Why are we so apathetic? | Page 5 | INFJ Forum

Why are we so apathetic?

Funny. No one in their right mind would get that close to a rhino.

debbie-downer.jpeg


Why trying to be the antithesis of something that you should view as a sad turning point in our species?
This is the apathy problem is all it’s glory…too far away…you don’t give a fuck…feel powerless…etc…whatever the reason…that is HOW we reach such a sad point….by laughing at those trying to sound the alarm.
It’s not based in reality frankly.
 
debbie-downer.jpeg


Why trying to be the antithesis of something that you should view as a sad turning point in our species?
This is the apathy problem is all it’s glory…too far away…you don’t give a fuck…feel powerless…etc…whatever the reason…that is HOW we reach such a sad point….by laughing at those trying to sound the alarm.
It’s not based in reality frankly.

I can go into two modes. One involves killing and burning damn near every opposition to my view, because my view is right and their view is fucking retarded - "Global Warming is a hoax!!1!!1!!!". The other involves me retreating a safe distance and watching the world burn itself to the ground.
 
I can go into two modes. One involves killing and burning damn near every opposition to my view, because my view is right and their view is fucking retarded - "Global Warming is a hoax!!1!!1!!!". The other involves me retreating a safe distance and watching the world burn itself to the ground.
I guess I will forever play the part of Sisyphus trying to make some sort of change…maybe that sounds stupid and pointless to some people.
Sometimes it sounds stupid and pointless to me too…but what then is this life worth if you have done nothing to contribute to it…even in a small detail?
It’s worth a pile of crap is what it is…and more and more that is what the view has been..that it’s somehow beyond repair…that we humans are on a path off a cliff like so many lemmings thrown bodily over the edge to make a Disney nature movie (poor lemmings).
I know I can’t effect huge changes…but I can do what I can do, and fuck it if that just isn’t enough…because that puts humanity back in the equation.
And it’s frustrating and every other adjective that goes along with that…but there is something…someone who you or I will effect, who in turn will effect another…and these are how society changes it’s views and morals.
I give up some days…but some days I fight.
 
11173324_10152901528176275_4114202278302067264_n.jpg


More apathy…slut shaming someone who was violated…how sad.
 
11173324_10152901528176275_4114202278302067264_n.jpg


More apathy…slut shaming someone who was violated…how sad.

This reminds me of a recent anti-vaccination protest poster which is pointing out how vaccination is the same as RAPE because it is forced on children without their consent

People are so apathetic about vaccines they don't even research into them

mq4xloqase9ldjswuhio.jpg

mq4xloqase9ldjswuhio.jpg
 
This reminds me of a recent anti-vaccination protest poster which is pointing out how vaccination is the same as RAPE because it is forced on children without their consent

People are so apathetic about vaccines they don't even research into them

View attachment 23328

Rape, and rights for the rapist and being vaccinated are hardly the same…it kind of diminishes the person raped.
 
I think the basic issue is the lack of education on how the government works and simple economics. Like, if you ask most people very basic questions about our governing system, The Constitution, or basic historical facts, you'll be met with blank stares for the most part. Like really easy questions such as "What happened in Plessy v. Ferguson" or "What is the first article of the U.S. Constitution about"? These are things that everyone person in the U.S. should have some idea of, but most have no clue. I just think that if people in general had a basic understanding of history, constitutional law, and maybe some political philosophy, we'd be much better off as a country. It would address ignorance, apathy, and denial.

And it is really unfortunate that we do not care that kids are in poverty. Our country has become very mean-spirited, and many conservatives like to blame poor people for their poverty. They view people on food stamps as being leeches and want to cut the program. You can't blame children for their poverty though. However, they would probably just blame the parents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muir
Rape, and rights for the rapist and being vaccinated are hardly the same…it kind of diminishes the person raped.

Not really

I think most people would agree that rape is the forceful insertion of a penis, finger or other implement into an orafice of the human body such as the mouth, anus or vagina against the will of the person

A needle is an implement and it is being inserted into the body against the will of the person

babies and small children are not able to give consent and should be left alone until they are of age where they are able to give free will consent

It is forceful insertion of an implement into the body of a human being without their consent= rape

Not realising this is so diminishes the children and babies who are being raped in this manner every day

http://vactruth.com/2015/04/23/baby-dies-after-13-vaccines/

[h=1]Six Month-Old Baby Dies Just Five Days After Receiving 13 Vaccines[/h] Christina England
April 23 2015

Bently-Neathery-1-630x315.jpg


Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?
However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.
She told VacTruth:
“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”
According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.
If this were not bad enough, the hospital then decided to blame Alisa for Bently’s death and called child protective services (CPS), who immediately removed her two year-old daughter from the home and gave her to the grandmother to care for her.
Fortunately, her daughter was returned a few months later.


Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?
However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.
She told VacTruth:
“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”
According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.
If this were not bad enough, the hospital then decided to blame Alisa for Bently’s death and called child protective services (CPS), who immediately removed her two year-old daughter from the home and gave her to the grandmother to care for her.
Fortunately, her daughter was returned a few months later.


