The Minimal Facts for the Resurrection of Christ.

You make it seem like people should live their lives to be accepted.
Not at all. People can rightly live their lives however they wish.

That said, I do wish for people’s happiness, however they might define that. If I hear they are less-than-well, I hope for their healing, and growth, and well-being.

I like the idea of a person thriving, and breaking through imaginary limits and realizing potentials within them, but that is always on their terms, and rightly so, because it is their responsibility.
Categorization doesn't necessitate projection.
Correct, in the case when that which is known, is categorized. Absent that knowledge, projection is required.
Please provide an argument for why categorization requires projection.
In and of itself, it does not. Done in the absence of knowledge, projection must occur such that judgment and categorization may then occur.
Was Jung just projecting for all his theories?
No, because they were just that—theories.

Yet those theories came from knowing people for who they were, himself most of all.

Cheers,
Ian
 
I am genuinely interested

Alright, feel free to read the first chapter of my book I wrote. You don't have to buy the book for this. You can just read the preview or whatever it is called. Almost the full first two chapters are in the preview. The first is where I talk about how my mind works and such. Again, you don't have to buy my book to read the whole first chapter. You just have to click on the preview or whatever it is called.

(FYI, it is called "read sample" not "preview")

 
I guess you don't actually want to know then

What I'm interested in is organic connection.
My question and curiosity was a vehicle towards that.
I can read your chapter and likely will, but it won't give me what I'm actually interested in, which is hearing your current frame of mind and today's version of how you perceive yourself as a thinking human.
It's a very different experience from reading something planned out and orchestrated with a purpose.

Also not very kind of you to brush me off like that.
 
What I'm interested in is organic connection.
My question and curiosity was a vehicle towards that.
I can read your chapter and likely will, but it won't give me what I'm actually interested in, which is hearing your current frame of mind and today's version of how you perceive yourself as a thinking human.
It's a very different experience from reading something planned out and orchestrated with a purpose.

Also not very kind of you to brush me off like that.

You asked me how I think. I went out of my way to ask you if you really wanted to know the answer to THAT question. I provided a resource which you could read all about the answer to that question. If you don't read it, IDK what I am to think. I don't care if you read it or not. If you do actually want to know how I think, that is the resource to read.
 
It is helpful to know you have Schizoaffective disorder for the simple fact it provides a larger context for understanding.

My heart goes to you.

Cheers,
Ian
 
Back
Top