Putins message to western leaders: playtime is over | Page 4 | INFJ Forum

Putins message to western leaders: playtime is over

Its because whatever isnt straight up invented online by conspiracy nuts is created for Russians for Russian domestic consumption.

Putin would love it to be broadcast elsewhere, especially if it would mobilise the public and politicians against him because he really, really needs what he is telling the Russian public about their being menaced by sinister, reckless foreigners to be confirmed by said foreigners.

So, Putin is really behaving a lot like North Korea and other despotic nations like that, he is counting on some western power bumbling or blundering into providing the credience he desperately needs for his political survival.

I used to think that the Russians were serious threats to world peace but they only are if foreign powers let them be, if he "humiliates" them with his posturing and bizarre antiquated ideologies about manifest destiny and a greater Eurasian superpower, it'll all be a drop in the water in terms of world history, all men die, including Putin, he's not immortal and neither is his highly idiosyncratic vision of Russia and the world.

What he's opposing, the international rule of law etc. will endure long after he's gone because it corresponds to real human needs not dreams and wishes but needs.

So there are no sinister forces at work in the US and UK?

Wow! Got any more state-socialist propaganda for us?

BBC Southern eye documentary on freemasonic corruption in the UK: [FONT=&quot]

[video=youtube;x0aAY83j54Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0aAY83j54Q[/video]

The waterhouse freemasonry peadophile scandal in the UK

[video=youtube;rjSztuKnGeU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjSztuKnGeU[/video]

Franklin affair cover up documentary 'a conspiracy of silence' about the rent boys taken to the white house

[video=youtube;sQHrbJPhus4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQHrbJPhus4[/video]

Channel 4 news covering the list of peadophiles who were all freemasons

[video=youtube;6m-5BUNXfNU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m-5BUNXfNU[/video]

More to follow...
[/FONT]
 
The police, freemasonry, corruptiona nd pornography explained by a police whistleblower

[video=youtube;3r649ftMXjE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r649ftMXjE[/video]

North wales police chief and freemason arrested on peadophile charges

http://google-law.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/freemason-and-ex-north-wales-police.html?spref=tw

[h=2]Thursday, 16 January 2014[/h] [h=3]Freemason and ex North Wales Police Superintendent Gordon Anglesea arrested by operation Pallial for historic child abuse[/h]
RETIRED FREEMASON and NORTH Wales Police superintendent Gordon Anglesea has been arrested on suspicion of historic physical and sexual assaults against children.
Rebecca Televison reveals thatAnglesea was detained at his Colwyn Bay home in December by officers of the National Crime Agency. He was the 18th person to be arrested as part of Operation Pallial, based at North Wales Police headquarters.​
Operation Pallial was set up by David Cameron in November 2012.​


ON 12 DECEMBER officers from the National Crime Agency knocked on the door of a house in a quiet suburban street in Old Colwyn on the North Wales coast.
Inside the property they arrested a 76-year-old man and later took him to a police station in Cheshire.

gordonanglesea-6536434.jpg
Anglesea finally Arrested

The detectives were part of the Agency’s Operation Pallial team.
They questioned the arrested man about allegations of child abuse dating back to the 1970s and 1980s.
Seven men have alleged that they were sexually or physically abused by the retired police officer in the period 1975 to 1983 when they were between 8 and 16 years of age.
The following day the National Crime Agency, which is in charge of Operation Pallial, said the pensioner had been released on police bail until mid-April.
The Agency would not reveal his identity. But it is Gordon Anglesea.


Between 1975 to 1983 he was a North Wales Police Inspector based in Wrexham.
He served as a policeman for more than 34 years and reached the rank of Superintendent by the time he retired in 1991.
Anglesea is a Rotarian and a Freemason.
Shortly after his arrest last December, he informed his local Rhos on Sea Rotary Club that he had been detained.
Six days after the arrest, on December 20, Rebecca Television in North Wales rang John Roberts, secretary of the Rhos club. They told him they were planning to name Anglesea. Roberts replied that Anglesea had not resigned.


Roberts said the retired police officer had applied for leave of absence and that the request would be considered at the club’s January meeting. At that meeting, which took place on January 7, Anglesea was given leave of absence until April.


He is a long-standing Rotarian, one of 51,000 members in Britain and Ireland.
He has been President of the Rhos on Sea club on three occasions — 1989-90, 1990-91 and 2007-8.


In 2010 he was the club official in charge of “Youth Service”.
A spokeswoman for Rotary International told Rebecca Television that “while there was a legal process under way, the organisation could not comment.”


Anglesea is also a Freemason of more than 30 years standing.
There are 250,000 masons in England and Wales — outnumbering Rotarians 5 to 1.
In 1976 Anglesea joined a masonic lodge in Colwyn Bay.
In 1982 he became a member of Wrexham’s Berwyn lodge.
He left in 1984 to join a new Wrexham lodge called Pegasus becoming its Master in 1990.


The secretary of the North Wales Province of Freemasonry, Peter Sorahan, said:
“In view of the fact that Operation Pallial is an ongoing investigation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment.” “However”, he added, “I can assure you that if requested by the Police to do so, the Province of North Wales will provide full assistance with their inquiries.”


Masonic HQ, the United Grand Lodge of England based in London, also confirmed it would assist the police if asked.
On January 8 Rebecca Television wrote to Gordon Anglesea informing him that the website intended to reveal that he was the man arrested on December 12.
We asked for a comment. Royal Mail confirmed delivery of the letter. There was no reply.


The present accusations are not the first he has faced.
The background is laid out in the article The Trials Of Gordon Anglesea.


In 1994 a libel jury found journalists had falsely accused him of abusing children at the Bryn Estyn children’s home in Wrexham.
Private Eye, The Observer, Independent on Sunday and the broadcaster HTV paid him combined damages of £375,000 with their legal bills running into several million pounds.
These and other allegations were also considered by the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of 1996-2000.
In its 2000 report Lost in Care, the Waterhouse Tribunal found no evidence that the retired police officer had abused children.

story curtesy of Rebecca TV



Gordon Angelsea not only took advantage of and abused children in North Wales Care Homes but made a small fortune from his perjury to the High Court in London. Will operation Pallial now also look at the child porn trade supported by the North Wales Police?





Operation Pallial can be contacted on 0800 118 1199 or by email at operationpallial@nca.x.gsi.gov.uk.
 
Internal police investigation Operation Tiberius leaked to newspapers tells tale of the corruption of the police by organised crime through the medium of freemasonry

[FONT=&quot]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-9054670.html

[/FONT] [h=1]Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police[/h]
Scotland-Yard-Getty.jpg








[h=3]Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard
[/h]
Tom Harper
plus.png


Investigations Reporter

13 january 2014


Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.

Operation Tiberius, written in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.
The report – marked “Secret” – found serving officers in East Ham east London who were members of the Freemasons attempted to find out which detectives were suspected of links to organised crime from other police sources who were also members of the society.
Famous for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.
The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists. However, Operation Tiberius is the second secret police report revealed by The Independent in the last six months to highlight the possible issue.
Project Riverside, a 2008 report on the rogue private investigations industry by the Serious Organised Crime Agency, also claimed criminals attempt to corrupt police officers through Freemason members in a bid to further their interests.
Concerns over the influence of freemasons on the criminal justice system in 1998 led former Home Secretary Jack Straw to order that all police officers and judges should declare membership of the organisation.
However, ten of Britain’s 43 police forces refused to take part and the policy was dropped under threat of legal action. In England and Wales, the Grand Master of the Freemasons is Prince Edward, Duke of Kent. The United Grand Lodge of England declined to comment last night.
The Independent revealed last week that Operation Tiberius found that organised crime syndicates such as the Adams family and the gang led by David Hunt were able to infiltrate the Met “at will”.
Asked to comment on the Tiberius report, a spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “The Metropolitan Police Service will not tolerate any behaviour by our officers and staff which could damage the trust placed in police by the public.
“We are determined to pursue corruption in all its forms and with all possible vigour.”
Read more
 
[FONT=&quot]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-9052617.html

[/FONT]
[h=1]The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals[/h]
3019764v2.jpg








[h=3]Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised
[/h]
Tom Harper
plus.png


Investigations Reporter



[FONT=&quot]Friday 10 January 2014

[/FONT]The entire criminal justice system was infiltrated by organised crime gangs, according to a secret Scotland Yard report leaked to The Independent.

In 2003 Operation Tiberius found that men suspected of being Britain’s most notorious criminals had compromised multiple agencies, including HM Revenue & Customs, the Crown Prosecution Service, the City of London Police and the Prison Service, as well as pillars of the criminal justice system including juries and the legal profession.
The strategic intelligence scoping exercise – “ratified by the most senior management” at the Met – uncovered jurors being bought off or threatened to return not-guilty verdicts; corrupt individuals working for HMRC, both in the UK and overseas; and “get out of jail free cards” being bought for £50,000.
The report states that the infiltration made it almost impossible for police and prosecutors to successfully pursue the organised gangs that police suspected controlled much of the criminal underworld.
The author of Tiberius, which was compiled from intelligence sources including covert police informants, live telephone intercepts, briefings from the security services and thousands of historical files, came to the desperate conclusion: “Quite how much more damage could be done is difficult to imagine.”
The fresh revelations come a day after The Independent revealed that Tiberius had concluded the Metropolitan Police suffered “endemic police corruption” at the time, and that some of Britain’s most dangerous organised crime syndicates were able to infiltrate New Scotland Yard “at will”.
In its conclusions, the report stated: “The true assessment of the damage caused by these corrupt networks is impossible to make at this stage, until further proactive scoping has been undertaken.
“However a statement by an experienced SIO [senior investigating officer] currently attached to SO 1(3) gives some indication of the depth of the problem in east and north-east London: ‘I feel that at the current time I cannot carry out an ethical murder investigation without the fear of it being compromised.’
“The ramifications of this statement are serious and disturbing and provide a snapshot of the current threat to the criminal justice system. Additionally the fact that none of these syndicates have been seriously disrupted over the last five years provides an insight into the effectiveness of their networks.”
In one case identified by Tiberius, a leading criminal was acquitted of importing cannabis after he allegedly “bought” members of the jury hearing his case. A named police officer “was involved in some way or another”, according to the report.
Tiberius also revealed the Met was concerned at the time with a national newspaper story on the ability of the Adams family to escape the law by penetrating the criminal justice system.
In 1998, police appeared to have finally made a breakthrough when Tommy Adams was jailed for more than seven years for importing cannabis.
However, the article cited by Tiberius stated that the “only reason the Adams family had allowed the prosecution to succeed and had not resorted to bribery or intimidation to thwart it, was because the other brothers wanted to teach Tommy a lesson for getting involved in crimes they had not authorised”.
The article concluded: “Witnesses terrified into silence, dodgy jurors, bent lawyers, bent policemen and bent CPS clerks – all are part of the same cancer eating away at justice. A cure for the malady will not be easy to come by. Perhaps we should begin by acknowledging that the patient is sick.”
Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire. The reporter stated one of her journalistic sources on the family was a corrupt police officer but did not disclose who it was.
Another case of corruption beyond the Met, identified by Tiberius, included intelligence of alleged foul play within HMRC, which is supposed to lead the UK’s fight against white-collar crime such as money laundering.
In 2000, according to Tiberius, a key police informant was secretly helping Scotland Yard with an investigation into the importation of £10m of heroin by a Turkish gang in north London.
The deal went wrong, the informant was tortured in a cellar and “an attempt was made to sever his fingers with a pair of garden shears”. His associate was also attacked and had “three fingers chopped off with a machete”.
The henchman Tiberius alleged had committed the assaults was the son of a named Met detective, who repeatedly tried to impede police inquiries into the case, according to Tiberius. He also had a corrupt relationship with a named detective sergeant then based in Marylebone police station who is suspected to have “organised cheque frauds”. Research conducted by The Independent suggests that none of the three men has ever been prosecuted.
The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.
Alastair Morgan, whose brother Daniel was murdered in 1987 before he could expose links between Met officers and organised crime, told The Independent: “Despite all the protestations by police that things have changed since the ‘bad old days’, this doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.
“The police have no desire to tackle this. It would be too damaging to have it all aired in open court. The Met is a highly political organisation.”
Scotland Yard said: “[We] will not tolerate any behaviour by our officers and staff which could damage the trust placed in police by the public. We are determined to pursue corruption in all its forms and with all possible vigour. All such allegations and intelligence are taken extremely seriously.”
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...-expenses-records-and-its-own-reputation.html

[h=1]Parliament shreds MPs' expenses records - and its own reputation[/h] [h=2]Getting rid of old claims is a cynical, conniving insult to the electorate[/h]
183427021_3037051b.jpg
Bright lights, shady dealings: the Houses of Parliament Photo: Getty Images







By Robert Colvile
12:15PM GMT 03 Nov 2014

comments.gif
527 Comments

I sometimes find myself trying to make the argument – as the froth and spittle fly around me – that MPs are not greedy, corrupt incompetents. That the overwhelming majority are dedicated public servants, who do an often punishing job with a surprising level of diligence and dedication.

And then you find out that John Bercow and co have authorised the destruction of MPs’ old expenses claims, and you think: why bother?

Let’s be clear: what has happened is not routine compliance with data protection laws, but a deliberate act. In the wake of the expenses scandal, the destruction of old receipts was suspended.




But in February 2012, a committee chaired by the Speaker decided to bring back the “Authorised Records Disposal Practice”, under which the documentation for expenses claims is destroyed three years after the financial year in which they are settled (you can find the full 70-page policy document here).

A Commons spokesman said this was necessary to comply with data protection laws – but that is pure nonsense. The Data Protection Act, in the words of the Information Commissioner's Office, "does not set out any specific minimum or maximum periods for retaining personal data": instead, data should be held for as long as is appropriate. It doesn’t even mandate its destruction: archiving is perfectly acceptable.


In addition, the Commons’ own regulations contain an exemption for material of “long-term administrative and/or historical value” – which should surely include the expenses claims at the centre of the greatest parliamentary scandal in decades. Oh, and HMRC asks the rest of us to keep hold of our tax records for six years (that’s twice as long, maths fans), without any legal complications.
If those who made this decision were in any doubt about how it would be received, they have only to look at this gloating tweet from Denis MacShane, exulting that others wouldn’t now have to face his “difficulties”. For “difficulties”, read imprisonment and public disgrace after being found to have defrauded the taxpayer.