[h=3]Dr. Offit Says Babies Can Tolorate 10,000 Vaccines In One Day[/h] In 2002, Dr. Paul Offit wrote a paper entitled Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System? In his paper, he explained to parents that an infant can theoretically tolerate as many as 10,000 vaccinations at any one time and that a neonate could develop the capacity to respond to foreign antigens before they are even born.
He wrote that:
“A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time. If we assume that 1) approximately 10 ng/mL of antibody is likely to be an effective concentration of antibody per epitope (an immunologically distinct region of a protein or polysaccharide), 2) generation of 10 ng/mL requires approximately 103 B-cells per mL,3) a single B-cell clone takes about 1 week to reach the 103 progeny B-cells required to secrete 10 ng/mL of antibody (therefore, vaccine-epitope-specific immune responses found about 1 week after immunization can be generated initially from a single B-cell clone per mL), 4) each vaccine contains approximately 100 antigens and 10 epitopes per antigen (ie, 103 epitopes), and 5) approximately 107 B cells are present per mL of circulating blood, then each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time (obtained by dividing 107 B cells per mL by 103 epitopes per vaccine).”
And he continued by adding:
“Of course, most vaccines contain far fewer than 100 antigens (for example, the hepatitis B, diphtheria, and tetanus vaccines each contain 1 antigen), so the estimated number of vaccines to which a child could respond is conservative. But using this estimate, we would predict that if 11 vaccines were given to infants at one time, then about 0.1% of the immune system would be ‘used up.’” [1]
Dr. Offit used the words estimate and predict throughout his paper, which leads many to believe that this paper was based upon POSSIBLE outcomes and contained very little scientific fact.
Sadly, it appears that Dr. Offit’s words were taken seriously by Bently’s doctor when he decided to vaccinate this previously unvaccinated baby with a total of 13 vaccinations in one day, in what can only be described as a bid to catch up.
The vaccinations included:

  • Two doses of the DTaP – diptheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine
  • Hib – haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine
  • IPV- inactivated polio vaccine
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Three doses of oral rotavirus vaccine
Bently was also given three other vaccinations, which appear to be unidentified on his vaccination card, plus the hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine.
Little Bently died in his mother’s arms just five days later.
Bently-Neathery-3.jpg


Alisa told VacTruth:
“My son Bently was almost 6 months old when I took him to the doctor for a visit and to begin his first round of vaccinations. I had decided to wait on his vaccinations until he was closer to the age when the sudden infant death (SIDS) rate lowers to begin him on the recommended vaccinations.
That day was April 5, 2012. He did have some congestion in his lungs. The doctor stated it was a slight congestion and that everything would be just fine. He was completely healthy and above his percentile for his age.
The doctor gave him 2 rounds of DTaP in one shot. I did not know this at the time. I didn’t find this out until after my son passed away and I went up to the doctor’s office to ask for his medical report from our visit. That particular injection was the worst for him.
As soon as they stabbed him with the needle, he let out a giant scream. After that, he was not the same. This injection actually happened to turn into a hard red knot on his leg where they stabbed him with DTaP. Even until he was laid to rest one month later, he still has the same hard red knot. I was never asked about why it was there.”
She continued by stating:
“He wouldn’t let me touch his leg. He screamed and cried constantly. I knew babies were fussy after vaccines, but this was excessive. His little vein in his head would bulge out when he cried. I didn’t know what to do. I had nothing telling me this was in any way unusual.
Within a few days he stopped making eye contact with us and he began to twitch and jerk. One side of his body began to slump slightly. If he was not being held, he would scream and cry constantly.
On April 10, 2012, my son appeared to be exceptionally well and he and my daughter played and watched TV while I cleaned the house. Around noon, my daughter laid down for a nap. Around 2 o’clock, my son began getting very sleepy. So he and I sat in our big chair and he fell asleep on my chest.
Two hours later, my husband came home from work and thought my son wasn’t moving. He woke me up saying the baby wasn’t breathing. All hell broke loose from that point on. Bently was pronounced dead at 5:35 pm. Five days after receiving his first and only round of vaccinations.”
This leaves many of us to question whether Bently’s doctor acted in the best interests of his patient or whether his actions were totally irresponsible and amounted to medical negligence.
Bently-Neathery-4.jpg


