But that's the point. She's cute because she's drawn that way, and that's where it stops with her. She's completely two-dimensional.
An innocent, cute, alien princess (who is also a total WARRIOR... RAWR!) trying to find her way around planet earth. She gets a modeling contract along the way and the love of the former boy-wonder. She also has an evil sister who plots against her.
Sounds like a twelve year old's fanfiction project.
Gag.
The thing that I love about Starfire (note, I've never read a single comic book version of Starfire because the comic version of her looks so cheesy even I want to gag, so I'm unaware of any differences from the animated series Starfire) is that she's this
homely little creature who is so inherently sweet, sincere, and innocent that it's actually a disadvantage. The cute things she says and her adorable motivations are what give me the crush on her.
I know nothing about this modeling contract you speak of, was that in the comics? The comic version of her looks like a pin up, so I can see where you are coming from on the cookie cutter thing.
The animated version of her has these little blobs for eyebrows, weird green eyes, and is so homely she's cute. On the animated series, the character seems unique to me because I've never seen sweet and innocent portrayed like that, and she really does seem to develop depth as the series goes on. I didn't get the whole warrior princess thing from the way they wrote her. I got the sense that she was from an alien race of warlike people with inherent powers (which I'll admit is about as cheesy of a cop out origin as being a mutant, or magically endowed hero), yet she really didn't fit in with them because she was too nice (if this was in the animated version, I missed it).
My gripe isn't about
unrealistic characters; I am well aware of the parameters of the genre of fantasy and suspended disbelief. Considering what's been going on in comics for the last thirty years, maybe I've been spoiled to expect a little more psychological complexity.
I guess I tend to dislike characters that have cut and paste superpowers/alien origins.
Like Superman, for example
Aww... now you stepped in it.
Point one: the benevolent alien with super powers is a cut and paste template
because of Superman.
Point two: Smallville has done an amazing job of giving depth to that character (when they had good writers).
You know what always really annoyed me about Superman? Here's this guy who is impermeable to bullets. He can survive a friggin' nuclear missile to the gut... and yet, he has the audacity to act hurt when he's tossed around by some super villain.
Seriously, watch any episode of Justice League and you'll see. He gets slammed into a brick wall, he's groaning. Next minute, he gets a grenade to the face and he doesn't even blink.
I object!
Bad writers. This bothers me too. It's like the old Superman TV shows where he'd stand there and let bullets bounce off his chest until the bad guys ran out of bullets, at which point they
threw their guns at him... and what does Steve Reeves do? He ducks! Bruce Timm, one of the producers of the Superman animated series as well as the Batman, Justice League, and Teen Titans animated series mentioned in the DVD extras interviews more than a few times that they wanted to make Superman more easily empathized with... which is why he's variably invulnerable... aka a lot of fans have complained about this point.
In contrast, Smallville (which had good writers) rarely has Clark getting hurt without good (spelled out) reason. They even did a good job of slowly increasing his invulnerability and making a point of it as the seasons progressed. Early in the seasons, bullets would bruise him (which they made a point of showing). Later, they'd 'hurt' him but wouldn't bruise him (which they made a point of mentioning). Later still they were just an annoyance (which they again pointed out).
Any super hero is only as good as their writer. For example, Batman is such a flaming bad ass because he has good writers. There is no logical way that he could pull off
half the stuff that he does otherwise. The law of average dictates at some point, an unpredictable element would have killed him while interacting with forces that transcend mortal capacity. The opposite is true. A bad writer can make a good character suck.
Seems like your issue is more with writers than characters.
Edit: And for the record... this version of Starfire gags me too...