It’s tempting, at this point, to trot out the old charge: “they just don’t get it”. But that’s the tragedy. They do get it, but they did it anyway. It’s like News International’s loss of its email archive as the hacking scandal swelled, as part of an internal systems upgrade: exactly the thing most likely to make people think you’re guilty.
In this instance, the calculation was presumably that it was worth taking the hit – in terms of feeding the public’s near-toxic levels of contempt for parliamentarians – if it got rid of the Sword of Damocles hanging above the heads of every member of the pre-2010 House of Commons who took liberties with their expenses that haven’t yet been revealed. The fact that it may have shored up John Bercow’s tottering Speakership – which started, let’s remember, with promises of reform and transparency – is, I’m sure, just a happy side-effect.
Once again, to be clear: the documents that have been shredded aren’t any old leftover receipts. They are proof of how MPs spent – or, in many cases, mis-spent – public money. Our money. As such, they should be retained not just for three years, or six years, but for as long as is remotely, conceivably necessary.
Otherwise, we’re effectively saying that ripping off the public and betraying the trust of your voters is morally deplorable, but only within a certain administrative window.
If the people who did these things are still in Parliament, and still receiving public money, then their expenses should be retained. If they’ve left Parliament, their expenses should still be retained, so that if they are elected or appointed to other public offices, their record can be appropriately scrutinised.
The silver lining here, of course, is that many of these records aren’t gone for ever: the Telegraph still has its famous expenses discs. But in a functioning democracy, it shouldn’t be left to a newspaper to act as custodian of the public good.
Over the past month, MPs have endorsed Nick Clegg’s hugely watered-down Recall Bill, and Parliament has backed the shredding of old expenses receipts. The combined effect has been to make it harder for voters to punish MPs for betraying their trust – and harder to find out about those betrayals in the first place. If anyone wonders why the public don’t trust politicians, here are Exhibits A and B.
As I said, I try to think the best of everyone – even in politics. But this decision by John Bercow and his cronies is a cynical, conniving insult to the electorate. It makes the Speaker appear not as a guardian of democracy, but as a shop steward for a gang of cheats and swindlers. So much for restoring Parliament's reputation.
 
Lets take a brief break from freemasonry and the corrupt british establishment to go back to russia for a minute...

As monsanto push unlabelled cancer causing GMO's on the US public and fight to get them pushed onto europeans the russians are blockign them to protect their people (see article below)

On top of that the russians are looking into stopping fast food adverts on childrens TV programmes (see article below)

Wow! I bet the british and US americans wish they had a leadership who was trying to protect them instead of poisoning them!

So what's the point of it all? Well according to Putin the meaning of life is LOVE (see article below)

http://rt.com/news/russia-import-gmo-products-621/

[h=1]Russia will not import GMO products - PM Medvedev[/h]

[h=1]Russia will not import GMO products - PM Medvedev[/h] Published time: April 06, 2014 00:58
Edited time: April 07, 2014 10:33 Get short URL

rian_02349517.hr.en.si.jpg
RIA Novosti / Maksim Bogodvid

34.9K2.5K3K544



Tags
Economy, GMO, Law, Russia, Trade

Russia will not import GMO products, the country’s Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said, adding that the nation has enough space and resources to produce organic food.
Moscow has no reason to encourage the production of genetically modified products or import them into the country, Medvedev told a congress of deputies from rural settlements on Saturday.
“If the Americans like to eat GMO products, let them eat it then. We don’t need to do that; we have enough space and opportunities to produce organic food,” he said.

http://rt.com/news/203391-russia-fast-food-kids/


[h=1]Russia may ban fast food commercials in TV programs for kids[/h]
Russia may ban the advertising of junk food during children’s shows aired on national TV or radio. The Parliament is considering new amendments to the Advertising Law which would limit marketing of foods containing high amounts of fat, salt and sugar.
A relative new comer to Russian politics, young MP Alena Arshinova, is trying to change the face of the nation by banning fast food commercials from children’s radio and TV channels, by introducing an amendment to the Russia’s Advertising Law.
“Every children's program is a guide, instilling some values, giving moral guidance. But we must understand that the child does not take advertising in isolation from fairy tales or cartoons. And the favorite program in the future is associated with a particular product, often harmful to health,” explained Arshinova.

http://rt.com/news/203339-putin-love-meaning-life/


[h=1]Putin: ‘Love is the meaning of life’[/h]
Vladimir Putin is known for his sharp wit, but musings on love are a relative novelty. In an unexpected remark Friday, the Russian president spoke of the “meaning of life,” saying that for him “in general” it is love that matters.
Briefly digressing from politics, Putin ventured a philiosophical observation that “multifaceted” love is the basis of all actions and the essence of being.
"The meaning of our whole life and existence is love," Putin told his audience at the 15th Congress of the Russian Geographical Society. "It is love for the family, for the children, for the motherland. This is a multifaceted phenomenon; it lies at heart of any of our behaviors."
Putin, who chairs the board of trustees at the Russian Geographical Society, went on to express his hopes that “joint work” would help strengthen love for the motherland.
"It is exactly the top priority which all of us should go after, and I am absolutely sure that we will succeed," he added.
Putin has spoken at length about the necessity to attract more interest in geography among younger Russians, saying it “can and should be one of the most interesting subjects in school.”
The president also suggested launching a National Geographical Quiz for testing knowledge in this field.
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...o-escape-prosecution-for-decades-8541473.html

[h=1]Police 'protection' of celebrities 'allowed serial abusers Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile to escape prosecution for decades'[/h]
savile.pa.jpg








[h=3]Information on high profile suspects was reportedly marked as 'secret' or 'restricted' and only available to a small number of officers
[/h]
Charlie Cooper
plus.png



Wednesday 20 March 2013


Celebrities and politicians were protected from child sex investigations because hundreds of police intelligence files were kept so secret that investigating officers could not access them, it has been reported.

Information on famous suspects was marked “secret” or “restricted”, allowing only a small number of officers to access it, to offset the risk of police officers or staff leaking the information to the media, according to The Times.
However, the burying of information is understood to have helped serial offenders such as Jimmy Savile and Sir Cyril Smith MP escape prosecution for decades. Campaigners for the victims of child sex abuse said that police had “put protecting celebrities above child protection”.
The problem has emerged in a review of police information handling by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal. Since the exposure of the former TV presenter as Britain’s most prolific child sex offender, police have been inundated with reports from members of the public of “historical abuse”, often by prominent politicians, celebrities and VIPs.
Valuable intelligence on Savile was recorded in 1964, 1998 and 2003 by Scotland Yard, the inspectorate found, but other forces were unable to access it. The inspectorate said the restriction of access to intelligence files was “an area we are concerned about”.
Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler told The Times that the force had in the past had “officers and staff who were prepared to leak information to the media for payment and the mechanism to prevent that was to restrict access to that information.”
“We are not going to let 50,000 people [police officers and staff] across London read sensitive material about celebrities, politicians, or other high profile people,” he told the newspaper.
The National Association of People Abused in Childhood said the practice had hampered investigations that could have prevented further abuse. John Bird, spokesman for the charity, said: “It is certainly the case that in the past the police put protecting celebrities above child protection. However we do think that now there is a clear drive to learn from these mistakes and get it right in the future.”
The new Police National Database, launched in 2011, will help stop information from being missed in the future, police believe. Before 2003, police forces had no national intelligence sharing facility. Within the new database, sensitive information can be found but not necessarily seen in full without higher clearance. The £20 million a year national database, reportedly designed to hold 250 million intelligence records, is also coming under strain with 1.8 billion items now uploaded.
Chief Constable Mike Barton, the Association of Chief Police Officer's lead on intelligence, said the current system is capable of being interrogated by any trained officer across the UK to “identify suspects, offenders and patterns of behaviour”.
 
[FONT=&quot]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...uspicion-of-a-deliberate-coverup-9802307.html

[/FONT] [h=1]Rotherham child abuse scandal: Missing files 'fuel public suspicion of a deliberate cover-up’, say MPs[/h]
Rotherham.jpg








[h=3]MPs accuse council and police of ignoring credible warnings
[/h]
Nigel Morris
plus.png


Deputy Political Editor

Saturday 18 October 2014




Fears of a “deliberate cover-up” by public officials of the sexual abuse of children in Rotherham have been fuelled by the large number of documents detailing the scandal which have vanished, an investigation by MPs has concluded.

They urged the Home Office to launch an immediate search for the missing paperwork and to examine claims that files warning about the activities of paedophile rings were stolen from a locked council office in the South Yorkshire town.
In a report published on Saturday, the Commons home affairs select committee said the “shocking” failure to act on repeated warnings of systematic exploitation had exposed more victims to abuse.
At least 1,400 girls as young as 11 were groomed and abused by gangs in the town over a 16 year period and new victims continue to come forward.
The committee, in its second inquiry into Rotherham, said there was “compelling evidence” that the town’s council and South Yorkshire Police ignored “numerous, credible warnings about the scale of child sexual exploitation”.
And it raised suspicions that officials colluded to conceal evidence which could have uncovered the scandal years before it came to light.
The MPs heard private evidence from a former researcher who was hired by Rotherham Council to find ways of catching men who tried to lure girls and vulnerable young women into prostitution.
Rotherham-Getty.jpg
MPs have accused council and police of ignoring credible warnings (Getty Images)
She referred in a report, which was about to be sent to the Home Office, to the “alleged indifference towards, and ignorance of, child sexual exploitation on the part of senior managers”, the committee said.
“The researcher told us that an unknown individual subsequently gained access to her office and removed all of the data relating to the Home Office work.
“There were no signs of a forced entry and the action involved moving through key-coded and locked security doors. “She was also subjected to personal hostility at the hands of Council officials and police officers,” the committee said.
The MPs said: “This is not the first case in which it has been alleged that files of information relating to child sexual exploitation have disappeared. The proliferation of revelations about files which can no longer be located gives rise, whether fairly or not, to public suspicion of a deliberate cover-up.
“The only way to address these concerns is with a full, transparent and urgent investigation and the Home Office must do everything in its power to locate any missing files in its possession relating to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham and other places.”
Keith Vaz, the committee chairman, said: “A number of individuals attempted to bring these crimes to light, only to face obstacles from the council and police, which in some cases questioned their credibility and the veracity of their claims.
Keith-Vaz.jpg
The committee chairman Keith Vaz (Getty Images)
“If the council and police had taken these warnings seriously, the abusers could have been brought to justice more quickly and some of the later victims could have been spared their ordeal.”
His committee also called for the introduction of a power of recall for police and crime commissioners (PCCs).
Its recommendation was prompted by Shaun Wright refusing to step down as South Yorkshire’s PCC despite being the councillor responsible for children's services in Rotherham from 2005 to 2010. He eventually bowed to pressure and quit last month after spending weeks resisting calls for his resignation.
The committee said: “We are concerned that at present there is no mechanism at all to suspend or remove a Police and Crime Commissioner for behaviour which falls short of criminal.
“This is clearly anomalous when compared to Members of the House of Commons, who may be suspended or expelled by the House for breaches of the Code of Conduct.”
A Home Office spokesman said: “The Home Secretary has been very clear that what happened in Rotherham amounted to a total dereliction of duty by the authorities.
“We are already taking a wide range of action to ensure police, councils, the health sector and other agencies are taking their safeguarding responsibilities seriously and share our commitment to ending this appalling abuse.
“The increasing number of cases the police are bringing before the courts demonstrates the progress being made.”
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ers-are-implicated-in-corruption-9802832.html

[h=1]New investigation after '2,000 police officers' are implicated in corruption[/h]
police.jpg








[h=3]Exclusive: Independent investigation reveals thousands of officers are suspected to be crooked
[/h]
Tom Harper
plus.png



Friday 17 October 2014



Police corruption is to be investigated by a powerful committee of MPs amid fears of widespread impropriety – as The Independent reveals that thousands of officers are suspected to be crooked.

The Home Affairs Select Committee will launch an inquiry next month into the police’s relationship with organised crime, focusing on the infiltration of forces by criminal networks. The inquiry, which will allow MPs to hear from witnesses under the protection of parliamentary privilege, follows a series of scandals including the inquiries relating to Stephen Lawrence, Daniel Morgan, phone-hacking and Plebgate.
It comes as The Independent can reveal for the first time the Government’s official estimate of how many members of police staff were suspected of being compromised by dealings with criminals.
An analysis of intelligence by Home Office researchers found between 0.5 and 1 per cent of the 200,000 police officers and civilian employees in England and Wales in 2003 were “potentially corrupt”, and involved in leaking information to criminals, stealing property during raids, fabricating evidence, helping villains to escape prosecution and “using their power to obtain money or sexual favours from the public”.


However, the previously unnoticed report said the problem at the time was “far wider” and made clear the 2,000 figure did not include officers suspected of “criminality and misconduct”, which included dealing and using drugs ranging from steroids to crack cocaine, fraud, domestic violence and “sexist, racist and homophobic behaviour”.
police-2.jpg
The report suggested that police who had committed crimes should be dealt with behind closed doors (Ian Forsyth /Getty Images)
The report cited raids where suspects were apparently expecting police, had no incriminating evidence and had “already got the kettle on when the police arrive”.
One investigator is quoted as saying: “A good villain can’t operate without having a bent officer...it’s impossible.”
The report said the suspected criminality was not limited to junior officers and found “examples of higher-ranking officers implicated in corruption or other unethical behaviour”.
The Home Office report also recommended that, in some cases, police who had committed crimes should be dealt with behind closed doors, rather than mount prosecutions in open court, with “alternative outcomes” such as “disciplinary procedures” and “disruption tactics” being “less damaging to the morale of the organisation”.
Another theme running through the 2003 paper was the fear of “bad publicity and criticism” that resulted from publicising investigations into police corruption. “Media strategies accompanying investigations might be used to minimise negative publicity,” the report suggests.
Critics said this “kid-gloves” approach to the police from successive Labour governments was one of the reasons why the Home Secretary, Theresa May, is having to deal with a series of historical scandals, such as Hillsborough, the Daniel Morgan murder and corruption of the Stephen Lawrence investigation.
Conservative MP Lorraine Fullbrook, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: “Labour’s kid-gloves treatment of the police bred a lack of accountability which ultimately let down the public. There has been a loss of confidence in the police as a result, which is quite dangerous. Theresa is trying to tackle these historic issues to restore the public’s trust.”
police-3.jpg
There was “endemic corruption” in the Metropolitan Police, according to a secret Scotland Yard report from 2002 (Harry Engels/Getty Images)
Earlier this year, The Independent revealed the existence of a secret Scotland Yard report from 2002, code-named Operation Tiberius, which concluded there was “endemic corruption” in the Metropolitan Police.
The file found organised crime networks in north-east London were able to infiltrate the Met “at will” to frustrate the criminal justice system.
Following pressure from the Home Affairs Select Committee, Scotland Yard later admitted it held an astonishing 260 crates of documents on police criminality relating to Operation Tiberius – yet none of the rogue detectives appears to have been successfully prosecuted.
The separate 2003 Home Office report into police corruption was unearthed by The Independent after being buried in exhibits submitted to the Leveson inquiry.
The research found up to 1 per cent of the 200,000 police officers were “potentially corrupt”, but warned: “There is likely to be a far wider range of unethical behaviour within the police service that is not picked up.”