[h=3]Mother Did Not Give Her Full Informed Consent[/h] In recent weeks, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic was asked by activist parental groups in Texas and California to write an opinion in support of resisting the bills calling for abolishing all exemptions to vaccinations other than medical. [2]
In answer to their request, she wrote:
“Medical ethics demands that vaccination should be carried out with the participant’s full and informed consent. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable vaccination benefits and risks. The way in which pediatric vaccines are often promoted by various health authorities indicates that such disclosure is rarely given from the basis of best available knowledge but rather, largely unproven and/or untenable assumptions on both, vaccine safety and effectiveness.”
Bently’s mother told VacTruth that she was never informed by her doctor exactly which vaccinations were going to be given to her son, nor was she informed of any risks associated with these vaccinations.
She told VacTruth that:
“The doctor asked me to bring him in each month after that April 5th visit to receive each round of shots in just a few months. He even stated that he didn’t want to give my sons little body too many. However the decision he made to give him 13 vaccines was completely excessive I believe.
Had I of known that’s what he was doing I would have refused. However he wasn’t completely forthcoming about what he was doing that day. As I said it wasn’t until I picked up his medical record a couple weeks later that I noticed the 3 separate sheets of paper with in his file stating what shots were ordered and I noticed that on each one it said DTaP twice.”
Many people may question the reason why Bently’s mother did not ask exactly which vaccinations her son was being given before her son was vaccinated, but she told VacTruth that she trusted her doctor and believed that he knew what he was doing.
Sadly, Alisa is one of thousands of parents trusting their doctors every day.
Many parents are unaware that every vaccination carries some risk of an adverse reaction and this is a fact that Dr. Tomljenovic made very clear in her letter to the members of the California Senate Committee. She wrote:
“All drugs are associated with some risks of adverse reactions. Because vaccines represent a special category of drugs which are by and large given to healthy individuals, and for prophylaxis against diseases to which an individual may never be exposed, the margin of tolerance for side effects is very narrow (in fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concurs with this point [1]) and careful assessment of risks versus benefits essential in deciding whether one should be vaccinated or not. Removing the parental rights to exemptions to childhood vaccinations will put vulnerable but otherwise healthy individuals at risk of serious adverse reactions to vaccinations. Such an outcome should be of concern since serious adverse reactions following routine vaccinations in children, including deaths, permanent neurological damage and disabling autoimmune and/or inflammatory conditions have been clearly described in the scientific literature [2-14]. Notably, cases of seizure attacks and deaths occurring as a result of routine vaccinations have occurred even in children and individuals without any relevant prior medical history [7, 15, 16] and in some cases a direct causal link was established between vaccination and the serious adverse reactions [16].”
In her letter, she referred to a paper written by Ken Tsumiyama et al. and stated that:
“It is further likely that an increasing number of individuals, regardless of their genetic background, will react adversely if exposures to compounds with immune adjuvant properties exceed a certain threshold. This concept has in fact been clearly demonstrated by Tsumiyama et al. [57] who in 2009 showed that repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases.” [2]
Interested by this statement, I decided to research their paper, titled Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, and discovered that Tsumiyama et al. had concluded:
“Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.” [3]
If they are correct, then their paper proves that Dr. Paul Offit is incorrect and that multiple vaccinations can overwhelm an infant’s immune system, causing a variety of adverse reactions and, in some cases, death.
In further reference to their paper, Dr. Tomlejenovic stated that:
“It is true that people are exposed constantly to infectious agent in the environment, however, there is a vast difference between natural exposure and that induced by vaccinations. The reason for this is that the immune response induced by vaccination is greatly amplified, owing to the addition of adjuvants with immune-stimulating properties.” [2] (emphasis added)
Her words make absolute perfect sense and parents should ask themselves whether or not their children are being over-vaccinated.
[h=3]The Lasting Impact Of Bently's Tragic Loss[/h] I asked Alisa how she and her family have coped with the tragedy of losing a baby at such a young age, and if she had any words that she would like to share with other families. She said:
“I wish he were still here! It kills me daily to see my daughter play ALONE. She shouldn't have had to go through this kind of loss, none of us should. He was such a sweetheart. He adored his sister, father and I. All of that was stolen from us the day he received all those vaccines.
After that day, he was no longer the same. It completely ripped my entire family apart. Most of my family thought it must have been my fault because infants just don’t die like that, or so they thought.
All his short life he had been a healthy, happy and extremely content little boy. Ahead of his percentiles and then to just die ... so, to my family, it must have been my fault somehow. They did not support my husband and I. We did nothing to deserve that and it’s all because some dangerous, ignorant doctor decided to ruin our lives and steal all the joy from us by killing our son.
I know without a doubt Bently WOULD STILL BE ALIVE if it weren’t for the vaccines and that damn doctor and the decisions he made that day. He caused my son to lose his life.
Since that day, my grandma, my mom and my husband’s mom have all died. They went to their graves being on bad terms with my husband and me. Again, something we can never get back, and we feel it’s all due to my son’s death being ruled as unexplained.
It was listed on his death certificate as 'S.U.D.S. SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED UNEXPECTED DEATH SYNDROME.' There has been no justice for my son whatsoever. We want answers, answers that we never got! All we have been left with is loss after loss after loss! That is not ok on any level! I will never vaccinate again, period! We cannot afford to lose any more.”
[h=3]Conclusion[/h] Deciding on whether to vaccinate your baby is never easy. In this case, Alisa decided to hold back on having her baby vaccinated until he was older. She was then emotionally blackmailed and forced into having her baby over-vaccinated with a massive cocktail of vaccines, by whom many would call an overzealous doctor.
She was not offered any information on the vaccinations being given to her baby, she was not given any paperwork and she was not offered any advice on any possible adverse reactions.
Alisa trusted her doctor to do the right thing and was let down in the worse possible way and believes that the doctor should be held accountable for the death of her son. She said:
“No one was ever held accountable for my son Bently's death. That kills me every day.”
She is now bringing a case against her doctor.
If you would like to help Alisa and her family to get justice, please go to Baby Bently’s Support Campaign.
Bently-Neathery-2.jpg

