[MENTION=4717]subwayrider[/MENTION] fine feel free to disagree, but that doesn't make you right. MBTI is complete bunk. Its slightly better than Astrology, but not by much, its non-scientific. Feel free to post any proof that its real and quantitative or non-subjective.
Economics is probably the best major anyone can choose unless you want to be a scientist. It just translates to so many different areas its bound to be useful in some way.
Abandoning the INF perspective, yeah, that's true.
Apparently, a minor in Statistics can help just about anyone, too.
Why would you have to abandon the INF perspective? Im sure some INF could use econ to help others in some way.
WARNING:
Do NOT use your MBTI type as some kind of career path. MBTI is subjective and fake. Its no better than astrology. When you ask, should INFJs go into accounting, its like asking should a Taurus go into accounting.
Not exactly. I think MBTI is:
- misunderstood
- used out of context
- confining
- used incorrectly when trying to adapt with your pre-existing belief structure
To summarize, most people actually should not use MBTI for many things because chances are, you wont understand it properly.
In this case, it should not be used for a career path because it falls under "confining". BUT it can be used as a guide if it is guidance you are seeking. In other words, MBTI can, in some cases, inform you of what you are probably good at, but that is not to say you can't do other things.
its completely subjective. Its not based on facts or science, its all theory that is unproven and unsupported with anything close to real.
Your statement is completely subjective. Its not based on facts or science, its all theory that is unproven and unsupported with anything close to real.
AS well as YOUR FACE