In one force, 15 per cent of all corrupt activity related to the disclosure of information to criminals, and 11 per cent to the “inappropriate association with criminals”.
It said Scotland Yard had a particular problem with the corruption of detectives by informants from the underworld. Prosecuting police officers is “particularly difficult”, according to the report. One investigator was quoted as saying: “Unlike a criminal, a corrupt officer knows exactly what can be deployed against him … they know how to cover their tracks.”
The report also found a systemic problem with officers sharing a “solidarity …that stands in the way of colleagues reporting on one another where corruption is evident”.
Policing minister Mike Penning said: “The public expect the police to act with honesty and integrity and it is right that the full force of criminal law is available to punish and deter acts of corruption by police officers. This Government has introduced a range of measures to tackle misconduct.”

Police corruption: previous reports



Operation Othona 1994-98


Top-secret intelligence-gathering exercise on police criminality later inexplicably shredded by the Met.
Macpherson inquiry 1998



Judicial probe into Stephen Lawrence murder, concluded Met was “institutionally racist”.
Operation Tiberius 2002
Huge intelligence-gathering exercise found Met suffered “endemic corruption” and was being infiltrated “at will” by organised crime gangs.
Hillsborough Independent Panel 2012
Review of 1989 disaster when 96 Liverpool fans were crushed to death at Hillsborough Stadium. Concluded police had wrongly smeared fans as drunk and violent, and found 116 police statements had been altered to mask police failings.
Daniel Morgan Independent Panel 2013
Investigating claims a private investigator was murdered in 1987 as he was about to blow the whistle on police corruption. Yet to report.
Ellison report 2014


Judicial probe into Stephen Lawrence murder, concluded Met was “institutionally racist”.
Operation Tiberius 2002
Huge intelligence-gathering exercise found Met suffered “endemic corruption” and was being infiltrated “at will” by organised crime gangs.
Hillsborough Independent Panel 2012
Review of 1989 disaster when 96 Liverpool fans were crushed to death at Hillsborough Stadium. Concluded police had wrongly smeared fans as drunk and violent, and found 116 police statements had been altered to mask police failings.
Daniel Morgan Independent Panel 2013
Investigating claims a private investigator was murdered in 1987 as he was about to blow the whistle on police corruption. Yet to report.
Ellison report 2014
 
[FONT=&quot]http://www.nickdavies.net/1997/01/01...in-the-police/
Freemasons in the police
The Guardian
Published January 1997

Today the Guardian publishes for the first time what we believe is a unique photograph. It pierces the wall of secrecy which surrounds one of Britain’s most mysterious organisations by revealing a large gathering of London policemen wearing the white gloves, embroidered sashes and lambskin aprons of the worshipful order of freemasonry.

At the time that the picture was taken, these 60 men were members of Masonic Lodge number 9179, known as the Manor of St James, which was founded eleven years ago, on January 27 1986, for the exclusive use of Scotland Yard officers who had worked in the West End of London. The picture, which has been leaked to the Guardian by non-Masonic Metropolitan police officers, appears to have been taken at one of their inaugural meetings and includes men who then occupied some of the most powerful jobs in the force.

Since April 1985, when Sir Kenneth Newman was Commissioner, Scotland Yard have been advising their officers to stay away from the lodges. According to The Principles of Policing, which was produced under Sir Kenneth: “The discerning officer will probably consider it wise to forgo the prospect of pleasure and social advantage in freemasonry so as to enjoy the unreserved regard of all those around him. It follows from this that one who is already a freemason would also be wise to ponder from time to time whether he should continue as a freemason.”

And yet the Manor of St James is still active. On Monday of this week, a Guardian photographer caught dozens of former and serving police officers as they made their way through the crowded pavements of St James’s Street, off Picadilly. Wearing dinner jackets and carrying their Masonic regalia in flat black brief cases, they converged on number 86, an imposing sandstone building which looks like any of the gentleman’s clubs around the corner, in Pall Mall, but which is in fact the site of a Masonic temple.

Inside, they gathered to hold their annual ritual to install a London policeman as the new master of the lodge, to elect other police officers as their stewards, tylers and almoners, and to consider the names of prospective new members, all of them drawn from the past and present ranks of the Metropolitan Police, all of them willing to be blindfolded with a noose around their neck and a dagger to their heart while they are warned that if they break their vows of secrecy and loyalty, they will have their throats cut and their tongues torn out by the root. And then, until late into the night, they dined together.

The leaking of the photograph co-incides with new efforts by politicians and senior police officers to meet public concern about the role of freemasons in law-enforcement. Masons insist that they are misunderstood and that their organisation stands for service to “our God, our country and our laws”. Critics fear that the secrecy of the organisation and its stern oaths of “mutual defence and support” conflict with a police officer’s need to be seen to apply the law impartially.

The Police Complaints Authority, which says its own ranks are free of masons, is pressing for a new law to compel police masons to declare their membership on a register of interests. Last October, the Association of Chief Police Officers, ACPO, supported the move. And today (Jan 29), the House of Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs continues its own inquiry into the issue, taking evidence from ACPO as well as from the Police Federation, which represents lower ranks and which is fighting for the status quo. Until now, the issue has been as secretive as it has been controversial.

The evidence of the membership of the Manor of St James is that freemasonry reaches high into the command structure of the Metropolitan Police. Among the founder members of the lodge was Gilbert Kelland, who was in charge of all of London’s three thousand detectives when he was the Assistant Commissioner for Crime from 1977 to 1984. He is pictured here in his regalia, in the third row back, three from the right.

Among his worshipful brothers who joined the lodge, in spite of Sir Kenneth’s request, are two Deputy Assistant Commissioners, Peter Nievens and Edgar Maybanks; twelve commanders, including George Churchill-Coleman and Jim Neville, both of whom headed the Anti Terrorist Squad, and Malcolm Campbell, who was the head of Scotland Yard’s intelligence branch; John Cass, who was a Scotland Yard commander before becoming co-ordinator for the nation’s regional crime squads; at least two dozen chief superintendents; a dozen superintendents; and more than a score from the lower ranks.

One of the few officers in the lodge who did take Sir Kenneth’s advice is Tony Speed, who is now the Assistant Commissioner for Central London. He said last week that he had followed his father and grandfather into the Craft, joining his first lodge when he was 21. “There was no furore about it in those days and I have to say that in something like 20 years as a mason I never came across anything that made me feel ashamed or that I felt was wrong. But then about ten years ago, the public perception began to change and we were advised that we should reconsider our position and so, simply because of this problem of perception, I resigned.”

Most of his colleagues in the lodge did not see it that way. Malcolm Campbell is still serving as a commander and has not resigned from the lodge but says that he no longer attends its functions. Many of the others in the picture are now retired although sources who know the Manor of St James say they have been joined by a steady stream of serving officers.

Martin Short, author of the most detailed account of modern British freemasonry, Inside The Brotherhood, estimates that 20% of London officers belong to Masonic lodges. He says there is cause for concern about this and in December, he gave evidence to the Select Committee inquiry of a case he had researched recently in Lancashire which, he told them, “demonstrates just how badly the administration of justice can go wrong when police, Crown Prosecution solicitors and private citizens are all in the same Masonic lodge.”

This story began one night in 1988 when two Leicester businessmen were taking a late-night drink in a hotel in Blackburn. A group of burly strangers in dinner jackets ordered them out of the bar. The Leicester men declined to go. The strangers then announced that they were policemen and proceeded to beat them up. They then called other police who arrested the two Leicester men and charged them with assaulting police officers. When the Leicester men were released on bail the next morning, they found that the hotel manager had seized their belongings until they agreed to pay for damage caused by the fight and that someone had let all the air out of their car tyres and removed their hub caps.

The Blackburn police and Crown prosecutors pursued the case to court, where the two Leicester men faced substantial jail sentences for allegedly assaulting policemen. But the case fell apart. The jury rejected all of the police evidence and found that the Leicester businessmen were not guilty of any offence at all. The judge signalled his own view by taking the unusual step of ordering that the defendants’ costs should be paid out of the public purse. The two men then sued for assault, wrongful arrest, malicious prosecution, conspiracy to injure and libel. In an out-of-court settlement, they were awarded £170,000, most of which was paid on behalf of the policemen by the Lancashire force.

Martin Short told the Select Committee that freemasonry was at the heart of this case. The two Leicester men had stumbled into the tail-end of a Masonic event, a dinner organised by the Victory lodge of Blackburn. This lodge, said Short, is dominated by police officers: the policemen who were involved in the original fight, the officer who subsequently investigated the incident, a senior official in the Crown Prosecution office which handled the case, and the manager of the hotel where the dinner took place were all members of the Victory lodge.

No-one is suggesting that all Masonic officers are corrupt or even liable to become corrupt. However, in the past, there have been occasions when Masonic lodges have acted as nests of corruption, where detectives have rubbed shoulders with professional criminals in an atmosphere of friendship and loyalty with disastrous results. When Scotland Yard’s Obscene Publications Squad was destroyed by scandal in the late 1960s, twelve officers were jailed for taking bribes from pornographers. All of them were masons, including the head of the squad, Detective Chief Superintendent Bill Moody, who had even helped one of the pornographers he was supposed to be arresting to become a member of his own lodge.

On the other side of the argument, there have been high-profile examples of Masonic officers fighting corruption. During the Operation Countryman inquiry in the 1980s, it was a Masonic detective chief superintendent, John Simmons, who secretly tape-recorded his brother mason, Detective Chief Inspector Phil Cuthbert, boasting of his villainy and of the involvement of other senior officers in taking bribes and setting up armed robberies. However, Simmons was later ostracised by his lodge, while Cuthbert continued to be welcomed, even after he had been convicted and jailed for three years.

Some of the most angry critics of freemasonry are police officers who do not belong to the lodges. They fear that masons may promote brother officers and conceal each other’s wrong doing and that, on occasion, they might abuse their internal powers to discipline troublesome non-masonic officers. One serving Metropolitan Police detective said: “This is a secret society at the heart of Scotland Yard. I have no doubt that some masons use the lodges to get their way and this is not acceptable for the public or for the police service as a whole.” The Police Complaints Authority says that some officers have approached them privately to voice their concerns about some masonic colleagues.

One non-masonic officer says he reported to his commander that colleagues had invented a fictitious informer so that they could claim reward money for crimes which they solved and then share it among themselves. He claims that he was moved sideways while his colleagues were allowed to carry on and that he subsequently discovered that the corrupt officers and the commander were all “on the square”. Another claims to have heard a superintendent boasting that he was recruiting a new officer to his squad and that he was shortlisting only masons.

The Police Complaints Authority has run into problems with masonic officers. On one occasion a man complained that he had been charged as the result of a masonic conspiracy. He then discovered that the superintendent who was investigating his complaint was himself a mason. The superintendent resigned and was replaced by a second officer who also turned out to be a mason. On another occasion, a provincial Chief Constable simply refused to ask whether one of his officers, who was looking into allegations about masons, was himself a member of a lodge.

Masons played a prominent part in the demise of John Stalker, the former Deputy Chief Constable of Manchester who tried to unravel a cover-up of political shootings in Northern Ireland and in the case of the Scotland Yard Chief Inspector Brian Woolard, who found evidence that his career had been blighted by senior masons after he attempted to uncover the role of civilian masons in a fraud. Masonic officers argue that policemen who want to be corrupt can make bad friendships through golf clubs or Round Table dinners, and that the lodges have no special influence.

When Sir Kenneth Newman produced his advice in 1985, his office considered all of the available evidence. The booklet which he produced acknowledged that the lodges offered friendship, a chance to mix with “some of the most distinguished people in the land” and an invitation to self-improvement. It noted that many of the allegations that were made against them were unsupported or plain wrong. Yet it concluded that some of the allegations were reliable and that the exclusivity of the lodges, the oddness of their rituals and their collection of coded signals amounted to a significant problem. “They militate against the acceptance, by colleagues and citizens alike, of an officer who is a freemason as a man on whose fairness it is possibly to rely always and unquestionably… A freemason’s oath holds inevitably the implication that loyalty to fellow freemasons may supersede any other loyalty.” The worshipful brothers of the Manor of St James disagree.

The two sides of the story came face to face late last year when the current Metropolitan Commissioner, Sir Paul Condon, appeared in front of the Select Committee which is investigating freemasonry in law enforcement. The Commissioner had reassured the committee that all was well but, as he prepared to leave, he was confronted by Chris Mullin, the ebullient Labour MP for Sunderland South, who had acquired his own copy of our photograph. Mullin pulled out the picture and told the Commissioner: “I thought you might like to have a look at your alternative command structure.”

[/FONT]
 
Nah I don't think the cold war was a world war. It's never been classified as world war 3 anyway.
NATO is trying to move closer to russia and to encircle it. This is extremely aggressive behaviour and russia is standing up and saying it is ready to defend itself

View attachment 22439

Seems like we also got India encircled.
Oh and Iran.
And China.
And Tunis.
And Vietnam.
And Yemen
And Switzerland.
I'm sure they're all preparing for war against NATO.