Baby Bently Neathery


[h=2]References[/h]
  1. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/1/124.full.html
  2. http://parentsandcarersagainstinjustice.weebly.com/professional-papers.html
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795160/
 
debbie-downer.jpeg


Why trying to be the antithesis of something that you should view as a sad turning point in our species?
This is the apathy problem is all it’s glory…too far away…you don’t give a fuck…feel powerless…etc…whatever the reason…that is HOW we reach such a sad point….by laughing at those trying to sound the alarm.
It’s not based in reality frankly.

Its a fake picture. Trying to get people to side with a cause using falsehoods annoy me. Its a classic tactic. As for the idea of a rhino going into extinction, yeah it sucks.
There are too many wrong things in this world to combat all of them. Most people have a hard enough time combating the things they encounter in their daily lives. Its rare that anyone has enough time to address all of the atrocities of the world.

So what are you doing about it besides complaining? Have you donated any money to the cause of the rhino? Have you volunteered to spend part of your life to protect it? Or are you just coming here to tell other people they are losers for not being able to stop things like this?
 
Not really

I think most people would agree that rape is the forceful insertion of a penis, finger or other implement into an orafice of the human body such as the mouth, anus or vagina against the will of the person

A needle is an implement and it is being inserted into the body against the will of the person

babies and small children are not able to give consent and should be left alone until they are of age where they are able to give free will consent

It is forceful insertion of an implement into the body of a human being without their consent= rape

Not realising this is so diminishes the children and babies who are being raped in this manner every day

http://vactruth.com/2015/04/23/baby-dies-after-13-vaccines/

Six Month-Old Baby Dies Just Five Days After Receiving 13 Vaccines

Christina England
April 23 2015

Bently-Neathery-1-630x315.jpg


Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?
However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.
She told VacTruth:
“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”
According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.
If this were not bad enough, the hospital then decided to blame Alisa for Bently’s death and called child protective services (CPS), who immediately removed her two year-old daughter from the home and gave her to the grandmother to care for her.
Fortunately, her daughter was returned a few months later.


Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?
However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.
She told VacTruth:
“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”
According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.
If this were not bad enough, the hospital then decided to blame Alisa for Bently’s death and called child protective services (CPS), who immediately removed her two year-old daughter from the home and gave her to the grandmother to care for her.
Fortunately, her daughter was returned a few months later.


Dr. Offit Says Babies Can Tolorate 10,000 Vaccines In One Day

In 2002, Dr. Paul Offit wrote a paper entitled Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System? In his paper, he explained to parents that an infant can theoretically tolerate as many as 10,000 vaccinations at any one time and that a neonate could develop the capacity to respond to foreign antigens before they are even born.
He wrote that:
“A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time. If we assume that 1) approximately 10 ng/mL of antibody is likely to be an effective concentration of antibody per epitope (an immunologically distinct region of a protein or polysaccharide), 2) generation of 10 ng/mL requires approximately 103 B-cells per mL,3) a single B-cell clone takes about 1 week to reach the 103 progeny B-cells required to secrete 10 ng/mL of antibody (therefore, vaccine-epitope-specific immune responses found about 1 week after immunization can be generated initially from a single B-cell clone per mL), 4) each vaccine contains approximately 100 antigens and 10 epitopes per antigen (ie, 103 epitopes), and 5) approximately 107 B cells are present per mL of circulating blood, then each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time (obtained by dividing 107 B cells per mL by 103 epitopes per vaccine).”
And he continued by adding:
“Of course, most vaccines contain far fewer than 100 antigens (for example, the hepatitis B, diphtheria, and tetanus vaccines each contain 1 antigen), so the estimated number of vaccines to which a child could respond is conservative. But using this estimate, we would predict that if 11 vaccines were given to infants at one time, then about 0.1% of the immune system would be ‘used up.’” [1]
Dr. Offit used the words estimate and predict throughout his paper, which leads many to believe that this paper was based upon POSSIBLE outcomes and contained very little scientific fact.
Sadly, it appears that Dr. Offit’s words were taken seriously by Bently’s doctor when he decided to vaccinate this previously unvaccinated baby with a total of 13 vaccinations in one day, in what can only be described as a bid to catch up.
The vaccinations included:

  • Two doses of the DTaP – diptheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine
  • Hib – haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine
  • IPV- inactivated polio vaccine
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Three doses of oral rotavirus vaccine
Bently was also given three other vaccinations, which appear to be unidentified on his vaccination card, plus the hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine.
Little Bently died in his mother’s arms just five days later.
Bently-Neathery-3.jpg


