagram:
    9w1
    I think parents should be allowed to destroy their offspring at any time any age.



    How can you know anything without bias?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  19. OP
    TheLastMohican

    TheLastMohican Captain Obvious
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Threads:
    206
    Messages:
    6,233
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    676
    MBTI:
    ENTJ
    Enneagram:
    Type me.
    What gives a parent the right to kill a grown, self-sufficient descendant (assuming that a person who is not the parent does not have that right)?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  20. IndigoSensor

    IndigoSensor Product Obtained
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Threads:
    762
    Messages:
    14,154
    Likes Received:
    1,320
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    1w2 sx/so/sp

    ... do you realise how HORRIBLE those implications would be? I truly hope you are joking.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
Loading...

Share This Page