Russia is big. It's hard not to encircle it.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ce-SLEPT-criminals-intimidated-witnesses.html

[h=1]Scotland Yard corruption: leaked report claims police were bribed to DESTROY evidence, SLEPT with criminals and intimidated witnesses[/h]
  • Internal investigation into corruption at the Metropolitan Police was leaked
  • File from 2002 says that organised criminals could access records 'at will'
  • Claims officers owned houses and racehorses with suspected gang leaders
  • Also alleges officers were paid £15,000 to destroy surveillance logs
  • Another accessed records for drug supplier he was having sex with
  • Met spokesman says report is 'outdated' and the force has 'changed vastly'
By Kieran Corcoran
Published: 10:25, 10 January 2014 | Updated: 09:24, 13 January 2014

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nals-intimidated-witnesses.html#ixzz3ITkatlEh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Dozens of corrupt police officers helped organised criminals hide evidence, intimidate witnesses and access details of ongoing operations, according to a leaked report.
An internal investigation by the Metropolitan Police claimed officers were bribed to destroy surveillance logs and some officers even co-owned houses and racehorses with suspected gang leaders.

The 2002 report, produced as part of Operation Tiberius, an investigation into police corruption, named 80 corrupt officers. More than half of them were still serving at the time.

'Corrupt': The report alleges that criminals had free access to information held by the Metropolitan Police

The documents, leaked to the Independent, concludes that organised criminals were able to infiltrate Scotland Yard 'at will' and access confidential information from secure databases.
The report, written by a team led by Andy Hayman, the force's former assistant commissioner, spoke to informants, used intelligence from intercepted telephone conversations, interviewed officers and scoured old police files to reach its conclusions.
The Metropolitan Police today insisted that the force has 'changed vastly' since the report was completed. But a recently retired senior officer, speaking anonymously to the newspaper, said that: 'The Met is still every bit as corrupt as it was back then.'
Details of the report include a case in which a police statement from a sensitive witness was found in a nightclub controlled by a family of suspected gangsters.


Other records claim that a man on trial for drug trafficking was able to pay officers £15,000 to destroy two 'crucial' surveillance logs. His trial later collapsed.
At another point, a corrupt officer who discovered the existence of a highly sensitive informant was able to threaten his handler with reprisals if he any evidence about organised crime were to emerge.

Another part of the report speaks of a corrupt officer who had 'an ongoing sexual relationship with a female drug supplier', and access police records for her.
Speaking to MailOnline today, a spokesman for the Metropolitan Police suggested that the report was 'outdated' and does not reflect the organisation as it is today.
He said: 'I think everyone recognises that the police has changed vastly over the past five years - let alone the last 10 or 15 years.'
A statement issued by the force also said that the Met continues to investigate corruption, and has 'no complacency' about the matter.
It said: 'The dedicated Anti-Corruption Command (ACC), part of the Met's Directorate of Professional Standards, proactively investigates any allegations or intelligence relating to either corrupt police officers and staff and those that may seek to corrupt our officers or staff.

'All such allegations and intelligence are taken extremely seriously and any any lessons learnt from resulting investigations are used to further our efforts to reduce the likelihood of such offences occurring in the future.

'There is no complacency in the Met's determination to succeed in this task and the work of the officers and staff of the ACC is undertaken relentlessly and determinably, fully recognising that criminals who seek to corrupt our officers and staff will remain a threat.'


Read more:


 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...e-attack-on-David-Camerons-riot-response.html
[h=1]Freemasons in the police leading the attack on David Cameron's riot response[/h] [h=2]Leading police officers have set up a national Masonic lodge where they can meet in secret in defiance of fears about the influence of the secret society on the criminal justice system.[/h]

By Jason Lewis, Investigations Editor

9:00PM BST 20 Aug 2011

comments.gif
124 Comments


The founding members include senior officials from the Police Federation, the police staff association, which is currently fighting the Government over its plans to cut budgets.

Tully_1976821f.jpg
The new Masonic lodge is led by John Tully, a Metropolitan Police officer





The new Masonic lodge is led by John Tully, a Metropolitan Police officer, who has given numerous interviews in recent days accusing the Prime Minister of "fighting violence, arson and looting on our city streets with sound-bites".

Other founder members include officers from the Metropolitan Police, Essex Police, Thames Valley Police and from other forces including Northumbria, Dyfed Powys, South Wales, South Yorkshire and even a high ranking officer from the Royal Gibraltar Police.

The "Sine Favore" Lodge was opened despite the conclusions of a Parliamentary inquiry which warned of public fears that "Freemasonry can have an unhealthy influence on the criminal justice system".

The inquiry followed questions about masonic involvement in the abandonment of an investigation into a shoot-to-kill policy in Northern Ireland and with the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad, which was disbanded after evidence of police malpractice.

[h=2]Related Articles[/h]


Membership is open to all serving and retired officers across Britain and others working alongside the police, including lawyers, criminologists and even the financial advisers who manage officers' retirement plans.
The idea for the new police Masonic lodge grew out of a series unofficial get-togethers in hotel bars during Police Federation annual conferences.
Masonic rules require members to do all they can to support each other, to look after each other and to keep each others' lawful secrets.
New members of the so-called Brotherhood are blindfolded, a hangman's noose placed around their necks and they are warned their throat will be slit and their tongue torn out if they break their oath. Critics argue this could put them at odds with discharging their duty to serve the public.
The inquiry by the Home Affairs Select Committee in 1998 called for a public register of police officers who joined the Freemasons, although in the end the then Labour government proposed that officers could make voluntary disclosures about their membership. Few did.
The new "Sine Favore" lodge, is named after the Latin motto of the Police Federation, "Without Fear, Without Favour".
The founders include Police Federation Treasurer Martyn Mordecai, John Giblin, chairman of the Federation's Sergeants Central Committee, and Steve Williams, general secretary of the Federation's Inspectors Central Committee.
Earlier this year Mr Giblin told the Federation's annual conference that government ministers "hate the police service" and wanted to "destroy" it.
Other founding members include solicitor Tristan Hallam, a personal injury lawyer who specialises, according to his firm Russell Jones and Walker, in "road traffic accidents and public liability cases for both private clients and associations including the Police Federation".
Mr Hallam said: "Membership of any organisation is a personal choice. Russell Jones & Walker are aware of my membership."
Stewart Imbimbo, an ex-Thames Valley police officer and now a senior official at Milton Keynes council, Robert Taylor, a financial adviser, Eric Misselke, director of a police credit union which provides cheap loans, savings accounts and insurance, and the Metropolitan Police's resident criminologist Dr Attilio Grandani.
Dr Grandani sits on the Metropolitan Police Authority's equality and diversity sub-committee and is behind the Met's new controversial statistical-led policing model, which aims to combat areas of high crime as opposed to more thinly spread bobbies-on-the-beat territorial policing.
Lodge number 9856 was officially opened by a senior Masonic official, Russell Race. He is the Metropolitan Grand Master, head of the Grand Lodge of London, a corporate financier and chairman of a construction firm behind the huge Westfield shopping centre in west London and The Pinnacle office development, which, when complete, will be the tallest building in the City of London.
The lodge is based at 10 Duke Street in central London, which is also the headquarters of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree, one of the most important and mysterious bodies in international Masonic circles, which has an elite membership of only 75 people.
The building, known as Grand East by Masons, contains the "Black Room", the "Red Room" and a "Chamber of Death", used for Masonic rituals.
The Police Federation last night refused to discuss whether any of its officials had disclosed their involvement with Freemasonary.
A spokesman said: "Being a member of any organisation is a matter for the individual, so long as membership of that organisation does not compromise their duties and responsibilities as a police officer."
Lodge Secretary Mr Tully, vice chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation refused to comment.
 
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/2012/James/freemasonry-queen.htm