Alisa told VacTruth:
“My son Bently was almost 6 months old when I took him to the doctor for a visit and to begin his first round of vaccinations. I had decided to wait on his vaccinations until he was closer to the age when the sudden infant death (SIDS) rate lowers to begin him on the recommended vaccinations.
That day was April 5, 2012. He did have some congestion in his lungs. The doctor stated it was a slight congestion and that everything would be just fine. He was completely healthy and above his percentile for his age.
The doctor gave him 2 rounds of DTaP in one shot. I did not know this at the time. I didn’t find this out until after my son passed away and I went up to the doctor’s office to ask for his medical report from our visit. That particular injection was the worst for him.
As soon as they stabbed him with the needle, he let out a giant scream. After that, he was not the same. This injection actually happened to turn into a hard red knot on his leg where they stabbed him with DTaP. Even until he was laid to rest one month later, he still has the same hard red knot. I was never asked about why it was there.”
She continued by stating:
“He wouldn’t let me touch his leg. He screamed and cried constantly. I knew babies were fussy after vaccines, but this was excessive. His little vein in his head would bulge out when he cried. I didn’t know what to do. I had nothing telling me this was in any way unusual.
Within a few days he stopped making eye contact with us and he began to twitch and jerk. One side of his body began to slump slightly. If he was not being held, he would scream and cry constantly.
On April 10, 2012, my son appeared to be exceptionally well and he and my daughter played and watched TV while I cleaned the house. Around noon, my daughter laid down for a nap. Around 2 o’clock, my son began getting very sleepy. So he and I sat in our big chair and he fell asleep on my chest.
Two hours later, my husband came home from work and thought my son wasn’t moving. He woke me up saying the baby wasn’t breathing. All hell broke loose from that point on. Bently was pronounced dead at 5:35 pm. Five days after receiving his first and only round of vaccinations.”
This leaves many of us to question whether Bently’s doctor acted in the best interests of his patient or whether his actions were totally irresponsible and amounted to medical negligence.
Bently-Neathery-4.jpg


Mother Did Not Give Her Full Informed Consent

In recent weeks, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic was asked by activist parental groups in Texas and California to write an opinion in support of resisting the bills calling for abolishing all exemptions to vaccinations other than medical. [2]
In answer to their request, she wrote:
“Medical ethics demands that vaccination should be carried out with the participant’s full and informed consent. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable vaccination benefits and risks. The way in which pediatric vaccines are often promoted by various health authorities indicates that such disclosure is rarely given from the basis of best available knowledge but rather, largely unproven and/or untenable assumptions on both, vaccine safety and effectiveness.”
Bently’s mother told VacTruth that she was never informed by her doctor exactly which vaccinations were going to be given to her son, nor was she informed of any risks associated with these vaccinations.
She told VacTruth that:
“The doctor asked me to bring him in each month after that April 5th visit to receive each round of shots in just a few months. He even stated that he didn’t want to give my sons little body too many. However the decision he made to give him 13 vaccines was completely excessive I believe.
Had I of known that’s what he was doing I would have refused. However he wasn’t completely forthcoming about what he was doing that day. As I said it wasn’t until I picked up his medical record a couple weeks later that I noticed the 3 separate sheets of paper with in his file stating what shots were ordered and I noticed that on each one it said DTaP twice.”
Many people may question the reason why Bently’s mother did not ask exactly which vaccinations her son was being given before her son was vaccinated, but she told VacTruth that she trusted her doctor and believed that he knew what he was doing.
Sadly, Alisa is one of thousands of parents trusting their doctors every day.
Many parents are unaware that every vaccination carries some risk of an adverse reaction and this is a fact that Dr. Tomljenovic made very clear in her letter to the members of the California Senate Committee. She wrote:
“All drugs are associated with some risks of adverse reactions. Because vaccines represent a special category of drugs which are by and large given to healthy individuals, and for prophylaxis against diseases to which an individual may never be exposed, the margin of tolerance for side effects is very narrow (in fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concurs with this point [1]) and careful assessment of risks versus benefits essential in deciding whether one should be vaccinated or not. Removing the parental rights to exemptions to childhood vaccinations will put vulnerable but otherwise healthy individuals at risk of serious adverse reactions to vaccinations. Such an outcome should be of concern since serious adverse reactions following routine vaccinations in children, including deaths, permanent neurological damage and disabling autoimmune and/or inflammatory conditions have been clearly described in the scientific literature [2-14]. Notably, cases of seizure attacks and deaths occurring as a result of routine vaccinations have occurred even in children and individuals without any relevant prior medical history [7, 15, 16] and in some cases a direct causal link was established between vaccination and the serious adverse reactions [16].”
In her letter, she referred to a paper written by Ken Tsumiyama et al. and stated that:
“It is further likely that an increasing number of individuals, regardless of their genetic background, will react adversely if exposures to compounds with immune adjuvant properties exceed a certain threshold. This concept has in fact been clearly demonstrated by Tsumiyama et al. [57] who in 2009 showed that repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases.” [2]
Interested by this statement, I decided to research their paper, titled Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, and discovered that Tsumiyama et al. had concluded:
“Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.” [3]
If they are correct, then their paper proves that Dr. Paul Offit is incorrect and that multiple vaccinations can overwhelm an infant’s immune system, causing a variety of adverse reactions and, in some cases, death.
In further reference to their paper, Dr. Tomlejenovic stated that:
“It is true that people are exposed constantly to infectious agent in the environment, however, there is a vast difference between natural exposure and that induced by vaccinations. The reason for this is that the immune response induced by vaccination is greatly amplified, owing to the addition of adjuvants with immune-stimulating properties.” [2] (emphasis added)
Her words make absolute perfect sense and parents should ask themselves whether or not their children are being over-vaccinated.
The Lasting Impact Of Bently's Tragic Loss

