Si = politicians? | INFJ Forum

Si = politicians?

Discussion in 'News and Politics' started by enfp can be shy, Feb 24, 2010.

Share This Page

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 1 user.
More threads by enfp can be shy
  1. enfp can be shy

    enfp can be shy people vs the bad people?
    Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Threads:
    36
    Messages:
    2,538
    Likes Received:
    288
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    enfp
    Enneagram:
    -
    The last Se US president must have been Nixon. Seems there are always more Si politicians. Eg: ESFJ, INTP, ENTP, ENFP... I think the explanation is: Se are more influential in society, which means that practically they influence the majority of people who to vote for. However, Se are more likely to support someone Si, instead of another Se. Because two Se tend to clash after some time. So in the end Si get elected more often.

    Let me make sure that logic became clear:

    Si ----> elected
    | \
    Se + Se + Se ...
    | | \ | | \ | \ \ \
    Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si ...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    #1 enfp can be shy, Feb 24, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2010
  2. DefectiveCreative

    Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Threads:
    1
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFP
    Enneagram:
    4w5 so/sx
    Well, the way I see it, because Si types (SJs) are amongst the most common types in the general population a politician is automatically more likely to be an SJ, and on top of that Si is essentially the "tradition" function, so his/her policies are likely to be traditionally minded* which will appeal to the majority of SJs in the country, who as previously mentioned make up a sizeable majority of the general population.

    *(Note that I said traditionally minded, rather than conservative, as it's entirely possible to have liberal traditions, and if an SJ was raised in that environment then they're more likely to hold "liberal" views than "conservative" ones).

    (Oh, and Bill Clinton was probably an ESFP, and George W. Bush was quite possibly an ESTP, so there's at least one recent Se type president for you).
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. OP
    enfp can be shy

    enfp can be shy people vs the bad people?
    Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Threads:
    36
    Messages:
    2,538
    Likes Received:
    288
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    enfp
    Enneagram:
    -
    Si = NP/SJ
    Se = NJ/SP

    Bush Jr., Clinton - ENTP
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. IndigoSensor

    IndigoSensor Product Obtained
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Threads:
    762
    Messages:
    14,154
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFJ
    Enneagram:
    1w2 sx/so/sp
    Si by it's nature is more regiment, linear, and solid. Which has appeal for socieity as a president is supposed to be these things. Si also gives an inate drive to control and hold common and shared ideals, which is largely what government is about.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. DefectiveCreative

    Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Threads:
    1
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MBTI:
    INFP
    Enneagram:
    4w5 so/sx
    Don't forget that Si plays a very different cognitive role for SJs and NPs. For SJs it's their main perceiving function, and so it's the main way their ideas and beliefs are informed and therefore structured around. Whereas for NPs Si only plays a back-up role, with Ne forming the main framework for their ideas, perceptions and beliefs.

    Because of that the policies of an SJ politician will tend to be based around tradition and stability, whereas the policies of an NP politician will tend to be based around progressiveness and diversity. Which will naturally appeal to different voters in different ways.

    Hmmm, I just don't see it. To me Clinton seems like a very clear F, Bush a very clear S, they don't seem similar enough to share the same personality type, and they don't remind me to any significant degree of any of the ENTPs I'm familiar with. =P
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
Loading...
Similar Threads - politicians
  1. Lark
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    593

Share This Page