Why single-sex schools are bad for your health . . . (if you're a boy) | INFJ Forum

Why single-sex schools are bad for your health . . . (if you're a boy)

Gaze

Donor
Sep 5, 2009
28,259
44,730
1,906
MBTI
INFPishy
</EM>
Boys taught in male-only schools face divorce and depression by their early 40s, research reveals
By Richard Garner, Education

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

You might have thought that boys brought up in a single-sex environment would find relationships with girls difficult to handle.

Now research due to be published tomorrow proves it.

It shows that boys taught in singlesex schools are more likely to be divorced or separated from their partner than those who attended a mixed school by their early 40s.

However, those who stayed together were just as likely to be happy in their relationship as men educated in mixed schools – when asked to rate the quality of their marriage on a scale of one to seven.

The findings, taken from studying a cohort of all those born in a single week of 1958, will be presented by Professor Diana Leonard, from London University's Institute of Education, at a conference at the Perse School for Girls in Cambridge.

The research covered 17,000 adults who had been taught in a range of institutions from private boarding schools to state comprehensives. The majority had been brought up in day schools.

Dr Leonard's findings have fuelled claims from teachers' leaders and education psychologists that boys brought up in a single-sex environment are less able to relate to the opposite sex than those taught in a co-educational school.

Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "All the research shows single-sex schools are good for girls but bad for boys – both in terms of academic performance and socialisation.

"Girls seem to learn what the nature of the beast is if they have been to single sex schools whereas boys taught on their own seem to find girls more puzzling."

Dr Bousted added: "Boys learn better when they are with girls and they actually learn to get on better."

The research also reveals that men taught in boys' schools are more likely to suffer from "a sense of malaise" or depression by their early 40s – possibly as a result of relationship breakdown.

Men were also more likely to have spoken of a "dislike" for their school days if taught in a male-dominated environment.

However, there was no difference in the likelihood of marital breakdown between girls brought up in single-sex schools and those taught in a mixed-sex environment.

The research also shows that boys from single-sex schools were just as likely to take part in household chores – such as cooking the evening meal, laundry, cleaning and shopping.

"We found no link between single-sex schooling and the domestic division of labour," Professor Leonard will say.

The research failed to back up a claim made by advocates of mixed schooling that being taught co-educationally meant youngsters were less likely to opt for a homosexual or lesbian lifestyle. "Only 21 men and 22 women reported living with same-sex partners at age 42," says the research.

"We are therefore unable to comment on whether co-education did provide the 'clean, healthy, natural atmosphere' so commended by its early advocates."

Nearly half of those born in the 1958 week under study, who subsequently graduated from universities, had attended single-sex schools, the research also found.

However, this was more likely to have been as a result of the type of schools they attended – there are more single private schools and grammar schools than comprehensives. Pupils taught in single-sex schools are more likely to study for subjects traditionally thought of as the preserve of the opposite sex, though.

For instance, more girls choose to study maths and science in single-sex schools and more boys pick the arts and humanities than if they were taught in mixed classes.

""A central finding is that single-sex schooling moderates the effect of gender-stereotyping in terms of choice of field of study," says the research.

"This runs counter to earlier assertions that co-education would widen subject choice."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/e...d-for-your-health-if-youre-a-boy-1831636.html
 
Interesting. Most of these schools are very religious too. Do you think there could be a correlation. I've heard that atheists have a lower divorce rate than Christians and that was out of Glenn Beck's mouth.
 
Not surprised in the least. Just backs up what I internally thought about such things when I was a kid. I remember when I was 6 talking to my dad about all boys schools and all girls schools and saying how I thought it was bad. That just resulted in him telling me I was wrong. ha!

I've heard that atheists have a lower divorce rate than Christians and that was out of Glenn Beck's mouth.

lol wut?
 
Interesting. Most of these schools are very religious too. Do you think there could be a correlation. I've heard that atheists have a lower divorce rate than Christians and that was out of Glenn Beck's mouth.

Yeah, many of these single sex schools are usually more religious or conservative with strict rules regarding behavior and conduct, so that probably adds to the stats. Although, I think the real issue is how they are, not that they are single sexed. If there is a balance of social, emotional, and academic needs in the school, then I don't think it would such an unhealthy environment.
 

It was an episode where he had like three other uber right wing christian pastors on his show and actually that's what they said. I just feel that if someone that biased towards religion is saying atheists are better at staying married, it seems likely to be true.

I don't like what Glenn has to say but I watch it for entertainment purposes.
 
im pretty sure it aint so bad in a same sex gay kids school. oooh lala I'm sure the schoolbooks arent the only... eh I won't go that far with this joke.


To be serious: Yea, I would have imagined this would have been the result of denial of the opposite gender. Goddamn, people were stupid back in the day. And when you think about it, even the "smart" people were stupid back in the day.
 
It was an episode where he had like three other uber right wing christian pastors on his show and actually that's what they said. I just feel that if someone that biased towards religion is saying atheists are better at staying married, it seems likely to be true.