I asked Alisa how she and her family have coped with the tragedy of losing a baby at such a young age, and if she had any words that she would like to share with other families. She said:
“I wish he were still here! It kills me daily to see my daughter play ALONE. She shouldn't have had to go through this kind of loss, none of us should. He was such a sweetheart. He adored his sister, father and I. All of that was stolen from us the day he received all those vaccines.
After that day, he was no longer the same. It completely ripped my entire family apart. Most of my family thought it must have been my fault because infants just don’t die like that, or so they thought.
All his short life he had been a healthy, happy and extremely content little boy. Ahead of his percentiles and then to just die ... so, to my family, it must have been my fault somehow. They did not support my husband and I. We did nothing to deserve that and it’s all because some dangerous, ignorant doctor decided to ruin our lives and steal all the joy from us by killing our son.
I know without a doubt Bently WOULD STILL BE ALIVE if it weren’t for the vaccines and that damn doctor and the decisions he made that day. He caused my son to lose his life.
Since that day, my grandma, my mom and my husband’s mom have all died. They went to their graves being on bad terms with my husband and me. Again, something we can never get back, and we feel it’s all due to my son’s death being ruled as unexplained.
It was listed on his death certificate as 'S.U.D.S. SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED UNEXPECTED DEATH SYNDROME.' There has been no justice for my son whatsoever. We want answers, answers that we never got! All we have been left with is loss after loss after loss! That is not ok on any level! I will never vaccinate again, period! We cannot afford to lose any more.”
Conclusion

Deciding on whether to vaccinate your baby is never easy. In this case, Alisa decided to hold back on having her baby vaccinated until he was older. She was then emotionally blackmailed and forced into having her baby over-vaccinated with a massive cocktail of vaccines, by whom many would call an overzealous doctor.
She was not offered any information on the vaccinations being given to her baby, she was not given any paperwork and she was not offered any advice on any possible adverse reactions.
Alisa trusted her doctor to do the right thing and was let down in the worse possible way and believes that the doctor should be held accountable for the death of her son. She said:
“No one was ever held accountable for my son Bently's death. That kills me every day.”
She is now bringing a case against her doctor.
If you would like to help Alisa and her family to get justice, please go to Baby Bently’s Support Campaign.
Bently-Neathery-2.jpg

Baby Bently Neathery


References


  1. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/1/124.full.html
  2. http://parentsandcarersagainstinjustice.weebly.com/professional-papers.html
  3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795160/

A sad story.
Clearly the mistake was on the Doctor and his staff.
 
Its a fake picture. Trying to get people to side with a cause using falsehoods annoy me. Its a classic tactic. As for the idea of a rhino going into extinction, yeah it sucks.
There are too many wrong things in this world to combat all of them. Most people have a hard enough time combating the things they encounter in their daily lives. Its rare that anyone has enough time to address all of the atrocities of the world.

So what are you doing about it besides complaining? Have you donated any money to the cause of the rhino? Have you volunteered to spend part of your life to protect it? Or are you just coming here to tell other people they are losers for not being able to stop things like this?
Trying to get them to side with a cause using falsehoods annoys you?
And yet you are a watcher of Fox news…who is owned by a British billionaire and a Saudi Prince.
There is your first logical fallacy.
Would you like to see a list or perhaps a compilation video of their falsehoods? The city of Paris even sued them for their fabricated coverage.
I’m going to call you out on that nonsense man….back up what you say…because I provide links to stories on the subjects while you come in and go “well, this is wrong because, well…it’s isn’t really, it’s just misleading…and it sucks they’re dying…but now I’m going to to put the blame on you for YOUR OWN apathy.”
“Haha!”
I’m not going to sit here and espouse why it’s exactly your attitude that is killing the animals like the rhino…nor do I need to prove my worth to you as a human and someone who loves and tries to protect the planet.
I’m just going to say, either help come up with solutions to the the problems we can and do effect in our world, or just shut up about how it’s wrong to give a fuck because you have personally given up on life.
 
Trying to get them to side with a cause using falsehoods annoys you?
And yet you are a watcher of Fox news…who is owned by a British billionaire and a Saudi Prince.
There is your first logical fallacy.
Would you like to see a list or perhaps a compilation video of their falsehoods? The city of Paris even sued them for their fabricated coverage.
I’m going to call you out on that nonsense man….back up what you say…because I provide links to stories on the subjects while you come in and go “well, this is wrong because, well…it’s isn’t really, it’s just misleading…and it sucks they’re dying…but now I’m going to to put the blame on you for YOUR OWN apathy.”
“Haha!”
I’m not going to sit here and espouse why it’s exactly your attitude that is killing the animals like the rhino…nor do I need to prove my worth to you as a human and someone who loves and tries to protect the planet.
I’m just going to say, either help come up with solutions to the the problems we can and do effect in our world, or just shut up about how it’s wrong to give a fuck because you have personally given up on life.

