S
Shai Gar
The belief goes that Humanity needs to have a drastic population reduction by any means necessary in order to save the biosphere being destroyed or eroded, for the good of humanity as a species, and every other species that we haven't yet wiped out on earth.
Generally, this belief is stated in the form of a desire for genocide, appreciation for natural disasters on a large scale, or on the small scale, condoning suicide. These ideas are never well liked by the general population, the most common replies to this statement of belief are;
These ideas are rather stupid for the following reason.
Since the majority of the population are against the idea of population reduction and indeed governments actively foster the idea of reproduction amongst their citizens (with the exception of china), and since most people obey their governments, getting rid of the very few people who not only recognise that we're overpopulated on the planet, but are willing to take on the mantle of necessary evil, or well intentioned extremist to get something done about it, isn't a very good idea. Religions hold that abortions are evil, and that masturbation is wasting "seed" that ought to be fertilised in another person to increase the population (a throwback rule to the day when that particular religion had very few people amongst masses of perceived enemies). Most of the population on earth obey these religions and don't use condoms or have abortions, which lends to the slowly exponentially increasing birthrate. So what we have are societies two biggest influencers, Government and Religion both actively pursuing an agenda of overpopulation, and a massive society of sheep who obey either one or the other or both. Very few people actually have the brains to realise that we're overpopulated, and even fewer realise that even proposed solutions such as "better food harvesting and distribution" are solutions which won't be implemented for decades, in the meantime destroying our ecosystem and driving further species of animal life into extinction by proxy of protecting harvest animals.
Since so few people are able to recognise it, it stands then that even fewer have the courage to suggest these ideas out loud to the rest of the population. It's going to be fewer again who actively attempt to solve the crisis beyond words. It's well documented that people who do not believe in such socially unacceptable paths will not take them unless they're for Economic, Nationalistic or Territorial reasons, all of which are reasons which, in the main, are against the lowering of the human population drastically. It needs to be a proponent of the Ras Al Ghul Belief who champions it into mainstream reality. Whether or not the proponent deserves to live in such a world once they've finished their cause is a matter for debate once the cause has been fulfilled. Frank Castle carries a bullet with his own name on it for when his job is completed, and even The Operative understands and accepts that he has no place in the world he's helping to build. However, as stated, these are discussions for afterwards.
It's hypocritical for people who are against murder or suicide to even state that the proponent of genocide or condoning of suicide (personal, or soylent green) should go first, because what they're then stating is that murder or suicide is okay. A person cannot flippity flop between their beliefs without being a hypocrite, and the opinions of hypocrites given as statement of fact without being backed up in legalese can be written off with ease.
Generally, this belief is stated in the form of a desire for genocide, appreciation for natural disasters on a large scale, or on the small scale, condoning suicide. These ideas are never well liked by the general population, the most common replies to this statement of belief are;
or
These ideas are rather stupid for the following reason.
Since the majority of the population are against the idea of population reduction and indeed governments actively foster the idea of reproduction amongst their citizens (with the exception of china), and since most people obey their governments, getting rid of the very few people who not only recognise that we're overpopulated on the planet, but are willing to take on the mantle of necessary evil, or well intentioned extremist to get something done about it, isn't a very good idea. Religions hold that abortions are evil, and that masturbation is wasting "seed" that ought to be fertilised in another person to increase the population (a throwback rule to the day when that particular religion had very few people amongst masses of perceived enemies). Most of the population on earth obey these religions and don't use condoms or have abortions, which lends to the slowly exponentially increasing birthrate. So what we have are societies two biggest influencers, Government and Religion both actively pursuing an agenda of overpopulation, and a massive society of sheep who obey either one or the other or both. Very few people actually have the brains to realise that we're overpopulated, and even fewer realise that even proposed solutions such as "better food harvesting and distribution" are solutions which won't be implemented for decades, in the meantime destroying our ecosystem and driving further species of animal life into extinction by proxy of protecting harvest animals.
Since so few people are able to recognise it, it stands then that even fewer have the courage to suggest these ideas out loud to the rest of the population. It's going to be fewer again who actively attempt to solve the crisis beyond words. It's well documented that people who do not believe in such socially unacceptable paths will not take them unless they're for Economic, Nationalistic or Territorial reasons, all of which are reasons which, in the main, are against the lowering of the human population drastically. It needs to be a proponent of the Ras Al Ghul Belief who champions it into mainstream reality. Whether or not the proponent deserves to live in such a world once they've finished their cause is a matter for debate once the cause has been fulfilled. Frank Castle carries a bullet with his own name on it for when his job is completed, and even The Operative understands and accepts that he has no place in the world he's helping to build. However, as stated, these are discussions for afterwards.
It's hypocritical for people who are against murder or suicide to even state that the proponent of genocide or condoning of suicide (personal, or soylent green) should go first, because what they're then stating is that murder or suicide is okay. A person cannot flippity flop between their beliefs without being a hypocrite, and the opinions of hypocrites given as statement of fact without being backed up in legalese can be written off with ease.