Freemasonry and the British Monarchy
Why the Queen of England Pretends to be a Christian
by Jeremy James ~ www.zephaniah.eu Source article HERE
BD14538-med.gif
"...do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God." Romans 12:2
June 4, 2012
Home Please ignore the British sp
A single bloodline connects the royal families of Europe. They see themselves as an exclusive and superior breed – genetically, morally and intellectually. For centuries they have used wars, economic sabotage and extensive political intrigue to advance their cause. Now that a federal Europe is finally taking shape, they are anxious to extend their reach even further and create a New World Order. They are far closer to achieving this aim than most of us would imagine.
The groundwork was laid in the 17th century. By creating two global super-powers – first the British Empire and then the United States of America – they were able to mould large parts of the world in accordance with their totalitarian doctrine. Through their world-wide system of secret societies, business monopolies and family connections, as well as their stranglehold on the international banking system, they have been able to infiltrate the political structure of virtually every country in the world and install client or puppet regime of one kind or another.
Democracies do not impede their activities in any significant way since each democracy, whether large or small, is really a system of rotating puppets. In fact, democracies are often their preferred system of governance since they reinforce the illusion that a free and popular consensus is directing each country.
Note from Berit: Few have affirmed this revolutionary agenda more clearly than Carrol Quigley, the history professor at the Foreign Service Schools of Georgetown University whom soon-to-be President Clinton honored in his acceptance speech at the 1992 Democratic Convention. Quigley wrote:
"The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies... is a foolish idea acceptable only the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so the that American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy." [Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, The MacMillan Company, 1966, pps. 1247-1248]
World empire by stealth
Using these invisible levers of power, the Elite have been able to play one country against another and bring about further change, all in conformity with their long-term plan to establish a One World Government. For example, they created the state of modern China by subjecting her various provinces to over one hundred years of drug trafficking, criminal intrigue, military invasion, widespread famine and civil war, with the result that today, after tens of millions of innocent people have been murdered, and many more imprisoned and tortured, they have an obedient serf economy which they are now using to destroy America.
king-george-VI.jpg
Picture of George VI,
father of Queen Elizabeth II,
in Masonic regalia
Nearly half of American industry has been' outsourced’ (given away) over the past 30 years, most of it to the totalitarian, Marxist police-state known as China. This enables the Elite to undercut wages in each sector to such a degree that American industry simply cannot compete. And when a nation can't compete commercially with her principal rival and potential enemy, she is well on the road to destruction.
This paper is not about the coming collapse of the United States, or even the confederacy of super-rich families which control the world, but merely the religious affiliation of just one member of one super-rich family – Queen Elizabeth II of England. While this may seem a very modest topic by comparison, it actually sheds great deal of light on the Ruling Elite, their disturbing agenda, and their remarkable capacity for duplicity and deception.
The Queen as Supreme Governor of the Church of England
The Elite are not atheists or agnostics, as they often pretend. Neither are they Christian, as some of their most prominent members would have us believe. Rather, they are profoundly committed to the old religion. This is the ancient system of pantheism, Gnosticism and idolatry which rejects the LORD God of the Bible and is generally identified in the public mind with the worship of pagan deities. In short, the people who rule this world are not simply indifferent to Christianity, but reject it completely.
Officially, the Queen is a member of the Church of England, an Anglican convocation similar to the Lutheran church in Germany or the Episcopalian in the United States. She was baptized at five weeks by the Archbishop of York in Buckingham Palace on 26 May, 1926. Under British law, as reigning monarch, she is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. All members of the British royal family are officially affiliated with the Anglican Church, but not one of them has ever been known to testify to the atoning power of the blood of Christ. Indeed, it is doubtful whether any influential member of the British ruling class is a Bible-believing Christian.
The Anglican Church is the official state religion or Established Church of England. Having been under the covert control of the ruling elite almost from its inception, it is the principal means by which true Christianity in England has been suppressed. Through its empty formalism and shallow doctrines, its seasonal ritual and genteel pageantry, it offers a comforting substitute for true Biblical Christianity. In order to keep the commoners and lower classes in thrall, the nobility themselves profess to be Anglican and participate in certain annual services.
Behind the scenes, however, the ruling elite have for centuries been freemasons, atheists or Unitarians. They all reject the deity of Christ. The Anglican church has long been primarily a system of social control whereby the rich and powerful maintain their privileged positions and at the same time imbue the masses with the mindless patriotism that is needed to run an Empire.
Paganism and the Royal Family
Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth, was initiated into Freemasonry at Navy Lodge No 2612, London, on December 5, 1952:
“Present at the initiation were the Earl of Scarborough, grand master...and Geoffrey Fisher, archbishop of Canterbury. The lodge has many ties with the royal family as King Edward VII served as its first master in 1896 when he was Prince of Wales. King George VI...served as master when he was Duke of York. In 1928 H.R.H. Duke of Kent...was master and later became grand master of the Grand Lodge of England.” – William Denslow,10,000 Famous Freemasons, 1957.
There is more than enough information on record to prove beyond all doubt that the British royal family is not Christian but pagan. The Prince of Wales – the Queen's eldest son [Charles] – is a well-known advocate of New Age philosophy and paranormal science. Numerous members of the royal family down the years, including Queen Victoria, attended séances where professional mediums channeled ‘messages’ from demonic source. They have also availed routinely of the services of psychic healers and paranormal advisors. Prince Charles himself was counseled for many years by the shamanic fantasist, Laurens van der Post.
We will shortly demonstrate that the Queen too is a non-believer. Her membership of the Anglican church is immaterial. What matters is whether or not she openly professes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that she has accepted him into her heart as Lord and Savior. The evidence clearly shows that she has not.
It may seem strange that the official head of the Church of England is a not a Christian, but it is doubtful whether any senior cleric in the Church of England is a Christian. It is virtually impossible to advance into a position of influence in the English system of social-political control without being a Freemason, a Unitarian or someone who has otherwise demonstrated his or her rejection of both the deity of Christ and the authority of Scripture. There are bound to be exceptions, of course, but they are few and have little practical bearing on how the system operates.
For example, we have already noted that the Archbishop of Canterbury was present at the induction of Prince Philip into Freemasonry, while the current incumbent, Rowan Williams – like each of his predecessors during the 20th century – rejects the account of Creation given in the Bible, and has even expressed the view that it should not be taught in schools as an alternative to Evolution.
In Her Own Words
Instead of drawing on secondary sources or informed reports, we will confine ourselves to the Queen’s own words. Among the best primary sources of evidence about her real beliefs is the set of Christmas Messages that she has delivered annually since her coronation in 1952.
Given that these messages are delivered on a major feast day in the Christian calendar, by a professing Christian, to a primarily Christian audience, one would expect at least some of them to give a clear endorsement of her Christian faith. There are 59 messages in all, comprising a total of 43,000 words, and yet nowhere in any of them do we find a clear reference to the deity of Christ. In fact, as we shall shortly see, we find the very opposite, namely a consistent portrayal of Jesus as nothing more than a well-meaning, peace-loving idealist who wanted to make this world a better place.
It is truly remarkable that, over a sixty year period, the official head of the Anglican Church has failed to make even a single statement that would demonstrate her belief in the most basic doctrine of Christianity, namely the deity of Christ.
Before we proceed to examine her words in detail, we need to consider the general attitude of the British aristocracy toward the person of Christ. As we have seen, this has been shaped in the main by Freemasonry, Gnosticism, and Unitarian theology,all of which deny his deity, his substitution atonement, and the inerrancy of the Bible. They regard him merely as a good man who had a talent for healing and preaching.
The Unitarian/Masonic Christ is very similar to the New Age Christ, a guru-type figure possessing a more elevated or spiritual state of consciousness than the average man.
For centuries Freemasons have stealthily but aggressively promoted a humanistic message which they express as two principles with universal application – the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God. By this they mean that all men, regardless of their religious affiliation, are of equal spiritual standing, both in relation to each other and in relation to God. As it happens these same beliefs also figure prominently in the New Age movement.
Taken together these principles are proclaiming that the Bible is wrong when it makes an absolute distinction between believers and unbelievers, between those who are saved and those who are lost. Freemasonry and the New Age movement completely reject original sin, the fallen state of man, and the need for redemption through the saving blood of Christ. In their view, man is not lost but continually evolving through experience into a higher spiritual state.
The Queen’s definition of Christ
From a study of her Christmas Messages we find that the Queen’s portrayal of Christ differs little, if at all, from the Masonic/New Age Christ, namely, a holy man – and nothing but a man – who tried to teach the people of his time the importance of kindness and tolerance, that we are all one human family, and that we should live together in peace and harmony. This definition places him on a par with men like Mahatma Gandhi and Albert Schweitzer, Bishop Tutu and the Dalai Lama. And as flattering as this might seem to the average atheist or humanist, it is an appalling distortion of reality.
The first point to note is that, although she was (and still is) the official head of the Established church in England, the Queen made no reference whatever to Christ by name in her annual Christmas Messages during the first 20 years of her reign! Not one. Why not search the file yourself to confirm this? A complete compilation of the Queen's Christmas messages may be found at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/93046264/Christmas-Messages-by-Queen-Elizabeth-II.
The same material is also available in serial form on her official website: http://www.royal.gov.uk. Perhaps her advisors realized that such an attitude was bound eventually to attract adverse attention. In any event, she finally made her first reference in 1973:
“Christ taught love and charity and that we should show humanity and compassion at all times and in all situations."
When read in context, this otherwise innocent statement can be seen to sit neatly with the Masonic brotherhood-of-man philosophy:
"I believe that Christmas should remind us that the qualities of the human spirit are more important than material gain. Christ taught love and charity and that we should show humanity and compassion at all times and in all situations.... A lack of humanity and compassion can be very destructive – how easily this causes divisions within nations and between nations. We should remember instead how much we have in common and resolve to give expression to the best of our human qualities, not only at Christmas, but right through the year.” (1973)
Two years later she made her second reference to Christ, but this time she didn’t even bother to refer to him by name:
"We are celebrating a birthday – the birthday of a child born nearly2,000 years ago, who grew up and lived for only about 30 years. That one person, by his example and by his revelation of the good which is in us all, has made an enormous difference to the lives of people who have come to understand his teaching.” (1975)
Note that the teaching of Christ is described as “his revelation of the good which is in us all”. But this is completely false! The Bible teaches the very opposite. Christ came to save man from his wretched, fallen state and not to reveal “the good that is in us all” – since the Bible clearly teaches that there is none! ["I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells..." Romans 7:18]
It is ironic that, in the same breath, she refers to people “who have come to understand his teaching”, and yet she doesn’t seem to understand it herself.
Note the blasphemous incorporation of the Ark of the Covenant. Both through his words and through his actions, Christ confirmed the basic message that runs through the entire Bible, namely, that man in his natural state [apart from Christ] is a fallen, sin-filled being, blindly headed for eternal damnation. So which philosophy is the Queen actually citing, that of the Bible or that of Freemasonry?
Two years later she made another brief reference to the person whom her words were meant to honour. This too was in the ‘holy man’ mould:
"Christians have the compelling example of the life and teaching of Christ and, for myself, I would like nothing more than that my grandchildren should hold dear his ideals which have helped and inspired so many previous generations.” (1977)
Note that it is his ideals that she holds dearnot his deity, his resurrection, or his redemption of mankind.
The Masonic Parliament of Man
duke-grand-master-apron.jpg
The Duke of Kent, Grand Master of the Freemasons of England and Wales since 1967. Note the Masonic apron, which is always made of lamb’s skin, a blasphemous parody of the Lamb (Christ).
Following a brief reference to “the birth of the child who transformed history and gave us a great faith” (1979), she quoted liberally in 1980 from a peculiar poem by Tennyson which referred to “the” Christ. This is highly suggestive since Tennyson was also the author of a poem, Locksley Hall, which was well known (and well understood) by the luminaries of Victorian England.
They knew that Tennyson rejected Christianity and drew his inspiration exclusively from pagan authors. These included the pantheist, Baruch Spinoza, and the eminent occult philosopher, Giordano Bruno. He was also a member of an exclusive secret society at Cambridge, known as the Cambridge Apostles, which was audaciously non-Christian in outlook.
Locksley Hall contains one of the most celebrated statements of the Masonic vision of a New World Order:
For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,
Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be;
Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain'd a ghastly dew
From the nations' airy navies grappling in the central blue; ...
Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the battle-flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world.
He envisaged a parliament of man, a federation of the world. These words have been quoted many times by top Freemasons and key players in the long-range plan to create a unified World Government, a parliament of man. Tennyson's poem was greatly admired by leading architects of the New World Order, Winston Churchill and Harry Truman, while Andrew Carnegie, one of the richest men in America in the 19thcentury and a high-ranking member of the Ruling Elite, wrote in Triumphant Democracy (1893):
“The Parliament of Man and the Federation of the World have already been hailed by the poet, and these mean a step much farther in advance of the proposed reunion of Britain and America.”
Note his final words – a step much farther in advance of the proposed reunion of Britain and America.
Reunion of Britain and America? Yes, and more, as Carnegie says, a step much farther in advance of that. So when a reigning British monarch quotes a poem by Tennyson, we should pay close attention. Here are the verses she quoted (from Ring Out, Wild Bells):
"Ring out false pride in place and blood,
The civic slander and the spite;
Ring in the love of truth and right,
Ring in the common love of good ...
Ring in the valiant man and free,
The larger heart, the kindlier hand,
Ring out the darkness of the land,
Ring in the Christ that is to be."
Given that Tennyson had no regard for Christianity, the Christ figure to whom he refers is clearly not Biblical. Christians seldom, if ever, put a definite article before Christ because there is only one Christ, but Freemasons, gnostics and pagans often refer to ‘the Christ’ since they regard it as a cosmic or celestial office separate from the one who holds it.
In their occult philosophy, the Freemasons envisage the future incarnation in human form of their Angel of Light – known variously as Apollo, Horus, Helios, Lucifer, etc– whom they will enthrone and honour as their Messiah in their long-planned federation of the world. This is “the Christ that is to be” in Tennyson’s poem, though born-again Christians will recognize him as the Antichrist.
Did the Queen realize the significance of this? Given that the royal family has been a patron and protector of Freemasonry in Britain for generations, it would astonishing if she didn’t. Her consistent espousal of the brotherhood-of-man-fatherhood-of-god philosophy demonstrates her familiarity with the tenets of Freemasonry, which includes a belief in the arrival of a Messiah-type figure once the New World Order has been established. (This is the true meaning of the catchphrase, ‘If you build it, he will come,’ from the sugar-coated occult movie, Fields of Dreams.)
The Masonic Trivialization of Christianity
Her Christmas Message the following year, 1981, included the following:
"Our Christian faith helps us to sustain those convictions. Christ not only revealed to us the truth in his teachings. He lived by what he believed and gave us the strength to try to do the same – and, finally, on the cross, he showed the supreme example of physical and moral courage. That sacrifice was the dawn of Christianity and this is why at Christmas time we are inspired by the example of Christ as we celebrate his birth.” (1981)
Even though she takes a seemingly bold step and mentions the cross, it is immediately neutralised by two references to Christ as an ‘example’. According to Masonic philosophy, the Cross of Calvary achieved nothing. As the Queen says, it was just an example of exceptional moral courage and something that should inspire us. This is a patent trivialization of Christianity, where the whole basis of our faith is reduced to a courageous symbolic act, an inspiring example, but certainly not the atoning work of the incarnate Son of God for the sins of mankind.
The following year, Her Majesty took the opportunity to inject even more Masonic philosophy into her message. In three short paragraphs she managed to depict Christianity as just one of many “religious groups” in the world today and to equate the Christian message with “the Commonwealth” – meaning the common weal or common good:
“At this time of the year, Christians celebrate the birth of their Saviour, but no longer in an exclusive way. We hope that our greetings at Christmas to all people of religious conviction and goodwill will be received with the same understanding that we try to show in receiving the greetings of other religious groups at their special seasons."
The poet John Donne said: 'No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.' That is the message of the Commonwealth and it is also the Christian message. Christ attached supreme importance to the individual and he amazed the world in which he lived by making it clear that the unfortunate and the underprivileged had an equal place in the Kingdom of Heaven with the rich and powerful. But he also taught that man must do his best to live in harmony with man and to love his neighbors.” (1982)
The brotherhood-of-man-fatherhood-of-god philosophy is clearly evident in these paragraphs. Freemasons and members of the New Age movement are fond of Donne’s little phrase, “No man is an island”. It fits perfectly with the parliament of man idea in Freemasonry and the all is one principle that features so prominently in the New Age movement.
Note also the careful way she distances herself from Christianity and any suggestion that she might actually be a Christian – “At this time of the year, Christians celebrate the birth of their Saviour, but no longer in an exclusive way." The latter words, “but no longer in an exclusive way”, are designed to reinforce the idea that truth is not exclusive to Christianity but may be found in many different religious traditions.
Again, with shameless candour, a central tenet of Freemasonry is fed to the nation on prime-time television by the official head of the Anglican church. The common spiritual source of all religious traditions was again emphasized in the year 2000 when she said:
"This spirituality can be seen in the teachings of other great faiths. Of course religion can be divisive, but the Bible, the Koran and the sacred texts of the Jews and Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs, are all sources of divine inspiration and practical guidance passed down through the generations.” (2000)
If she was really a Christian the Queen would know that the Koran and the religious writings of the Hindus and Buddhists were not divinely inspired. She would also know that they reject outright the divinity of Christ. So, on a feast day that is supposed to recognize and honour the incarnation of Christ in human form, she boldly asserts the broad equivalence of all religious traditions, including those which reject the deity of Christ.
In an earlier Message (1986), she described Jesus as merely a simple person from lowly background who managed to affect the course of history:
"Christmas is a festival for all Christians, but it is particularly a festival for children. As we all know, it commemorates the birth of a child, who was born to ordinary people, and who grew up very simply in his own small home town and was trained to be a carpenter. His life thus began in humble surroundings, in fact in a stable, but he was to have a profound influence on the course of history, and on the lives of generations of his followers. You don't have to be rich or powerful in order to change things for the better and each of us in our own way can make a contribution.
"The infant Jesus was fortunate in one very important respect. His parents were loving and considerate. They did their utmost to protect him from harm. They left their own home and became refugees, to save him from King Herod, and they brought him up according to the traditions of their faith.” (1986)
His deity is completely erased. Instead we are presented with the image of a little boy who, because he was greatly loved by his mummy and daddy and raised “according tithe traditions of their faith”, succeeded in doing something useful with his life.
Note how the Old Testament, the Word of God, is described merely as “the traditions of their faith." This humanistic depiction of Christ was repeated in 2001:
“As a boy he learnt his father's trade as a carpenter. He then became a preacher, recruiting twelve supporters to help him...His great emphasis was to give spirituality a practical purpose.” (2001)
So, there it is, the royal description of Jesus – a carpenter-preacher with a talent for highlighting the practical side of religion, a former child refugee who recruited twelve supporters and acquired generations of followers. In short, an unlikely social reformer who managed to make a difference in the lives of ordinary people. She could hardly have been more patronising without provoking adverse comment. In fact, it is a mark of the shallowness and hypocrisy of Anglican Christianity that such a demeaning portrait of Christ by the nation’s monarch could even be televised.
The Good Samaritan
Over a sixty year period the Queen mentioned only one episode from the Bible (other than the nativity) in her Christmas Messages, but she did so on three occasions – in1985, 1989 and 2004. This is the parable by Jesus of the Good Samaritan which tells of a traveler who stopped and helped an injured man by the roadside, and even brought him to a hostel to recover, while two respected members of the community passed him by and failed to offer any assistance.
The parable is presented by the Queen as though Jesus was endorsing the brotherhood-of-man-fatherhood-of-god philosophy. When taken out of context and given a Masonic slant, it seems to confirm that salvation is contingent upon good works and human conduct. However, a professing Christian with only a rudimentary knowledge of Scripture will know that this interpretation is false. There is nothing man can do of himself to save himself from the devastating consequences of original sin.
The ‘love’ taught in Freemasonry and the New Age movement is not he love we find in the Bible. Scripture teaches – in the strongest possible terms – that God’s love cannot touch and redeem man in his sinful, fallen state without the atoning work of Christ, and yet this is precisely what Freemasonry and the New Age movement reject!
The Queen confirmed her Masonic perception of love when she said:
"But these technical skills [invention, scientific progress] are not enough by themselves. They can only come to the rescue of the planet if we also learn to live by the golden rule which Jesus Christ taught us– "love thy neighbour as thyself".” (1989)
Here she is discussing environmental issues such as pollution of the rivers and seas. Incredibly, she equates the ‘love’ needed to ‘rescue’ the planet with the love that Jesus was speaking about,a love which has no meaning – and no power – when divorced from his divinity and obedience to his Word.
Jesus did not teach ‘the golden rule’ of Freemasonry, as the Queen implies; rather he taught the commandments and precepts of the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel. These are vastly different from, and in fundamental conflict with, the morals and dogma of Freemasonry, a philosophy that flagrantly rejects the saving blood of Christ and his atoning sacrifice on the cross.
Man as an Animal Species
We are not dealing here with the simplifications that are sometimes necessary when presenting a message to a large and diverse audience. Rather, we are dealing with a very deliberate re-statement of Christianity along Masonic and New Age lines. If you still doubt this, then consider the following comment from the same Christmas Message:
grand-lodge-england-ark-s.jpg
Coat of arms of the United Grand Lodge of England
“It's not very difficult to apply that story [the Good Samaritan] to our own times and to work out that our neighbours are those of our friends, or complete strangers, who need a helping hand. Do you think they might also be some of the living species threatened by spoiled rivers, o some of the children in places like Ethiopia and Sudan who don't have enough to eat?” (1989)
Prince Philip once stated during a televised documentary that humans are a “plague”on the planet. This implies that humans are just one of the many animal species living on earth today. It is obvious from her remark that his wife subscribes to the same materialistic philosophy. However, true Biblical Christianity completely rejects the popular idea that humans are an animal species. Man is made in the image and likeness of God. He is not an animal of any kind, but a unique creation.
Animals cannot sin, only man can sin. This is why Freemasonry, the New Age movement, and atheistic humanism subscribe so strongly to the theory of evolution or any similar theory that portrays man as just another animal species. If man is just an animal then he cannot sin, and if he cannot sin then he cannot be judged by God.
I am reminded here of an exhibition in central London in 2009 which was housed in he former church of the Holy Trinity, Marylebone. The event included an unusually blasphemous exhibit as its centre piece, namely a life-size waxen figure of a gorilla nailed to a large wooden cross. Despite receiving lively coverage in the national media, this obscene effigy – which was described in the press as a ‘crucified ape’ –was not condemned or even criticized by any prominent Church leader in Britain.
But should we be surprised? After all, the Masons, atheists and evolutionists who control the Anglican Church regard man as just another animal species. A Masonic restatement of the Christian Message One of her most Masonic, New Age and ecumenical renderings of the Christian message was given in 2001 when she quoted the words of a well-known hymn, but failed to include the most important part:
“I believe that the Christian message, in the words of a familiar blessing, remains profoundly important to us all: Go forth into the world in peace be of good courage, hold fast that which is good, render to no man evil for evil, strengthen the faint-hearted, support the weak, help the afflicted, honour all men.”
These words are from a benediction in the 1928 version of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer. While they are certainly edifying, they cannot be considered “the Christian message” in any meaningful sense. So what’s missing? See for yourself. Here is the complete version:
"Go forth into the world in peace. Be of good courage. Hold fast that which is good. Render to no man evil for evil. Strengthen the faint-hearted. Support the weak. Help the afflicted. Honor all men. Love and serve the Lord, rejoicing in the power of the Holy Ghost. And the blessing of God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, be upon you and remain with you forever. Amen."
Since the British royal family, like their counterparts across Europe, reject the deity of Christ, they also reject the Scriptures. They do not believe in the Triune God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel [Mark 12:26], but in a different god entirely. The Anglican benediction has no distinctively Christian element without the words which they Queen chose to omit. Her version does nothing more than encapsulate the interfaith morality and brotherhood-of-man philosophy of Freemasonry.
The version read on television by the Queen would be perfectly acceptable to a Hindu, Buddhist, or Moslem. Indeed, it would be acceptable even to an atheist or a humanist. So, to portray it as “the Christian message” is incredibly disingenuous, if not deceitful. She repeated her view that Christianity is in essence an ideology when, the following year, she said:
Christmas is the anniversary of the birth of Christ over two thousand years ago, but it is much more than that. It is the celebration of the birth of an idea and an ideal."
This is Masonic to the core. The birth of the Son of God, the Saviour of mankind, is reduced to “an idea and an ideal.” Marxism is an idea and an ideal. Humanism is an idea and an ideal. And yet the Queen sees fit to place Christianity on the same plane. It beggars belief. Here are just a few more occasions when she expressed a similar view:
“I wished to speak of it from New Zealand this Christmas Day because we are celebrating the birth of the Prince of Peace, who preached the brotherhood of man.” (1953)“ ...the essential message of Christmas is still that we all belong to the great brotherhood of man. This idea is not limited to the Christian faith. Philosophers and prophets have concluded that peace is better than war, love is better than hate and that mankind can only find progress in friendship and co-operation.” (1968)