Again, what are you doing to save the rhino? Tell me one thing you have done besides place the problem in others laps?
 
Again, what are you doing to save the rhino? Tell me one thing you have done besides place the problem in others laps?
Would you like me to photocopy the bill/thank you here’s your tax-write of of my charitable donations?
I donate to 3…because that it all I can afford…two benefit our environment…the other is to Rolling Jubilee that helps eliminate student loans.
And again, trying to sit there in your pretend high chair while you lay out the criticism doesn’t disprove anything I have said or posted.
So what if they doctored the picture to have anti-aircraft missile launchers on the fucking Rhino’s back…it still doesn’t make the story less true.
So they soldiers aren’t stroking the rhino’s balls…what they hell have you done besides complain about the picture when the real atrocity is what the story is about.
You have missed the main point, and you have missed it on purpose like you usually do because you just don’t give a flying fuck about anyone else.
 
Would you like me to photocopy the bill/thank you here’s your tax-write of of my charitable donations?
I donate to 3…because that it all I can afford…two benefit our environment…the other is to Rolling Jubilee that helps eliminate student loans.
And again, trying to sit there in your pretend high chair while you lay out the criticism doesn’t disprove anything I have said or posted.
So what if they doctored the picture to have anti-aircraft missile launchers on the fucking Rhino’s back…it still doesn’t make the story less true.
So they soldiers aren’t stroking the rhino’s balls…what they hell have you done besides complain about the picture when the real atrocity is what the story is about.
You have missed the main point, and you have missed it on purpose like you usually do because you just don’t give a flying fuck about anyone else.
I simply noted that the picture was BS.
No they arent stroking the rhinos balls, that would be the second mistake they would make assuming the picture were real.
No I have not missed the point. What you think you are the only one who cares enough to see these things?
So save the Rhino. I wonder how long that will take with your money donations. Did you donate directly toward the rhino or just a general donation regarding wildlife? No matter either way.
If you think you are going to gain some prize at the end of your life for how much you cared you wont. Everyone is equal on their death bed.
The issue is I simply do not think you see the world as it really is. For me its easy to understand..now. It wasnt always. I saw the world as the huge conglomeration of people who if they were simply made aware of all the the crap going on in the world they would work together to stop it. So I tried. I used my words and made logical arguments. In the end I changed nothing.
You asked a question with your thread. I attempted to answer the question and you are taking an attitude with me. Going so far as to insert a Foxnews comment again where foxnews was never part of anything I said in relation to it. You have Foxnews on the mind. You have hatred of people who make more money than you think they should be allowed to make on your mind.

So my observation is this. Nothing in the way you present information will have any effect on changing the world. If you dont really want answers dont ask questions.
 
I simply noted that the picture was BS.
No they arent stroking the rhinos balls, that would be the second mistake they would make assuming the picture were real.
No I have not missed the point. What you think you are the only one who cares enough to see these things?
So save the Rhino. I wonder how long that will take with your money donations. Did you donate directly toward the rhino or just a general donation regarding wildlife? No matter either way.
If you think you are going to gain some prize at the end of your life for how much you cared you wont. Everyone is equal on their death bed.
The issue is I simply do not think you see the world as it really is. For me its easy to understand..now. It wasnt always. I saw the world as the huge conglomeration of people who if they were simply made aware of all the the crap going on in the world they would work together to stop it. So I tried. I used my words and made logical arguments. In the end I changed nothing.
You asked a question with your thread. I attempted to answer the question and you are taking an attitude with me. Going so far as to insert a Foxnews comment again where foxnews was never part of anything I said in relation to it. You have Foxnews on the mind. You have hatred of people who make more money than you think they should be allowed to make on your mind.

So my observation is this. Nothing in the way you present information will have any effect on changing the world. If you dont really want answers dont ask questions.

I do want answers and you just answered it.
You gave up and are now just another cynical apathetic Joe blow.
You didn’t effect the world they way you thought you would, so you just fucking gave up completely?
So what, if only a fraction of the money that I donate actually makes a difference…at least I’m trying…instead of sitting on my high horse being critical of everything posted on here you happen to smirk upon.
You haven’t really been following what I have been saying elsewhere and here at all…
And no, not every man is equal on their deathbed…they bring the life they have cultivated.

You didn’t just answer the question…you proceeded to make snarky comments about posts I was making.
So don’t go making shit up that didn’t happen…read the thread.
 
I do want answers and you just answered it.
You gave up and are now just another cynical apathetic Joe blow.
You didn’t effect the world they way you thought you would, so you just fucking gave up completely?
So what, if only a fraction of the money that I donate actually makes a difference…at least I’m trying…instead of sitting on my high horse being critical of everything posted on here you happen to smirk upon.
You haven’t really been following what I have been saying elsewhere and here at all…
And no, not every man is equal on their deathbed…they bring the life they have cultivated.

