My take on Ni (experience, and its archetypes)

I think its a decent starting point since i still have to read a lot about the cognitive functions. It feels quite abstract to me.
But i'd love to see more theory debates

I wouldn't go as far as you, defining a typology, but i see where you are coming from.

@ force is guiding me:
Yes thats one aspect. Force sounds a bit strange since you are not forced. For me it feels like following a trail.
There is also the "it pops out of nothing". A sudden blink and i get an answer to a question or a point of view / a place / theory / book where i find an answer or the next step i need.

This reminds me of a lecture centuries ago. A biology prof told us we all possess the power to slow down time. He had examples where accidents happened and people experienced it slower than others in the same room or on tv.
His conclusion was that we're trying to act in this situation but we have problems doing it in realtime. I wonder if this is somehow connected.

Anything known about the biological basis? Mirror neurons or whatsoever?

@non verbal:
Sure its an emotion based language aka gut feeling. I wonder if there is more known about the "vocabulary" and "grammar" of this language. Any hints where to look?
Is there a systematic in the variety of feelings? Anything known from cross cultural studies? - eg. like cultural related syndroms when it comes to illness?

@ Dreamy process:
Can't say much about this relation here but a kinda liminal state is often used to come to a conclusion. Think of trance or lucid dreaming in healing techniques and religious rituals.
Even dowsers(?) could fit into this. Would these things be comparable or are these clearly different topics?

Anything known about mental states / brainwave activity during such processes?

@teacher archetype:
hehe i'd call it researcher. Man i hated coding interviews. I usually scanned the text or took a short note while listening to the recordings and i had the interesting parts already.
I made the rest up so everything looks legit and like scientific craftsmanship, well others did too Tbh i think every (business) consultant is capable of these things since its bread and butter to get the
important data fast, so they can waste weeks on the powerpoints

What is the "special" you mentioned and can you differ this from what consultants or researchers do?

In Sociology one talks about definatory power. But who defines importance? Are classic categories important like class, peer group, etc.? Emotional bonding with certain topics?
And how is it verified as "true" or "important" inside a person? Especially since someone (John?) mentioned elsewhere that there might be just reflections, a mirror of one own what we see in another person.
Are there viable techniques to reflect these gut feelings?