“The scriptures and traditions of the other faiths enshrine the same fundamental guidance. It is very easy to concentrate on the differences between the religious faiths and to forget what they have in common – people of different faiths are bound together by the need to help the younger generation to become considerate and active citizens.” (2006)

“Perhaps it was because of this early experience that, throughout his ministry, Jesus of Nazareth reached out and made friends with people whom others ignored or despised. It was in this way that he proclaimed his belief that, in the end, we are all brothers and sisters in one human family.” (2007)
In The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Manley Palmer Hall, who is widely respected by Freemasons as one of their supreme authorities, stated:
"The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth."
Masons reject Christ as "the way." As Hall says, “the name means little.”
However, as every true Christian knows, this is one of Satan’s greatest lies. The Word of God tells us that salvation is found only in the name of Jesus Christ:
“And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ...” (1John 3:23); “...for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)
Here is how the Grand Lodge of Louisiana stated the Masonic position in their secret handbook:
"To the altar of Freemasonry all men bring their most votive offerings. Around it all men, whether they have received their teachings from Confucius, Zoroaster, Moses, Mohammed or the founder of the Christian religion – just so long as they believe in the universality of the fatherhood of God and universality of the brotherhood of man – meet upon a common level. The Jew returns to his synagogue, the Mohammedan to his mosque and the Christian to his temple – each better prepared for the solemn duties of life by the associations in this universal brotherhood." - Louisiana Monitor, 1980 [Emphasis added]
mason-apron-sun.jpg
mason-apron.jpg
Sun God: Helios-Apollo: The lamb skin apron worn by the Grand Master, the Duke of Kent depicts the Masonic sun god.
So, under the pretense that she is a Christian, the Queen is preaching the philosophy of Freemasonry. The fact that her messages are couched in Christian terminology is irrelevant. Freemasonry does this all the time, packaging and disguising its ancient occult beliefs in a deceptive, vernacular form.
Conclusion
Christians need to understand that the people who rule this world are NOT Christian – though they often pretend to be. They worship another god and loath Christianity, Christ, the Cross of Calvary, the blood of the Lamb, the Resurrection, and the LORD God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel. They are busily preparing the scenario set out in the Book of Revelation, where their ‘messiah’ or godman takes on human form and rules over the entire earth.
In order to make this possible they are working hard behind the scenes to create a unified global system of governance (‘If you build it, he will come’). Since their messiah has no power against Christ, they are also determined to radically reduce the number of true believers, chiefly by getting professing Christians to adopt a soft, New Age version of ‘Christianity’ which has no power to save.
The Power Elite controls much of Europe and North America through Freemasonry. However, many national and world leaders pretend to be Christian in order to retain the confidence of the public. Most Presidents of the United States during the past hundred years or so was a high-ranking Freemason or a member of a secret occult society.
For example, both George Bush senior and George Bush junior pretended to be Christians when in fact they were initiated members of the Society of the Skull & Bones, a dark Luciferian fraternity based at Yale University. The god of Fremasonry is Lucifer, the Light Bearer, the beguiling ‘angel of light’ face that Satan presents to his acolytes. The British like to refer to him as Helios or Apollo, the sun god of Greek mythology.
The Queen of England may or may not adhere to all of the beliefs and doctrines of Freemasonry, but her Christmas Messages are profoundly Masonic. She clearly rejects the deity of Christ and cannot be regarded as a Christian. In reality, she is a senior member of a pagan ruling caste that is gradually bringing the world ever closer to a One World Government and a One World Religion.
"My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. And I give them eternal life..." John 10:27-28
Jeremy James, Copyright 2012, Ireland, 9 May 2012
For more information about the organized attack by the Ruling Elite on biblical Christianity visit www.zephaniah.eu
1-line.jpg
BD14538_.gif
Coronation Picture: Queen Elizabeth II poses in the Throne Room of Buckingham Palace after her June 2, 1953 coronation for this photo by Cecil Beaton. She is attired in her coronation dress and her purple velvet robe. On her head is the Imperial Crown, worn on state occasions. In her left hand she holds the Orb, emblem of sovereign power and in her right the scepter with cross, ensign of kingly power and justice. On her wrists she wears the armills, or bracelets, of sincerity." [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Elizabeth_and_Philip_1953.jpg[/URL] (Cecil Beaton/The Associated Press)
"This file is licensed under the Creative Commons. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to adapt the work" and "You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)."

 
[FONT=&quot]Kincora: How an Establishment Peadophile Ring Leads to the Monarchy, MI5 & Rothschilds [/FONT]

[video=youtube;oRq8xIJLcIE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRq8xIJLcIE&list=UUoKn2GX7lHUWoGijGrNKeow[/video]
 
Nah I don't think the cold war was a world war. It's never been classified as world war 3 anyway.

That's because it has been classed a 'cold war' but what i'm saying is that there is nothing cold about it. It has been a hot war that ahs seen millions killed

For example the US has killed more than a million Iraqis in recent years. There are the ones it killed through bombs and bullets in the two invasions and then there are the children who died picking up cluster bombs and other ordinance that was left behind and then there are the children and adults who have contracted cancer or been deformed through the depleted uranium the US military littered Iraq with; then there are the hundreds of thousands of children who died from lack of food and medicines due to the crippling sanctions imposed on Iraq by the US before the conflict began

But i say 'US' here but according to jewish journalist Carl bernstein the real driving force behind the iraq war was 'jewish neo-cons':

[video=youtube;BbyBL3-ZOsM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbyBL3-ZOsM[/video]

The encirclement of russia is no coincidence and NATO is doing it to china as well

The russians and the chinese are sick of the US using its advantage of having the dollar as the worlds reserve currency to print money and use it to build a military that they use to stop the spread of democracy and which they use to destabilie whole regions like the middle east and which they use to destroy whole countries and economies so they are building their own banks to aid the development of the world and financial infrastructure and they are trading commodities in non dollar currencies and in gold so that countries like Iran won't be suffocated by US sanctions

What the globalists want is to have a rothschild bank in every country; remenber from the quotes above what old meyer amschel rothschild said:

Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws

Seems like we also got India encircled.
Oh and Iran.
And China.
And Tunis.
And Vietnam.
And Yemen
And Switzerland.
I'm sure they're all preparing for war against NATO.

They are trying to protect themselves for example India is now taking bill gates to court for poisoning tens of thousands of its citizens with his toxic 'vaccines'

India, Brazil, China, Russia and south africa are soe of the most populous ocuntries in the world and they are called collectvieyl the 'BRICS' countries

They are 'de-dollarising' to protect themselves form US (israeli) imperialism

Brazil is creating its own cable across the ocean to bypass US servers because it is sick of US spying (after snowden revelations)

Russia is big. It's hard not to encircle it.[/QUOTE]
 
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...yril-smith-and-the-dolphin-square-connection/

[h=1]The Queen’s Lord-Lieutenants, Elm Guest House, child-rapist Cyril Smith, BBC Paedophiles, Mark Speight, MI5, Childline, Paul Knapman, William Hague and the Dolphin Square Connection[/h] By thecolemanexperience September 14, 2013

Who are the Queen’s Lord Lieutenants?
According to Wikipedia:
” The title Lord Lieutenant is given to the British monarch‘s personal representatives in the United Kingdom, usually in a county or similar circumscription, with varying tasks throughout history. Usually a retired local notable, senior military officer, peer or business person is given the post honorarily.
Lieutenants were first appointed to a number of English historic counties by Henry VIII in the 1540s.
Lord-lieutenants are the monarch’s representatives in their lieutenancy. It is their foremost duty to uphold the dignity of the Crown, and in so doing they seek to promote a spirit of co-operation and good atmosphere by the time they give to voluntary and benevolent organisations and by the interest they take in the business and social life of their counties.
The lord-lieutenant is supported by a vice lord-lieutenant and deputy lieutenants“.
How very noble.
Or is it?
As with most things in filthy Britain, the Queen’s Lieutenants may not be all they appear to be.
It’s now been revealed that child-rapist and MP for Rochdale, the late Cyril Smith, visited notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House, where vulnerable boys were trafficked from local care homes.
As in the case of murderous Jimmy Savile, the police knew about Smith’s abuse for years but did nothing.
Were the police given a warning not to fully investigate by the intelligence services, who had been filming VIP child-abuse in order to blackmail the perpetrators?
In a moving eulogy to Cyril Smith, the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, heaped praise on the perverted paedophile:
Cyril Smith was a larger-than-life character and one of the most recognisable and likeable politicians of his day.
I am deeply saddened to hear the news of his death today, and offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.
“Everybody in Rochdale knew him, not only as their MP but also as a friend.
“He was a true Liberal, dedicated to his constituency, always showing great passion and determination.
“Cyril was a colourful politician who kept the flame of Liberalism alive when the party was much smaller than it is today.
Rochdale and Britain have sadly lost one of their great MPs, and I think we can safely say there will never be an MP quite like Cyril Smith again.”
Why would Clegg pretend he knew nothing about Smith’s child-raping ways when he was obviously aware of all the rumours? Is Nick Clegg himself being blackmailed?
Cyril Smith was knighted in 1988 but less well-known was his appointment as the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater Manchester in 1991. Why were the Royals so fond of the larger-than-life paedophile that they gave him a prestigious and powerful role?
In a strange twist, BBC children’s presenter Mark Speight was implicated in the death of his girlfriend Natasha Collins in 2008.
He subsequently disappeared and was found hanging in a disused section of Paddington Station.
We now know Rolf Harris has been arrested by officers from Operation Yewtree., investigating a paedophile ring at the BBC.
It transpires that Mark Speight had done a lot of work with Rolf Harris.
At Mark’s memorial, Rolf made an emotional and tearful address:
It was joyful to work with Mark.
‘I realise now that I never told him how much I appreciated his programmes.
‘You realise you should always tell people what you think, you should tell them you love them because it might suddenly be too late.’
Rolf sang Sun Arise, backed by a band complete with didgeridoos.
He also did his version of Led Zeppelin’s Stairway to Heaven.”
We know Mark Speight did volunteer work for Childline and was one of their spokesmen and a high-profile campaigner.
Some say Childline is a “front” organisation used to filter out callers who may have been abused by VIP’s.
The coroner who held the inquiry into the deaths of Mark Speight and Natahsa Collins was Paul Knapman.
Knapman was responsible for many high-profile inquests during his 30-year tenure including the following:

He was heavily criticised for his bizarre and gruesome handling of the Marchioness riverboat inquest in 1989:
Chris Pond MP raised serious and urgent questions relating to the conduct of Westminster coroner, Paul Knapman.
He sought to highlight the shockingtreatment of families of victims of the Marchioness boat tragedy by the creepy coroner.
For some unexplained reason, Knapman horrifically allowed the victims hands to be cut off and their body parts and tissues to be removed without permission and treated concerned family members with utter contempt.”
There are other significant cases where Paul Knapman was in charge and they relate to another notorious boy-brothel, this time based at the Dolphin Square complex.
In 1997 , the Conservative MP for Meriden, Iain Mills, was found dead in his flat in Dolphin Square, Pimlico.
Initially there was confusion over the cause of death but Westminster’s creepy coroner Paul Knapman soon recorded a verdict of alcohol poisoning.
Iain Mills, MP, was apparently found with extreme levels of alcohol in his blood and was surrounded by gin bottles.
The media blamed his death on the stress of being a parliamentarian and it was assumed he’d had an alcohol problem for many years.
This was at odds however with members of his local constituency group who insisted he was a teetotaler and only ever drank orange juice during the 20 years they knew him.
His untimely death was soon forgotten and to this day is rarely mentioned, but that might be about to change.
Could it be that Iain Mills MP was aware of the high -level paedophile ring operating in Dolphin Square and this knowledge led to his death?”
Another strange death occurred at Dolphin Square and yet again Paul Knapman was responsible for the inquest:
In 2007, the Honourable Judge Rodney McKinnon fell 50ft from his Dolphin Square flat.
Despite his family’s protests, Westminster’s creepy coronor, Paul Knapman, recorded a verdict of suicide.
A carefully spun tale of depression and anxiety was woven by Knapman to skew the evidence so McKinnon was portrayed as having suicidal tendencies.
But do the facts really stack up?
Rodney McKinnon’s brother, Warwick, is, by coincidence, also a High Court Judge.
He said at the time of his brother’s inquest:
“I don’t believe it was suicide and neither does anyone in the family or any friends I gave spoken to.
“There is obviously some evidence that could point towards suicide. I am not going to be unrealistic, but there is nothing like enough for it to fill the required standard.”
The bald oddity known as William Hague once lived in Dolphin Square.
Some claim that Hague is being blackmailed by Mi5 to do their bidding as they have compromising evidence of his less- than manly predilections.
Hague once employed a style guru. The guru jumped to his death from his flat and it was Knapman who held the inquest.
The dapper fashion and etiquette expert John Morgan was hired by Willie and he immediately advised him to ditch the baseball caps.
” Hague is seeking help and has recruited the services of style guru John Morgan to spruce up his image.
Morgan, 39, described as a “Burlington Bertie” because of his dapper appearance, is associate editor of GQ magazine and editor of Debrett’s Guide to Etiquette and Modern Manners.”
Unfortunately. less than 18 months after his appointment, he was dead.
“ The death of the man seen by many as the guru of style and good manners remains a mystery after a coroner recorded an open verdict.”
“John Morgan, the etiquette guru credited with persuading William Hague to abandon baseball caps, has died after apparently falling from a window.
Mr Morgan, 41, was found dead outside his third-floor flat in Albany, central London, in the early hours of Monday.
In 2008, Paul Knapman was made the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater London.
Was he being rewarded for his dubious inquests?
In yet another twist we find Operation Pallial which is charged with investigating child-abuse in North Wales children’s homes.
There is compelling evidence that boys were trafficked from these homes and sent to the Dolphin Square complex in Pimlico.
They were allegedly used by a filthy VIP ring which operated at the address.
This report, from the now-defunct Scallywag magazine, details how Westminster Conservative councillors allegedly knew of and indeed participated in the vile and sordid activities:
SCALLYWAG story on scandal in Westminster City
” As in the right-wing clique in Smith Square, with social headquarters in Dolphin Square, so they were able to put up a bold front in the Westminster City Council so discredited by the Dame Porter fiasco of selling council houses to pals for cash and support.
And here again, it was predominantly, and quite overtly, gay. Tony Karpel, now a special adviser to Kenneth Baker, was not only a prominent force in the council itself at the time, but had joined the CCO at the very same time as Julian Lewis, and shared his sympathies, both for extreme right-wing politics, and his fondness for male company.
You would be more than correct to put them down as bosom pals and political flatmates.
As you weave your way through the insidious net of dirty tricks, gerrymandering, the more sordid side of lobbying through sex, as we have, the more you keep coming across the name of Tony Karpel. Karpel and CO’s peers on the council included the crucial Chairman of Planning, Robert Davies, the Deputy Chairman, Simon Milton, the leader, Miles Young, and Cllrs Martindale, Alan Bradley, Alex Segal, Avery and Mortland.
All these belonged to the clique who invariably went out in small groups to the more insalubrious “Boys’ Clubs” in the Soho area where their council was, in fact, also the landlords.
Martindale even once toured the clubs in a Ministry car lent to him to go on a late night tour with a handful of pals. More often they would collect at one of the on-going soirées in Dolphin Square, where, of course, again, their council were the ultimate landlords.
While Karpel retained his very close relationship with the CCO, Deputy Chairman Simon Milton was helping Ian Greer and Associates – the lobby group specially set up to pander to the 100 known Tory gays in Westminster”
Simon Milton is now dead but his partner Robert Davis is still a Westminster Councillor.
By a strange coincidence, Robert Davis is also the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater London.
Isn’t it about bloody time the police looked again at the Royals links to paedophiles?
Why not start with the Lord’s Lieutenants?
We’re sure they’d be only too delighted to help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Lieutenant#Deputies
http://www.royal.gov.uk/TheRoyalHousehold/OfficialRoyalposts/LordLieutenants/LordLieutenants.aspx
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/community/obituaries/sir-cyril-smith-1-2587695
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...gerthanlife-exmp-sir-cyril-smith-2069888.html
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...iversity-conservative-association-connection/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...ttan-ludgate-life-sciences-international-ltd/
http://www.manchester-celebrities.co.uk/celebrities/politicians05.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-24074818
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...ildrens-home-and-the-elm-guest-house-scandal/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...use-and-the-filthy-warwick-spinks-connection/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...dge-elm-guest-house-and-the-kitty-connection/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Speight
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/rolf-harris-and-the-mark-speight-connection/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...ttan-ludgate-life-sciences-international-ltd/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...arthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Knapman
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/westminsters-creepy-coroner/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...n-mills-mp-and-the-dolphin-square-connection/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...dney-mckinnon-who-jumped-from-dolphin-square/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...rious-deaths-of-the-style-guru-and-the-judge/
http://transact.westminster.gov.uk/cttee/committee1/cllr.cfm?cllr_id=16
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...eration-pallial-and-the-scallywag-connection/
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpre...on-pallial-and-the-dolphin-sqaure-connection/
 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179
[h=2]The Federal Reserve Cartel: Freemasons and The House of Rothschild[/h] By Dean Henderson
Global Research, June 08, 2011
8 June 2011

Part two of a four-part series
In 1789 Alexander Hamilton became the first Treasury Secretary of the United States. Hamilton was one of many Founding Fathers who were Freemasons. He had close relations with the Rothschild family which owns the Bank of England and leads the European Freemason movement. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Ethan Allen, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Brown and Roger Sherman were all Masons.
hamilton.gif

Andrew Hamilton

Roger Livingston helped Sherman and Franklin write the Declaration of Independence. He gave George Washington his oaths of office while he was Grand Master of the New York Grand Lodge of Freemasons. Washington himself was Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. Of the General Officers in the Revolutionary Army, thirty-three were Masons. This was highly symbolic since 33rd Degree Masons become Illuminated. [1]
Populist founding fathers led by John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Thomas Paine- none of whom were Masons- wanted to completely severe ties with the British Crown, but were overruled by the Masonic faction led by Washington, Hamilton and Grand Master of the St. Andrews Lodge in Boston General Joseph Warren, who wanted to “defy Parliament but remain loyal to the Crown”. St. Andrews Lodge was the hub of New World Masonry and began issuing Knights Templar Degrees in 1769. [2]
warren1.jpg

General Joseph Warren
All US Masonic lodges are to this day warranted by the British Crown, whom they serve as a global intelligence and counterrevolutionary subversion network. Their most recent initiative is the Masonic Child Identification Program (CHIP). According to Wikipedia, the CHIP programs allow parents the opportunity to create a kit of identifying materials for their child, free of charge. The kit contains a fingerprint card, a physical description, a video, computer disk, or DVD of the child, a dental imprint, and a DNA sample.
The First Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia in 1774 under the Presidency of Peyton Randolph, who succeeded Washington as Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. The Second Continental Congress convened in 1775 under the Presidency of Freemason John Hancock. Peyton’s brother William succeeded him as Virginia Lodge Grand Master and became the leading proponent of centralization and federalism at the First Constitutional Convention in 1787. The federalism at the heart of the US Constitution is identical to the federalism laid out in the Freemason’s Anderson’s Constitutions of 1723. William Randolph became the nation’s first Attorney General and Secretary of State under George Washington. His family returned to England loyal to the Crown. John Marshall, the nation’s first Supreme Court Justice, was also a Mason. [3]
When Benjamin Franklin journeyed to France to seek financial help for American revolutionaries, his meetings took place at Rothschild banks. He brokered arms sales via German Mason Baron von Steuben. His Committees of Correspondence operated through Freemason channels and paralleled a British spy network. In 1776 Franklin became de facto Ambassador to France. In 1779 he became Grand Master of the French Neuf Soeurs (Nine Sisters) Lodge, to which John Paul Jones and Voltaire belonged. Franklin was also a member of the more secretive Royal Lodge of Commanders of the Temple West of Carcasonne, whose members included Frederick Prince of Whales. While Franklin preached temperance in the US, he cavorted wildly with his Lodge brothers in Europe. Franklin served as Postmaster General from the 1750’s to 1775 – a role traditionally relegated to British spies. [4]
With Rothschild financing Alexander Hamilton founded two New York banks, including Bank of New York. [5] He died in a gun battle with Aaron Burr, who founded Bank of Manhattan with Kuhn Loeb financing. Hamilton exemplified the contempt which the Eight Families hold towards common people, once stating, “All communities divide themselves into the few and the many. The first are the rich and the well born, the others the mass of the people…The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge and determine right. Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share of government. They will check the unsteadiness of the second.”[6]
Hamilton was only the first in a series of Eight Families cronies to hold the key position of Treasury Secretary. In recent times Kennedy Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon came from Dillon Read (now part of UBS Warburg). Nixon Treasury Secretaries David Kennedy and William Simon came from Continental Illinois Bank (now part of Bank of America) and Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup), respectively. Carter Treasury Secretary Michael Blumenthal came from Goldman Sachs, Reagan Treasury Secretary Donald Regan came from Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America), Bush Sr. Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady came from Dillon Read (UBS Warburg) and both Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Bush Jr. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner worked at Kissinger Associates and the New York Fed.
Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States needed a publicly-owned central bank so that European monarchs and aristocrats could not use the printing of money to control the affairs of the new nation. Jefferson extolled, “A country which expects to remain ignorant and free…expects that which has never been and that which will never be. There is scarcely a King in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh – get first all the people’s money, then all their lands and then make them and their children servants forever…banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy.” Jefferson watched as the Euro-banking conspiracy to control the United States unfolded, weighing in, “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”. [7[
But the Rothschild-sponsored Hamilton’s arguments for a private US central bank carried the day. In 1791 the Bank of the United States (BUS) was founded, with the Rothschilds as main owners. The bank’s charter was to run out in 1811. Public opinion ran in favor of revoking the charter and replacing it with a Jeffersonian public central bank. The debate was postponed as the nation was plunged by the Euro-bankers into the War of 1812. Amidst a climate of fear and economic hardship, Hamilton’s bank got its charter renewed in 1816.
Old Hickory, Honest Abe & Camelot
In 1828 Andrew Jackson took a run at the US Presidency. Throughout his campaign he railed against the international bankers who controlled the BUS. Jackson ranted, “You are a den of vipers. I intend to expose you and by Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people understood the rank injustices of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before morning.”
Jackson won the election and revoked the bank’s charter stating, “The Act seems to be predicated on an erroneous idea that the present shareholders have a prescriptive right to not only the favor, but the bounty of the government...for their benefit does this Act exclude the whole American people from competition in the purchase of this monopoly. Present stockholders and those inheriting their rights as successors be established a privileged order, clothed both with great political power and enjoying immense pecuniary advantages from their connection with government. Should its influence be concentrated under the operation of such an Act as this, in the hands of a self-elected directory whose interests are identified with those of the foreign stockholders, will there not be cause to tremble for the independence of our country in war...controlling our currency, receiving our public monies and holding thousands of our citizens independence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than the naval and military power of the enemy. It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government for selfish purposes...to make the rich richer and more powerful. Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought us to make them richer by acts of Congress. I have done my duty to this country.”[8]
Populism prevailed and Jackson was re-elected. In 1835 he was the target of an assassination attempt. The gunman was Richard Lawrence, who confessed that he was, “in touch with the powers in Europe”. [9]
Still, in 1836 Jackson refused to renew the BUS charter. Under his watch the US national debt went to zero for the first and last time in our nation’s history. This angered the international bankers, whose primary income is derived from interest payments on debt. BUS President Nicholas Biddle cut off funding to the US government in 1842, plunging the US into a depression. Biddle was an agent for the Paris-based Jacob Rothschild. [10]
The Mexican War was simultaneously sprung on Jackson. A few years later the Civil War was unleashed, with London bankers backing the Union and French bankers backing the South. The Lehman family made a fortune smuggling arms to the south and cotton to the north. By 1861 the US was $100 million in debt. New President Abraham Lincoln snubbed the Euro-bankers again, issuing Lincoln Greenbacks to pay Union Army bills.
The Rothschild-controlled Times of London wrote, “If that mischievous policy, which had its origins in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” [11]
The Euro-banker-written Hazard Circular was exposed and circulated throughout the country by angry populists. It stated, “The great debt that capitalists will see is made out of the war and must be used to control the valve of money. To accomplish this government bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now awaiting Secretary of Treasury Salmon Chase to make that recommendation. It will not allow Greenbacks to circulate as money as we cannot control that. We control bonds and through them banking issues”.
The 1863 National Banking Act reinstated a private US central bank and Chase’s war bonds were issued. Lincoln was re-elected the next year, vowing to repeal the act after he took his January 1865 oaths of office. Before he could act, he was assassinated at the Ford Theatre by John Wilkes Booth. Booth had major connections to the international bankers. His granddaughter wrote This One Mad Act, which details Booth’s contact with “mysterious Europeans” just before the Lincoln assassination.
Following the Lincoln hit, Booth was whisked away by members of a secret society known as Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC). KGC had close ties to the French Society of Seasons, which produced Karl Marx. KGC had fomented much of the tension that caused the Civil War and President Lincoln had specifically targeted the group. Booth was a KGC member and was connected through Confederate Secretary of State Judah Benjamin to the House of Rothschild. Benjamin fled to England after the Civil War. [12]
Nearly a century after Lincoln was assassinated for issuing Greenbacks, President John F. Kennedy found himself in the Eight Families’ crosshairs. Kennedy had announced a crackdown on off-shore tax havens and proposed increases in tax rates on large oil and mining companies. He supported eliminating tax loopholes which benefit the super-rich. His economic policies were publicly attacked by Fortune magazine, the Wall Street Journal and both David and Nelson Rockefeller. Even Kennedy’s own Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, who came from the UBS Warburg-controlled Dillon Read investment bank, voiced opposition to the JFK proposals. [13]
Kennedy’s fate was sealed in June 1963 when he authorized the issuance of more than $4 billion in United States Notes by his Treasury Department in an attempt to circumvent the high interest rate usury of the private Federal Reserve international banker crowd. The wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently gunned down by Jack Ruby before Ruby himself was shot, told author A. J. Weberman in 1994, “The answer to the Kennedy assassination is with the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t underestimate that. It’s wrong to blame it on Angleton and the CIA per se only. This is only one finger on the same hand. The people who supply the money are above the CIA”. [14]
Fueled by incoming President Lyndon Johnson’s immediate escalation of the Vietnam War, the US sank further into debt. Its citizens were terrorized into silence. If they could kill the President they could kill anyone.
The House of Rothschild
The Dutch House of Orange founded the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609 as the world’s first central bank. Prince William of Orange married into the English House of Windsor, taking King James II’s daughter Mary as his bride. The Orange Order Brotherhood, which recently fomented Northern Ireland Protestant violence, put William III on the English throne where he ruled both Holland and Britain. In 1694 William III teamed up with the UK aristocracy to launch the private Bank of England.
The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street- as the Bank of England is known- is surrounded by thirty foot walls. Three floors beneath it the third largest stock of gold bullion in the world is stored. [15]
The Rothschilds and their inbred Eight Families partners gradually came to control the Bank of England. The daily London gold “fixing” occurred at the N. M. Rothschild Bank until 2004. As Bank of England Deputy Governor George Blunden put it, “Fear is what makes the bank’s powers so acceptable. The bank is able to exert its influence when people are dependent on us and fear losing their privileges or when they are frightened.”[16]
Mayer Amschel Rothschild sold the British government German Hessian mercenaries to fight against American Revolutionaries, diverting the proceeds to his brother Nathan in London, where N.M. (Nathan and Mayer) Rothschild & Sons was established. Mayer was a serious student of Cabala and launched his fortune on money embezzled from William IX- royal administrator of the Hesse-Kassel region and a prominent Freemason.
Rothschild-controlled Barings bankrolled the Chinese opium and African slave trades. It financed the Louisiana Purchase. When several states defaulted on its loans, Barings bribed Daniel Webster to make speeches stressing the virtues of loan repayment. The states held their ground, so the House of Rothschild cut off the money spigot in 1842, plunging the US into a deep depression. It was often said that the wealth of the Rothschilds depended on the bankruptcy of nations. Mayer Amschel Rothschild once said, “I care not who controls a nation’s political affairs, so long as I control her currency”.
War didn’t hurt the family fortune either. The House of Rothschild financed the Prussian War, the Crimean War and the British attempt to seize the Suez Canal from the French. Nathan Rothschild made a huge financial bet on Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo, while also funding the Duke of Wellington’s peninsular campaign against Napoleon. Both the Mexican War and the Civil War were goldmines for the family.
nathanrotschild.jpg