You didn’t just answer the question…you proceeded to make snarky comments about posts I was making.
So don’t go making shit up that didn’t happen…read the thread.

Give up? No, I simply began to see the truth.
At least you are trying.... by donating money. Ok, well you are trying more then me but lets be serious, throwing money at something and telling its banished is hardly trying. Donating money is just something people do because they think it will help them sleep at night. Its still passing the buck and you know it.
Am I being critical. I dont think so. What I think I am doing is pointing out why these issues arent going away. Think about it. Many people with a lot more money than you or I are donating to causes like this so...why aren't they going away? They arent going away because throwing money at something doesnt solve the problem. And this is a point I have been making over and over here. To correct a problem you must fix the foundation. Putting out fires where they pop up does not fix the problem, the main fire.
I can garuntee I have not smirked at because of anything you have typed. Whatever picture you have in your head on me doing this is false.
If I am not following what you have said, its because you have not said it.

I fully believe that every man is made equal by death.
 
Give up? No, I simply began to see the truth.
At least you are trying.... by donating money. Ok, well you are trying more then me but lets be serious, throwing money at something and telling its banished is hardly trying. Donating money is just something people do because they think it will help them sleep at night. Its still passing the buck and you know it.
Am I being critical. I dont think so. What I think I am doing is pointing out why these issues arent going away. Think about it. Many people with a lot more money than you or I are donating to causes like this so...why aren't they going away? They arent going away because throwing money at something doesnt solve the problem. And this is a point I have been making over and over here. To correct a problem you must fix the foundation. Putting out fires where they pop up does not fix the problem, the main fire.
I can garuntee I have not smirked at because of anything you have typed. Whatever picture you have in your head on me doing this is false.
If I am not following what you have said, its because you have not said it.

I fully believe that every man is made equal by death.

I don’t throw money at something (as if it were so much trash that I had volumes of) and expect that it and it alone will fix the problem. It’s the combined efforts of many groups all working toward the same goal that will fix anything.
Most of the time these issues haven’t gone away because there is usually an oppositional force usually exploiting the majority of people or our environment.
Woken up?
Explain to me HOW exactly you have woken up?
Not saying that you haven’t just that when people say they have woken up they can develop the same superiority complex that some hardcore religious folks can develop too.
I’m really not poking you with a stick here…I really am curious what are your symptoms of waking up?
 
I don’t throw money at something (as if it were so much trash that I had volumes of) and expect that it and it alone will fix the problem. It’s the combined efforts of many groups all working toward the same goal that will fix anything.
Most of the time these issues haven’t gone away because there is usually an oppositional force usually exploiting the majority of people or our environment.
Woken up?
Explain to me HOW exactly you have woken up?
Not saying that you haven’t just that when people say they have woken up they can develop the same superiority complex that some hardcore religious folks can develop too.
I’m really not poking you with a stick here…I really am curious what are your symptoms of waking up?

Not sure where you get woken up from my post but I will try to answer anyway.
Whwn I was young I used to take things apart to see how they worked. I never accepted that they worked just because. When I got older I applied the same principle to people ...without taking them apart. But I did delve into why do people do anything at all. What drives them etc... in the end a few people would want to kill the rhino for the sake of killing it...some out of ignorance that its the last one...some for meat...and so on and so on. In the end though whoever kills the rhino does so because they think it benefits them in someway and that is more important than its life. After all its going to die eventually anyway right?
So whats the foundational problem here? I see it. Do you?
 
Not sure where you get woken up from my post but I will try to answer anyway.
Whwn I was young I used to take things apart to see how they worked. I never accepted that they worked just because. When I got older I applied the same principle to people ...without taking them apart. But I did delve into why do people do anything at all. What drives them etc... in the end a few people would want to kill the rhino for the sake of killing it...some out of ignorance that its the last one...some for meat...and so on and so on. In the end though whoever kills the rhino does so because they think it benefits them in someway and that is more important than its life. After all its going to die eventually anyway right?
So whats the foundational problem here? I see it. Do you?

Yes I see the foundational problem when you try to take the emotional aspects of things.
And then to top it off you say - After all its going to die eventually anyway right?
So you just gave up…and that’s fine for you personally, but don’t try to stop the rights of other’s to still try because you think it’s stupid or clearly a waste of resources, etc.
It sounds like you need to come to terms with why you feel life failed you so badly.
 
Yes I see the foundational problem when you try to take the emotional aspects of things.
And then to top it off you say - After all its going to die eventually anyway right?
So you just gave up…and that’s fine for you personally, but don’t try to stop the rights of other’s to still try because you think it’s stupid or clearly a waste of resources, etc.
It sounds like you need to come to terms with why you feel life failed you so badly.

Perhaps. Kill yourself worrying about things you will never change then. In the end you and I will be equals in death.

Best of luck to you in your endeavor. The people who actually changed the world is a short list indeed. I hope to see you on it someday.