I don't like what Glenn has to say but I watch it for entertainment purposes.

Every statistic I've read have shown that Christians have the highest success rate in the U.S. I think thats followed by Same Sex marriages.

Edit: Don't mix religion and politics, history tells us thats a bad idea.
 
Every statistic I've read have shown that Christians have the highest success rate in the U.S. I think thats followed by Same Sex marriages.

WAKKA WAKKA


GET IT GET IT GET IT GET IT DONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
gay people have lower divorce rates than straight people
know why?
most divorces are because of money
gay people can share a wardrobe so they spend less money, so they fight about spending less
 
gay people have lower divorce rates than straight people
know why?
most divorces are because of money
gay people can share a wardrobe so they spend less money, so they fight about spending less

AND LESBIANS MAKE GREAT HUMMUS.

Hmmmm, hummus.


Also gay dudes are like two drama queens together, unless you get a twink and a bear, then you got a queen and a king. excellent ruling couple.
 
Every statistic I've read have shown that Christians have the highest success rate in the U.S. I think thats followed by Same Sex marriages.

That's what I thought but he's so biased and he came out and said atheists have a lower divorce rate. There was no reference to a study but why would Glenn say that when it doesn't support his theories? Because that's what he's about.

Edit: Don't mix religion and politics, history tells us thats a bad idea.

Agreed
 
Also gay dudes are like two drama queens together, unless you get a twink and a bear, then you got a queen and a king. excellent ruling couple.

Wow. Wtf? Not all gay people are drama queens. That's a cliche and a stereotype.
 
Wow. Wtf? Not all gay people are drama queens. That's a cliche and a stereotype.


im gay, so im allowed to make stereotypes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bickelz
Well, I don't know about the effect of single sex education on males in regard to relationships but I've always preferred males who attended boys' school. I find them to be generally more respectful towards women and they have a more rounded high school education. Coed males never seem to catch up in that regard even after tertiary education.

Our situation, in my country, is somewhat different from the article. The schools are run by the state and the religious component although there is not overly emphasized. The single sex schools here have a system of brother and sister schools where some extracurricular activities are combined so neither gender is ignorant of how to interact with the other. Do they have a similar system in the UK? Also, single sex day schools are more common than single sex boarding schools.

If I had children, I would want single sex education for them. Of course, I would not force it on them. The tradition of single sex education is dying out and I personally think it is sad. One of the reasons is that ignorant people fear that single sex school will make their kids gay.

I used to take extra courses at a coed school in the afternoons and coed school looked like absolute chaos to me. The girls seemed sidelined and the boys seemed to be in a machissmo competition.


A classic study from my country: Marlene Hamilton, studying students in my country, found that students attending single-sex schools outperformed students in coed schools in almost every subject tested. At the time of the study, public single-sex schools were still widely available in my country, so that there were few if any socioeconomic or academic variables which distinguished students at single-sex schools from students at coed schools. Hamilton noted the same pattern of results which has been found in most studies worldwide: Girls at single-sex schools attain the highest achievement; boys at single-sex schools are next; boys at coed schools are next; and girls at coed schools do worst of all.
[SIZE=-1]Source: Marlene Hamilton. Performance levels in science and other subjects for adolescents attending single-sex and coeducational high schools, International Science Education, 69(4):535-547, 1985.[/SIZE]
URL Removed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I don't know about the effect of single sex education on males in regard to relationships but I've always preferred males who attended boys' school. I find them to be generally more respectful towards women and they have a more rounded high school education. Coed males never seem to catch up in that regard even after tertiary education.

Our situation, in Jamaica, is somewhat different from the article. The schools are run by the state and the religious component although there is not overly emphasized. The single sex schools here have a system of brother and sister schools where some extracurricular activities are combined so neither gender is ignorant of how to interact with the other. Do they have a similar system in the UK? Also, single sex day schools are more common than single sex boarding schools.

If I had children, I would want single sex education for them. Of course, I would not force it on them. The tradition of single sex education is dying out and I personally think it is sad. One of the reasons is that ignorant people fear that single sex school will make their kids gay.

I used to take extra courses at a coed school in the afternoons and coed school looked like absolute chaos to me. The girls seemed sidelined and the boys seemed to be in a machissmo competition.


</B>http://www.singlesexschools.org/advantages-equity.htm

Agree, I went to a single-sex high school, and it was great for academics, but not necessarily the best for social development. I think many who didn't have much normal, everyday, social interaction with the opposite sex during high school had difficulty transitioning into the real world, not knowing what to expect from relationships, or having a overly ideal view of the opposite sex. Great academics but not necessarily for relationships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: not sure
Interesting. Most of these schools are very religious too. Do you think there could be a correlation. I've heard that atheists have a lower divorce rate than Christians and that was out of Glenn Beck's mouth.

There are many who claim to be Christians but do nothing that the Bible states. Those who are actually true practicing Christians have a lower divorce rate than those who are Christmas/Easter "Christians".