Nathan Rothschild

One Rothschild family biography mentions a London meeting where an “International Banking Syndicate” decided to pit the American North against the South as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once stated, “The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War. These bankers were afraid that the United States…would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed.” Rothschild biographer Derek Wilson says the family was the official European banker to the US government and strong supporters of the Bank of the United States. [17]
Family biographer Niall Ferguson notes a “substantial and unexplained gap” in private Rothschild correspondence between 1854-1860. He says all copies of outgoing letters written by the London Rothschilds during this Civil War period “were destroyed at the orders of successive partners”. [18]
French and British troops had, at the height of the Civil War, encircled the US. The British sent 11,000 troops to Crown-controlled Canada, which gave safe harbor to Confederate agents. France’s Napoleon III installed Austrian Hapsburg family member Archduke Maximilian as his puppet emperor in Mexico, where French troops massed on the Texas border. Only an 11th-hour deployment of two Russian warship fleets by US ally Czar Alexander II in 1863 saved the United States from re-colonization. [19]
That same year the Chicago Tribune blasted, “Belmont (August Belmont was a US Rothschild agent and had a Triple Crown horse race named in his honor) and the Rothschilds…who have been buying up Confederate war bonds.”
Salmon Rothschild said of a deceased President Lincoln, “He rejects all forms of compromise. He has the appearance of a peasant and can only tell barroom stories.” Baron Jacob Rothschild was equally flattering towards the US citizenry. He once commented to US Minister to Belgium Henry Sanford on the over half a million Americans who died during the Civil War, “When your patient is desperately sick, you try desperate measures, even to bloodletting.” Salmon and Jacob were merely carrying forth a family tradition. A few generations earlier Mayer Amschel Rothschild bragged of his investment strategy, “When the streets of Paris are running in blood, I buy”. [20]
Mayer Rothschild’s sons were known as the Frankfurt Five. The eldest – Amschel – ran the family’s Frankfurt bank with his father, while Nathan ran London operations. Youngest son Jacob set up shop in Paris, while Salomon ran the Vienna branch and Karl was off to Naples. Author Frederick Morton estimates that by 1850 the Rothschilds were worth over $10 billion. [21] Some researchers believe that their fortune today exceeds $100 trillion.
The Warburgs, Kuhn Loebs, Goldman Sachs, Schiffs and Rothschilds have intermarried into one big happy banking family. The Warburg family- which controls Deutsche Bank and BNP- tied up with the Rothschilds in 1814 in Hamburg, while Kuhn Loeb powerhouse Jacob Schiff shared quarters with Rothschilds in 1785. Schiff immigrated to America in 1865. He joined forces with Abraham Kuhn and married Solomon Loeb’s daughter. Loeb and Kuhn married each others sisters and the Kuhn Loeb dynasty was consummated. Felix Warburg married Jacob Schiff’s daughter. Two Goldman daughters married two sons of the Sachs family, creating Goldman Sachs. In 1806 Nathan Rothschild married the oldest daughter of Levi Barent Cohen, a leading financier in London. [22] Thus, Merrill Lynch super-bull Abby Joseph Cohen and Clinton Secretary of Defense William Cohen are likely descended from Rothschilds.
Today the Rothschild’s control a far-flung financial empire, which includes majority stakes in most world central banks. The Edmond de Rothschild clan owns the Banque Privee SA in Lugano, Switzerland and the Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. The family of Jacob Lord Rothschild owns the powerful Rothschild Italia in Milan. They are founding members of the exclusive $10 trillion Club of the Isles – which controls corporate giants Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Barclays, Lonrho, Rio Tinto Zinc, BHP Billiton and Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum, gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials. [23]
The Club of the Isles provides capital for George Soros’ Quantum Fund NV – which made substantial financial gains in 1998-99 following the collapse of currencies of Thailand, Indonesia and Russia. Soros was a major shareholder at George W. Bush’s Harken Energy. The Club of Isles is led by the Rothschilds and includes Queen Elizabeth II and other wealthy European aristocrats and Nobility.[24]
Perhaps the largest repository for Rothschild wealth today is Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG – a secretive Swiss-based bank holding company. By the late 1990s scions of the Rothschild global empire were Barons Guy and Elie de Rothschild in France and Lord Jacob and Sir Evelyn Rothschild in Britain. [25]
Evelyn was chairman of the Economist and a director at DeBeers and IBM UK.
Jacob backed Arnold Schwarzenegger’s California gubernatorial campaign. He took control of Khodorkovsky’s YUKOS oil shares just before the Russian government arrested him. In 2010 Jacob joined Rupert Murdoch in a shale oil extraction partnership in Israel through Genie Energy – a subsidiary of IDT Corporation. [26]
Within months, Sarah Palin had hired former IDT executive Michael Glassner as her chief of staff. [27] Is Palin the Rothschild choice in 2012?
Next Week: Part III: Knights of the Roundtable and The Illuminati

Notes

[1] The Temple & the Lodge. Michael Bagent & Richard Leigh. Arcade Publishing. New York. 1989. p.259
[2] Ibid. p.219
[3] Ibid. p.253
[4] Ibid. p.233
[5] The Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.156
[6] Democracy for the Few. Michael Parenti. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1977. p.51
[7] Fourth Reich of the Rich. Des Griffin. Emissary Publications. Pasadena, CA. 1978. p.171
[8] Ibid. p.173
[9] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.68
[10] The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Eustace Mullins. Bankers Research Institute. Staunton, VA. 1983. p.179
[11] Human Race Get Off Your Knees: The Lion Sleeps No More. David Icke. David Icke Books Ltd. Isle of Wight. UK. 2010. p.92
[12] Marrs. p.212
[13] Idid. p.139
[14] Ibid p.141
[15] Icke. The Robot’s Rebellion. p.114
[16] Ibid. p.181
[17] Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty. Derek Wilson. Charles Schribner’s Sons. New York. 1988. p.178
[18] The House of Rothschild. Niall Ferguson. Viking Press New York 1998 p.28
[19] Marrs. p.215
[20] Ibid
[21] “What You Didn’t Know about Taxes and the Crown”. Mark Owen. Paranoia. #41. Spring 2006. p.66
[22] Marrs. p.63
[23] “The Coming Fall of the House of Windsor”. The New Federalist. 1994
[24] “The Secret Financial Network Behind ‘Wizard’ George Soros”. William Engdahl. Executive Intelligence Review. 11-1-96
[25] Marrs. p.86
[26] “Murdoch, Rothschild Invest in Israeli Oil Shale”. Jerusalem Post. November 22, 2010
[27] “Sarah Palin hires chief of staff for PAC”, Huffington Post. February 2011
Dean Henderson is the author of Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network and The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries. His Left Hook blog is at [url]www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com[/URL]
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page
Become a Member of Global Research
 
Congress stenographer walks upto the mic and says that freemasons go against god and that you can't serve two masteres before she is dragged away!

[video=youtube;3yfOhwF0DV8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yfOhwF0DV8#t=217[/video]
 
Freemasons open a lodge in Buckingham Palace

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...dge-Buckingham-Palace--Queen-isnt-amused.html

[h=1]Freemasons open a lodge at Buckingham Palace... but the Queen isn't amused[/h]By SARAH OLIVER
Last updated at 23:59 08 March 2008

A branch of the Freemasons secret society is being formed by members of the Royal Household and police who protect the Royal Family.
And their decision to call it The Royal Household Lodge has put them on a collision course with Buckingham Palace – as has their plan to co-opt the royal cipher – EIIR – for their regalia, to underline their connection to the Queen.
Although the Queen's cousin, the Duke of Kent, is head of the secretive organisation – he is Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England – the new branch has not gone down well with the Royal Family.
The Palace has no power to halt the formation of the lodge, but it is determined to stop it adopting its chosen name and block it from hijacking the Queen's EIIR.
Use of the Royal Household title and any related symbols requires official permission.
Angry officials clearly feel the new lodge's proposed name is the last thing the Palace needs at a time when it is trying to be seen as more modern and open.
Last night, a spokesman for the Queen said: “Buckingham Palace has not, and would not, endorse this sort of arrangement. No permission has been given by the Palace for a Buckingham Palace lodge or anything similar.
“If permission is sought, it will be declined.”
The founding of the lodge has also alarmed some Royal staff who do not wish to be associated with the fraternity famed for bizarre initiation rites, mystical regalia and mysterious codes of conduct.
It is also likely to cause consternation among career women in the Palace, as it is a men-only organisation.
Non-members in Royal service are said to be fearful they will be overlooked for prestigious promotions and left unsupported in any below-stairs clashes.
Masons are widely believed to further the business and professional interests of brother Masons, although they would deny this and claim it is a harmless social and charitable organisation.
The lodge, which will not meet at the Palace but will be based in a Masonic Hall elsewhere, will be open to all members of the Royal Household, from armed police protection officers to below-stairs staff such as pages and footmen.
It will also recruit staff in other Royal residences including Windsor Castle, Clarence House and St James's Palace.
A Palace insider said: “There's a lot of consternation and rightly so. People fear a lot of business will now be conducted behind closed doors so that those who don't sign up to Freemasonry can't have any effect on it.
“They are concerned that Masons will be preferred and those who aren't Masons will be written out of the script.
“Backstairs life is already complicated enough – there are all sorts of allegiances and cliques and cabals. People fall in and out of favour and there's a lot of whispering in ears.
“The last thing the household needs is a secret society, especially one with the reputation of Freemasonry.”
The United Grand Lodge of England issued the Royal Household Lodge with a warrant in June last year although it will not formally exist until the consecration ceremony on May 19 at the Freemasons' Hall in London.
That will be followed by a celebration dinner for up to 300 Masons and their guests at the historic Lincoln's Inn.
The insider said the idea had been generated by serving and past members of the Royalty Protection Squad, SO14. With new recruits, the total number involved is approximately 70.
Author and broadcaster Martin Short, whose book Inside The Brotherhood exposed Masonic practices in the UK, said: “It's a catastrophic time to start such a lodge, given all the problems facing the Royal Family at present.
“The Royal Family is desperately trying to prove it is modernising – in PR terms, this is bad news for them.”