How much the brain is affected by genetic transfer of knowledge is more controversial in humans than other species since humans spend more time in development outside the uterus than other animals. Nature vs nurture.
How much the brain is affected by genetic transfer of knowledge is more controversial in humans than other species since humans spend more time in development outside the uterus than other animals. Nature vs nurture.
Controversial but not necessarily insignificant.
Edit:
Also is there any particular scientific reason that this subject needs to be anthropocentric?
It gets touchy because then it brings up the issue of homosexuality and those who clearly make their stand that it a choice and not how someone is born.
(though we see it throughout the animal kingdom)
Well the thing is, looking just at humans is scientifically problematic. For example what if spirit for some reason doesn't exist in living humans, but could be found in living animals?
It has been suggested that there are some humans who are nothing more than bio-robots following their programming…we all are to a certain extent, but the idea was that some people are more cognizant and conscious than others, and that such a person wouldn’t truly have free will, which was the discussion that brought us to this thread in the first place. ;-)
Still, it could be useful to look at other species to know what is generally possible, so that if you identify something interesting you know who doesn't have it.
Controversial but not necessarily insignificant.
Edit:
Also is there any particular scientific reason that this subject needs to be anthropocentric?
If you are specifically interested in the prayer aspect of PSI I can certainly provide you with a bucket of links for you to peruse (you know me).
I must say that clutter is not much different from confusion.
I'll not read any of the tales of the scripts, as I am spirit-filled and have no need of causing unrest.
Be cautious what you allow others to place in your minds.
Who do you think you are talking to?
How much the brain is affected by genetic transfer of knowledge is more controversial in humans than other species since humans spend more time in development outside the uterus than other animals. Nature vs nurture.
I didn't want to bother getting the studies, but I'm sure you guys can find them if you want them. They are referenced in the post. If you can't, I can dig for it.N > 63,000; tested 6.9 million SNPs
— Extraversion (van den Berg et al. 2015)
- All non-significant
— Neuroticism (de Moor et al. 2014)
- One significant; didn’t replicate
Yeah, I think we are done with our misunderstanding.
There is replication though for many things such as the above posted link to the meta-analysis of precognitive studies.
Our own military and many militaries around the world have had or maintain PSI programs mainly focused on remote viewing.
But I also recently published an article on my thread some months back (I’ll look for it) taking about harnessing people’s intuitive reaction almost into the realm of precognition (without actually saying it since it was a release by the Navy).
Found it!
http://www.infjs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27025&page=132&p=816490&viewfull=1#post816490
It’s an interesting prospect anyhow.
I would like to read those studies you mention if you find time later, thanks.
Evidence for a non-physical power requires searching for a non-physical effect.
I don't think we should assume anything, even that paranormal activity is actually anything more than coincidence.But we shouldn't assume paranormal facts are non-physical. Even the soul isn't non-physical. We should discount those possibilities before talking about non-physical entities. Further, even if these entities are non-physical, we might still tackle questions of these entities by searching for physical effects IF the non-physical entities are not causally closed. If there are causal interactions between the physical things and the non-physical things, then we should be able to notice that
I don't think we should assume anything, even that paranormal activity is actually anything more than coincidence.
Here's the second one I was thinking of. It's about consciousness as a state of matter:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219
I don't understand almost any of it, lol.
I couldn't find the first one though, sorry
It was a slide that was extra, so she didn't publish it online